New topic
Printable| Author | Message |
Gwen stefani overexposed? I think so...this LAMB clothing line and all her sappy GAVIN-inspired songs is overkill.... Let the rain come down...17 days.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
IF SHE NOT WANT BE OVEREXPOSE SHE SHOULD WEAR WHOLE SHIRT P o o |/, P o o |\ | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
POOK said: IF SHE NOT WANT BE OVEREXPOSE SHE SHOULD WEAR WHOLE SHIRT You must be a writer! Let the rain come down...17 days.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
IMHO you can only be overexposed if you have no talent or rely more on your exploits than your music. Hence J.Lo is overexposed. Gwen is not. See the difference? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: IMHO you can only be overexposed if you have no talent or rely more on your exploits than your music. Hence J.Lo is overexposed. Gwen is not. See the difference?
I'm sorry but "no-talent" does not constitute overexposure (except in Britney's case-ha ha) Let the rain come down...17 days.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i don't think she's overexposed. now, honestly, i don't watch much tv or listen to too much radio so i may not be the most aware. but from the magazines i've seen and the tv i have watched, it doesn't seem like she is everywhere. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I wonder if she will be a good actress ( M Scorseese new movie) | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplegypsy said: VoicesCarry said: IMHO you can only be overexposed if you have no talent or rely more on your exploits than your music. Hence J.Lo is overexposed. Gwen is not. See the difference?
I'm sorry but "no-talent" does not constitute overexposure (except in Britney's case-ha ha) I didn't say JUST "no talent", there is also the obvious requirement of you being stuffed down the public's throats. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: purplegypsy said: I'm sorry but "no-talent" does not constitute overexposure (except in Britney's case-ha ha) I didn't say JUST "no talent", there is also the obvious requirement of you being stuffed down the public's throats. Is sheryl crow exploitive or not taleneted? Becuase she certainly went through overexposure for a while a few years ago... Let the rain come down...17 days.... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplegypsy said: VoicesCarry said: I didn't say JUST "no talent", there is also the obvious requirement of you being stuffed down the public's throats. Is sheryl crow exploitive or not taleneted? Becuase she certainly went through overexposure for a while a few years ago... Well, not in my opinion  . I think she's a bit overrated though. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ok so...
overexposure means the talent does not warrant the exposure? or is there just a standard threshold of exposure until you're like "ok  enough"? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
hardly...altho she does seem to be going for it all right now...she was on the cover of vouge....and the interview is online somewhere...shes got the movie thing,her solo album,and the clothing line right now. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No point over-analysing...Gwen is lovely. And lovely she remains.
Over-exposed? - I can't be ยค#"%&? to answer that one.
Take what you want from it...if you think she's over-exposed, so be it. But I think either way she's still got a true charisma and talent for what she became well known for in the first place. [This message was edited Sun Apr 18 1:05:42 2004 by TheJoker] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |