independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > What has happened to music ?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 5 12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 12/10/20 5:59am

JayCrawford

What has happened to music ?

It's a shame that music has been awful for the past 27 years. Back in it's golden age 60s, 70s and 80s we saw lots of changes and cultural moments and historical moments that changed rock n roll. We had Michael Jackson, Prince, Donna Summer, Stevie Wonder, Metallica, Queen, Elton John, Beatles, Rolling Stones, James Brown, Sly Stone, Marvin Gaye, Joni Mitchell, David Bowie, Bob Dylan, Bob Marley, Dennis Brown, Jimmy Clif, Gregory Issac, Peter Tosh, Led Zepplien, Pink Floyd and so much more.

Those 3 decades of music during it's golden age 60s, 70s and 80s saw a movement's. I don't know if it's me but music is dead.

The 90s, 00s and 10s and even today just didn't have anything like this.

RIP to music 1960s-1980s.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 12/10/20 10:22am

SoulAlive

I mostly listen to 70s music.That’s my favorite musical decade.I also love the 80s of course.

I just can’t tolerate today’s whack music.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 12/10/20 10:56am

EmmaMcG

So called "popular" music has always been very much a mixed bag. A lot of those artists mentioned in the OP were never big commercial acts. Even Prince had relatively little chart success. Shakin' Stevens had more UK top 10 hits in the 80s than Prince did. So even during his heyday, Prince was never in the same category as the likes of Michael Jackson and Madonna. Now, I think his music is miles ahead of pretty much any 80s act but talent has never been equal to chart success.

And it's the same now. The charts are predominantly filled with crap, manufactured pop acts. But great music still exists and just like most other decades, you have to look outside the charts to find it. Acts like Mayer Hawthorne, Ekkah, Tuxedo, Chromeo, Niki & The Dove, Boulevards, Chromatics, Gaslight Anthem, Harts etc are all relatively new and all put out quality music.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 12/10/20 11:43am

looby

EmmaMcG said:

So called "popular" music has always been very much a mixed bag. A lot of those artists mentioned in the OP were never big commercial acts. Even Prince had relatively little chart success. Shakin' Stevens had more UK top 10 hits in the 80s than Prince did. So even during his heyday, Prince was never in the same category as the likes of Michael Jackson and Madonna. Now, I think his music is miles ahead of pretty much any 80s act but talent has never been equal to chart success. And it's the same now. The charts are predominantly filled with crap, manufactured pop acts. But great music still exists and just like most other decades, you have to look outside the charts to find it. Acts like Mayer Hawthorne, Ekkah, Tuxedo, Chromeo, Niki & The Dove, Boulevards, Chromatics, Gaslight Anthem, Harts etc are all relatively new and all put out quality music.

Uh, excuse you! To Prince fans, Michael Jackson and Madonna were "never in the same category" as Prince! All Michael could do better than Prince, was dance, but Prince wrote his own songs, played his own instruments, and could sing his ass off, in both low and high pitch. He wasn't some one note, commercialized puppet, who only thought that "making the charts and having chart success" was his end all and be all.

[Edited 12/10/20 11:44am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 12/10/20 12:24pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

EmmaMcG said:

So called "popular" music has always been very much a mixed bag. A lot of those artists mentioned in the OP were never big commercial acts. Even Prince had relatively little chart success. Shakin' Stevens had more UK top 10 hits in the 80s than Prince did. So even during his heyday, Prince was never in the same category as the likes of Michael Jackson and Madonna. Now, I think his music is miles ahead of pretty much any 80s act but talent has never been equal to chart success.


Just gonna take about 20% issue with this, only in the regard that they were in the same category when it came to domination of the charts and pop culture. It started with Thriller, then Like A Virgin and Purple Rain. Madonna modeled her early career after Prince. Prince showed up at a couple Victory Tour shows to watch, and MJ saw Prince's talent and asked for that duet. Prince & M would later duet. They all had a great and healthy synergy and competition between them. We just sorta vacillated from one to the other depending who had what out at the time. They all raised eye brows with what they did, and everyone dressed and acted like them. The plethora of boy toys at M shows rivaled that of folks in purple at a PR show. That is equally rivaled by white gloves at the Victory Tour.

That said, they were all the same category when it came to pop perfection, exposure, media, and making great music. Their aesthetics were copied and propegated from Chess King to Jeans West to The GAP. No one was trying to dress or act like Bruce Springsteen (arguably the distant 4th in line for biggest 80s act) and anyone who dressed like a new wave or new romantic act was one of many bands who did. So in those regard, they were very much in the same category of epic proportions.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 12/10/20 12:25pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

EmmaMcG said:

So called "popular" music has always been very much a mixed bag. A lot of those artists mentioned in the OP were never big commercial acts. Even Prince had relatively little chart success. Shakin' Stevens had more UK top 10 hits in the 80s than Prince did. So even during his heyday, Prince was never in the same category as the likes of Michael Jackson and Madonna. Now, I think his music is miles ahead of pretty much any 80s act but talent has never been equal to chart success. And it's the same now. The charts are predominantly filled with crap, manufactured pop acts. But great music still exists and just like most other decades, you have to look outside the charts to find it. Acts like Mayer Hawthorne, Ekkah, Tuxedo, Chromeo, Niki & The Dove, Boulevards, Chromatics, Gaslight Anthem, Harts etc are all relatively new and all put out quality music.

Exactly! Good music is still here... You just have to look in the underground to find it.

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 12/10/20 12:35pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

Music today does suck. While music is a mixed bag, there is still solid music and people know it when they hear it. Sure, charts and counting plays or streams etc are different, but who is humming a Taylor Swift song? Who's humming "The Thong Song" or "Umbrella?" Those almost seem like novelty songs at this point, not bangers. You can't put a Rihanna album against an 90s TLC record and expect Ms Fenty to survive.

Solid music is just not there like it used to be. I don't mind production changes in music or new ideas. That's what makes music interesting and appealing. But so much of it now is just garbage. It's the same few writing teams or producers rewriting the same song for a half dozen artists. Or it's some wannabe prodigy who is producing everything in their bedroom with a bootlegged copy of ProTools or GarageBand on their MacBook Air.

I guess that while some artists depend on those things to make music, it also robs them of their real creativity to make a rich and full song. Music doesn't have teeth anymore. There's no grit, no by-the-seat-of-your-pants mentality to it. Where are folks like Dallas Austin, Nelle Hooper, Brown Banister, anyone who doesn't feel the need to be on the record, chanting their own name (looking at your Rodney)? Where the fuck is Jill Scott or Erykah Badu? Where is goddamn Maxwell? I'd even settle for a new Hootie & The Blowfish album at this point, or Jon Secada to make a comeback. What about Jon B? The Tony Rich Project? Soul II Soul? Hell, even those boy girl acts like Boy Meets Girl ("Waiting For A Star To Fall"), Will To Power, etc?

It's no wonder I listen to a yacht rock station when I do some quilting or another task. To put on the top 40 of today? Pffft, bitch please. And they say rap encourages violence? Put on something from today and see if I don't start punching a wall. LOL

I'm glad for folks like Mayer Hawthorne (who has such a love for 80s music), Chromeo (who has a huge stake in the 80s), or Confection (Aussie act who makes 80s-inspired music), or Sneaky Sound System. But even Fitz and the Tantrums have all but disappeared. But that stuff is so far and few between....

Alexa. Play yacht rock station on Amazon Music in the lounge.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 12/10/20 12:45pm

Phase3

There is great and fantastic music still around now days but it's mostly in the indie rock.The main charts stuff like lizzo and justin beavis are terrible and are only so popular because the higher ups are shoving it down people's throats.
[Edited 12/10/20 12:45pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 12/10/20 12:49pm

SoulAlive

TrivialPursuit said:


It's no wonder I listen to a yacht rock station when I do some quilting or another task.

Same here biggrin there is an excellent yacht rock station on SiriusXM that I really enjoy...I go crazy when I hear songs like "Reminiscing" by Little River Band.That's REAL music to me!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 12/10/20 12:49pm

JayCrawford

TrivialPursuit said:

Music today does suck. While music is a mixed bag, there is still solid music and people know it when they hear it. Sure, charts and counting plays or streams etc are different, but who is humming a Taylor Swift song? Who's humming "The Thong Song" or "Umbrella?" Those almost seem like novelty songs at this point, not bangers. You can't put a Rihanna album against an 90s TLC record and expect Ms Fenty to survive.

Solid music is just not there like it used to be. I don't mind production changes in music or new ideas. That's what makes music interesting and appealing. But so much of it now is just garbage. It's the same few writing teams or producers rewriting the same song for a half dozen artists. Or it's some wannabe prodigy who is producing everything in their bedroom with a bootlegged copy of ProTools or GarageBand on their MacBook Air.

I guess that while some artists depend on those things to make music, it also robs them of their real creativity to make a rich and full song. Music doesn't have teeth anymore. There's no grit, no by-the-seat-of-your-pants mentality to it. Where are folks like Dallas Austin, Nelle Hooper, Brown Banister, anyone who doesn't feel the need to be on the record, chanting their own name (looking at your Rodney)? Where the fuck is Jill Scott or Erykah Badu? Where is goddamn Maxwell? I'd even settle for a new Hootie & The Blowfish album at this point, or Jon Secada to make a comeback. What about Jon B? The Tony Rich Project? Soul II Soul? Hell, even those boy girl acts like Boy Meets Girl ("Waiting For A Star To Fall"), Will To Power, etc?

It's no wonder I listen to a yacht rock station when I do some quilting or another task. To put on the top 40 of today? Pffft, bitch please. And they say rap encourages violence? Put on something from today and see if I don't start punching a wall. LOL

I'm glad for folks like Mayer Hawthorne (who has such a love for 80s music), Chromeo (who has a huge stake in the 80s), or Confection (Aussie act who makes 80s-inspired music), or Sneaky Sound System. But even Fitz and the Tantrums have all but disappeared. But that stuff is so far and few between....

Alexa. Play yacht rock station on Amazon Music in the lounge.




I don't know how old you are but you sound pretty young. Who actually thinks artists like Maxwell, Jill Scott, Erykah Nadu Soul II Soul Tony Rich product are even great? Let alone some of producers you mentioned were not even great.

Who in the hell is actually going to be humming to their songs?

Real talent happened throughout the 60s-80s MJ, Prince, Donna Summer, Marvin Gaye, Beatles, Rolling Stones and so much more legendary talents. The producers from the golden age Quincy Jones, Giorgio Moroder, Gamble and Huff, Brian Eno, Phil Spector and loads more.

That is real talent
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 12/10/20 12:51pm

onlyforaminute

avatar

There are times to just be the fly on the wall. I think this is one.
Time keeps on slipping into the future...


This moment is all there is...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 12/10/20 1:38pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

JayCrawford said:

TrivialPursuit said:

Music today does suck. While music is a mixed bag, there is still solid music and people know it when they hear it. Sure, charts and counting plays or streams etc are different, but who is humming a Taylor Swift song? Who's humming "The Thong Song" or "Umbrella?" Those almost seem like novelty songs at this point, not bangers. You can't put a Rihanna album against an 90s TLC record and expect Ms Fenty to survive.

Solid music is just not there like it used to be. I don't mind production changes in music or new ideas. That's what makes music interesting and appealing. But so much of it now is just garbage. It's the same few writing teams or producers rewriting the same song for a half dozen artists. Or it's some wannabe prodigy who is producing everything in their bedroom with a bootlegged copy of ProTools or GarageBand on their MacBook Air.

I guess that while some artists depend on those things to make music, it also robs them of their real creativity to make a rich and full song. Music doesn't have teeth anymore. There's no grit, no by-the-seat-of-your-pants mentality to it. Where are folks like Dallas Austin, Nelle Hooper, Brown Banister, anyone who doesn't feel the need to be on the record, chanting their own name (looking at your Rodney)? Where the fuck is Jill Scott or Erykah Badu? Where is goddamn Maxwell? I'd even settle for a new Hootie & The Blowfish album at this point, or Jon Secada to make a comeback. What about Jon B? The Tony Rich Project? Soul II Soul? Hell, even those boy girl acts like Boy Meets Girl ("Waiting For A Star To Fall"), Will To Power, etc?

It's no wonder I listen to a yacht rock station when I do some quilting or another task. To put on the top 40 of today? Pffft, bitch please. And they say rap encourages violence? Put on something from today and see if I don't start punching a wall. LOL

I'm glad for folks like Mayer Hawthorne (who has such a love for 80s music), Chromeo (who has a huge stake in the 80s), or Confection (Aussie act who makes 80s-inspired music), or Sneaky Sound System. But even Fitz and the Tantrums have all but disappeared. But that stuff is so far and few between....

Alexa. Play yacht rock station on Amazon Music in the lounge.

I don't know how old you are but you sound pretty young. Who actually thinks artists like Maxwell, Jill Scott, Erykah Nadu Soul II Soul Tony Rich product are even great? Let alone some of producers you mentioned were not even great. Who in the hell is actually going to be humming to their songs? Real talent happened throughout the 60s-80s MJ, Prince, Donna Summer, Marvin Gaye, Beatles, Rolling Stones and so much more legendary talents. The producers from the golden age Quincy Jones, Giorgio Moroder, Gamble and Huff, Brian Eno, Phil Spector and loads more. That is real talent

He ain't young...like I ain't. lol

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 12/10/20 1:45pm

JayCrawford

purplethunder3121 said:



JayCrawford said:


TrivialPursuit said:

Music today does suck. While music is a mixed bag, there is still solid music and people know it when they hear it. Sure, charts and counting plays or streams etc are different, but who is humming a Taylor Swift song? Who's humming "The Thong Song" or "Umbrella?" Those almost seem like novelty songs at this point, not bangers. You can't put a Rihanna album against an 90s TLC record and expect Ms Fenty to survive.

Solid music is just not there like it used to be. I don't mind production changes in music or new ideas. That's what makes music interesting and appealing. But so much of it now is just garbage. It's the same few writing teams or producers rewriting the same song for a half dozen artists. Or it's some wannabe prodigy who is producing everything in their bedroom with a bootlegged copy of ProTools or GarageBand on their MacBook Air.

I guess that while some artists depend on those things to make music, it also robs them of their real creativity to make a rich and full song. Music doesn't have teeth anymore. There's no grit, no by-the-seat-of-your-pants mentality to it. Where are folks like Dallas Austin, Nelle Hooper, Brown Banister, anyone who doesn't feel the need to be on the record, chanting their own name (looking at your Rodney)? Where the fuck is Jill Scott or Erykah Badu? Where is goddamn Maxwell? I'd even settle for a new Hootie & The Blowfish album at this point, or Jon Secada to make a comeback. What about Jon B? The Tony Rich Project? Soul II Soul? Hell, even those boy girl acts like Boy Meets Girl ("Waiting For A Star To Fall"), Will To Power, etc?

It's no wonder I listen to a yacht rock station when I do some quilting or another task. To put on the top 40 of today? Pffft, bitch please. And they say rap encourages violence? Put on something from today and see if I don't start punching a wall. LOL

I'm glad for folks like Mayer Hawthorne (who has such a love for 80s music), Chromeo (who has a huge stake in the 80s), or Confection (Aussie act who makes 80s-inspired music), or Sneaky Sound System. But even Fitz and the Tantrums have all but disappeared. But that stuff is so far and few between....

Alexa. Play yacht rock station on Amazon Music in the lounge.



