Well she is back again...

http://www.scottornot.com...stone1.jpg

And again...


http://www.scottornot.com...stone2.jpg


I can hear the comments already

"the boobs are fake"
"its airbrushed"
"Her ass is flat"
"she looks likes she is 10"
"damn thats hot"

My comments are all of the above.


But I don't understand why she doesn't just pose for Playboy, or Penthouse for that matter and just get it over with. I mean damn, every pic I see of her she's got less and less clothes on and she's posing like such a porn star.

It's only a matter of time, and hell, we've all seen pretty much everything of her anyway by now. I think she's scared that people will finally realize that she can't sing for shit, actually has no talent, and will be exposed as a fraud, so feels she needs to do all these photo shoots to stay relevant in the news.

My comments follow below:

"Oh my god I would bang her like a screendoor in a tornado."

Any questions?

minneapolisgenius said:

But that is he point with alot of the industry. Look all around especially from the female industry, Christina even though can sing did the same thing to draw attention to the CD. Its harder for females to be taken seriously in the indstry unless your are norah or erykah etc, it really comes down to the image. But this is nothing new, Britney is the New Madonna so to speak, she uses the Media and Press to get her word and image out there. Madonnas cd sold more just because she kissed Britney, which goes to show tha it really isnt about music anymore. I suggest everyone read the back of the Annie Lennox cd and her remarks about image. Sure I think Britney is hot, but i think she is so hot that I dont even care what she sings, now thats sad, but thats the way the industry is, maybe one day talent will rule again...maybe.

Oh, I got a comment: Pathetic...I'd still do her, though. Maybe me and Otan can tagteam her.

It's very obvious that Britney is a beautiful young lady with a great body, but why so many people buy her records is beyond me. She can't sing at all and she doesn't play any instruments AND she can't act either, so why does she get so much attention? Are we all so hung up on the beautiful people that we don't even care anymore whether someone has talent or not as long as they look good?

She's shaved.

lastdecember said:

Their plan is working then! Draw attention away from the music, so people will watch and buy everything a music "star" puts out even if it happens to be crap.

bananacologne said:

I JUST got it.

"ma lord!"-Prince Housequake

Britney can eat my poo

How about THAT

Britney has to watch her weight; so she cannot eat your poo.

I don't want her eating my poo anyway. I was just feeling hostile and wanted to harsh on someone.

Anyway, according to all the spam e-mail I get, Britney's more of a bukkake girl anyway.

I think there's some busy orgers reading this thread right about now.

Well, it least it looks like there's an article on Bowie to look forward to.

Anxiety said:

LMFAO!!!
Yay Bukkake!

ugh, she looks like hell from the neck up,

and yeah, of course she's doing this. People will respond a lot better to her when she poses on rollingstone topless with a headline where she talks about justin, as opposed to just her..umm.."music"


go on, britney, pimp that new album, pimp it good!

Sweet Fancy Moses!

Does she like sing or something. I haven't heard anything from her in a few years yet you see her all the time. I actually thought some of the stuff from the last album wasn't bad (but I, like most people, didn't buy it). Who would even know that she has an album out. I haven't heard the first single on the radio (which wasn't very kind to that last album). She should just do the Hilton Sisters thing of being famous for being famous and just party all the time and look hot. I think she looks better than Paris!
[This message was edited Wed Sep 10 19:02:08 PDT 2003 by VinnyM27]

She has gotten Pimped&Humped by the Industry&Yet She still is finding a way to Sell herself.we shall see.She is TEAR-RI-BLE! now if the Fellas say it real Slow then you get it.TEAR-RI-BLE!

lastdecember said:

oh shit!

i dont think teh criticisim here should b on Britney.

it should b on RS.
who,back in 1998 said of Prince that they wouldnt put him on the cover because he wasnt ,at the time, influential musically,culturally & wasnt successful.

now,Britney,she aint had a recording put out in over a year.
she aint influencing anyone as the whole boyband/pop gil thing is starting 2 fade out just a tad.
& culturally...well yeah ok girls r still dressing like teases.

but it makes u wonder.

but dang she looks hott in those photos.
she'll always be a spunk*rat 2 me.
just hope the new album is another cool pop album like 'Britney' was.

http://www.scottornot.com...stone2.jpg

...well, i say, GOT-DAMN!...

Joshy said:

Fact is, even in 1998, Prince was, or was rapidly becoming a C-List celebrity. He hadn't had a hit record since The Most Beautiful Girl in the World 5 years earlier, had a haircut like a 60 year old librarian, and released that piece of junk New Power Soul CD. Like her or not, Britney Spears is coming at pop culture in every direction, like cockroaches on sugar in a South Bronx kitchen. She's young, she's pretty, she's blonde, she's not very bright. That type will always beat out has-beens like Prince for magazine covers. She also is still selling millions of records - her last, according to the article sold "only" 2.2 million. What was the last platinum album Prince released? And she has the backing of a major label, and the collaboration of talents like Moby and The Matrix that bring her deservedly more attention than some religiously reborn bigot who now charges his fans for the "privilege" of buying his latest supermarket jazz snoozefest music and DVDs with the production quality of an amateur bootleg. Prince will never make the cover of any magazine just because he's your hero. There has to be a reason with some actual validity.

bananacologne said:

Joshy said:

Yeah, and the Olsen Twins are really doing a lot influencing music and culture as well.

>Britney's more of a bukkake girl anyway.<

At the risk of sounding completely ignorant or inexperienced, what exactly are you referring to with the word "bukkake"?

jtgillia said:

Something they wouldn't know of if it wasn't for Howard Stern.

Wonder if she'd get a cover and lead article if she was dressed conservatively and only wanting to discuss her music.