Author | Message |
e true hollywood story on janet i should've known better than to watch it...i should've known it would be a lot of rumour mixed with a little truth...i should've known to switch the channel when the camera turned to latoya for info. i just love janet so much i had to watch! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
tell me about it. what was said?
anything good? juicy stories? what? i heard there were a few stories about janet and renee. tell me please? don't need no reefer, don't need cocaine
purple music does the same to my brain i'm high, so high | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
purpleone said: tell me about it. what was said?
anything good? juicy stories? what? i heard there were a few stories about janet and renee. tell me please? it ws the same old tabloid mess... was janet linked to justin timberlake? is janet about to marry jermaine dupri? do janet and michael get along? why did janet and latoya fight? all that same old shit. they lightly dealt with her boughts of depression, which is what i really wanted to hear more about because she pulled herself out of it. but they didn't stay on that too much. instead, they focused on rumours and the like. check the eonline.com website to see another airdate...it comes on again soon. just for the love of janet its worth watching...but don't hold out for much. most of it is old news that most fans already know and the rest is just a pack of rumours. some very cool conversations with jimmy jamm though...and beautiful images of miss jackson! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm glad I missed it...I love Janet too much to see E! trying to dig up the messy on her! Every minute of last night is on my face today.... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Correction: it should've been dubbed "E! & National Enquirer presents... Janet Jackson:Our Hollywood Story"
What was so corny about the special was that they were constructing rumors and gossip into fact. A few things made me gag during this interview... 1. The fact that journalists and OP/ED columnists gave their "OPINIONS" on sales figures and public reactions. One journalist said that the Michael/Janet single Scream "bombed" because of lack of public interest. Hello..."Scream" was one of the biggest singles of the 90s and was the highest first-week debuting single for its time. Plus, it was played on the radio constantly. The video is still played on specials and featured in "Greats" lists. It was far from a flop. The journalist that E! interviewed would have you to believe that it was a commercial failure -- he's just culling from his own rememberances. 2. The special was so hell-bent upon pitting Janet AGAINST Michael. Janet and Michael are siblings, the love is there and will always be there. E! constructed their relationship as one of jealousy and competition. What was stupid about the closing of the special was that they summed up Janet's career as "the little Jackson girl surpassing her bigger, more famous brother." Sweetheart, Michael Jackson is STILL the biggest selling entertainer ... ever. <--period. There is NOOO WAYY any artist can achieve what MJ did in 30 years. MJ still has the biggest selling album of all time. There is no way my girl Janet eclipsed MJ sales wise. But the E! special would lead you to believe otherwise. 3. A random Janet biographer left his opinions about Janet and Rene's marriage. He said that "Rene did everything for Janet and was always there for her." Hmmm...excuse me, homeboy, did you live with Janet & Rene? Was he in the bedroom late nights getting the actual play by play? NO. Homedude relied on magazine clippings, allegiations made in court documents that never went to trial, etc. He failed to mention anything about Rene's infidelity, controlling nature or his "honey,lemme-manage-your-money" syndrome. 4. Why was the bulk of the special based around allegations lifted from ancient/outdated/skewed court documents. Rene eventually dropped the case and it never went to trial. 5. What's even more goofy is that they were trying to devulge the themes of Janet's music and the inner workings of her art and they didn't even have a clue as to what she was really singing about. Some random entertainment columnist said that All For You was basically "All For Rene." WRONG. Janet wasn't even operating on that frequency. It's a happy, optimistic record. It was funny how Jimmy Jam had to constantly keep correcting the interviewers and naysayers. "Son Of A Gun" does not mention Rene's name. The only song remotely implicating Rene was "Truth." 6. The special made it seem like Rene played an integral role in the shaping of Janet's music and career and was instrumental for her success: False. Did Rene snag Janet the $80 mil contract? Did Rene teach Janet how to dance? Was Rene's a** in the booth singing, doing background work, engineering, heavily songwriting, mixing...NO! Flyte Tyme did all that. Rene was only included when Janet asked for Ok, so the dude wrote a few lines in a song or two, directed one video (at Janet's request) and shot some mediocre publicity photos (at Janet's request). It was JANET that made Rene. Janet was the one who gave the homeboy some work, and a name, in the first place. Why aren't the photography calls ringing for Rene if he was so important? Shouldn't he rival Jam & Lewis by now if he was such a studio whiz? A lot of these celebrity bios and features recently have been very sloppy. Whatever happened to "objectionable journalism." Journalism used to be a medium striving for the truth, but it seems in the entertainment game, they're just stuck on sensationalism. Unless it's on CNN or from the lips of the A.P., I don't believe anything. Damn, I had a lot to say. LOL. [This message was edited Mon Oct 20 14:48:41 PDT 2003 by JANFAN4L] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Amen @ JANFAN!
