independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > MJ's "This Is It" film,11 years later
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 08/11/20 9:42pm

Phase3

MJ's "This Is It" film,11 years later

I have been binging on MJ films as of late.I watched "The Jacksons-An american dream last night and tonight I watched the "This is it" film since I only saw it once 11 years ago when it first came out.
I am wanting to know what do you all think of it? Is it a great concert type film? What are some things you would have changed about it? Also in only own this film on DVD. For the ones who have this on bluray,are the complete music videos for "thriller" and "smooth criminal" included? They looked great updated.
My opinion is that the film is great and really shows that MJ was trying his hardest to make every single thing right about the concert.He seemed out of breath at times but I guess that's understandable being that it had been maybe 13 years since he had last toured.He looked very skinny,skinny than usual to me.Was MJ vegan during the last years of his life hy chance?
It is a shame we never got to the actual concert but grateful for the film they put together.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 08/11/20 10:00pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

It's definitely not a concert film. At most, it's a haphazard documentary.

I think some of the extras on the BluRay should've been included in the actual film, like the technology behind some of his costumes. The level of creation was amazing.

The "Thriller" and "Smooth Criminal" segments were the backdrop video that would've been projected onscreen as a concert segue (Cher, Janet, Madonna, and others use this a lot for costume changes, set changes, etc). There are "performances" of songs, like "The Way You Make Me Feel," "Thriller," "Smooth Criminal," etc. But they're basically running thru songs, doing some staging, etc.

I think while fans enjoy the film, it was also a bit of a cash grab on the estate's part. But then again, it was sort of demanded in some way - something had to come out to show the process of the show being put together. MJ sorta filmed everything the way Prince did, so God only knows what is in his vaults.


Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 08/11/20 10:06pm

alphastreet

I’m glad it was released but preferred the dangerous rehearsals and was kind of snobby about it cause I was upset about his death that time. But I guess it’s aged well and is precious in its own way
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 08/11/20 10:50pm

Free2BMe

Phase3 said:

I have been binging on MJ films as of late.I watched "The Jacksons-An american dream last night and tonight I watched the "This is it" film since I only saw it once 11 years ago when it first came out.
I am wanting to know what do you all think of it? Is it a great concert type film? What are some things you would have changed about it? Also in only own this film on DVD. For the ones who have this on bluray,are the complete music videos for "thriller" and "smooth criminal" included? They looked great updated.
My opinion is that the film is great and really shows that MJ was trying his hardest to make every single thing right about the concert.He seemed out of breath at times but I guess that's understandable being that it had been maybe 13 years since he had last toured.He looked very skinny,skinny than usual to me.Was MJ vegan during the last years of his life hy chance?
It is a shame we never got to the actual concert but grateful for the film they put together.



I actually saw the premier of this film at a movie theater. It was great being able to view this with other MJ fans in the audience and to hear their reactions. I loved seeing Michael in the process of preparing for the This Is It concert. It was also heartbreaking that we never were able to witness the concert live and in person. I know it would have been great. Btw, I enjoy the DVD and the behind the scenes footage. I’m glad that the Estate released this. Let’s remember that it is the job of an estate(any estate), to make money$$$.
P
[Edited 8/11/20 22:52pm]
[Edited 8/11/20 22:57pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 08/12/20 12:27am

EmmaMcG

I m a huge Michael Jackson fan. He's in my top 3 favourite artists of all time. But I hated This Is It. Hated it. First of all, it was a shameless cash in. I'd say his body wasn't even cold yet and his scummy family were thinking of ways they could cash in on his death. Not only that but the quality of the actual documentary was poor. Badly edited rehearsal footage of what was clearly not a well man just going through the motions is not my idea of a great send off for pop music's biggest ever star.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 08/12/20 4:39am

RJOrion

EmmaMcG said:

I m a huge Michael Jackson fan. He's in my top 3 favourite artists of all time. But I hated This Is It. Hated it. First of all, it was a shameless cash in. I'd say his body wasn't even cold yet and his scummy family were thinking of ways they could cash in on his death. Not only that but the quality of the actual documentary was poor. Badly edited rehearsal footage of what was clearly not a well man just going through the motions is not my idea of a great send off for pop music's biggest ever star.



yeahthat
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 08/12/20 1:05pm

PatrickS77

avatar

EmmaMcG said:

I m a huge Michael Jackson fan. He's in my top 3 favourite artists of all time. But I hated This Is It. Hated it. First of all, it was a shameless cash in. I'd say his body wasn't even cold yet and his scummy family were thinking of ways they could cash in on his death. Not only that but the quality of the actual documentary was poor. Badly edited rehearsal footage of what was clearly not a well man just going through the motions is not my idea of a great send off for pop music's biggest ever star.

