New topic
PrintableAdoreDaBang1 said: Oh My GOD!! I just heard something disturbing on the news. AOL WANTS ITS MONEY BACK!! Apparently what Janet did so overshadowed the impact that the commercials had that it totally devalued them and made the million dollars for a 30 sec spot essentially worthless. If THEY do it the other advertisers might follow suit and then it will REALLY be a big mess.
On the other side of the coin this was on Access Hollywood web site Comedian Jon Lovitz told Access Hollywood's Shaun Robinson that Justin's "revealing" strip was indeed unintentional. "You think it was a wardrobe malfuntion?" Shaun asked Jon. "That's exactly what it was. That's just a fact. Adam Sandler's manager Sandy Warnick was at the Super Bowl with the wardrobe person when it happened," explained Jon. "She freaked out and said, 'Oh no!' because it wasn't supposed to happen. She had that red thing underneath but it got ripped away -- that's all." didn't know where to post this since people are complaining about to many Janet threads. Thoughts people? Somehow I think Jon Lovitz said that with a wink and a nudge implied. As for the AOL thing, yeah, they want their $7.5M back. If more and more sponsors start to complain and if lawsuits are filed, CBS could sue Janet and Justin for damages and win if there is no proof that they knew about the stunt. Let's hope this doesn't blow up in her face. So maybe this is why Madonna didn't show her tits to a live audience of 100 million people. You'd think she would have been the first. [This message was edited Wed Feb 4 19:12:56 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
Anxiety said: I think all of this is brilliant publicity for everyone involved, especially Janet. I hope she takes advantage of this whole mess and doesn't play the "poor little victim me" card - this could work out completely in her favor, and hopefully it's all just a big publicity coup for her next album.
If not...sheesh.  I wouldnt call it brilliant. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh, and while you're all bitching Justin out, here's his side of the story.
Timberlake: Family Offended by Super Bowl 1 hour, 53 minutes ago LOS ANGELES - Justin Timberlake (news) said Wednesday that his own family was offended by his racy Super Bowl halftime duet with Janet Jackson (news), but he insisted he thought only her bustier would be revealed when he pulled on her costume, not her breast. Timberlake, in an interview with KCBS-TV outside the Staples Center, where he was rehearsing for Sunday's Grammy Awards, said he understood "how unfortunate this is." "I do understand that there were a lot of people that were completely offended by what happened, including my own family. And I think that's probably the part that's frustrating the most for me and it's completely, completely, completely, regrettable," he told KCBS. He also said he was frustrated that his character was being questioned. Timberlake said that before the show he got a call from Jackson and her choreographer saying they wanted to do a "costume reveal." "Now I was under the impression that what was going to be revealed ...was a red brassierre, bustier," he said. He said he did not have time to rehearse the move before taking the stage, and was shocked at the outcome. You remember the look on his face when he saw what had happened. What if she didn't tell him about the final outcome? His shocked look was a hell of a lot more genuine than hers. I think he thought he had genuinely fucked up.  [This message was edited Wed Feb 4 19:34:44 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Did he really say, "I don't need to do things like that to sell records"? Man, screw Justin Timberlake. What a dork. He should be kissing Janet's ass. His music is so derivative of the Jacksons (Michael, Janet, the whole family) except it's a mere bad imitation.
He's a punk. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jtgillia said: Did he really say, "I don't need to do things like that to sell records"? Man, screw Justin Timberlake. What a dork. He should be kissing Janet's ass. His music is so derivative of the Jacksons (Michael, Janet, the whole family) except it's a mere bad imitation.
He's a punk.  So Justin is implying that Janet does? Janet's a legend, and Justin will never be. I was a fan of his before these ridiculous comments he's been making. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SassierBritches said: what a punk ass bitch. he blamed it all on her and acted like he had absolutely no idea what was going to happen. he then said how he doesn't need to pull stunts like that to sell records. he said he was apalled and shocked.
tell me then, justin, why were you bragging about it when you were backstage? fuckin' punk ass bitch. That's bullshit. Justin knew exactly what was going on, and, like you said, he was bragging about it immediately afterwards to Entertainment Tonight. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
theVelvetRoper said: jtgillia said: Did he really say, "I don't need to do things like that to sell records"? Man, screw Justin Timberlake. What a dork. He should be kissing Janet's ass. His music is so derivative of the Jacksons (Michael, Janet, the whole family) except it's a mere bad imitation.
He's a punk. So Justin is implying that Janet does? Janet's a legend, and Justin will never be. I was a fan of his before these ridiculous comments he's been making.I wouldn't say that Justin will never be a legend. Someone said that about MJ at one time, I'm sure. Granted, his music is still derivative and boring. [This message was edited Wed Feb 4 20:40:38 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: theVelvetRoper said: jtgillia said: Did he really say, "I don't need to do things like that to sell records"? Man, screw Justin Timberlake. What a dork. He should be kissing Janet's ass. His music is so derivative of the Jacksons (Michael, Janet, the whole family) except it's a mere bad imitation.
He's a punk. So Justin is implying that Janet does? Janet's a legend, and Justin will never be. I was a fan of his before these ridiculous comments he's been making.And where are you getting this quote from? Or did you just take SassyBritches' word for it? [This message was edited Wed Feb 4 20:40:04 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] Justin said that on an interview with CBS news. Here's the link if you'd like to see it: http://kcbs.dayport.com/v...viewer.tpl | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
theVelvetRoper said: VoicesCarry said: theVelvetRoper said: jtgillia said: Did he really say, "I don't need to do things like that to sell records"? Man, screw Justin Timberlake. What a dork. He should be kissing Janet's ass. His music is so derivative of the Jacksons (Michael, Janet, the whole family) except it's a mere bad imitation.
He's a punk. So Justin is implying that Janet does? Janet's a legend, and Justin will never be. I was a fan of his before these ridiculous comments he's been making.And where are you getting this quote from? Or did you just take SassyBritches' word for it? [This message was edited Wed Feb 4 20:40:04 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] Justin said that on an interview with CBS news. Here's the link if you'd like to see it: http://kcbs.dayport.com/v...viewer.tpl Hmm..doesn't work for me. Guess my comp. sucks 
But since he's a guy, he doesn't generally take his clothes off to sell records, so he's right in that respect. He's still a publicity whore. [This message was edited Wed Feb 4 20:44:41 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: theVelvetRoper said: jtgillia said: Did he really say, "I don't need to do things like that to sell records"? Man, screw Justin Timberlake. What a dork. He should be kissing Janet's ass. His music is so derivative of the Jacksons (Michael, Janet, the whole family) except it's a mere bad imitation.
He's a punk. So Justin is implying that Janet does? Janet's a legend, and Justin will never be. I was a fan of his before these ridiculous comments he's been making.I wouldn't say that Justin will never be a legend. Someone said that about MJ at one time, I'm sure. Granted, his music is still derivative and boring. [This message was edited Wed Feb 4 20:40:38 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't think Justin was emplying that Janet needed those kind of stunts to sell records, he was speaking for himself. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
theVelvetRoper said: VoicesCarry said: theVelvetRoper said: jtgillia said: Did he really say, "I don't need to do things like that to sell records"? Man, screw Justin Timberlake. What a dork. He should be kissing Janet's ass. His music is so derivative of the Jacksons (Michael, Janet, the whole family) except it's a mere bad imitation.
He's a punk. So Justin is implying that Janet does? Janet's a legend, and Justin will never be. I was a fan of his before these ridiculous comments he's been making.I wouldn't say that Justin will never be a legend. Someone said that about MJ at one time, I'm sure. Granted, his music is still derivative and boring. [This message was edited Wed Feb 4 20:40:38 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] Didn't argue that. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
EverlastingNow said: I don't think Justin was emplying that Janet needed those kind of stunts to sell records, he was speaking for himself. Yes, and he's full of shit. Justin, MTV, and CBS knew about this, and that's all there is to it. I the FCC proves this when the do their little investigation. As for the Grammys, if Janet has been uninvited, so should Justin. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
theVelvetRoper said: EverlastingNow said: I don't think Justin was emplying that Janet needed those kind of stunts to sell records, he was speaking for himself. Yes, and he's full of shit. Justin, MTV, and CBS knew about this, and that's all there is to it. I the FCC proves this when the do their little investigation. As for the Grammys, if Janet has been uninvited, so should Justin.And you know this how? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: theVelvetRoper said: EverlastingNow said: I don't think Justin was emplying that Janet needed those kind of stunts to sell records, he was speaking for himself. Yes, and he's full of shit. Justin, MTV, and CBS knew about this, and that's all there is to it. I the FCC proves this when the do their little investigation. As for the Grammys, if Janet has been uninvited, so should Justin.And you know this how? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Justin has proven to every entertainer that he can't be trusted with anything contraversial (not that i think the tittie was contraversial). He has shown them all that when the going gets tough, he blames those involved to save his own ass. He was probably that kid in school who participated in all the pranks but if he got caught he cried "he maaade me do it!" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: Oh, and while you're all bitching Justin out, here's his side of the story.
Timberlake: Family Offended by Super Bowl 1 hour, 53 minutes ago LOS ANGELES - Justin Timberlake (news) said Wednesday that his own family was offended by his racy Super Bowl halftime duet with Janet Jackson (news), but he insisted he thought only her bustier would be revealed when he pulled on her costume, not her breast. Timberlake, in an interview with KCBS-TV outside the Staples Center, where he was rehearsing for Sunday's Grammy Awards, said he understood "how unfortunate this is." "I do understand that there were a lot of people that were completely offended by what happened, including my own family. And I think that's probably the part that's frustrating the most for me and it's completely, completely, completely, regrettable," he told KCBS. He also said he was frustrated that his character was being questioned. Timberlake said that before the show he got a call from Jackson and her choreographer saying they wanted to do a "costume reveal." "Now I was under the impression that what was going to be revealed ...was a red brassierre, bustier," he said. He said he did not have time to rehearse the move before taking the stage, and was shocked at the outcome. You remember the look on his face when he saw what had happened. What if she didn't tell him about the final outcome? His shocked look was a hell of a lot more genuine than hers. I think he thought he had genuinely fucked up.
[This message was edited Wed Feb 4 19:34:44 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] HIS FAMILY WAS OFFENDED BY THIS BUT THEY WEREN'T OFFENDED WHEN HE FOLLOWED JANET ALL AROUND THE STAGE SMACKING HER ON THE ASS AND THE 2 OF THEM GRINDING ON EACH OTHER BEFORE THE BREAST INCIDENT? BULLSHIT! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
eldog98 said: VoicesCarry said: Oh, and while you're all bitching Justin out, here's his side of the story.
Timberlake: Family Offended by Super Bowl 1 hour, 53 minutes ago LOS ANGELES - Justin Timberlake (news) said Wednesday that his own family was offended by his racy Super Bowl halftime duet with Janet Jackson (news), but he insisted he thought only her bustier would be revealed when he pulled on her costume, not her breast. Timberlake, in an interview with KCBS-TV outside the Staples Center, where he was rehearsing for Sunday's Grammy Awards, said he understood "how unfortunate this is." "I do understand that there were a lot of people that were completely offended by what happened, including my own family. And I think that's probably the part that's frustrating the most for me and it's completely, completely, completely, regrettable," he told KCBS. He also said he was frustrated that his character was being questioned. Timberlake said that before the show he got a call from Jackson and her choreographer saying they wanted to do a "costume reveal." "Now I was under the impression that what was going to be revealed ...was a red brassierre, bustier," he said. He said he did not have time to rehearse the move before taking the stage, and was shocked at the outcome. You remember the look on his face when he saw what had happened. What if she didn't tell him about the final outcome? His shocked look was a hell of a lot more genuine than hers. I think he thought he had genuinely fucked up.
[This message was edited Wed Feb 4 19:34:44 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] HIS FAMILY WAS OFFENDED BY THIS BUT THEY WEREN'T OFFENDED WHEN HE FOLLOWED JANET ALL AROUND THE STAGE SMACKING HER ON THE ASS AND THE 2 OF THEM GRINDING ON EACH OTHER BEFORE THE BREAST INCIDENT? BULLSHIT! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No but it's ok for him to sell Britney out at any chance?
His the biggest publicty hungry star this side of Courtney Love he just doesn't get on the bad side of the networks! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
twink69 said: No but it's ok for him to sell Britney out at any chance?
He totally sold Britney out. Nobody's denying that.His the biggest publicty hungry star this side of Courtney Love he just doesn't get on the bad side of the networks! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
here's a funny photo i found at janet-xone (i hope no one's mad at me for this):
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I saw that interview tonight. Justin, no matter how sorry he is, he still has a part to play in this and he can't get out of this easily. I will say that he really did looked very sad by this and it's a shame that this happened, intentional or not. I'm not a fan of "old Prince". I'm not a fan of "new Prince". I'm just a fan of Prince. Simple as that | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purplecam said: I saw that interview tonight. Justin, no matter how sorry he is, he still has a part to play in this and he can't get out of this easily. I will say that he really did looked very sad by this and it's a shame that this happened, intentional or not.
It's NOT a shame this happened. Janet's got a great right tit. She should do "Playboy" now. There are three sides to every story. My side, your side, and the truth. And no one is lying. Memories shared serve each one differently | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
twink69 said: No but it's ok for him to sell Britney out at any chance?
His the biggest publicty hungry star this side of Courtney Love he just doesn't get on the bad side of the networks! You couldn't be any further off if you tried.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
theVelvetRoper said: eldog98 said: VoicesCarry said: Oh, and while you're all bitching Justin out, here's his side of the story.
Timberlake: Family Offended by Super Bowl 1 hour, 53 minutes ago LOS ANGELES - Justin Timberlake (news) said Wednesday that his own family was offended by his racy Super Bowl halftime duet with Janet Jackson (news), but he insisted he thought only her bustier would be revealed when he pulled on her costume, not her breast. Timberlake, in an interview with KCBS-TV outside the Staples Center, where he was rehearsing for Sunday's Grammy Awards, said he understood "how unfortunate this is." "I do understand that there were a lot of people that were completely offended by what happened, including my own family. And I think that's probably the part that's frustrating the most for me and it's completely, completely, completely, regrettable," he told KCBS. He also said he was frustrated that his character was being questioned. Timberlake said that before the show he got a call from Jackson and her choreographer saying they wanted to do a "costume reveal." "Now I was under the impression that what was going to be revealed ...was a red brassierre, bustier," he said. He said he did not have time to rehearse the move before taking the stage, and was shocked at the outcome. You remember the look on his face when he saw what had happened. What if she didn't tell him about the final outcome? His shocked look was a hell of a lot more genuine than hers. I think he thought he had genuinely fucked up.
[This message was edited Wed Feb 4 19:34:44 PST 2004 by VoicesCarry] HIS FAMILY WAS OFFENDED BY THIS BUT THEY WEREN'T OFFENDED WHEN HE FOLLOWED JANET ALL AROUND THE STAGE SMACKING HER ON THE ASS AND THE 2 OF THEM GRINDING ON EACH OTHER BEFORE THE BREAST INCIDENT? BULLSHIT! Proof that people will hear what they want to. I think Justin is just as upset that Janet is hurt by this, not just him. Anyone who knows anything about Justin would know this. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Wow,this scandal has really gotten out of hand.I just heard that Janet has been banned from the Grammys.I finally saw the whole performance,and I liked it,but it was probably inappropriate for a Super Bowl audience.Still,I think it's a little harsh to ban Janet from the Grammys,especially when Justin still gets to go. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The whole "new implementation of a 5 second delay" sucks, too. This country is SOOO full of pseudo-prudes it ain't even funny. The spontaneity is slowly being completely being sucked out of everything. Its starting to feel like the U.S.S.A. Oh yeah, punish Janet but let Justin slide, huh? Don't make me get black & white on this topic. 
As a matter of fact...last year's Grammy's had some of the lowest ratings ever while the Mtv awards were watched by ZILLIONS! This little fiasco is going to draw attention to the Grammys. They should be THANKING Janet & Justin. The Grammys suck anyway.  [This message was edited Thu Feb 5 1:53:08 PST 2004 by BlaqueKnight] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Do you think CBD, VIACOM AND CLEARVIEW will now ban Janet??
I hear even Paula Abdul was not happy about the stunt Michael Jackson has said: "What's a tit?" | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Like David said, this whole damn thing has gotten WAY out of hand!! I mean, I really couldn't give a fuck! But to correct the original poster, it seems that Janet herself is probably pulling out of the Grammys herself, according to her publicist.
http://www.usatoday.com/l...tion_x.htm Read the second paragraph. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
 The whole thing is so stupid. But banning Janet and letting this whiny mofo on stage is pathetic!
Even if he had nothing to do with it, find another way to express yourself. He is so slow. I love it! BlueNote | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
