| Author | Message |
‘Michael’ Over the Moon With Record $97M U.S. Opening, $219M Globally by Pamela McClintock • April 27, 2026 • The Hollywood Reporter You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I want to see it,but I’ll wait til it comes to streaming.I’m too lazy to go to a movie theatre these days | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Was absolutely incredible in IMAX. As noted ad nauseum at this point, there was hardly anything hard hitting or controversial discussed about the man - just an artistic highlights sweep from 6-year-old Michael through the start of the Bad tour. Jaafar's dancing (and full metamorphosis into his uncle) was both spectacular and magnificant, and it was so up-close, with no room for cut screens or doubles. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't have any issues with the movie not delving into the allegations and all that stuff. It only covers the first half of his career so I wouldn't expect it to feature that stuff. Given that his family are producers on the movie I was expecting it to be even more watered down so I was surprised by the scenes of Joseph beating the kids and stuff. I still think they let him off the hook for how much of a scumbag he was but still, credit where it's due. Overall I think it's a good movie. It could have done with being another 30 minutes longer because it feels like a lot of stuff is left out just so the movie can get back to the performances. But the performances are genuinely brilliant and both actors playing Michael Jackson deserve huge credit. It's not going to receive any nominations at next year's Oscars but it should. Jaafar and Colman Domingo absolutely give performances worthy of at least a nomination. There will inevitably be a part 2 and I'd expect that to go deeper into the controversial side of Michael Jackson (well, as deep as they can legally go) but I have to admit that I'm far less interested in that. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
pdiddy2011 said:
Yeah not even mentioning Janet Jackson was a bit weird. I get that she wanted no part of it and didn't want to be featured but surely they could have name checked her or just said something like "oh, Janet is out of town at the moment" or something to explain her absence. And who knows, maybe they did have something like that in one of the scenes that were cut? | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I walked away thinking it was cool in terms of watching a highlight reel of key performances even though important events that led to those moments were left out (like MJ not wanting to be in Motown 25, Berry Gordy convincing him, MJ agreeing to it with the caveat that he gets a solo performance). Them performing Never Can Say Goodbye before they got the Motown deal was weird lol It was cool, but I’d rather see MJs real videos/performances and The Jacksons: An American Dream is better if you’re looking for a more nuanced insight into the lives of MJ and his family. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hearing the music and seeing the concert footage in IMAX really makes it special, Im not sure if i would have felt the same watching it at home. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I enjoyed it a lot, it was sometimes magic.
As a movie it has some flaws i think, like people alrerady said, it didn't mention Janet and Diana Ross. In also didnt like they started all of a sudden with Bad, I would have loved to see something about the poces of making Bad. There was no buying Neverland, no We are the world.
But....it was the MJ I love to see, you `can really enjoy the madness of the 80's. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
nextedition said: I enjoyed it a lot, it was sometimes magic.
As a movie it has some flaws i think, like people alrerady said, it didn't mention Janet and Diana Ross. In also didnt like they started all of a sudden with Bad, I would have loved to see something about the poces of making Bad. There was no buying Neverland, no We are the world.
But....it was the MJ I love to see, you `can really enjoy the madness of the 80's. I guess that Part 2 will probably start with the creation of Bad. They have to feature Smooth Criminal and that whole Moonwalker period. So I'm not too cut up about that stuff being left out of this particular film because it will definitely be part of the next one. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SoulAlive said: I want to see it,but I’ll wait til it comes to streaming.I’m too lazy to go to a movie theatre these days I'd definitely recommend seeing it in the cinema. Some movies just work better on the big screen and this is one of them. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I can't see them making a part 2. The music wouldn't be nearly as good and you'd have to mention all of the controversies in some fashion since it dominated his life and career later on. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
whodknee said:
I can't see them making a part 2. The music wouldn't be nearly as good and you'd have to mention all of the controversies in some fashion since it dominated his life and career later on. This movie has them swimming in money like Scrooge McDuck. They're definitely going to make a second movie. I think the only debate is whether they're ONLY going to make a part 2 or if they'll turn it into a trilogy. Michael technically ends in 1988 but we see nothing from 1985 onwards because there's a time jump from the Jackson's show in 84 to the Bad tour in 88. So Part 2 will likely begin around 1985 and show the creation of Bad and all that goes with that era. Smooth Criminal, Moonwalker, the purchase of Neverland, all that stuff. Then we'll see the downfall. The allegations, the surgeries, the failed marriage to Lisa Marie Presley, etc. So whereas Part 1 was about his rise to superstardom, I'd say Part 2 will deal with his fall from grace and probably end around 2001 with his performance at Madison Square Garden and what was intended to be his big comeback with the Invincible album. Then Part 3 will deal with his attempts at a comeback and how the fresh allegations kind of put the final nail in his professional coffin and how he ended up working himself into an early grave by attempting the This Is It concerts. Now, I know from a casual fan perspective there would be a lot less interest in this kind of movie. Part 2 obviously has everything from Bad, Dangerous and History so that would do well but on the face of it, it would appear that Part 3 only really has the Invincible album to showcase. But we know he was working on a lot of material in his final years so if they can scrape together 8 to 12 unreleased songs from this period they could market the entire movie around them. The final works by Michael Jackson, heard here for the first time. They may not bother with the third movie. It will depend on how well the second movie does at the box office. But we are definitely getting that second movie. 100%. They're not going to just walk away and leave that kind of money on the table. | |
Reply w/quote - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |