Has anybody compared the sound of original Micheal Jackson Dangerous CD (1991)to the remastered version that came out in 2001?

There is no bonus tracks included with the 2001 version so it may not be worth buying if you have the original. How much better is the sound? Examples?

Much louder.

Ellie said:

less hiss.

ALL the remastered cds are incredible
MUCH better sound clarity and the volume levels have been upped

Dangerous was meant to be the only 2cd remastered issue in the series as it's track time doesn't allow it to fit anything extra on the single disc - alas the 2cd idea was scrapped - shame, ohh to hear those demos!

Great lp

It's louder and sounds a lot crisper and cleaner.

You know,I've been contemplating buying the remastered version,but the only thing that always stops me is the fact that it contains no bonus tracks.Y'all know how much I love "bonus tracks"...lol...I guess they didn't have any room to add more tracks?

I wish they would remaster History (Disc 2) and release it on its own 'cos the sound quality is quite poor compared to the re-releases, BOTD & Invincible.