Hell no, I really liked most of the new tracks on this record. Most disappointing/misguided would have to be Invincible. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: Hell no, I really liked most of the new tracks on this record. Most disappointing/misguided would have to be Invincible.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cloudbuster said: VoicesCarry said: Hell no, I really liked most of the new tracks on this record. Most disappointing/misguided would have to be Invincible.
Well excuse me for having an opinion [This message was edited Wed Apr 28 10:01:37 2004 by VoicesCarry] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: Cloudbuster said: Well excuse me for having an opinion [This message was edited Wed Apr 28 10:01:37 2004 by VoicesCarry] well i agree with ya lol for once! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Cloudbuster said: purpleone said: history get's a @@@ rating in my book.
You mean the album as a whole? If so, you missed the title track. you're right. the title track gets a @@@@ rating. that makes a total average of @@@1/2 for the album history. i enjoyed the album. it's just not that consistent. and it has far too many tracks imo. don't need no reefer, don't need cocaine
purple music does the same to my brain i'm high, so high | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |