Imagine what his dick looks like..hehe

I posted it. Sorry I didn´t know it. I am new here. But I think it´s still worth reading for anyone who hasn´t read it yet.

dag said:

That doesn't count. The GQ article is known by more people than MJ himself.

BlueNote

Geminy...I know a lot of people who know nothing about Prince and they will tell you that he´s the same weirdo! You don´t think that way cause you are his fan. I don´t think that way about MJ, cause I am HIS fan!!! I love Prince´s music, but I love MJ as a person more that´s way he´s more normal to me. You like Prince personality better than MJ´s that´s why you think that Prince is less weird.

I like weird people.

BlueNote
[This message was edited Thu May 6 11:38:36 2004 by BlueNote]

dag said:

Here's the reality: the number of people who think MJ is weird is MUCH, MUCH greater than the number of people who think Prince is weird.

Me too. That´s why I love Prince and MJ!

And believe me people, there are a lot of things that I find weird about Prince or don´t understand, but I am not gonna talk about them or try to diss him like some of you do with MJ! I don´t expect to understand every action of all the people in the world, just as I don´t expect anyone to understand me completely, so why spending time discussing what other people do differently, or what I find weird? It´s stupid. And I have always felt that when it comes to MJ people (except his fans) love ONLY to hate him!

VoicesCarry said:
Here's the reality: the number of people who think MJ is weird is MUCH, MUCH greater than the number of people who think Prince is weird.[/quote]

Yeah, but percentage is the same.

BlueNote

Because the number of people who know MJ is MUCH MUCH greater than the number of people who know Prince. If you don´t believe me, come to Czech republic! And you can bet that you won´t find any nasty articles about him in our tabloids. But on MJ, there are articles everyday.

Let me add that there are no articles on him because people don´t know him, don´t like his music. YOu hardly hear Prince on radio over here, which is a shame.

dag said:

Whats 'weird'? There is a reason for everything and who am I to judge those actions. Well, as long as it is legal. I wanna have my privat zoo too! I would like to shop on a giraffe, but I guess that would be illegal.

BlueNote

EXACTLY bluenote...I think we´ll understand each other.

And what are you doing here talking to a computer??? Aren´t there any real people you could talk to?? You know...we all have our issues....Let Mike have his...

And how do YOU know that he has never had a real relationship with woman? Are you a god or what...

dag said:

I used to be a fan of Michael's too until I found out he liked little boys. You are blinded by your "love" for him. If Prince were accused of the same thing, and all the facts pointed to his guilt, I SURE AS HELL wouldn't be anywhere defending him either.

dag said:

What kinda argument was that? What does the fact that I'm on a computer (just like you, I might add), have to do with MJ having intercourse with little boys? Computer addiction is one thing, sexual pedophilia is quite another.

Because MJ from the beginning was thought gay, thus no little girls
MJ hangs out with children not just little boys
but like prince says
"the people believe what they want to believe"
think of it this way....
the standard pedophile has 240 victims in a 15 mile radius within a 13 year period
Mj has befriend of probably thousands of children throughout the years
and yet only 2 come front to say that they were abused
2 in an 11 year period
if you look for the information you can pretty much see that MJ's Innocent
I've been doing esearch for a couple of weeks now
did you know that 75% of molestation cases usually have a Custody Battle Behind it
Did you know that 60% of all molestation crimes are deemed False
because the childr n lie at urging of the parent for monetary gain
If you do your home work
you'll find the shyt ou and i don't have to come here

gemini13 said:

The reason I don't want people like you on the jury is because YOU HAVE ALREADY MADE UP YOUR MIND. The people I want on the jury are people who are unbiased either way and will make a desicion based on the evidence brought up in the trial.
[This message was edited Thu May 6 17:23:10 2004 by WildStyle]

Luv4oneanotha said:

Can you cite all that info, please (esp. the stuff about pedophiles)? Because it contradicts much of what I've read.

Rediculous fact of current case:

The DA is claiming that Michael Jackson along with 4 other people, conspired to molest the boy. Yes, you read that right. The conspiring allegedly began on February 1st, while the molestation allegedly began February 20th (it was February 7th until the DA changed it so that the contradictory statements of the family during that period could be explained). So basically there were 5 people conspiring to molest thhe boy. It's in the charges and it's ludicrous.

WildStyle said:

Considering you don't really know the evidence (none of us are), how are you able to make that judgement?

And please don't say "Because Michael would never do that."

All conspiracy to molest means is that they set it up for him. If he really is a pedophile, is it hard to believe that his staff would help him out with his endeavours if he paid them well? Not so unbelievable to me. It's happened before.
[This message was edited Thu May 6 17:47:58 2004 by VoicesCarry]

VoicesCarry said:

Because why would 5 people conspire to molest someone?

WildStyle said:

Michael said it best himself: "Money".

A man making lampshades of human skin sounds a little ridiculous, doesn't it? But it's happened. So I really can't say this is impossible. Staff have acted as pimps or procurers for their employers before. The charge is nebulous - it could mean as little as standing watch while Michael enjoyed himself.

Until I hear the evidence, I reserve judgement on anything being "ridiculous". We are talking about a man who has his own amusement park on his front lawn, after all.
[This message was edited Thu May 6 17:54:34 2004 by VoicesCarry]

Keep in mind that Mark Geragos was hired in early February (and should be included in the charges if Sneddon is serious).

So basically this is Michael's line of thought: "Hmmm, that Gavin kid that I have known for 2 years and never touched is pretty cute. I forgot that I was a peadophile until I watched the Bashir interview. Now I am recieving backlash about my conduct with children. But that Gavin is looking mighty cute. I know, Ill get together 4 people to help me molest him. But I better hire a lawyer to get me out of it when they start talking"

I can't STAND when people say Prince is weird like MJ. Yes they are both weird, but in different ways.

Prince hasn't slept with little boys in his bed (and admitted to it), Prince also hasn't dangled a baby off a balcony. Prince can come off as a real dick, but he's never done or been accused of things as heinous as MJ has.

WildStyle said:

He doesn't have to have "gotten together" with them for them to be charged. They weren't all present watching (or molesting along with him), but they might all have been involved in one way or another, as I described above.

And if Michael is indeed a pedophile, you're saying you expect logic from him? That is ridiculous. Based on his behaviour, I really can't attribute such cold, logical thought to Michael. He has always been 'on his own planet' so to speak.
[This message was edited Thu May 6 17:57:51 2004 by VoicesCarry]

Anyway, I gotta get ready for school. I'll conntinue with this when I get home.

NOTE TO THE MJ FANS:

It doesn't matter how many articles you post and how many times you tell us how fucking saintly Michael is. You will never turn us.

Give it up.

P.S Ain't no way Prince is on the same level as MJ - leave our boy alone!

dag said:

I became a Michael Jackson fan in the early 70s,and I have followed Michael's career ever since.Who didn't love the Jackson Five? 'Off The Wall' and 'Thriller' are two of my all-time favorite albums.In the 'Thriller' days,I even begged my mother to buy me a white sequined glove (I already had the red "Beat It" jacket with all the zippers).Believe me,I was a HUGE fan of MJ and I will always love his old music .But being a fan of an artist does not mean you should condone and agree with everything they do.Michael's behavior is WRONG,period.A 45-year old man should not be having sleepovers with young boys.The man has problems and I'm sick of his fans,supporters,lawyers and family members being in denial about it.Part of the reason he's so out of touch with reality is because so many people around him always excuse his behavior.Apparently,nobody ever questions anything he does.And by the way,I'm not "dissing" Micheal,I'm simply being honest.

DavidEye u walking outside your house without a paper bag on is wrong to but do we complain

VoicesCarry said:

If Michael is a pedophile, I would expect more then 2 of the thousands of children that have been in his home to accuse him of molesting them. Especially the ones he was really close to who have slep in his room. People like McCauley Culkin, Wade Robson, Emanual Lewis, Sean Lennon etc. Yet these people have all defended MJ on this issue.

Note: Michael didn't get to where he is today by having his head in the clouds. Ask anyone who has worked with him or has been close to him. He is a smart business man, and just smart in general.