independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > ‘Michael’ Over the Moon With Record $97M U.S. Opening, $219M Globally
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 04/27/26 8:30pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

‘Michael’ Over the Moon With Record $97M U.S. Opening, $219M Globally

by Pamela McClintock • April 27, 2026 • The Hollywood Reporter
153_PBW_1180_CIN_v0018_COMP_g_r709.1025_rgb-H-2026.jpg
Jaafar Jackson as a younger Michael Jackson in Lionsgate's biopic of the late King of Pop.
.
In another win for a non-franchise title, Antoine Fuqua’s Michael Jackson biopic pulled off a moon walk for the ages at the worldwide box office with a record-smashing $97.2 million domestic opening and $121.6 million foreign launch for a global blast off of $218.8 million, according to weekend actuals.
.
Final weekend numbers show the movie coming in slightly ahead of Sunday’s estimated $97 domestic launch and $120.4 foreign debut.
.
Michael, beating expectations in North America by nearly $30 million, boasts the biggest domestic opening of all time for any biopic after passing up Oppenheimer ($80 million), not adjusted for inflation. And the Lionsgate movie eclipsed Bohemian Rhapsody to rank as the top worldwide opening for a music biopic. Universal, a powerhouse on the international front, is releasing the film overseas on behalf of Lionsgate.
.
Heading into the weekend, producer Graham King and Lionsgate never imagined Michael had a shot at becoming the King of All Biopics in terms of its North America opening, since even the most bullish tracking showed it coming in at around $70 million. Instead, they were focused on breaking the record-setting bow of Straight Outta Compton and ruling the music biopic category. But by Friday night, it became clear the movie was going to approach $100 million domestically after becoming the latest title to benefit from keeping its storyline family-friendly and appealing to those who simply wanted to celebrate Jackson’s music.
.
Other milestones: It marks Lionsgate’s best debut since the pandemic, and its sixth-biggest ever behind four Hunger Games installments and the final Twillight film. And it danced past the opening of 2026 sleeper hit Project Hail Mary to mark the second-biggest opening of the year, both in North America and globally, behind Universal and Illumination’s The Super Mario Galaxy Movie.
.
Overseas, where Jackson is an even bigger draw, Michael is likewise off to a record-breaking start with $121.6 million from 84 markets, including $10.7 million in previews and early screenings. In 63 of those — including the U.K., Germany, France, Italy, Germany, Brazil, Australia, Spain, Netherlands and South Asia — it sent a new benchmark for the music biopic genre.
.
“Above all, it reflects the tremendous outpouring of love and affection from moviegoers around the world, underscoring the strength and vitality of the theatrical box office. If you give audiences what they want, they will come,” Lionsgate Motion Picture Group Chair Adam Fogelson said, in addition to thanking all involved in making the film a reality.
.
Michael opened in virtually every corner of the globe; one exception is Japan, where Jackson’s fanbase is enormous. The 2011 Michael Jackson posthumous concert doc This Is It earned $196 million at the foreign office; Japan’s contribution was $57 million. Kino and Lionsgate have set a June release date.
.
Endorsed by the Jackson estate, Michael faced its fair share of challenges in reaching the big screen. It hit major delays when the decision was made by producer Graham King and Lionsgate to spend tens of millions reworking the third act to avoid mention of the allegations of child sexual abuse that engulfed the King of Pop in scandal before his death in 2009. All told, the final budget of $200 million appears worth it. Universal is handling the film overseas on behalf of Lionsgate, save for Japan.
.
Phenomenal world-of-mouth is more than making up for generally lousy reviews (its Rotten Tomatoes critics score is 40 percent).
.
Exit polls quickly revealed Michael isn’t just appointment viewing for hard-core fans and that strong word-of-mouth is more than making for one of the biggest divides in recent memory between critics and audiences: The film is graced with 97 percent audience score on Rotten Tomatoes — the best ever for the genre; PostTrak exit scores are in the low 90s and a definite recommend of 85 percent, levels rarely seen. And while it didn’t earn a perfect grade on CinemaScore, it did earn a good-enough A-.
.
Michael‘s success is a result of playing across all ethnicities and age groups. While it did over-index among Black moviegoers (38 percent), Latinos accounted for a sizable 26 percent of the audience, followed by white moviegoers at 26 percent, according to PostTrak.
.
And the following age stats are a distributor’s are a dream come true, but rarely do. Moviegoers over the age of 55 rarely turn out for opening weekend; teenagers can be just as elusive. In this case, those 55 and older made up anywhere from 15 to percent of ticket buyers, while teens made up 6 percent to 7 percent (believe me, those are excellent numbers). Gen Zers and younger Millennials also turned out in force, with those between the ages of 18 and 34 making up 45 percent to 50 percent of the opening-weekend audience. But those over the age of 35 almost matched those numbers, or 44 percent to 48 percent, including those over the age of 55 who were previously mentioned.
.
Elsewhere, Super Mario Galaxy is hardly complaining about coming in second ruling the roost for weeks, since it’s now focused on becoming the first film of the year to join the billion-dollar club after finishing Sunday with a global total of $871 million.
.
Nor is Hail Mary feeling sorry for itself as it racked up more milestones in its sixth outing when crossing the $300 million mark domestically and $600 million globally to finish Sunday with a worldwide total of $613.3 million. In North America, it placed third with $13 million after falling 36 percent, the lowest decline of any pic in the top 10.
.
From New Line, Lee Cronin’s The Mummy fell 58 percent to $5.6 million for a fourth-place finish in its second weekend for a 10-day domestic total of $23.5 million. The pic, produced by Blumhouse and Atomic Monster, is scaring up more business overseas, where it grossed another $12.4 million for a foreign tally of $42 million. Its global tally is $65.5 million against a reportedly modest budget of $22 million.
.
At the specialty box office, A24’s edgy and daring The Drama is an official sleeper hit after opening to so-so numbers amid solid, but not spectacular, reviews and audience scores. But word-of-mouth began spreading among Gen Zers, and the movie, starring Zendaya and Robert Pattinson, became a “thing.” And with many distracted attention to Michael’s opening, The Drama quietly cleared the $100 million globally, including a foreign war chest of $67 million and $44.8 million domestically (it rounded out the top in North America with $2.6 million.)
.
A24, unfortunately, couldn’t trumpet The Drama, considering its latest movie, Mother Mary, all-out bombed in its nationwide expansion. The David Lowery-directed film, whose cast is led by Anne Hathaway, Michaela Coel, FKA Twigs, Hunger Schafer and more, opened in ninth place with $1.1 million from 1,103 theaters.
.
Mother Mary‘s timing isn’t great, at least for Hathaway, since it arrives in theaters just one week before The Devil Wears Prada 2 kicks off the summer box office. However, no one is coming down too hard on Hathaway for the failure of Lowery’s horror-thriller pic about an aging pop star to resonate with audiences. Prada 2 is tracking to be a hit of record-breaking proportions and reunites Hathaway with Meryl Streep, Stanley Tucci and Emily Blunt.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 04/27/26 8:37pm

SoulAlive

I want to see it,but I’ll wait til it comes to streaming.I’m too lazy to go to a movie theatre these days biggrin
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 04/27/26 10:24pm

pdiddy2011

Was absolutely incredible in IMAX. As noted ad nauseum at this point, there was hardly anything hard hitting or controversial discussed about the man - just an artistic highlights sweep from 6-year-old Michael through the start of the Bad tour. Jaafar's dancing (and full metamorphosis into his uncle) was both spectacular and magnificant, and it was so up-close, with no room for cut screens or doubles.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 04/28/26 6:17pm

ShellyMcG

I don't have any issues with the movie not delving into the allegations and all that stuff. It only covers the first half of his career so I wouldn't expect it to feature that stuff. Given that his family are producers on the movie I was expecting it to be even more watered down so I was surprised by the scenes of Joseph beating the kids and stuff. I still think they let him off the hook for how much of a scumbag he was but still, credit where it's due.

Overall I think it's a good movie. It could have done with being another 30 minutes longer because it feels like a lot of stuff is left out just so the movie can get back to the performances. But the performances are genuinely brilliant and both actors playing Michael Jackson deserve huge credit. It's not going to receive any nominations at next year's Oscars but it should. Jaafar and Colman Domingo absolutely give performances worthy of at least a nomination.

There will inevitably be a part 2 and I'd expect that to go deeper into the controversial side of Michael Jackson (well, as deep as they can legally go) but I have to admit that I'm far less interested in that.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 04/28/26 8:46pm

pdiddy2011

ShellyMcG said:

I don't have any issues with the movie not delving into the allegations and all that stuff. It only covers the first half of his career so I wouldn't expect it to feature that stuff. Given that his family are producers on the movie I was expecting it to be even more watered down so I was surprised by the scenes of Joseph beating the kids and stuff. I still think they let him off the hook for how much of a scumbag he was but still, credit where it's due. Overall I think it's a good movie. It could have done with being another 30 minutes longer because it feels like a lot of stuff is left out just so the movie can get back to the performances. But the performances are genuinely brilliant and both actors playing Michael Jackson deserve huge credit. It's not going to receive any nominations at next year's Oscars but it should. Jaafar and Colman Domingo absolutely give performances worthy of at least a nomination. There will inevitably be a part 2 and I'd expect that to go deeper into the controversial side of Michael Jackson (well, as deep as they can legally go) but I have to admit that I'm far less interested in that.


Agreed. Even though it was just a softball expose of a movie, it was quite noticable that Janet was completely missing - as was Diana Ross. Missing is being modest - they weren't even mentioned in the film. eek

I completely agree that Part 2 is coming, but I'm already wondering who else is going to threaten legal action that might further water down the story. (Not to mention any outstanding nda's...)

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 04/28/26 8:54pm

ShellyMcG

pdiddy2011 said:



ShellyMcG said:


I don't have any issues with the movie not delving into the allegations and all that stuff. It only covers the first half of his career so I wouldn't expect it to feature that stuff. Given that his family are producers on the movie I was expecting it to be even more watered down so I was surprised by the scenes of Joseph beating the kids and stuff. I still think they let him off the hook for how much of a scumbag he was but still, credit where it's due. Overall I think it's a good movie. It could have done with being another 30 minutes longer because it feels like a lot of stuff is left out just so the movie can get back to the performances. But the performances are genuinely brilliant and both actors playing Michael Jackson deserve huge credit. It's not going to receive any nominations at next year's Oscars but it should. Jaafar and Colman Domingo absolutely give performances worthy of at least a nomination. There will inevitably be a part 2 and I'd expect that to go deeper into the controversial side of Michael Jackson (well, as deep as they can legally go) but I have to admit that I'm far less interested in that.


Agreed. Even though it was just a softball expose of a movie, it was quite noticable that Janet was completely missing - as was Diana Ross. Missing is being modest - they weren't even mentioned in the film. eek

I completely agree that Part 2 is coming, but I'm already wondering who else is going to threaten legal action that might further water down the story. (Not to mention any outstanding nda's...)



Yeah not even mentioning Janet Jackson was a bit weird. I get that she wanted no part of it and didn't want to be featured but surely they could have name checked her or just said something like "oh, Janet is out of town at the moment" or something to explain her absence. And who knows, maybe they did have something like that in one of the scenes that were cut?
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 04/29/26 7:16am

rudeboy4711

I walked away thinking it was cool in terms of watching a highlight reel of key performances even though important events that led to those moments were left out (like MJ not wanting to be in Motown 25, Berry Gordy convincing him, MJ agreeing to it with the caveat that he gets a solo performance). Them performing Never Can Say Goodbye before they got the Motown deal was weird lol

It was cool, but I’d rather see MJs real videos/performances and The Jacksons: An American Dream is better if you’re looking for a more nuanced insight into the lives of MJ and his family.
 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 04/29/26 1:42pm

nextedition

avatar

SoulAlive said:

I want to see it,but I’ll wait til it comes to streaming.I’m too lazy to go to a movie theatre these days biggrin

Hearing the music and seeing the concert footage in IMAX really makes it special, Im not sure if i would have felt the same watching it at home.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 04/29/26 1:45pm

nextedition

avatar

I enjoyed it a lot, it was sometimes magic.

As a movie it has some flaws i think, like people alrerady said, it didn't mention Janet and Diana Ross.

In also didnt like they started all of a sudden with Bad, I would have loved to see something about the poces of making Bad.

There was no buying Neverland, no We are the world.

But....it was the MJ I love to see, you `can really enjoy the madness of the 80's.

 Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply   New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > ‘Michael’ Over the Moon With Record $97M U.S. Opening, $219M Globally