independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > MJ Related: Why did Bad sell less than Thriller?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 03/25/22 9:49pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

SoulAlive said:

RODSERLING said:

it was a huge mistake to not release Liberian Girl, it would have made the top ten in the US, and a great publicity for Bad. Give In To Me would have been huge for sure.

how can you possibly know this? smile


Pssst, he doesn't.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 03/25/22 10:14pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

RODSERLING said:

I never said these albums had something to do with Bad musically. Despite Faith is really close ( same kind of music, solo artist, same kind of lead vocals, same background vocals, etc.), and U2 has that pop/rock vibe very common to the MJ's of the 90's. I never said neither the same people bought singles and albums. MJ always sold a lot of albums, triggered by singles that were million sellers worldwide. Selling singles never prevented him to sell his albums. I think single-wise, it was a huge mistake to not release Liberian Girl, it would have made the top ten in the US, and a great publicity for Bad. Just like Dangerous missed his Thriller in the US 😞: Give In To Me would have been huge for sure. [Edited 3/25/22 20:53pm]

Well maybe Mike was overexposed in the USA with Thriller and a lot of people were tired of him. Not only were there 7 singles. There were other songs that were played on the radio at the same time period the Thriller album was still selling (Somebody's Watching Me, Farewell My Summer Love, Say Say Say, Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin', Don't Stand Another Chance, Eaten Alive, Centipede, State Of Shock, Torture, etc). R&B radio played Lady In My Life, Baby Be Mine, Somewhere In The Dark, & Can't Get Outta The Rain. Motown reissued most of the Jackson 5 albums after Thriller became a success, There's also the ET Storybook album and We Are The World. He had a lot of magazine coverage and stuff like dolls, Thriller/Beat It jackets, posters, baseball cards, several quicky biography books, glitter gloves, picture discs, a red vinyl singles set, and other merchandise. Then there was the Victory album and tour. The tour got some bad press with people being forced to buy 4 tickets and Don King being involved, one ticket was already more expensive than the average concert of the period. Then During the Bad period, Stevie Wonder put out Get It as a single. Get It didn't get much pop airplay, but it was a Top 10 hit on the R&B chart. R&B radio did play Liberian Girl and the music video was on MTV, VH-1, & BET. This was also the time period Janet broke out. There's also the case that Triumph did not sell as well as Off The Wall and Victory did not sell as well as Thriller. Sojust because Michael Jackson is on a record did not mean it would automatically sell the same. It didn't help The Jacksons albums get the same amount of crossover. Yet Phil Collins was just as successful solo and with Genesis. Even Mike Rutherford from Genesis had some success with Mike + The Mechanics.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 03/26/22 1:54am

RODSERLING

MickyDolenz said:



RODSERLING said:


I never said these albums had something to do with Bad musically. Despite Faith is really close ( same kind of music, solo artist, same kind of lead vocals, same background vocals, etc.), and U2 has that pop/rock vibe very common to the MJ's of the 90's. I never said neither the same people bought singles and albums. MJ always sold a lot of albums, triggered by singles that were million sellers worldwide. Selling singles never prevented him to sell his albums. I think single-wise, it was a huge mistake to not release Liberian Girl, it would have made the top ten in the US, and a great publicity for Bad. Just like Dangerous missed his Thriller in the US 😞: Give In To Me would have been huge for sure. [Edited 3/25/22 20:53pm]

Well maybe Mike was overexposed in the USA with Thriller and a lot of people were tired of him. Not only were there 7 singles. There were other songs that were played on the radio at the same time period the Thriller album was still selling (Somebody's Watching Me, Farewell My Summer Love, Say Say Say, Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin', Don't Stand Another Chance, Eaten Alive, Centipede, State Of Shock, Torture, etc). R&B radio played Lady In My Life, Baby Be Mine, Somewhere In The Dark, & Can't Get Outta The Rain. Motown reissued most of the Jackson 5 albums after Thriller became a success, There's also the ET Storybook album and We Are The World. He had a lot of magazine coverage and stuff like dolls, Thriller/Beat It jackets, posters, baseball cards, several quicky biography books, glitter gloves, picture discs, a red vinyl singles set, and other merchandise. Then there was the Victory album and tour. The tour got some bad press with people being forced to buy 4 tickets and Don King being involved, one ticket was already more expensive than the average concert of the period. Then During the Bad period, Stevie Wonder put out Get It as a single. Get It didn't get much pop airplay, but it was a Top 10 hit on the R&B chart. R&B radio did play Liberian Girl and the music video was on MTV, VH-1, & BET. This was also the time period Janet broke out. There's also the case that Triumph did not sell as well as Off The Wall and Victory did not sell as well as Thriller. Sojust because Michael Jackson is on a record did not mean it would automatically sell the same. It didn't help The Jacksons albums get the same amount of crossover. Yet Phil Collins was just as successful solo and with Genesis. Even Mike Rutherford from Genesis had some success with Mike + The Mechanics.



I never talked about the Jacksons...Of course The Jacksons name didn't have the same appeal than the one of MJ.

By the way...

What's interesting, is that you say Liberian Girl was played on rnb radios. Still, IIRC it never charted on rnb charts, rnb airplay, adult airplay, etc.

You also say Liberian Girl was played on MTV, etc. : still the director of the video complained it was never shown in the US in the likes of MTV.
It never made the top 30 MTV neither.

All of this to say Liberian Girl didn't get the usual push by Epic in term of promotion and payola. Frank Dileo was fired after the Moonwalker direct-to-video fiasco. After that, the two following singles in the US were aborted, despite the fact the 7 former ones sold well.
Something happened in MJ's management at the time, and they didn't bother to promote aggressively the last 2 European singles in the US.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 03/26/22 2:07am

RODSERLING

SoulAlive said:



RODSERLING said:


it was a huge mistake to not release Liberian Girl, it would have made the top ten in the US, and a great publicity for Bad. Give In To Me would have been huge for sure.


how can you possibly know this? smile



Liberian Girl :
Because :
1) at the time every MJ singles went to top 10. Ok, APOM went #11 biggrin
2) it went to #4 in Euro Airplay charts
3) The music video had american-stars only. It was aimed directly to the American public.


Give in To Me

1) Was #1 for 2 weeks in the European airplay charts
2) Was a huge hit everywhere in the world ( #1 in Australia, #2 in Uk)
3) Guns and Roses was the thing in the US
4) The next sinGle was a top ten gold hit ( Will You Be There)

Statistically, I don't take a huge chance to bet on it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 03/26/22 7:00am

MickyDolenz

avatar

RODSERLING said:

By the way... What's interesting, is that you say Liberian Girl was played on rnb radios. Still, IIRC it never charted on rnb charts, rnb airplay, adult airplay, etc

Because at the time, only a song that was released as a physical single and its B-side could chart. Isn't She Lovely by Stevie Wonder never charted because it was never a single, even though it got a lot of radio airplay. Most Christmas songs did not chart either because they were not usually released as a single, but they got airplay every November thru December. If people wanted the songs they had to buy the acts Chrismas album, which could chart like the New Kids On The Block one. A lot of USA radio stations back then would play album tracks and also the longer album versions of singles & long remixes. Today Billboard changed its old rule for streaming. Very few songs are released as physical singles today, so that old criteria couldn't work anyhow. lol That's how Drake, Lil Wayne, & Nicki Minaj have more Hot 100 hits than anyone else. Every song on an album can chart now at the same time, single or not. Before streaming, Elvis Presley & James Brown held the record for decades. It was Aretha Franklin for female artists. Same as when Soundscan came in during the 1990s, it became common for albums to debut at #1, when only 6 albums had done it during the entire time the record business existed. Well LP albums were only invented around 1950. Before that everything was 78s which is a single.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 03/26/22 7:22am

MickyDolenz

avatar

With The Jacksons, it wasn't that their records had less appeal. It was that they were considered a Black group in the USA, so were marketed primarily to R&B radio stations, which is mainly a Black audience. Black artists usually had to crossover to mainstream (aka the white audience) Top 40 pop radio, and only a small percentage were allowed to do that. Lionel Richie, Billy Ocean, Kool & The Gang, and Whitney Houston got crossover but Teddy Pendergrass, Maze, and even Teena Marie (who's white) got little if any mainstream promotion. Rick James is pretty much known to the mainstream audience for Superfreak, but had a lot of R&B hits. Rick complained he couldn't get on MTV, which didn't play many Black artists at the beginning. CBS Records threatened to take off their other acts like Bruce Springsteen & Journey if they would not play any Michael Jackson videos. Like I mentioned radio in the USA was segregated. There's a reason Elvis Presley sold more than Little Richard/Chuck Berry. and Led Zeppelin/Rolling Stones sold more than the Black blues artists they copied. People are more likely to buy records of their own race over another. Like Selena & Vicnente Fernandez are huge with Latino audiences.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 03/26/22 7:52am

SolaceAHA

Because of the length of time between releases, also MJ was starting to get weird press it even started while thriller was out but it continued. Also when you have a huge mega seller and you NEVER had that kind of success you are going to loss the casual fan, you just are. He still was a mega star, but Thriller was the peak and all surrounding it was massive, the videos were legendary, and it was a NEW thing "video" when Michael jumped into it, it was NOT new when Bad came out, MTV by then had so much more going on, everyone was now doing an epic video. It is rare you have a THRILLER or a Purple Rain or FAITH or Born in the USA, and then actually outsell it. I mean almost everything Prince put out after Purple Rain, added together (some 30 albums) didnt outsell PR added together, the same can be said of George Michael and Bruce. So why the shock with MJ, it literally was the biggest seller ever, there was no way no chance that BAD would outsell it, no chance

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 03/26/22 8:34am

SoulAlive

SolaceAHA said:

It is rare you have a THRILLER or a Purple Rain or FAITH or Born in the USA, and then actually outsell it. I mean almost everything Prince put out after Purple Rain, added together (some 30 albums) didnt outsell PR added together


Exactly.Those kinda massive sales can’t always be duplicated.That shouldn’t be an artists’ main goal anyway.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 03/26/22 9:14am

RODSERLING

MickyDolenz said:



RODSERLING said:


By the way... What's interesting, is that you say Liberian Girl was played on rnb radios. Still, IIRC it never charted on rnb charts, rnb airplay, adult airplay, etc

Because at the time, only a song that was released as a physical single and its B-side could chart. Isn't She Lovely by Stevie Wonder never charted because it was never a single, even though it got a lot of radio airplay.



Of course, you have a point here. Still, I remembered that Tell Me I m not Dreaming, charted somewhere.
It was never really released as a b-side, not properly : just the vocal version and the instrumental version.

Still, it did appear on some charts, including the Dance Club charts.
My point is that there is no sign of Liberian Girl anywhere, not even on MTV.
If you lived in the USA around 1989 and listened to radio, tv, etc.
Do you remember how Leave Me Alone and Liberian Girl were promoted at the time, compared to the previous singles?
Clearly : did Americam people were aware of these songs and their music videos? Were they used extensively as tools to sell Bad?
Or as I think, did the American marketing department of Epic let the album die, after the departure of Dileo?

The vocal version of "Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin'" was on the B-side to both the 7" and 12" versions of Jermaine Jackson's single, "Do What You Do",[3][4] while an instrumental version of the song was on the B-side to another Jermaine Jackson song, "Dynamite".[5][6]

In her 1993 book Michael Jackson: The King of Pop, author Lisa D. Campbell states that "although it was never officially released as a single because of legal difficulties between Michael's label, Epic, and Jermaine's label, Arista, the song did receive a lot of airplay."[7] As a result, Billboard at the time could not show the song on any "single" chart. Billboard had not yet begun publishing the airplay chart on which it would have registered.[clarification needed] The song, however, did register on Radio and Records' Top 40 chart, a chart based solely on airplay, peaking at No. 6 in June 1984. The song was most successful on the Billboard Hot Dance Club Play chart, where it spent three weeks at No. 1 that same June.[8]


[Edited 3/26/22 9:18am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 03/26/22 9:57am

SoulAlive

“Tell Me I’m Not Dreamin” is a great song.I like it better than anything on ‘Victory’.It got alot of airplay on our local R&B station.Jermaine’s label (Arista) wanted to release it as a single but The Jackson’s label (Epic) said “no way”.They didn’t want it to compete with the ‘Victory’ singles.It’s a shame when a great song gets caught up in record company politics confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 03/26/22 10:06am

RODSERLING

SoulAlive said:

“Tell Me I’m Not Dreamin” is a great song.I like it better than anything on ‘Victory’.It got alot of airplay on our local R&B station.Jermaine’s label (Arista) wanted to release it as a single but The Jackson’s label (Epic) said “no way”.They didn’t want it to compete with the ‘Victory’ singles.It’s a shame when a great song gets caught up in record company politics confused


And Jermaine didn't want to appear on the Torture video neither. Or couldn't?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 03/26/22 12:00pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

SoulAlive said:

“Tell Me I’m Not Dreamin” is a great song.I like it better than anything on ‘Victory’. It got alot of airplay on our local R&B station. Jermaine’s label (Arista) wanted to release it as a single but The Jackson’s label (Epic) said “no way”. They didn’t want it to compete with the ‘Victory’ singles. It’s a shame when a great song gets caught up in record company politics confused


Jermaine Jackson was his Thriller. The albums are so similar, one wonders why there wasn't a rift between the brothers. But to his credit, Jermaine struck when the first had arguably been the hottest for him. The Jacksons rode Thriller's success with Victory and the subsequent tour. Jermaine released the album in the spring of 1984, at a sweet spot when Thriller hype was dying down - a tad - and before Purple Rain (which no one knew was coming) had been unleashed like a Kracken.

Side A

Dynamite - Wanna Be Startin' Something': The percussive-bass-heavy intro songs to the album.

Sweetest Sweetest - Baby Be Mine: a cute little bop about a girl

Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin' - The Girl is Mine: 3rd track duet

Escape From the Planet of the Ant Men - Thriller: Need I say more? It even includes a spoken spooky rap a la Vincent Price, and an evil laugh.

Side B (a bit different configuration for the 2nd and 3rd tracks)

Come To Me - Beat It: no real correlation here, although both have a dense-nature to them

Do What You Do - Human Nature: The mid-second side ballad

Take Good Care of My Heart - Billie Jean: The driving pop song, a duet on Jermaine's side

Some Things are Private - P.Y.T: a funk-pop workout

Oh Mother - The Lady In My Life: Both sparse odes to important women

Jermaine's album is awesome, and I love the "Dynamite" video.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 03/26/22 5:35pm

thesexofit

avatar

TrivialPursuit said:

SoulAlive said:

“Tell Me I’m Not Dreamin” is a great song.I like it better than anything on ‘Victory’. It got alot of airplay on our local R&B station. Jermaine’s label (Arista) wanted to release it as a single but The Jackson’s label (Epic) said “no way”. They didn’t want it to compete with the ‘Victory’ singles. It’s a shame when a great song gets caught up in record company politics confused


Jermaine Jackson was his Thriller. The albums are so similar, one wonders why there wasn't a rift between the brothers. But to his credit, Jermaine struck when the first had arguably been the hottest for him. The Jacksons rode Thriller's success with Victory and the subsequent tour. Jermaine released the album in the spring of 1984, at a sweet spot when Thriller hype was dying down - a tad - and before Purple Rain (which no one knew was coming) had been unleashed like a Kracken.

Side A

Dynamite - Wanna Be Startin' Something': The percussive-bass-heavy intro songs to the album.

Sweetest Sweetest - Baby Be Mine: a cute little bop about a girl

Tell Me I'm Not Dreamin' - The Girl is Mine: 3rd track duet

Escape From the Planet of the Ant Men - Thriller: Need I say more? It even includes a spoken spooky rap a la Vincent Price, and an evil laugh.

Side B (a bit different configuration for the 2nd and 3rd tracks)

Come To Me - Beat It: no real correlation here, although both have a dense-nature to them

Do What You Do - Human Nature: The mid-second side ballad

Take Good Care of My Heart - Billie Jean: The driving pop song, a duet on Jermaine's side

Some Things are Private - P.Y.T: a funk-pop workout

Oh Mother - The Lady In My Life: Both sparse odes to important women

Jermaine's album is awesome, and I love the "Dynamite" video.

I love this discussion and I love Jermaine's whole Arista output, but you are reaching a little here lol

I love Jermaines 1984 album too. He transformed "Dynamite" from the demo I have heard. He didn't produce much after this album unfortunately, at least not on his own.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 03/26/22 6:57pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

thesexofit said:

I love this discussion and I love Jermaine's whole Arista output, but you are reaching a little here lol

I love Jermaines 1984 album too. He transformed "Dynamite" from the demo I have heard. He didn't produce much after this album unfortunately, at least not on his own.


Well, I never mentioned production. But I do believe he used the Thriller blue print to sequence that record. Things like "Thriller" and "Escape..." are incredibly alike. So are "The Lady in my Life" and "Oh Mother." The duet on side one. NOt unusual. Prince did the same with on ATWIAD using Purple Rain template.

Anyhoo - I don't always think Jermaine's output was great, but this album was really good, and deserved more attention. If it had been released just a year or two later, it'd have sounded dated and out of touch. So he had to release it when he did. And probably wanted to anyway.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 03/26/22 8:07pm

thesexofit

avatar

TrivialPursuit said:

thesexofit said:

I love this discussion and I love Jermaine's whole Arista output, but you are reaching a little here lol

I love Jermaines 1984 album too. He transformed "Dynamite" from the demo I have heard. He didn't produce much after this album unfortunately, at least not on his own.


Well, I never mentioned production. But I do believe he used the Thriller blue print to sequence that record. Things like "Thriller" and "Escape..." are incredibly alike. So are "The Lady in my Life" and "Oh Mother." The duet on side one. NOt unusual. Prince did the same with on ATWIAD using Purple Rain template.

Anyhoo - I don't always think Jermaine's output was great, but this album was really good, and deserved more attention. If it had been released just a year or two later, it'd have sounded dated and out of touch. So he had to releyase it when he did. And probably wanted to anyway.

As I said, I love all of Jermaines Arista stuff. His 1986 followup was even more commercial, but no silly "Escape" like track on it thank God. I agree that "Escape" track was a (terrible imo) "Thriller" ripoff and yeah, the album was definately going after the "Thriller" template in places.

Commodores "Animal instinct", Diana Ross "Eaten alive", Melissa Manchester "Night Creatures". A few monster themed tracks popped up thanks to "Thriller" haha.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 03/26/22 8:14pm

thesexofit

avatar

TrivialPursuit said:

thesexofit said:

I love this discussion and I love Jermaine's whole Arista output, but you are reaching a little here lol

I love Jermaines 1984 album too. He transformed "Dynamite" from the demo I have heard. He didn't produce much after this album unfortunately, at least not on his own.


Well, I never mentioned production. But I do believe he used the Thriller blue print to sequence that record. Things like "Thriller" and "Escape..." are incredibly alike. So are "The Lady in my Life" and "Oh Mother." The duet on side one. NOt unusual. Prince did the same with on ATWIAD using Purple Rain template.

Anyhoo - I don't always think Jermaine's output was great, but this album was really good, and deserved more attention. If it had been released just a year or two later, it'd have sounded dated and out of touch. So he had to release it when he did. And probably wanted to anyway.

Tbh, you didn't. I just rarely get to discuss Jermaine on here anymore. My bad.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 03/26/22 8:19pm

thesexofit

avatar

All the above answers were factors to an extent, plus the glaring failure of no stadium tour in America and no cinema release for "Moonwalker". I do think a few of his no.1's from "Bad" are abit suspicious LOL. Frank trying to make up for the above 2 failings LOL?

Oh and yes "Bad" did initially outsell "Thriller" in UK. Its still hovering 9th-10th all time seller in UK, despite poor single showings compared to America.

Bytheway, "Thriller" in USA is mind boggling sales wise. Once in a lifetime as discussed. The fact he never officially toured at all for "Thriller" makes it more incredible

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 03/27/22 1:46am

RODSERLING

thesexofit said:

All the above answers were factors to an extent, plus the glaring failure of no stadium tour in America and no cinema release for "Moonwalker". I do think a few of his no.1's from "Bad" are abit suspicious LOL. Frank trying to make up for the above 2 failings LOL?





How could the #1 be suspicious?
Of course payolas was the key to it.

You do have a point for the no stadium tour in the USA. He sold about 1 million tickets in the USA, when Victory and Purple Rain Tour sold twice as much.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 03/27/22 7:12am

MickyDolenz

avatar

thesexofit said:

By the way, "Thriller" in USA is mind boggling sales wise. Once in a lifetime as discussed. The fact he never officially toured at all for "Thriller" makes it more incredible

I don't get the idea that touring makes an album sell more. Relatively few people go to concerts compared to the ones who hear songs played on the radio or see an act on TV shows like Solid Gold, Dance Fever, Soul Train, or MTV. The big acts mostly only go to large major cities. Large cities are a small percentage of the USA. There's thousands of small towns that they never go to. They're not gong to perform in some juke joint or hole in the wall in a rural area. Small towns do have radio & TV reception. Also buying a record back then was cheaper than going to a concert. There's also the case that a lot of acts only perform their hits, especially today. People don't usually go to see veteran acts to hear their new material. If touring helped that much to sell records, then there wouldn't be many "one hit wonder" acts. lol

With the Thriller sales in the USA, Eagles Greatest Hits Vol 1 passed it up 2 or 3 times. The albums keep leap froggin' each other. I think Eagles are currently ahead.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 03/27/22 8:43am

TrivialPursuit

avatar

thesexofit said:

Tbh, you didn't. I just rarely get to discuss Jermaine on here anymore. My bad.


To your original statement, MJ didn't solely produce Thriller either. So that phenomenon wasn't MJ alone. I guess I never looked at who produced Jermaine's album.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 03/27/22 11:39am

SoulAlive

thesexofit said:

"Thriller" in USA is mind boggling sales wise. Once in a lifetime as discussed. The fact he never officially toured at all for "Thriller" makes it more incredible

indeed.Can you imagine what a "Thriller World Tour 1983" would have been like? eek

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 03/27/22 12:04pm

RODSERLING

MickyDolenz said:



thesexofit said:


By the way, "Thriller" in USA is mind boggling sales wise. Once in a lifetime as discussed. The fact he never officially toured at all for "Thriller" makes it more incredible



I don't get the idea that touring makes an album sell more. Relatively few people go to concerts compared to the ones who hear songs played on the radio or see an act on TV shows like Solid Gold, Dance Fever, Soul Train, or MTV. The big acts mostly only go to large major cities. Large cities are a small percentage of the USA. There's thousands of small towns that they never go to. They're not gong to perform in some juke joint or hole in the wall in a rural area. Small towns do have radio & TV reception. Also buying a record back then was cheaper than going to a concert. There's also the case that a lot of acts only perform their hits, especially today. People don't usually go to see veteran acts to hear their new material. If touring helped that much to sell records, then there wouldn't be many "one hit wonder" acts. lol

With the Thriller sales in the USA, Eagles Greatest Hits Vol 1 passed it up 2 or 3 times. The albums keep leap froggin' each other. I think Eagles are currently ahead.



You're wrong, I read 20 years ago that labels estimate that a tour usually bring 40% of the sales of an album.
Because of the people who go at a concert but never bought the album, and of course the huge publicity and exposition there is around it.
I talked with romanians girl about it, the simple fact MJ did a Bucarest show gained the heart of the Romanians forever.

I don't know the trick the Eagles used for their RIAA certifocations, but it's fake.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 03/27/22 1:08pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

RODSERLING said:

You're wrong, I read 20 years ago that labels estimate that a tour usually bring 40% of the sales of an album.

Is that so? There's no tour for Saturday Night Fever, Footloose, The Sound Of Music, and other popular soundtracks. The Dirty Dancing soundtracks were mostly oldies of acts that in some cases did not exist anymore. How do The Beatles, Bob Marley, Jimi Hendrix, Robert Johnson, & Elvis Presley continue to sell? They can't tour. lol The Beatles sold more records after they broke up than when they were an active group. When they were touring, the Fab 4 mostly sang the same stuff from the early days since no one could hear them because of all of the screaming girls and the technology of the era. How did 1990s dance music groups like Black Box sell records? The girl in the videos and the album covers didn't sing on the records, it was Martha Wash. Martha didn't perform with them. Milli Vanilli sold big until they went on tour. The concerts is when people found out Rob & Fab weren't singing, because the tapes would sometimes skip. Their Grammy was taken away form them. Donny & Marie Osmond was touring up until a few years ago, but I don't see their albums racing up the charts.

People who go to a concert are usually already fans of the group, unless they're going to see a bar band or something. It's the same with tribute bands/singers. Do Elvis Presley impersonators make people in the audience want to buy Elvis albums? More than likely, the people going to see a tribute band already owns the albums. Like with The Musical Box, the folks who go to see them like Peter Gabriel era Genesis. Neither the real Genesis nor Peter Gabriel perform those songs. Steve Hackett does though. So The Musical Box and Steve Hackett is the only way to see that material live in concert.

[Edited 3/27/22 13:14pm]

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 03/27/22 1:58pm

RODSERLING

MickyDolenz said:



RODSERLING said:


You're wrong, I read 20 years ago that labels estimate that a tour usually bring 40% of the sales of an album.

Is that so? There's no tour for Saturday Night Fever, Footloose, The Sound Of Music, and other popular soundtracks. The Dirty Dancing soundtracks were mostly oldies of acts that in some cases did not exist anymore. How do The Beatles, Bob Marley, Jimi Hendrix, Robert Johnson, & Elvis Presley continue to sell? They can't tour. lol The Beatles sold more records after they broke up than when they were an active group. When they were touring, the Fab 4 mostly sang the same stuff from the early days since no one could hear them because of all of the screaming girls and the technology of the era. How did 1990s dance music groups like Black Box sell records? The girl in the videos and the album covers didn't sing on the records, it was Martha Wash. Martha didn't perform with them. Milli Vanilli sold big until they went on tour. The concerts is when people found out Rob & Fab weren't singing, because the tapes would sometimes skip. Their Grammy was taken away form them. Donny & Marie Osmond was touring up until a few years ago, but I don't see their albums racing up the charts.

People who go to a concert are usually already fans of the group, unless they're going to see a bar band or something. It's the same with tribute bands/singers. Do Elvis Presley impersonators make people in the audience want to buy Elvis albums? More than likely, the people going to see a tribute band already owns the albums. Like with The Musical Box, the folks who go to see them like Peter Gabriel era Genesis. Neither the real Genesis nor Peter Gabriel perform those songs. Steve Hackett does though. So The Musical Box and Steve Hackett is the only way to see that material live in concert.

[Edited 3/27/22 13:14pm]



Maybe because when an act is dead he can't tour anymore?
This is not true for every album, but of course the more you tour for an album, the more you aell it.
There's no wonder why MJ was almost obliged to go to tour for History, the sales were too weak.
What was supposed to sell the album in the US, was the HBO show that was cancelled.
Then, no wonder why every singles after You Are Not Alone were cancelled, or didn't receive airplay at all.
Not only a tour sell the album for obvious reasons ( people attending the tour because they go with their family, friends, or just out of curiosity, decrease in price for History, every media telling about the event, huge exposition, people talking about it, good press coverage the day after, etc.).

But it also make the marketing plan viable: it generates more money to pay the music videos, more tv ads, more single releases, etc.

As we are talking about MJ here, you can easily see that effect on the Blood On The Dance Floor Album. It sold 4 millions in Europe alone (!) Mostly thanks to the European tour of History. An album of only 5 songs!

The exact opposite was of course Invincible : without a tour, Sony fast cut the money for music videos, new singles, etc.
And the album sold poorly.
It desesperatly needed a world tour.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 03/27/22 2:56pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

RODSERLING said:

This is not true for every album, but of course the more you tour for an album, the more you aell it.

Alvin & The Chipmunks have been selling records since the 1950s and they're a cartoon. They've also had popular live action movies in recent years. The Archies & Max Headroom had hit singles and they don't really exist either to perform concerts. Do people usually tour for Christmas albums? Maybe Mannheim Steamroller does. razz I don't think the Jackson 5 toured for their Christmas album. They probably couldn't anyway since the were Jehovah's Witnesses when it came out. A tour itself is not guaranteed to be a success. There's been a lot of tours and/or concerts that flopped or didn't make any money because of extravagant production. How can a unsuccessful tour help an album sell? Does the Whitney Houston hologram tour help her music sale?

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 03/27/22 5:18pm

PatrickS77

avatar

SoulAlive said:

thesexofit said:

"Thriller" in USA is mind boggling sales wise. Once in a lifetime as discussed. The fact he never officially toured at all for "Thriller" makes it more incredible

indeed.Can you imagine what a "Thriller World Tour 1983" would have been like? eek

Uhm. Kinda like the Victory tour??

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 03/27/22 5:20pm

PatrickS77

avatar

MickyDolenz said:

RODSERLING said:

You're wrong, I read 20 years ago that labels estimate that a tour usually bring 40% of the sales of an album.

Is that so? There's no tour for Saturday Night Fever, Footloose, The Sound Of Music, and other popular soundtracks. The Dirty Dancing soundtracks were mostly oldies of acts that in some cases did not exist anymore. How do The Beatles, Bob Marley, Jimi Hendrix, Robert Johnson, & Elvis Presley continue to sell? They can't tour. lol The Beatles sold more records after they broke up than when they were an active group. When they were touring, the Fab 4 mostly sang the same stuff from the early days since no one could hear them because of all of the screaming girls and the technology of the era. How did 1990s dance music groups like Black Box sell records? The girl in the videos and the album covers didn't sing on the records, it was Martha Wash. Martha didn't perform with them. Milli Vanilli sold big until they went on tour. The concerts is when people found out Rob & Fab weren't singing, because the tapes would sometimes skip. Their Grammy was taken away form them. Donny & Marie Osmond was touring up until a few years ago, but I don't see their albums racing up the charts.

People who go to a concert are usually already fans of the group, unless they're going to see a bar band or something. It's the same with tribute bands/singers. Do Elvis Presley impersonators make people in the audience want to buy Elvis albums? More than likely, the people going to see a tribute band already owns the albums. Like with The Musical Box, the folks who go to see them like Peter Gabriel era Genesis. Neither the real Genesis nor Peter Gabriel perform those songs. Steve Hackett does though. So The Musical Box and Steve Hackett is the only way to see that material live in concert.

[Edited 3/27/22 13:14pm]

That doesn't change the fact that back then a tour promoted an album. That's why record companies usually where involved when one of their artists went on tour. Nowadays an album promotes a tour and the money is made touring.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 03/27/22 6:54pm

SoulAlive

PatrickS77 said:



SoulAlive said:




thesexofit said:



"Thriller" in USA is mind boggling sales wise. Once in a lifetime as discussed. The fact he never officially toured at all for "Thriller" makes it more incredible





indeed.Can you imagine what a "Thriller World Tour 1983" would have been like? eek




Uhm. Kinda like the Victory tour??



No,it would have been bigger and better than the Victory tour.A solo MJ tour in 1983,at the height of Thrillermania??
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 03/27/22 7:23pm

thesexofit

avatar

TrivialPursuit said:

thesexofit said:

Tbh, you didn't. I just rarely get to discuss Jermaine on here anymore. My bad.


To your original statement, MJ didn't solely produce Thriller either. So that phenomenon wasn't MJ alone. I guess I never looked at who produced Jermaine's album.

Jermaine produced some of that album alone (including "Dynamite"). Like Mike, Jermaine was a good producer. I will stop there before I derail the thread again haha

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 03/27/22 7:27pm

thesexofit

avatar

SoulAlive said:

PatrickS77 said:

Uhm. Kinda like the Victory tour??

No,it would have been bigger and better than the Victory tour.A solo MJ tour in 1983,at the height of Thrillermania??

Victory tour was a strange one. Yes, it is basically a Michael solo tour as no new tracks from "Victory" were played, but I don't count it as a "Thriller" tour, but I can see Patrick's point.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 5 <12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > MJ Related: Why did Bad sell less than Thriller?