Although Rene did play an integral part in her career. I mean Whose hands were they on the 'janet' cover? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JANFAN4L said: Correction: it should've been dubbed "E! & National Enquirer presents... Janet Jackson:Our Hollywood Story"
What was so corny about the special was that they were constructing rumors and gossip into fact. A few things made me gag during this interview... 1. The fact that journalists and OP/ED columnists gave their "OPINIONS" on sales figures and public reactions. One journalist said that the Michael/Janet single Scream "bombed" because of lack of public interest. Hello..."Scream" was one of the biggest singles of the 90s and was the highest first-week debuting single for its time. Plus, it was played on the radio constantly. The video is still played on specials and featured in "Greats" lists. It was far from a flop. The journalist that E! interviewed would have you to believe that it was a commercial failure -- he's just culling from his own rememberances. 2. The special was so hell-bent upon pitting Janet AGAINST Michael. Janet and Michael are siblings, the love is there and will always be there. E! constructed their relationship as one of jealousy and competition. What was stupid about the closing of the special was that they summed up Janet's career as "the little Jackson girl surpassing her bigger, more famous brother." Sweetheart, Michael Jackson is STILL the biggest selling entertainer ... ever. <--period. There is NOOO WAYY any artist can achieve what MJ did in 30 years. MJ still has the biggest selling album of all time. There is no way my girl Janet eclipsed MJ sales wise. But the E! special would lead you to believe otherwise. 3. A random Janet biographer left his opinions about Janet and Rene's marriage. He said that "Rene did everything for Janet and was always there for her." Hmmm...excuse me, homeboy, did you live with Janet & Rene? Was he in the bedroom late nights getting the actual play by play? NO. Homedude relied on magazine clippings, allegiations made in court documents that never went to trial, etc. He failed to mention anything about Rene's infidelity, controlling nature or his "honey,lemme-manage-your-money" syndrome. 4. Why was the bulk of the special based around allegations lifted from ancient/outdated/skewed court documents. Rene eventually dropped the case and it never went to trial. 5. What's even more goofy is that they were trying to devulge the themes of Janet's music and the inner workings of her art and they didn't even have a clue as to what she was really singing about. Some random entertainment columnist said that All For You was basically "All For Rene." WRONG. Janet wasn't even operating on that frequency. It's a happy, optimistic record. It was funny how Jimmy Jam had to constantly keep correcting the interviewers and naysayers. "Son Of A Gun" does not mention Rene's name. The only song remotely implicating Rene was "Truth." 6. The special made it seem like Rene played an integral role in the shaping of Janet's music and career and was instrumental for her success: False. Did Rene snag Janet the $80 mil contract? Did Rene teach Janet how to dance? Was Rene's a** in the booth singing, doing background work, engineering, heavily songwriting, mixing...NO! Flyte Tyme did all that. Rene was only included when Janet asked for Ok, so the dude wrote a few lines in a song or two, directed one video (at Janet's request) and shot some mediocre publicity photos (at Janet's request). It was JANET that made Rene. Janet was the one who gave the homeboy some work, and a name, in the first place. Why aren't the photography calls ringing for Rene if he was so important? Shouldn't he rival Jam & Lewis by now if he was such a studio whiz? A lot of these celebrity bios and features recently have been very sloppy. Whatever happened to "objectionable journalism." Journalism used to be a medium striving for the truth, but it seems in the entertainment game, they're just stuck on sensationalism. Unless it's on CNN or from the lips of the A.P., I don't believe anything. Damn, I had a lot to say. LOL. [This message was edited Mon Oct 20 14:48:41 PDT 2003 by JANFAN4L] i couldn't have worded it any better! how about that crazy journalist who said something along the lines of "well, if the relationship (between j and rene) was kept so secret, you have to wonder ho wgood the relationship was". what the hell kind of summation is that? what...because she wanted privacy that means her relationship was bad? so awful. and yeah, the whole bit about scream being a flop was out of this world! it was on mtv non stop and on the radio 24/7! everybody loved it...even people who didn't care for michael at the time seemed to dig it. and clubs played the hell outta that remix! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I agree with y'all more knowledgeable fans.
But after all. It is E! The station that gives the Rivers long-term employment should not be trusted to give credible advice. But doggone it . . . that Brooke . . . Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016
Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
They did get a lot of things mixed up in that special, but I didn't think it was as bad as others I have seen. The shit about Rene didn't even need to be in there. He was useless. I loved how Jimmy Jam said "I never saw him in the actual writing process with a pin" or something like that. I took that as if he wrote 37 songs Jimmy never saw him write them | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JANFAN4L said: What was stupid about the closing of the special was that they summed up Janet's career as "the little Jackson girl surpassing her bigger, more famous brother." Sweetheart, Michael Jackson is STILL the biggest selling entertainer ... ever. <--period. There is NOOO WAYY any artist can achieve what MJ did in 30 years. MJ still has the biggest selling album of all time. There is no way my girl Janet eclipsed MJ sales wise. But the E! special would lead you to believe otherwise.
I didn't see the special, but I would interpret that as meaning that Janet today can sell more records than Michael. She is the more marketable and popular Jackson. Certainly, she hasn't surpassed his overall efforts, but she's been the more popular Jackson ever since 1993, I'd say. Oh, Janet DID beat Michael in one category. "Thriller" featured a record 7 top 10 singles, but Janet topped it with "Rhythm Nation," which features 7 top FIVE singles. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh, Janet DID beat Michael in one category. "Thriller" featured a record 7 top 10 singles, but Janet topped it with "Rhythm Nation," which features 7 top FIVE singles.
7 Top 5 US singles but zero Top 10 UK singles And Invincible actually sold the same as All For You worldwide, without multiple singles or a tour. Janet's done so well for herself, but she's kind of a "local" artist with a couple of select big markets that she's conquered. Outside the US and Japan her status is a different story. [This message was edited Tue Oct 21 0:58:49 PDT 2003 by Ellie] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Ellie said: Oh, Janet DID beat Michael in one category. "Thriller" featured a record 7 top 10 singles, but Janet topped it with "Rhythm Nation," which features 7 top FIVE singles.
7 Top 5 US singles but zero Top 10 UK singles And Invincible actually sold the same as All For You worldwide, without multiple singles or a tour. Janet's done so well for herself, but she's kind of a "local" artist with a couple of select big markets that she's conquered. Outside the US and Japan her status is a different story. [This message was edited Tue Oct 21 0:58:49 PDT 2003 by Ellie] STOP PITTING MICHAEL AGAINST JANET! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I was ssooo waiting to see this. But all that it did was rehash old info. I actually fell asleep on it. Why didn't they dig into her reasons for depression? It was so "surface". Did it really tell us anything that we didn't already know? What was the purpose for it? **************************************************
Pull ya cell phone out and call yo next of kin...we 'bout to get funky......2,3 come on ya'll | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Did they mention the "baby rumor" from the 80s? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DavidEye said: Did they mention the "baby rumor" from the 80s?
DOes ANYONE believe that? So so so scandalous. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |