New topic
PrintableI have said to people for about 10 years now that I was afraid MJ wouldn't make it to 50, due to the horrid damage he has done to his body. Don't tell me he can do what he's done to himself and expect to live for long.
That being said, if he does go to jail, which is STILL unlikely (regardless of the merits of the charges), I doubt he'll be killed. Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016
Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
namepeace said: I have said to people for about 10 years now that I was afraid MJ wouldn't make it to 50, due to the horrid damage he has done to his body. Don't tell me he can do what he's done to himself and expect to live for long.
That being said, if he does go to jail, which is STILL unlikely (regardless of the merits of the charges), I doubt he'll be killed. Prisoners don't look kindly upon child killers/abusers and many of them end up being murdered. I'm sure he'd be pampered and protected though. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: theVelvetRoper said: I dunno, supposedly this judge is supposed to be a tough, no-nonsense type of judge, and Mike is already starting off on a bad foot. This trial may be different from all of the other celebrity trials because supposedly they have proof. They wouldn't put formal charges against him without it.
I really hope he didn't do it. I don't know, he's got issues. Well, O.J Simpson got acquitted, and they basically had an extremely solid case against him. I don't know how strong their evidence against MJ is, but it will have to be dazzling for any real action to be taken against him. How do you figure that the prosecution had an extremely solid case against OJ? Not in a court of law, maybe in the court of public opinion. The facts remain, no one saw either victim get killed, no one can place OJ at the scene of the crime, no one found a murder weapon, there wasn't any of the victims blood found at OJ's house, OJ volunteered to give a blood sample and the prosecution could not account for the entire sample that he submitted (which could explain why there were drops in his driveway and foyer), it was proven by blood splatter experts that the blood found on OJ's socks were planted (therefore it questions the validity of any evidence), and the star witness, Furhman, purjered himself on the stand! Not an extremely solid case in my opinion. And for the record, I would have found OJ INNOCENT in the CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (based on reasonable doubt)and GUILTY in the CIVIL TRIAL (based on proponderonse of evidence)! He presented a much stronger case in the criminal case than the civil. I did not weigh my decisiona on tabloids and CNN, just what was presented in court. (And before anyone says was I there, all court proceedings are public record and available for viewing unless sealed, which they are not.) | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The1AndOnlyAndTheOnly1 said: VoicesCarry said: theVelvetRoper said: I dunno, supposedly this judge is supposed to be a tough, no-nonsense type of judge, and Mike is already starting off on a bad foot. This trial may be different from all of the other celebrity trials because supposedly they have proof. They wouldn't put formal charges against him without it.
I really hope he didn't do it. I don't know, he's got issues. Well, O.J Simpson got acquitted, and they basically had an extremely solid case against him. I don't know how strong their evidence against MJ is, but it will have to be dazzling for any real action to be taken against him. How do you figure that the prosecution had an extremely solid case against OJ? Not in a court of law, maybe in the court of public opinion. The facts remain, no one saw either victim get killed, no one can place OJ at the scene of the crime, no one found a murder weapon, there wasn't any of the victims blood found at OJ's house, OJ volunteered to give a blood sample and the prosecution could not account for the entire sample that he submitted (which could explain why there were drops in his driveway and foyer), it was proven by blood splatter experts that the blood found on OJ's socks were planted (therefore it questions the validity of any evidence), and the star witness, Furhman, purjered himself on the stand! Not an extremely solid case in my opinion. And for the record, I would have found OJ INNOCENT in the CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS (based on reasonable doubt)and GUILTY in the CIVIL TRIAL (based on proponderonse of evidence)! He presented a much stronger case in the criminal case than the civil. I did not weigh my decisiona on tabloids and CNN, just what was presented in court. (And before anyone says was I there, all court proceedings are public record and available for viewing unless sealed, which they are not.) you saved me a lot of typing!  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SassyBritches said: i've only heard of these supposed video tapes from tabloid sources..
cnn reported about the existence. six tapes and cassettes they said. the content is still unknown. don't need no reefer, don't need cocaine
purple music does the same to my brain i'm high, so high | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purpleone said: SassyBritches said: i've only heard of these supposed video tapes from tabloid sources..
cnn reported about the existence. six tapes and cassettes they said. the content is still unknown. Someone leaks them to the internet in 5...4...3...2...1... | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tapes weren'r seized from Neverland, they were from the apartment of his videographer. MJ practically films his whole life. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: purpleone said: SassyBritches said: i've only heard of these supposed video tapes from tabloid sources..
cnn reported about the existence. six tapes and cassettes they said. the content is still unknown. Someone leaks them to the internet in 5...4...3...2...1... but the question is.. who'd wanna friggin' see it? don't need no reefer, don't need cocaine
purple music does the same to my brain i'm high, so high | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purpleone said: VoicesCarry said: purpleone said: SassyBritches said: i've only heard of these supposed video tapes from tabloid sources..
cnn reported about the existence. six tapes and cassettes they said. the content is still unknown. Someone leaks them to the internet in 5...4...3...2...1... but the question is.. who'd wanna friggin' see it? NAMBLA members  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: purpleone said: VoicesCarry said: purpleone said: SassyBritches said: i've only heard of these supposed video tapes from tabloid sources..
cnn reported about the existence. six tapes and cassettes they said. the content is still unknown. Someone leaks them to the internet in 5...4...3...2...1... but the question is.. who'd wanna friggin' see it? NAMBLA members | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: Prisoners don't look kindly upon child killers/abusers and many of them end up being murdered. I'm sure he'd be pampered and protected though.
Well, that's true, but some media reports speculate that his new ties to the Nation of Islam were forged in anticipation of possible jail time. They have a very strong presence in American prisons and would protect him.  My goodness, are we really talking about Michael Jackson needing protection in prison?Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016
Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
If MJ is going to jail, I couldn't care less what happens to him in there. If he's going, it will be because he then is proven guilty. How fellow inmates react to child-molesters is common knowledge, MJ should have thought of that beforehand! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Give me a break. More than likely (hopefully), MJ will be acquitted and the whole thing will disintergrate in a matter of months. 
If not, MJ won't even be put in "jail", but in a confined home: a shopping mall-sized cell with all the fixin's.  They did WHAT??!....
Org Sci-Fi Association | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
What if they make him try on the glove, and it doesn't fit?
Wait a minute, what if Mike and OJ swapped gloves 
 and true love lives on lollipops and crisps | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DavidEye said: I really really WANT to believe that MJ is innocent,but it gets harder and harder to do that.This case is so tragic and unfortunate.Even if he is innocent and gets acquitted,so much damage has been done.There would be no point in making a new CD after all this.He should just sell his Beatles catalog and go retire somewhere.
Davideye, you took the words right out of my mouth. I'm having a hard time believing that he would sexually abuse a child, but I've heard that there is solid evidence against him that will come out at trial. His publicity stunt the other day was sickening. Watching him dance on top of the vehicle was enough to make me want to bitch-slap him for hours. He is living in a complete dream world. Guilty or not, he is doing more damage to himself by acting like such an idiot and so non-chalant about what is happening. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
CB - you always know how to put a smile on my face | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
kisscamille said: DavidEye said: I really really WANT to believe that MJ is innocent,but it gets harder and harder to do that.This case is so tragic and unfortunate.Even if he is innocent and gets acquitted,so much damage has been done.There would be no point in making a new CD after all this.He should just sell his Beatles catalog and go retire somewhere.
Davideye, you took the words right out of my mouth. I'm having a hard time believing that he would sexually abuse a child, but I've heard that there is solid evidence against him that will come out at trial. His publicity stunt the other day was sickening. Watching him dance on top of the vehicle was enough to make me want to bitch-slap him for hours. He is living in a complete dream world. Guilty or not, he is doing more damage to himself by acting like such an idiot and so non-chalant about what is happening. I agree. He pisses me off that he acts above the law. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
|
If Michael goes to jail>>It's Good 4 the children!!
It's Funny...no?
|
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