A) his family had nothing to do with it

B) Duh, it was never meant to be a documentary, so all things considered, it turned out great. Fans needed that. And I'm forever grateful, that it was released and so quick.

C) That he was not a well man is your projection, clouded by what happened the night and morning of the 25th. The footage shown, shows that he was together enough to know what he was doing and that he wanted this.

D) It's a tragedy he never got to complete the show. I would be an ever "bigger" tragedy, had that footage never been released.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 08/12/20 4:33pm

EmmaMcG

PatrickS77 said:



EmmaMcG said:


I m a huge Michael Jackson fan. He's in my top 3 favourite artists of all time. But I hated This Is It. Hated it. First of all, it was a shameless cash in. I'd say his body wasn't even cold yet and his scummy family were thinking of ways they could cash in on his death. Not only that but the quality of the actual documentary was poor. Badly edited rehearsal footage of what was clearly not a well man just going through the motions is not my idea of a great send off for pop music's biggest ever star.


A) his family had nothing to do with it


B) Duh, it was never meant to be a documentary, so all things considered, it turned out great. Fans needed that. And I'm forever grateful, that it was released and so quick.


C) That he was not a well man is your projection, clouded by what happened the night and morning of the 25th. The footage shown, shows that he was together enough to know what he was doing and that he wanted this.


D) It's a tragedy he never got to complete the show. I would be an ever "bigger" tragedy, had that footage never been released.




A) I'll take your word for it but I'm sure they were compensated in some way.

B) Regardless of what it was meant to be, it is badly edited rehearsal footage that was clearly pieced together in a hurry to cash in on the man's death.

C) It's clear to anyone with a working pair of eyes that he was not in good health when this was filmed. His voice was weak, his dancing was off and he was much thinner than he was only a few months prior.

D) I think it's pushing it a bit to say it would be a tragedy if the footage was never released. Sure, it's nice to see some of the behind the scenes stuff but the haphazard nature of the movie itself just undermines everything Michael Jackson stood for when it came to his output. The whole This Is It thing comes across as tacky, disrespectful and amateurish in it's execution.


If you enjoy it, then I'm happy for you. But I personally feel that the man deserved better than that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 08/12/20 10:23pm

MattyJam

avatar

EmmaMcG said:

PatrickS77 said:

A) his family had nothing to do with it

B) Duh, it was never meant to be a documentary, so all things considered, it turned out great. Fans needed that. And I'm forever grateful, that it was released and so quick.

C) That he was not a well man is your projection, clouded by what happened the night and morning of the 25th. The footage shown, shows that he was together enough to know what he was doing and that he wanted this.

D) It's a tragedy he never got to complete the show. I would be an ever "bigger" tragedy, had that footage never been released.

A) I'll take your word for it but I'm sure they were compensated in some way. B) Regardless of what it was meant to be, it is badly edited rehearsal footage that was clearly pieced together in a hurry to cash in on the man's death. C) It's clear to anyone with a working pair of eyes that he was not in good health when this was filmed. His voice was weak, his dancing was off and he was much thinner than he was only a few months prior. D) I think it's pushing it a bit to say it would be a tragedy if the footage was never released. Sure, it's nice to see some of the behind the scenes stuff but the haphazard nature of the movie itself just undermines everything Michael Jackson stood for when it came to his output. The whole This Is It thing comes across as tacky, disrespectful and amateurish in it's execution. If you enjoy it, then I'm happy for you. But I personally feel that the man deserved better than that.

I agree with some of your points, but not that his voice was weak. The live singing on Human Nature, I Just Can't Stop Loving You and I'll Be There was the best I'd heard him sound since the Dangerous tour,

He did look painfully thin though.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 08/13/20 1:26am

Free2BMe

PatrickS77 said:



EmmaMcG said:


I m a huge Michael Jackson fan. He's in my top 3 favourite artists of all time. But I hated This Is It. Hated it. First of all, it was a shameless cash in. I'd say his body wasn't even cold yet and his scummy family were thinking of ways they could cash in on his death. Not only that but the quality of the actual documentary was poor. Badly edited rehearsal footage of what was clearly not a well man just going through the motions is not my idea of a great send off for pop music's biggest ever star.


A) his family had nothing to do with it


B) Duh, it was never meant to be a documentary, so all things considered, it turned out great. Fans needed that. And I'm forever grateful, that it was released and so quick.


C) That he was not a well man is your projection, clouded by what happened the night and morning of the 25th. The footage shown, shows that he was together enough to know what he was doing and that he wanted this.


D) It's a tragedy he never got to complete the show. I would be an ever "bigger" tragedy, had that footage never been released.



👏👏👏👏Thank You! I agree 100% with EVERYTHING that you posted.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 08/13/20 4:04am

PatrickS77

avatar

EmmaMcG said:

PatrickS77 said:

A) his family had nothing to do with it

B) Duh, it was never meant to be a documentary, so all things considered, it turned out great. Fans needed that. And I'm forever grateful, that it was released and so quick.

C) That he was not a well man is your projection, clouded by what happened the night and morning of the 25th. The footage shown, shows that he was together enough to know what he was doing and that he wanted this.

D) It's a tragedy he never got to complete the show. I would be an ever "bigger" tragedy, had that footage never been released.

A) I'll take your word for it but I'm sure they were compensated in some way. B) Regardless of what it was meant to be, it is badly edited rehearsal footage that was clearly pieced together in a hurry to cash in on the man's death. C) It's clear to anyone with a working pair of eyes that he was not in good health when this was filmed. His voice was weak, his dancing was off and he was much thinner than he was only a few months prior. D) I think it's pushing it a bit to say it would be a tragedy if the footage was never released. Sure, it's nice to see some of the behind the scenes stuff but the haphazard nature of the movie itself just undermines everything Michael Jackson stood for when it came to his output. The whole This Is It thing comes across as tacky, disrespectful and amateurish in it's execution. If you enjoy it, then I'm happy for you. But I personally feel that the man deserved better than that.



A) What you’re sure of and imagine don’t matter (but pretty much telling about you). Fact is, they weren’t and don’t have any claim on any money made with that movie (or even input in the decision on whether to release it or not).

B) Any documentary is „pieced together“ and as for „badly edited“ (whatever the hell that means), ii‘s your impression. I doubt you’re a professional.

C) No. What is clear is that you are projecting. Michael didn’t die because he was sick, so there is nothing to see. Michael died because his doctor shot him up with Propofol and left him to die. His singing and dancing was good enough for the occasion, which was a rehearsal in an empty arena, where he never went full out. He’s always been thin. So him getting thinner in a time of high work to get the show together is not all that shocking.

D) That he died is the main tragedy. But to not see what he was working on in his last months and to not have the footage showing him pouring his heart into, putting a great show together, rot away in a vault, having him die in vain in a sense, would make this whole thing even worse. And I’m sure you would be among the first to complain about the evil Sony/AEG depriving us of our last moments with Michael (like any fan of the man would).


What I would have enjoyed would be attending 20 shows in London on the „This is it“ residency (for which I had tickets). What Michael would have deserved is to get that triumphant return to the stage in front of 1 million of his fans, proving all naysayers wrong. We both didn’t get that. What I appreciate and I’m glad about is, that at least we got to see the rehearsal footage to get a glimpse of what he was working on and what was planned. That the world got to see that at the end of his life, he wasn’t holed up somewhere, far removed from his glory days as a performer, but that he still was performing and in the process of putting his biggest show together and that he still had it. That documetary is his legacy. Despite anything that went on, he went out performing, doing what he does best. The world needed to see that.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 08/13/20 4:20am

woogiebear

It took Me 11 Years to FINALLY watch it!!!!

sad sad sad

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 08/13/20 5:56am

EmmaMcG

PatrickS77 said:



EmmaMcG said:


PatrickS77 said:



A) his family had nothing to do with it


B) Duh, it was never meant to be a documentary, so all things considered, it turned out great. Fans needed that. And I'm forever grateful, that it was released and so quick.


