independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > re: Janet is lazy
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 04/04/04 12:48am

musicman

I want to like Damita Jo so bad, but I honestly can only listen to a few tracks also.
And ditto on the interludes,I was laughing out loud because I was thinking the same thing--these damn interludes don't make sense.

At least on the other albums, I felt they fit in creating the theme. But, I don't think Janet was being lazy, I just think she tried to venture out to other producers and was way too determined to use them, but I was bored by the time I got to track 9.

Still, she's my girl. Too bad I gotta wait another 4 years for another album. We'll see how this one plays out.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 04/04/04 5:14am

theVelvetRoper

avatar

SassierBritches said:

DavidEye said:


The sad truth is,in today's R&B world,there really isn't much innovation or fresh ideas anymore.And that's the problem for Janet,she's simply too afraid to venture outside of this genre.(The same also applies to her brother Michael,but that's another thread,lol).That's why you hear people saying that she basically makes the same album over and over.I'm glad that you're enjoying this new CD,but don't you think it would have been REALLY exciting if Janet had been willing to go in a totally new direction for once? Maybe record a few kickass electroclash tracks? Or how about a couple of loud rock songs with some killer guitar? Or how about some eerie,hypnotic tracks recorded with some unknown European dance music producer ? You know,just something to spice things up a bit and take in her a whole other direction.Jam and Lewis were once great producers,but there time has come and gone.Babyface is great,but he's already worked with everybody else in R&B.It was wise of her to hook up with Dallas Austin though.


is she afraid to venture out or does she simply make the kind of music she likes to make? janet doesn't jump with the trends...she never has and i hope she never does. is it possible that janet just doesn't like electroclash (and all the other trendy sounds that die in a week)? electroclash and american bands ripping the european pop scene was such a short lived trend in the states...fischerspooner, air, etc. i'm not saying those bands aren't still popular in certain crowds but not the way they were a few years back. besides, excluding damita jo, didn't janet make a loud guitar song called 'black cat'? and 'what about'? and 'trust a try'? why does she need to make a 'rock' album? clearly she enjoys dance, pop and r&b. i think janet can leave trend hopping sounds to other performers. its funny, i hear people say that sade makes the same record every time and, other than a few critics, people expect that. that's whay they like her. the same can be said of janet. i like her because janet is janet. i don't have to worry about what trend she's gonna jump on for the next record. if i want to listen to a trendy rock band of the moment/sound of the minute i can just go to my local record store and pick up their cd. i don't need janet to give it to me. i like air. that's why i listen to them when i want to hear their sound. and that's why i listen to janet when i want to hear her sound.


Thank you! Janet doesn't have to change for anyone! Her fans certainly love what she's doing. Janet has always said she just makes the music that she wants to make, and hopefully the fans will love it, too.
'Cause your friends don't dance, and if they don't dance... well, they're no friends of mine.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 04/04/04 7:13am

sosgemini

avatar

SassierBritches said:


is she afraid to venture out or does she simply make the kind of music she likes to make? janet doesn't jump with the trends...she never has and i hope she never does. is it possible that janet just doesn't like electroclash (and all the other trendy sounds that die in a week)? electroclash and american bands ripping the european pop scene was such a short lived trend in the states...fischerspooner, air, etc. i'm not saying those bands aren't still popular in certain crowds but not the way they were a few years back. besides, excluding damita jo, didn't janet make a loud guitar song called 'black cat'? and 'what about'? and 'trust a try'? why does she need to make a 'rock' album? clearly she enjoys dance, pop and r&b. i think janet can leave trend hopping sounds to other performers. its funny, i hear people say that sade makes the same record every time and, other than a few critics, people expect that. that's whay they like her. the same can be said of janet. i like her because janet is janet. i don't have to worry about what trend she's gonna jump on for the next record. if i want to listen to a trendy rock band of the moment/sound of the minute i can just go to my local record store and pick up their cd. i don't need janet to give it to me. i like air. that's why i listen to them when i want to hear their sound. and that's why i listen to janet when i want to hear her sound.



glad you brought up sade..i will agree that sade (and someone like tracy chapman) also sticks to the same musical pallet however with those artist. they have allowed themselves to expand on the limited formats they choose...sade has grown masterfully lyrically..so much I could consider her one of our premier poets.....and there are subtle changes...notice the abscence of horns from lovedeluxe to lover's rock?....and while the substance of the sound may sound the same their entire instrumentation has evolved.....she went from brass big band sounds to electronica-lite.....

janet's last three albums have relied on the same forumala...a few r&b dance tracks, a lot of slow r&B songs that sound like all the other r&b songs that others are doing and sample heavy instrumentation....at least the only one doing sade is sade..
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 04/04/04 11:48am

Marrk

avatar

Hmm, i love Janet, but started losing interest after The Velvet Rope, i bought All For You (twice! i needed the DVD edition) but i won't be buying Damita Jo til it hits the bargain bins. I've read too many negative comments about it, and i'm not in the mood for 'more of the same'. The last time she showed any innovation or growth was on TVR but even that was patchy.

Shame, she's always been one of my favourite female artists. sad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 04/04/04 12:50pm

VoicesCarry

sosgemini said:

SassierBritches said:


is she afraid to venture out or does she simply make the kind of music she likes to make? janet doesn't jump with the trends...she never has and i hope she never does. is it possible that janet just doesn't like electroclash (and all the other trendy sounds that die in a week)? electroclash and american bands ripping the european pop scene was such a short lived trend in the states...fischerspooner, air, etc. i'm not saying those bands aren't still popular in certain crowds but not the way they were a few years back. besides, excluding damita jo, didn't janet make a loud guitar song called 'black cat'? and 'what about'? and 'trust a try'? why does she need to make a 'rock' album? clearly she enjoys dance, pop and r&b. i think janet can leave trend hopping sounds to other performers. its funny, i hear people say that sade makes the same record every time and, other than a few critics, people expect that. that's whay they like her. the same can be said of janet. i like her because janet is janet. i don't have to worry about what trend she's gonna jump on for the next record. if i want to listen to a trendy rock band of the moment/sound of the minute i can just go to my local record store and pick up their cd. i don't need janet to give it to me. i like air. that's why i listen to them when i want to hear their sound. and that's why i listen to janet when i want to hear her sound.



glad you brought up sade..i will agree that sade (and someone like tracy chapman) also sticks to the same musical pallet however with those artist. they have allowed themselves to expand on the limited formats they choose...sade has grown masterfully lyrically..so much I could consider her one of our premier poets.....and there are subtle changes...notice the abscence of horns from lovedeluxe to lover's rock?....and while the substance of the sound may sound the same their entire instrumentation has evolved.....she went from brass big band sounds to electronica-lite.....

janet's last three albums have relied on the same forumala...a few r&b dance tracks, a lot of slow r&B songs that sound like all the other r&b songs that others are doing and sample heavy instrumentation....at least the only one doing sade is sade..


I love me some Sade, but Janet produces some very eclectic mainstream pop albums. Take some of her dance tracks, for example. "Throb" is a house track aimed squarely at the crotch. "Together Again" is a great midtempo number set against a subtle disco backdrop. "Go Deep" is a party track, with a bouncy but somehwat menacing backbeat. "All Nite (Don't Stop)" is skittish and a bit trancey in tone, but very addictive too. You might say "Janet does dance" and dismiss her, but productionwise I would say she's much more varied than Sade AND she's one of the more eclectic artists in mainstream R&B at the moment. Everything R. Kelly does sounds the same, but the same can't be said of Janet IMHO.

I think the next album needs something new, though. I'd like a return to the personal introspection of TVR and for less than half the album to be produced by Jam & Lewis. I think that would be interesting, although saleswise it would bomb (but then so did the misunderstood American Life).
[This message was edited Sun Apr 4 12:52:39 2004 by VoicesCarry]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 04/04/04 12:57pm

AaronX

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

sosgemini said:




glad you brought up sade..i will agree that sade (and someone like tracy chapman) also sticks to the same musical pallet however with those artist. they have allowed themselves to expand on the limited formats they choose...sade has grown masterfully lyrically..so much I could consider her one of our premier poets.....and there are subtle changes...notice the abscence of horns from lovedeluxe to lover's rock?....and while the substance of the sound may sound the same their entire instrumentation has evolved.....she went from brass big band sounds to electronica-lite.....

janet's last three albums have relied on the same forumala...a few r&b dance tracks, a lot of slow r&B songs that sound like all the other r&b songs that others are doing and sample heavy instrumentation....at least the only one doing sade is sade..


I love me some Sade, but Janet produces some very eclectic mainstream pop albums. Take some of her dance tracks, for example. "Throb" is a house track aimed squarely at the crotch. "Together Again" is a great midtempo number set against a subtle disco backdrop. "Go Deep" is a party track, with a bouncy but somehwat menacing backbeat. "All Nite (Don't Stop)" is skittish and a bit trancey in tone, but very addictive too. You might say "Janet does dance" and dismiss her, but productionwise I would say she's much more varied than Sade AND she's one of the more eclectic artists in mainstream R&B at the moment. Everything R. Kelly does sounds the same, but the same can't be said of Janet IMHO.



except on DamitaJo, which is the problem. it sounds like everything she's done for the last 10 years, which wouldn't be that big of a problem except that most of the tracks on this album sound like each other. the only shock is there's no tear-jerker AC ballad on this one. yeah, she's really changed it up for this one rolleyes
"...from the ashes." the ALL-NEW, ALL-DIFFERENT Aaron! on sale now!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 04/04/04 1:00pm

VoicesCarry

AaronX said:

VoicesCarry said:



I love me some Sade, but Janet produces some very eclectic mainstream pop albums. Take some of her dance tracks, for example. "Throb" is a house track aimed squarely at the crotch. "Together Again" is a great midtempo number set against a subtle disco backdrop. "Go Deep" is a party track, with a bouncy but somehwat menacing backbeat. "All Nite (Don't Stop)" is skittish and a bit trancey in tone, but very addictive too. You might say "Janet does dance" and dismiss her, but productionwise I would say she's much more varied than Sade AND she's one of the more eclectic artists in mainstream R&B at the moment. Everything R. Kelly does sounds the same, but the same can't be said of Janet IMHO.



except on DamitaJo, which is the problem. it sounds like everything she's done for the last 10 years, which wouldn't be that big of a problem except that most of the tracks on this album sound like each other. the only shock is there's no tear-jerker AC ballad on this one. yeah, she's really changed it up for this one rolleyes


"it sounds like everything she's done for the last 10 years"

I'd have to disagree with that. Besides, don't you like some artists who basically don't change? Sade, for example (and removing horns from your instrumentation doesn't really count). They're like comfort food.
[This message was edited Sun Apr 4 13:00:41 2004 by VoicesCarry]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 04/04/04 1:00pm

AaronX

avatar

musicman said:

I want to like Damita Jo so bad, but I honestly can only listen to a few tracks also.
And ditto on the interludes,I was laughing out loud because I was thinking the same thing--these damn interludes don't make sense.

At least on the other albums, I felt they fit in creating the theme. But, I don't think Janet was being lazy, I just think she tried to venture out to other producers and was way too determined to use them, but I was bored by the time I got to track 9.

.



actually, i think that's the problem. even on most of the songs where she used other producers, jam & lewis are listed as co-producers. as if she worked with others, and then panicked because it didn't sound like a "janet album" and brought them all back to jam & lewis to water down. it worked a little too well, because the whole thing suffers from sameness.
"...from the ashes." the ALL-NEW, ALL-DIFFERENT Aaron! on sale now!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 04/04/04 1:02pm

AaronX

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

AaronX said:




except on DamitaJo, which is the problem. it sounds like everything she's done for the last 10 years, which wouldn't be that big of a problem except that most of the tracks on this album sound like each other. the only shock is there's no tear-jerker AC ballad on this one. yeah, she's really changed it up for this one rolleyes


"it sounds like everything she's done for the last 10 years"

I'd have to disagree with that. Besides, don't you like some artists who basically don't change? Sade, for example. They're like comfort food.



generally, no. i don't want to hear the same people doing the same thing over and over again.


but with janet, the problem is more pronounced because i could look past all of the songs being retreaded ground if the songs themselves were of higher quality. that's what made AFY enjoyable. yes, it was the same old thing she'd done twice before, but the songs were of pretty good quality, and you could at least tell most of them apart (aside from the middle and end passages).
"...from the ashes." the ALL-NEW, ALL-DIFFERENT Aaron! on sale now!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 04/04/04 1:08pm

VoicesCarry

AaronX said:

VoicesCarry said:



"it sounds like everything she's done for the last 10 years"

I'd have to disagree with that. Besides, don't you like some artists who basically don't change? Sade, for example. They're like comfort food.



generally, no. i don't want to hear the same people doing the same thing over and over again.


but with janet, the problem is more pronounced because i could look past all of the songs being retreaded ground if the songs themselves were of higher quality. that's what made AFY enjoyable. yes, it was the same old thing she'd done twice before, but the songs were of pretty good quality, and you could at least tell most of them apart (aside from the middle and end passages).


And I thought AFY was a disappointment that overall lacked strong songs. Guess we know where we stand wink .
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 04/04/04 1:29pm

theVelvetRoper

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

AaronX said:




generally, no. i don't want to hear the same people doing the same thing over and over again.


but with janet, the problem is more pronounced because i could look past all of the songs being retreaded ground if the songs themselves were of higher quality. that's what made AFY enjoyable. yes, it was the same old thing she'd done twice before, but the songs were of pretty good quality, and you could at least tell most of them apart (aside from the middle and end passages).


And I thought AFY was a disappointment that overall lacked strong songs. Guess we know where we stand wink .


Yeah, for me All For You was a real disappointment, too.

omfg Did a "Janazi" just say that?!
'Cause your friends don't dance, and if they don't dance... well, they're no friends of mine.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 04/04/04 1:47pm

VoicesCarry

theVelvetRoper said:

VoicesCarry said:



And I thought AFY was a disappointment that overall lacked strong songs. Guess we know where we stand wink .


Yeah, for me All For You was a real disappointment, too.

omfg Did a "Janazi" just say that?!


I think this album is definitely a BIG improvement over AFY. I'm spinning it a lot more than I did that disc.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 04/04/04 1:58pm

NakedPreacherL
ady

avatar

sosgemini said:

....at least the only one doing sade is sade..


I'd do Sade. wave
stoned
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 04/04/04 2:01pm

theVelvetRoper

avatar

VoicesCarry said:

theVelvetRoper said:



Yeah, for me All For You was a real disappointment, too.

omfg Did a "Janazi" just say that?!


I think this album is definitely a BIG improvement over AFY. I'm spinning it a lot more than I did that disc.


Same here. AFY really had to grow on me, and it's still my least favorite album next to Dream Street. There are some songs that I love from it, though, like "Son of a Gun", but even that one doesn't compare to something like "This Time" or "What About". I also think Janet's voice sounds a lot better on DJ.
'Cause your friends don't dance, and if they don't dance... well, they're no friends of mine.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 04/04/04 7:19pm

sosgemini

avatar

NakedPreacherLady said:

sosgemini said:

....at least the only one doing sade is sade..


I'd do Sade. wave



giggle
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 04/05/04 2:15am

DavidEye

SassierBritches said:

DavidEye said:


The sad truth is,in today's R&B world,there really isn't much innovation or fresh ideas anymore.And that's the problem for Janet,she's simply too afraid to venture outside of this genre.(The same also applies to her brother Michael,but that's another thread,lol).That's why you hear people saying that she basically makes the same album over and over.I'm glad that you're enjoying this new CD,but don't you think it would have been REALLY exciting if Janet had been willing to go in a totally new direction for once? Maybe record a few kickass electroclash tracks? Or how about a couple of loud rock songs with some killer guitar? Or how about some eerie,hypnotic tracks recorded with some unknown European dance music producer ? You know,just something to spice things up a bit and take in her a whole other direction.Jam and Lewis were once great producers,but there time has come and gone.Babyface is great,but he's already worked with everybody else in R&B.It was wise of her to hook up with Dallas Austin though.


is she afraid to venture out or does she simply make the kind of music she likes to make? janet doesn't jump with the trends...she never has and i hope she never does. is it possible that janet just doesn't like electroclash (and all the other trendy sounds that die in a week)? electroclash and american bands ripping the european pop scene was such a short lived trend in the states...fischerspooner, air, etc. i'm not saying those bands aren't still popular in certain crowds but not the way they were a few years back. besides, excluding damita jo, didn't janet make a loud guitar song called 'black cat'? and 'what about'? and 'trust a try'? why does she need to make a 'rock' album? clearly she enjoys dance, pop and r&b. i think janet can leave trend hopping sounds to other performers. its funny, i hear people say that sade makes the same record every time and, other than a few critics, people expect that. that's whay they like her. the same can be said of janet. i like her because janet is janet. i don't have to worry about what trend she's gonna jump on for the next record. if i want to listen to a trendy rock band of the moment/sound of the minute i can just go to my local record store and pick up their cd. i don't need janet to give it to me. i like air. that's why i listen to them when i want to hear their sound. and that's why i listen to janet when i want to hear her sound.



No,it's not about "chasing trends",it's about growing and evolving as an artist.Isn't that one of the reasons why we love Prince so much? He changes with each album.Imagine if he had stayed in "Dirty Mind" mode throughout his career,releasing album after album that sounded like those songs.I've heard the new Janet CD (my niece just bought it),and the only song that dares to take her in a bold direction is the last track "Just A Little While",which I actually like (whatta shame that it bombed as a single!).

And I'm not just talking about changing the music,I mean lyrics too.Janet seems to be stuck in the whole "sex kitten" phase,writing the same sexy lyrics she's been doing since 1993.Surely there be something else to sing about besides her libido? But I'm not trying to dampen your enthusiasm,if you like the CD,I'm happy for you.
[This message was edited Mon Apr 5 2:29:20 2004 by DavidEye]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > re: Janet is lazy