I don't know how old you are but you sound pretty young. Who actually thinks artists like Maxwell, Jill Scott, Erykah Nadu Soul II Soul Tony Rich product are even great? Let alone some of producers you mentioned were not even great. Who in the hell is actually going to be humming to their songs? Real talent happened throughout the 60s-80s MJ, Prince, Donna Summer, Marvin Gaye, Beatles, Rolling Stones and so much more legendary talents. The producers from the golden age Quincy Jones, Giorgio Moroder, Gamble and Huff, Brian Eno, Phil Spector and loads more. That is real talent

He ain't young...like I ain't. lol




I don't know man lol, some of the "artists" he mentioned aren't that great.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 12/10/20 3:17pm

EmmaMcG

looby said:



EmmaMcG said:


So called "popular" music has always been very much a mixed bag. A lot of those artists mentioned in the OP were never big commercial acts. Even Prince had relatively little chart success. Shakin' Stevens had more UK top 10 hits in the 80s than Prince did. So even during his heyday, Prince was never in the same category as the likes of Michael Jackson and Madonna. Now, I think his music is miles ahead of pretty much any 80s act but talent has never been equal to chart success. And it's the same now. The charts are predominantly filled with crap, manufactured pop acts. But great music still exists and just like most other decades, you have to look outside the charts to find it. Acts like Mayer Hawthorne, Ekkah, Tuxedo, Chromeo, Niki & The Dove, Boulevards, Chromatics, Gaslight Anthem, Harts etc are all relatively new and all put out quality music.

Uh, excuse you! To Prince fans, Michael Jackson and Madonna were "never in the same category" as Prince! All Michael could do better than Prince, was dance, but Prince wrote his own songs, played his own instruments, and could sing his ass off, in both low and high pitch. He wasn't some one note, commercialized puppet, who only thought that "making the charts and having chart success" was his end all and be all.

[Edited 12/10/20 11:44am]



Lol. Read what I wrote again. I agree with you that talent-wise, Prince is head and shoulders above both MJ and Madonna and every other major pop star of the 80s. But in terms of chart success, he was miles behind. My point was that he was never a big seller outside of a couple of big hits. In other words, looking to the charts of today and complaining that modern pop is crap would be to forget that even in the 80s, the pop charts rarely, if ever, featured the best music. And so that in whatever era of music you look at, the top 10 was never any kind of indication of the quality of music during that period.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 12/10/20 3:24pm

EmmaMcG

TrivialPursuit said:



EmmaMcG said:


So called "popular" music has always been very much a mixed bag. A lot of those artists mentioned in the OP were never big commercial acts. Even Prince had relatively little chart success. Shakin' Stevens had more UK top 10 hits in the 80s than Prince did. So even during his heyday, Prince was never in the same category as the likes of Michael Jackson and Madonna. Now, I think his music is miles ahead of pretty much any 80s act but talent has never been equal to chart success.


Just gonna take about 20% issue with this, only in the regard that they were in the same category when it came to domination of the charts and pop culture. It started with Thriller, then Like A Virgin and Purple Rain. Madonna modeled her early career after Prince. Prince showed up at a couple Victory Tour shows to watch, and MJ saw Prince's talent and asked for that duet. Prince & M would later duet. They all had a great and healthy synergy and competition between them. We just sorta vacillated from one to the other depending who had what out at the time. They all raised eye brows with what they did, and everyone dressed and acted like them. The plethora of boy toys at M shows rivaled that of folks in purple at a PR show. That is equally rivaled by white gloves at the Victory Tour.

That said, they were all the same category when it came to pop perfection, exposure, media, and making great music. Their aesthetics were copied and propegated from Chess King to Jeans West to The GAP. No one was trying to dress or act like Bruce Springsteen (arguably the distant 4th in line for biggest 80s act) and anyone who dressed like a new wave or new romantic act was one of many bands who did. So in those regard, they were very much in the same category of epic proportions.