C) That he was not a well man is your projection, clouded by what happened the night and morning of the 25th. The footage shown, shows that he was together enough to know what he was doing and that he wanted this.


D) It's a tragedy he never got to complete the show. I would be an ever "bigger" tragedy, had that footage never been released.



A) I'll take your word for it but I'm sure they were compensated in some way. B) Regardless of what it was meant to be, it is badly edited rehearsal footage that was clearly pieced together in a hurry to cash in on the man's death. C) It's clear to anyone with a working pair of eyes that he was not in good health when this was filmed. His voice was weak, his dancing was off and he was much thinner than he was only a few months prior. D) I think it's pushing it a bit to say it would be a tragedy if the footage was never released. Sure, it's nice to see some of the behind the scenes stuff but the haphazard nature of the movie itself just undermines everything Michael Jackson stood for when it came to his output. The whole This Is It thing comes across as tacky, disrespectful and amateurish in it's execution. If you enjoy it, then I'm happy for you. But I personally feel that the man deserved better than that.




A) What you’re sure of and imagine don’t matter (but pretty much telling about you). Fact is, they weren’t and don’t have any claim on any money made with that movie (or even input in the decision on whether to release it or not).


B) Any documentary is „pieced together“ and as for „badly edited“ (whatever the hell that means), ii‘s your impression. I doubt you’re a professional.


C) No. What is clear is that you are projecting. Michael didn’t die because he was sick, so there is nothing to see. Michael died because his doctor shot him up with Propofol and left him to die. His singing and dancing was good enough for the occasion, which was a rehearsal in an empty arena, where he never went full out. He’s always been thin. So him getting thinner in a time of high work to get the show together is not all that shocking.


D) That he died is the main tragedy. But to not see what he was working on in his last months and to not have the footage showing him pouring his heart into, putting a great show together, rot away in a vault, having him die in vain in a sense, would make this whole thing even worse. And I’m sure you would be among the first to complain about the evil Sony/AEG depriving us of our last moments with Michael (like any fan of the man would).



What I would have enjoyed would be attending 20 shows in London on the „This is it“ residency (for which I had tickets). What Michael would have deserved is to get that triumphant return to the stage in front of 1 million of his fans, proving all naysayers wrong. We both didn’t get that. What I appreciate and I’m glad about is, that at least we got to see the rehearsal footage to get a glimpse of what he was working on and what was planned. That the world got to see that at the end of his life, he wasn’t holed up somewhere, far removed from his glory days as a performer, but that he still was performing and in the process of putting his biggest show together and that he still had it. That documetary is his legacy. Despite anything that went on, he went out performing, doing what he does best. The world needed to see that.




A & B) It's clear that you're one of THOSE fans that can't accept any criticism of Michael Jackson. So it's not really worth my time explaining to you why or how the footage is badly edited.

C) I never once stated that he died because he was sick. That's just you trying to put words in my mouth so when you refute it you can pat yourself on the back for "winning" that particular argument. But the problem with that is that I never actually said he died from sickness. But if it makes you feel better to pretend I did, then that's fine. But my point was that this footage does not capture him at his best. Far from it. He doesn't look healthy at all in this footage and comes across as a bad Michael Jackson impersonator. Which, as a massive MJ fan, is very disappointing and sad to see.

D) I don't see Sony as being "evil" or any of that so I don't know where you get that from. They're a business and so made a business decision to take advantage of the man's death. There's a lot of that going around. But rather than tarnish his legacy with subpar "concert movies" or documentaries that they rushed out to capitalise on his death, as a fan, I would have preferred if they had taken their time to create a proper documentary and released it alongside some unreleased music from his final recording sessions. And if they want to include some of the This Is It rehearsal footage in the full documentary, like the Human Nature performance for example, then that's great.


My whole disappointment with This Is It stems from how little thought was put into it. MJ would take years crafting each album, perfecting it and making it sound just like he wanted. That's why each album is special. It's what set him apart from most other popstars. This Is It completely goes against that premise. And whereas I do like to see what was planned for the Thriller performance etc and how much work he was putting into his comeback shows, This Is It is just amateurish filmmaking at it's worst. Rushed, lazy and a total missed opportunity.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 08/13/20 6:27am

PatrickS77

avatar

EmmaMcG said:

PatrickS77 said:



A) What you’re sure of and imagine don’t matter (but pretty much telling about you). Fact is, they weren’t and don’t have any claim on any money made with that movie (or even input in the decision on whether to release it or not).

B) Any documentary is „pieced together“ and as for „badly edited“ (whatever the hell that means), ii‘s your impression. I doubt you’re a professional.

C) No. What is clear is that you are projecting. Michael didn’t die because he was sick, so there is nothing to see. Michael died because his doctor shot him up with Propofol and left him to die. His singing and dancing was good enough for the occasion, which was a rehearsal in an empty arena, where he never went full out. He’s always been thin. So him getting thinner in a time of high work to get the show together is not all that shocking.

D) That he died is the main tragedy. But to not see what he was working on in his last months and to not have the footage showing him pouring his heart into, putting a great show together, rot away in a vault, having him die in vain in a sense, would make this whole thing even worse. And I’m sure you would be among the first to complain about the evil Sony/AEG depriving us of our last moments with Michael (like any fan of the man would).


What I would have enjoyed would be attending 20 shows in London on the „This is it“ residency (for which I had tickets). What Michael would have deserved is to get that triumphant return to the stage in front of 1 million of his fans, proving all naysayers wrong. We both didn’t get that. What I appreciate and I’m glad about is, that at least we got to see the rehearsal footage to get a glimpse of what he was working on and what was planned. That the world got to see that at the end of his life, he wasn’t holed up somewhere, far removed from his glory days as a performer, but that he still was performing and in the process of putting his biggest show together and that he still had it. That documetary is his legacy. Despite anything that went on, he went out performing, doing what he does best. The world needed to see that.

A & B) It's clear that you're one of THOSE fans that can't accept any criticism of Michael Jackson. So it's not really worth my time explaining to you why or how the footage is badly edited. C) I never once stated that he died because he was sick. That's just you trying to put words in my mouth so when you refute it you can pat yourself on the back for "winning" that particular argument. But the problem with that is that I never actually said he died from sickness. But if it makes you feel better to pretend I did, then that's fine. But my point was that this footage does not capture him at his best. Far from it. He doesn't look healthy at all in this footage and comes across as a bad Michael Jackson impersonator. Which, as a massive MJ fan, is very disappointing and sad to see. D) I don't see Sony as being "evil" or any of that so I don't know where you get that from. They're a business and so made a business decision to take advantage of the man's death. There's a lot of that going around. But rather than tarnish his legacy with subpar "concert movies" or documentaries that they rushed out to capitalise on his death, as a fan, I would have preferred if they had taken their time to create a proper documentary and released it alongside some unreleased music from his final recording sessions. And if they want to include some of the This Is It rehearsal footage in the full documentary, like the Human Nature performance for example, then that's great. My whole disappointment with This Is It stems from how little thought was put into it. MJ would take years crafting each album, perfecting it and making it sound just like he wanted. That's why each album is special. It's what set him apart from most other popstars. This Is It completely goes against that premise. And whereas I do like to see what was planned for the Thriller performance etc and how much work he was putting into his comeback shows, This Is It is just amateurish filmmaking at it's worst. Rushed, lazy and a total missed opportunity.



A & B) doesn’t even make sense, as both has nothing to do with Michael Jackson.

C) You were claiming you see a person that is not well. The only reason you do that is because he died. But him dying has nothing to do with whatever you think you’re seeing. And what you’re seeing is a guy rehearsing, not giving his all. Not going in 100%, as that would make no sense, as it’s only a rehearsal.

D) They didn’t take advantage. They tried to make the best of a horrible situation and gave fans what they wanted: to see that footage. Nothing got tarnished, quite to the contrary, as the footage shows a different picture than the drab narrative some want to push. Also no one wanted to see another damn documentary with old stock footage and talking heads at the time. Also he wasn’t working on new music, he was working on a show, so no need to release unreleased music at that point.

Why do you compare the creation of a show to the creation of an album. Show rehearsals were always somewhat rushed and not projects that lasted for years. „This is it“ (the documentary) goes against that because, 1) it’s no album and 2) he died. There is nothing further he could contribute. They had to work with the footage they had and did a great job with it. And if you think no thought went into „This is it“ (the show), I suggest you watch the documentary again. Seriously, all of your „critisicms“ are total bullshit and don't make too much sense..

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 08/13/20 8:50am

EmmaMcG

PatrickS77 said:



EmmaMcG said:


PatrickS77 said:





A) What you’re sure of and imagine don’t matter (but pretty much telling about you). Fact is, they weren’t and don’t have any claim on any money made with that movie (or even input in the decision on whether to release it or not).


B) Any documentary is „pieced together“ and as for „badly edited“ (whatever the hell that means), ii‘s your impression. I doubt you’re a professional.


C) No. What is clear is that you are projecting. Michael didn’t die because he was sick, so there is nothing to see. Michael died because his doctor shot him up with Propofol and left him to die. His singing and dancing was good enough for the occasion, which was a rehearsal in an empty arena, where he never went full out. He’s always been thin. So him getting thinner in a time of high work to get the show together is not all that shocking.


D) That he died is the main tragedy. But to not see what he was working on in his last months and to not have the footage showing him pouring his heart into, putting a great show together, rot away in a vault, having him die in vain in a sense, would make this whole thing even worse. And I’m sure you would be among the first to complain about the evil Sony/AEG depriving us of our last moments with Michael (like any fan of the man would).



What I would have enjoyed would be attending 20 shows in London on the „This is it“ residency (for which I had tickets). What Michael would have deserved is to get that triumphant return to the stage in front of 1 million of his fans, proving all naysayers wrong. We both didn’t get that. What I appreciate and I’m glad about is, that at least we got to see the rehearsal footage to get a glimpse of what he was working on and what was planned. That the world got to see that at the end of his life, he wasn’t holed up somewhere, far removed from his glory days as a performer, but that he still was performing and in the process of putting his biggest show together and that he still had it. That documetary is his legacy. Despite anything that went on, he went out performing, doing what he does best. The world needed to see that.




A & B) It's clear that you're one of THOSE fans that can't accept any criticism of Michael Jackson. So it's not really worth my time explaining to you why or how the footage is badly edited. C) I never once stated that he died because he was sick. That's just you trying to put words in my mouth so when you refute it you can pat yourself on the back for "winning" that particular argument. But the problem with that is that I never actually said he died from sickness. But if it makes you feel better to pretend I did, then that's fine. But my point was that this footage does not capture him at his best. Far from it. He doesn't look healthy at all in this footage and comes across as a bad Michael Jackson impersonator. Which, as a massive MJ fan, is very disappointing and sad to see. D) I don't see Sony as being "evil" or any of that so I don't know where you get that from. They're a business and so made a business decision to take advantage of the man's death. There's a lot of that going around. But rather than tarnish his legacy with subpar "concert movies" or documentaries that they rushed out to capitalise on his death, as a fan, I would have preferred if they had taken their time to create a proper documentary and released it alongside some unreleased music from his final recording sessions. And if they want to include some of the This Is It rehearsal footage in the full documentary, like the Human Nature performance for example, then that's great. My whole disappointment with This Is It stems from how little thought was put into it. MJ would take years crafting each album, perfecting it and making it sound just like he wanted. That's why each album is special. It's what set him apart from most other popstars. This Is It completely goes against that premise. And whereas I do like to see what was planned for the Thriller performance etc and how much work he was putting into his comeback shows, This Is It is just amateurish filmmaking at it's worst. Rushed, lazy and a total missed opportunity.




A & B) doesn’t even make sense, as both has nothing to do with Michael Jackson.



C) You were claiming you see a person that is not well. The only reason you do that is because he died. But him dying has nothing to do with whatever you think you’re seeing. And what you’re seeing is a guy rehearsing, not giving his all. Not going in 100%, as that would make no sense, as it’s only a rehearsal.



D) They didn’t take advantage. They tried to make the best of a horrible situation and gave fans what they wanted: to see that footage. Nothing got tarnished, quite to the contrary, as the footage shows a different picture than the drab narrative some want to push. Also no one wanted to see another damn documentary with old stock footage and talking heads at the time. Also he wasn’t working on new music, he was working on a show, so no need to release unreleased music at that point.



Why do you compare the creation of a show to the creation of an album. Show rehearsals were always somewhat rushed and not projects that lasted for years. „This is it“ (the documentary) goes against that because, 1) it’s no album and 2) he died. There is nothing further he could contribute. They had to work with the footage they had and did a great job with it. And if you think no thought went into „This is it“ (the show), I suggest you watch the documentary again. Seriously, all of your „critisicms“ are total bullshit and don't make too much sense..



Once again you think you know what I mean when I talk about MJ looking ill and once again you are completely and utterly wrong. And once again I will tell you that I was NOT referencing his death in any way. Read the words I write, not your own interpretation of them. I've been very clear on what I mean. The reason I bring up his unhealthy appearance is not because he died shortly afterwards. The reason I bring it up is because he looks tired, gaunt, too thin and lacking energy. You can put it down to it just being a rehearsal but I've taken part in enough of those kinds of rehearsals to know that what he was doing was just going through the motions. It didn't look to me like his heart was in it. That's not the kind of legacy he deserves.

Also, and this is another example of you not actually reading what I'm writing and instead attributing your own meaning to it, but I didn't say that no thought went into the This Is It shows. Read it again and you'll see I'm referring to the actual documentary itself. And if you can't see what I'm getting at with my criticism of it then I'd put that down to your lack of understanding of how these kinds of docs SHOULD be edited. But needless to say, editing together different clips of the same song during the one "performance" is not how to do it.

Look, I know you're clearly a superfan so there's simply no getting through to you. Let's just agree to disagree and move on, yeah?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 08/13/20 9:32am

Doalwa

I've watched it once 11 years ago and have never looked at it since...in my opinion, MJ probably wouldnt have wanted this footage to get out...he was a perfectionist and rehearsels were simply that...rehearsels, not meant for public consumption.

But I disagree when people say that he looked off, he was thin, true...but then again, he was probably getting in shape for the show and he was never a big man.

And his vocals on Human Nature were out of this world, dude still had it in him..but I can't help but think that his heart wasn't really in it, he probably only wanted a final paycheck and spent his time raising his children...dude was rocking it since being a little kid after all..had nothing left to prove.

Sadly he was robbed this opportunity.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 08/13/20 2:05pm

BlueShakooo

To me it was an interesting glimpse at the reality of his last weeks.
But since Leaving Neverland I find it really hard to enjoy Michael's stuff.
Yes, after years of being a defender - but not quite like those who are gonna hate and attack me for this post - I allowed myself to change my mind.
I believe R. Kelly's, Harvey Weinstein's and Bill Cosby's victims.
Because there are too many IMO.
Just didn't make sense, that I would constantly make an exception for Michael (just because I like his music and dancing).
But back to topic:
I remember liking This Is It.
[Edited 8/13/20 14:06pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 08/13/20 6:02pm

Free2BMe

PatrickS77 said:



EmmaMcG said:


PatrickS77 said:


S


A) his family had nothing to do with it


B) Duh, it was never meant to be a documentary, so all things considered, it turned out great. Fans needed that. And I'm forever grateful, that it was released and so quick.


C) That he was not a well man is your projection, clouded by what happened the night and morning of the 25th. The footage shown, shows that he was together enough to know what he was doing and that he wanted this.


D) It's a tragedy he never got to complete the show. I would be an ever "bigger" tragedy, had that footage never been released.



A) I'll take your word for it but I'm sure they were compensated in some way. B) Regardless of what it was meant to be, it is badly edited rehearsal footage that was clearly pieced together in a hurry to cash in on the man's death. C) It's clear to anyone with a working pair of eyes that he was not in good health when this was filmed. His voice was weak, his dancing was off and he was much thinner than he was only a few months prior. D) I think it's pushing it a bit to say it would be a tragedy if the footage was never released. Sure, it's nice to see some of the behind the scenes stuff but the haphazard nature of the movie itself just undermines everything Michael Jackson stood for when it came to his output. The whole This Is It thing comes across as tacky, disrespectful and amateurish in it's execution. If you enjoy it, then I'm happy for you. But I personally feel that the man deserved better than that.




