independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > MICHAEL JACKSON IS GUILTY
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 05/07/04 3:08am

DavidEye

riverdean7 said:

DavidEye u walking outside your house without a paper bag on is wrong to but do we complain



Speaking of wearing a paper bag,perhaps you should recommend that to your skin-bleached idol? lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 05/07/04 3:22am

riverdean7

DavidEye give me addrress ok i'll send u a dozen paper bags for free
and feel free to distribute them amongst your family members to
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 05/07/04 3:47am

adoreme

avatar

riverdean7 said:

DavidEye give me addrress ok i'll send u a dozen paper bags for free
and feel free to distribute them amongst your family members to


This is uncalled for. The man is only expressing an opinion for God's sake.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 05/07/04 3:54am

TheFrog

WildStyle said:

VoicesCarry said:



And if Michael is indeed a pedophile, you're saying you expect logic from him? That is ridiculous. Based on his behaviour, I really can't attribute such cold, logical thought to Michael. He has always been 'on his own planet' so to speak.
[This message was edited Thu May 6 17:57:51 2004 by VoicesCarry]


If Michael is a pedophile, I would expect more then 2 of the thousands of children that have been in his home to accuse him of molesting them. Especially the ones he was really close to who have slep in his room. People like McCauley Culkin, Wade Robson, Emanual Lewis, Sean Lennon etc. Yet these people have all defended MJ on this issue.

Note: Michael didn't get to where he is today by having his head in the clouds. Ask anyone who has worked with him or has been close to him. He is a smart business man, and just smart in general.


Look, i hate to wade in here, because i don't see the point in discussing innocence or guilt when we know, let's be honest, fuck all.

But you should not expect that. There's absolutely no reason why a paedophile would try and molest more than two out of thousands - you don't understand paedophilia if you think that they try it on at every opportunity. Especially if the paedophile was intelligent, to refer to your second point.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 05/07/04 4:03am

VoicesCarry

TheFrog said:

WildStyle said:



If Michael is a pedophile, I would expect more then 2 of the thousands of children that have been in his home to accuse him of molesting them. Especially the ones he was really close to who have slep in his room. People like McCauley Culkin, Wade Robson, Emanual Lewis, Sean Lennon etc. Yet these people have all defended MJ on this issue.

Note: Michael didn't get to where he is today by having his head in the clouds. Ask anyone who has worked with him or has been close to him. He is a smart business man, and just smart in general.


Look, i hate to wade in here, because i don't see the point in discussing innocence or guilt when we know, let's be honest, fuck all.

But you should not expect that. There's absolutely no reason why a paedophile would try and molest more than two out of thousands - you don't understand paedophilia if you think that they try it on at every opportunity. Especially if the paedophile was intelligent, to refer to your second point.


Exactly. Some pedophiles are "dormant" for huge blocks of time.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 05/07/04 4:05am

VoicesCarry

riverdean7 said:

DavidEye give me addrress ok i'll send u a dozen paper bags for free
and feel free to distribute them amongst your family members to


Whoops, guess Davideye's opinion doesn't exactly fit with your worldview, does it? Had to retort with a lame insult. Is that how you operate in real life? You'd be at home with my 2-year-old nephew.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 05/07/04 4:10am

WildStyle

avatar

TheFrog said:

WildStyle said:



If Michael is a pedophile, I would expect more then 2 of the thousands of children that have been in his home to accuse him of molesting them. Especially the ones he was really close to who have slep in his room. People like McCauley Culkin, Wade Robson, Emanual Lewis, Sean Lennon etc. Yet these people have all defended MJ on this issue.

Note: Michael didn't get to where he is today by having his head in the clouds. Ask anyone who has worked with him or has been close to him. He is a smart business man, and just smart in general.


Look, i hate to wade in here, because i don't see the point in discussing innocence or guilt when we know, let's be honest, fuck all.

But you should not expect that. There's absolutely no reason why a paedophile would try and molest more than two out of thousands - you don't understand paedophilia if you think that they try it on at every opportunity. Especially if the paedophile was intelligent, to refer to your second point.


have you ever heard of any other case of a pedophile having access to that many children and only molesting 2?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 05/07/04 4:13am

VoicesCarry

WildStyle said:

TheFrog said:



Look, i hate to wade in here, because i don't see the point in discussing innocence or guilt when we know, let's be honest, fuck all.

But you should not expect that. There's absolutely no reason why a paedophile would try and molest more than two out of thousands - you don't understand paedophilia if you think that they try it on at every opportunity. Especially if the paedophile was intelligent, to refer to your second point.


have you ever heard of any other case of a pedophile having access to that many children and only molesting 2?


Yup, quite a few. If children were his outlet, it would make sense that he'd like them around. But it doesn't mean he was molesting them all. It's not uncommon for pedophiles to work in an environment with many children, but molest only a select few, as any pedophile who's ever worked in a school will explain.
[This message was edited Fri May 7 4:14:31 2004 by VoicesCarry]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 05/07/04 4:16am

DavidEye

VoicesCarry said:

riverdean7 said:

DavidEye give me addrress ok i'll send u a dozen paper bags for free
and feel free to distribute them amongst your family members to


Whoops, guess Davideye's opinion doesn't exactly fit with your worldview, does it? Had to retort with a lame insult. Is that how you operate in real life? You'd be at home with my 2-year-old nephew.



falloff


apparently,many of MJ's fans are as out-of-touch with reality as HE is!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 05/07/04 4:18am

WildStyle

avatar

Well, I can see that he does realy need a trial now. Just so all the evidence from both sides can get out in to the public and either change there perception of him in one way or the other, or not change it at all.

I just hope he can get an unbiased jury.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 05/07/04 4:19am

Cloudbuster

avatar

This is just getting boring now. rolleyes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 05/07/04 4:20am

VoicesCarry

WildStyle said:

Well, I can see that he does realy need a trial now. Just so all the evidence from both sides can get out in to the public and either change there perception of him in one way or the other, or not change it at all.

I just hope he can get an unbiased jury.


Agreed.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 05/07/04 4:20am

VoicesCarry

Cloudbuster said:

This is just getting boring now. rolleyes


You and Luv4Oneanotha post that on every MJ thread. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 05/07/04 4:21am

Cloudbuster

avatar

WildStyle said:

I just hope he can get an unbiased jury.


That's about as likely as the dead rising.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 05/07/04 4:21am

Cloudbuster

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

Cloudbuster said:

This is just getting boring now. rolleyes


You and Luv4Oneanotha post that on every MJ thread. wink


Well, wouldn't you agree? wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 05/07/04 4:22am

VoicesCarry

Cloudbuster said:

WildStyle said:

I just hope he can get an unbiased jury.


That's about as likely as the dead rising.


Well, since LaToya woke up this morning, it could happen razz .
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 05/07/04 4:24am

TheFrog

WildStyle said:

TheFrog said:



Look, i hate to wade in here, because i don't see the point in discussing innocence or guilt when we know, let's be honest, fuck all.

But you should not expect that. There's absolutely no reason why a paedophile would try and molest more than two out of thousands - you don't understand paedophilia if you think that they try it on at every opportunity. Especially if the paedophile was intelligent, to refer to your second point.


have you ever heard of any other case of a pedophile having access to that many children and only molesting 2?


Okay look, if you really want to discuss this, we can. But I think you're onto a loser here, and I guarantee that argument won't wash in court either.

In answer to your question if you're suggesting thousands, then no. But the question was based on several false premises. And in any case, an answer "no" to the question proves less than nothing. First, paedophilia is almost never a case of the paedophile leaping on a child at the first opportunity. It often involves lengthy grooming periods and time alone with the child. So, as you (I think) allude to, you're more likely to be looking at the close friends who regularly slept over etc. as being the real opportunity. That brings the "thousands" down wildly to a much more realistic figure. Furthermore, paedophiles are attracted to different people - not all children. I find certain women attractive, and others not. My preferences will be different from others. Revolting as it is, paedophiles find certain children attractive, and others not. They are almost never people who would leap on any child if they had the opportunity. That would narrow it down further.

Plus Michael Jackson is an extremely special case, because of his public notoriety. Enormous troupes of staff and constant barraging from the papparazi would, I suspect, make it less likely that, if he wanted to, he would feel comfortable with trying it on. No less because of the previous case. Given the above, I guarantee that, yes, there are plenty of paedophiles who have actually had opportunities (whether external or internal) with as many, if not more children. Go ask the catholic church.

Now I want to make it clear that I have absolutely no idea whether or not Michael Jackson is guilty, and unless and until he's found guilty, he's innocent as far as i'm concerned. I truly, truly hope he is innocent. But arguments like "look how many kids go through his house unharmed" won't help him, i'm afraid.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 05/07/04 4:25am

Cloudbuster

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

Cloudbuster said:



That's about as likely as the dead rising.


Well, since LaToya woke up this morning, it could happen razz .


Ouch! lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 05/07/04 4:48am

WildStyle

avatar

Cloudbuster said:

WildStyle said:

I just hope he can get an unbiased jury.


That's about as likely as the dead rising.


There's got to be 12 people SOMWHERE with absoloutly no bias for or against Michael Jackson. Right? lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 05/07/04 4:49am

WildStyle

avatar

TheFrog said:

WildStyle said:



have you ever heard of any other case of a pedophile having access to that many children and only molesting 2?


Okay look, if you really want to discuss this, we can. But I think you're onto a loser here, and I guarantee that argument won't wash in court either.

In answer to your question if you're suggesting thousands, then no. But the question was based on several false premises. And in any case, an answer "no" to the question proves less than nothing. First, paedophilia is almost never a case of the paedophile leaping on a child at the first opportunity. It often involves lengthy grooming periods and time alone with the child. So, as you (I think) allude to, you're more likely to be looking at the close friends who regularly slept over etc. as being the real opportunity. That brings the "thousands" down wildly to a much more realistic figure. Furthermore, paedophiles are attracted to different people - not all children. I find certain women attractive, and others not. My preferences will be different from others. Revolting as it is, paedophiles find certain children attractive, and others not. They are almost never people who would leap on any child if they had the opportunity. That would narrow it down further.

Plus Michael Jackson is an extremely special case, because of his public notoriety. Enormous troupes of staff and constant barraging from the papparazi would, I suspect, make it less likely that, if he wanted to, he would feel comfortable with trying it on. No less because of the previous case. Given the above, I guarantee that, yes, there are plenty of paedophiles who have actually had opportunities (whether external or internal) with as many, if not more children. Go ask the catholic church.

Now I want to make it clear that I have absolutely no idea whether or not Michael Jackson is guilty, and unless and until he's found guilty, he's innocent as far as i'm concerned. I truly, truly hope he is innocent. But arguments like "look how many kids go through his house unharmed" won't help him, i'm afraid.


Ok, I see what you are saying now.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 05/07/04 5:15am

Hobzie

I understand people who don't believe Mj is innocent...but please don't be sure he's guilty. There is no proof except the boys word at the moment...all the other things are just rumours. You really can't tell if they're true or not. But think about this: if you were a former MJ's employee, and someone offered you for example 10000$ for a story, no matter if it's true or not as long as it's really interesting, what would you do?

I'm definitely not believing MJ's guilty until they bring some evidence...And with evidence I don't mean that the boy and his brother tell the judge MJ did it...that's not an evidence, that's a
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 05/07/04 5:17am

riverdean7

voicescarry no i wouldnt cause im not a animal person and i never have been
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 05/07/04 5:19am

adoreme

avatar

riverdean7 said:

voicescarry no i wouldnt cause im not a animal person and i never have been


Oh no! Someone needs to stop this one now!

Put the computer down and stop making yourself sound like a prat.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 05/07/04 5:21am

riverdean7

if the boy testifies i wonder what script the mother will give him to read to bolster there case
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 05/07/04 5:44am

VoicesCarry

riverdean7 said:

voicescarry no i wouldnt cause im not a animal person and i never have been


Not worth responding to edit.
[This message was edited Fri May 7 5:48:52 2004 by VoicesCarry]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 05/07/04 7:06am

gemini13

riverdean7 said:

if the boy testifies i wonder what script the mother will give him to read to bolster there case



Y'know? What if the boy actually WAS molested?

Why is it so hard to believe?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 05/07/04 7:48am

riverdean7

well it is for me id put money on anyone here molesting a kid more then i would put on michael hey i dot wanna start a huge debate on this point so please noone get in a knot over it but im responding to gemini
[This message was edited Fri May 7 7:52:29 2004 by riverdean7]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 05/07/04 7:51am

dag

avatar

I used to be a fan of Michael's too until I found out he liked little boys. You are blinded by your "love" for him. If Prince were accused of the same thing, and all the facts pointed to his guilt, I SURE AS HELL wouldn't be anywhere defending him either.



how can you say that all the facts point on him?
Anyways i think I´m ending with this discussion, because it´s pointless.
Plus I think it´s also pointless trying to say what real pedophiles do or how they think. None of us knows unless you´re one of them and also if you were one of them, you won´t find two people thinking and acting the same way on this planet. We can´t generalize.

All that I can say is I LOVE him and BELIEVE (let me stress this word) in him. And I PRAY that he´ll get a FAIR trial!
End of discussion on my part.
"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 05/07/04 7:52am

dag

avatar

I can't STAND when people say Prince is weird like MJ. Yes they are both weird, but in different ways.


There are no two people on this earth weird in the same way, which means they are both - weird!
"When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 05/07/04 8:05am

TheFrog

dag said:

Plus I think it´s also pointless trying to say what real pedophiles do or how they think. None of us knows unless you´re one of them and also if you were one of them, you won´t find two people thinking and acting the same way on this planet. We can´t generalize.


And all the sociology teachers around the world resign. No point. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > MICHAEL JACKSON IS GUILTY