You are absolutely correct and I should have been more clear with what I meant. I'm referring purely to sales and number ones. Prince, especially here in Ireland and even in the UK and other parts of the world, was never an artist you'd see topping the singles charts regularly, unlike a lot of his contemporaries who were arguably far less talented than he was. My point being that the best artists producing the best music are rarely if ever actually top of the charts. So when we, as a collective, look at the state of music nowadays and bemoan the horrible music that makes up the top 10, it's in no way indicative of the overall state of music today. Because the best music in any generation was would generally fall outside of the top chart positions.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 12/10/20 3:27pm

EmmaMcG

TrivialPursuit said:

Music today does suck. While music is a mixed bag, there is still solid music and people know it when they hear it. Sure, charts and counting plays or streams etc are different, but who is humming a Taylor Swift song? Who's humming "The Thong Song" or "Umbrella?" Those almost seem like novelty songs at this point, not bangers. You can't put a Rihanna album against an 90s TLC record and expect Ms Fenty to survive.

Solid music is just not there like it used to be. I don't mind production changes in music or new ideas. That's what makes music interesting and appealing. But so much of it now is just garbage. It's the same few writing teams or producers rewriting the same song for a half dozen artists. Or it's some wannabe prodigy who is producing everything in their bedroom with a bootlegged copy of ProTools or GarageBand on their MacBook Air.

I guess that while some artists depend on those things to make music, it also robs them of their real creativity to make a rich and full song. Music doesn't have teeth anymore. There's no grit, no by-the-seat-of-your-pants mentality to it. Where are folks like Dallas Austin, Nelle Hooper, Brown Banister, anyone who doesn't feel the need to be on the record, chanting their own name (looking at your Rodney)? Where the fuck is Jill Scott or Erykah Badu? Where is goddamn Maxwell? I'd even settle for a new Hootie & The Blowfish album at this point, or Jon Secada to make a comeback. What about Jon B? The Tony Rich Project? Soul II Soul? Hell, even those boy girl acts like Boy Meets Girl ("Waiting For A Star To Fall"), Will To Power, etc?

It's no wonder I listen to a yacht rock station when I do some quilting or another task. To put on the top 40 of today? Pffft, bitch please. And they say rap encourages violence? Put on something from today and see if I don't start punching a wall. LOL

I'm glad for folks like Mayer Hawthorne (who has such a love for 80s music), Chromeo (who has a huge stake in the 80s), or Confection (Aussie act who makes 80s-inspired music), or Sneaky Sound System. But even Fitz and the Tantrums have all but disappeared. But that stuff is so far and few between....

Alexa. Play yacht rock station on Amazon Music in the lounge.



If you like Mayer Hawthorne and Chromeo I'd definitely recommend Ekkah. They're like a female Chromeo. Check out their new song Wendy's Yard on YouTube. Some good shit!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 12/10/20 3:33pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

looby said:

Prince wrote his own songs, played his own instruments,

So what? Paul McCartney can do that.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 12/10/20 3:39pm

EmmaMcG

MickyDolenz said:



looby said:


Prince wrote his own songs, played his own instruments,



So what? Paul McCartney can do that.



A lot of people can do that but that's not really the point. I think looby might have misread what I wrote or perhaps I didn't make myself clear enough and they thought I was putting Prince down in some way. In actual fact I meant the opposite but look, it is what it is. Mistakes happen.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 12/10/20 3:40pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

JayCrawford said:

It's a shame that music has been awful for the past 27 years.

That's your opinion. I'm pretty sure the people who buy it or listen to it don't think that. Also why make 20 threads about the same "get off my lawn" topic? lol


You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 12/10/20 3:47pm

JayCrawford

MickyDolenz said:



looby said:


Prince wrote his own songs, played his own instruments,



So what? Paul McCartney can do that.



I always thought Paul was better than Prince at that. There are certain Prince fans who do act like the man couldn't do no wrong
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 12/10/20 4:02pm

Phase3

JayCrawford said:

MickyDolenz said:



looby said:


Prince wrote his own songs, played his own instruments,



So what? Paul McCartney can do that.



I always thought Paul was better than Prince at that. There are certain Prince fans who do act like the man couldn't do no wrong

Paul mccartney? He's ok I guess.Compared to prince,his music is kinda boring
[Edited 12/10/20 16:02pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 12/10/20 5:27pm

S2DG

avatar

MickyDolenz said:

JayCrawford said:

It's a shame that music has been awful for the past 27 years.

That's your opinion. I'm pretty sure the people who buy it or listen to it don't think that. Also why make 20 threads about the same "get off my lawn" topic? lol




falloff

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 12/10/20 5:59pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 12/10/20 6:52pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

JayCrawford said:


I don't know how old you are but you sound pretty young. Who actually thinks artists like Maxwell, Jill Scott, Erykah Nadu Soul II Soul Tony Rich product are even great? Let alone some of producers you mentioned were not even great. Who in the hell is actually going to be humming to their songs? Real talent happened throughout the 60s-80s MJ, Prince, Donna Summer, Marvin Gaye, Beatles, Rolling Stones and so much more legendary talents. The producers from the golden age Quincy Jones, Giorgio Moroder, Gamble and Huff, Brian Eno, Phil Spector and loads more. That is real talent


Let me be clear: I'm mentioning anyone that made remotely better music than anything on the radio in the last 10 years. If that means I have to hear "Back To Life" again instead of something by Lil' _____ or (Name) The (Noun), so be it.

And I'm 52. I'm a Gen X'er. Born in 1968.

If you don't think Jill Scott, Maxwell, or Erykah Badu are great, well, that's on you. Who Is and Urban Hang Suite are two of the best neo-soul records ever released. (And both beat D'Angelo's Voodoo, IMO.)

Prince, Donna Summer, Marvin Gaye, half the Beatles, and most of the Rolling Stones are dead anyway.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 12/10/20 6:53pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

purplethunder3121 said:

He ain't young...like I ain't. lol


Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 12/10/20 7:25pm

JayCrawford

TrivialPursuit said:



JayCrawford said:



I don't know how old you are but you sound pretty young. Who actually thinks artists like Maxwell, Jill Scott, Erykah Nadu Soul II Soul Tony Rich product are even great? Let alone some of producers you mentioned were not even great. Who in the hell is actually going to be humming to their songs? Real talent happened throughout the 60s-80s MJ, Prince, Donna Summer, Marvin Gaye, Beatles, Rolling Stones and so much more legendary talents. The producers from the golden age Quincy Jones, Giorgio Moroder, Gamble and Huff, Brian Eno, Phil Spector and loads more. That is real talent


Let me be clear: I'm mentioning anyone that made remotely better music than anything on the radio in the last 10 years. If that means I have to hear "Back To Life" again instead of something by Lil' _____ or (Name) The (Noun), so be it.

And I'm 52. I'm a Gen X'er. Born in 1968.

If you don't think Jill Scott, Maxwell, or Erykah Badu are great, well, that's on you. Who Is and Urban Hang Suite are two of the best neo-soul records ever released. (And both beat D'Angelo's Voodoo, IMO.)

Prince, Donna Summer, Marvin Gaye, half the Beatles, and most of the Rolling Stones are dead anyway.




Doesn't matter if they're dead, they were real talented artists who changed the industry
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 12/10/20 7:33pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

TrivialPursuit said:

purplethunder3121 said:

He ain't young...like I ain't. lol


evillol

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 12/10/20 7:35pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

TrivialPursuit said:

and most of the Rolling Stones are dead anyway.

They're all alive except Brian Jones and he passed in the 1960s.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 12/10/20 7:39pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

MickyDolenz said:

TrivialPursuit said:

and most of the Rolling Stones are dead anyway.

They're all alive except Brian Jones and he passed in the 1960s.

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 12/10/20 8:18pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

^^I'm more surprised that Mick Jagger & Ronnie Wood are still having children in their 70s razz

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 5 12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > What has happened to music ?