A) What you’re sure of and imagine don’t matter (but pretty much telling about you). Fact is, they weren’t and don’t have any claim on any money made with that movie (or even input in the decision on whether to release it or not).


B) Any documentary is „pieced together“ and as for „badly edited“ (whatever the hell that means), ii‘s your impression. I doubt you’re a professional.


C) No. What is clear is that you are projecting. Michael didn’t die because he was sick, so there is nothing to see. Michael died because his doctor shot him up with Propofol and left him to die. His singing and dancing was good enough for the occasion, which was a rehearsal in an empty arena, where he never went full out. He’s always been thin. So him getting thinner in a time of high work to get the show together is not all that shocking.


D) That he died is the main tragedy. But to not see what he was working on in his last months and to not have the footage showing him pouring his heart into, putting a great show together, rot away in a vault, having him die in vain in a sense, would make this whole thing even worse. And I’m sure you would be among the first to complain about the evil Sony/AEG depriving us of our last moments with Michael (like any fan of the man would).



What I would have enjoyed would be attending 20 shows in London on the „This is it“ residency (for which I had tickets). What Michael would have deserved is to get that triumphant return to the stage in front of 1 million of his fans, proving all naysayers wrong. We both didn’t get that. What I appreciate and I’m glad about is, that at least we got to see the rehearsal footage to get a glimpse of what he was working on and what was planned. That the world got to see that at the end of his life, he wasn’t holed up somewhere, far removed from his glory days as a performer, but that he still was performing and in the process of putting his biggest show together and that he still had it. That documetary is his legacy. Despite anything that went on, he went out performing, doing what he does best. The world needed to see that.




AGAIN, you expressed my opinions, thoughts, sentiments, etc. exactly. I just want to add one thing; Michael was thin because that murdering son of a bitch, Conrad Murray, was recommending Michael just drink liquids and had Michael on a very strict diet, according to his chef and children. That bastard killed Michael either intentionally or with his gross negligence.

Thank you for hitting all the points and setting record straight with facts and not speculation, innuendo, and rumors.
[Edited 8/13/20 18:09pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 08/13/20 6:35pm

Phase3

Doalwa said:

I've watched it once 11 years ago and have never looked at it since...in my opinion, MJ probably wouldnt have wanted this footage to get out...he was a perfectionist and rehearsels were simply that...rehearsels, not meant for public consumption.



But I disagree when people say that he looked off, he was thin, true...but then again, he was probably getting in shape for the show and he was never a big man.



And his vocals on Human Nature were out of this world, dude still had it in him..but I can't help but think that his heart wasn't really in it, he probably only wanted a final paycheck and spent his time raising his children...dude was rocking it since being a little kid after all..had nothing left to prove.



Sadly he was robbed this opportunity.


I still havent seen "Leaving Neverland".It slipped my radar somehow.Do you recommend that I see it?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 08/13/20 7:19pm

alphastreet

Phase3 said:

Doalwa said:

I've watched it once 11 years ago and have never looked at it since...in my opinion, MJ probably wouldnt have wanted this footage to get out...he was a perfectionist and rehearsels were simply that...rehearsels, not meant for public consumption.



But I disagree when people say that he looked off, he was thin, true...but then again, he was probably getting in shape for the show and he was never a big man.



And his vocals on Human Nature were out of this world, dude still had it in him..but I can't help but think that his heart wasn't really in it, he probably only wanted a final paycheck and spent his time raising his children...dude was rocking it since being a little kid after all..had nothing left to prove.



Sadly he was robbed this opportunity.


I still havent seen "Leaving Neverland".It slipped my radar somehow.Do you recommend that I see it?


Nah, don’t waste 4 hours of you life with that crap
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 08/14/20 3:25am

slyjackson

alphastreet said:

Phase3 said:
I still havent seen "Leaving Neverland".It slipped my radar somehow.Do you recommend that I see it?
Nah, don’t waste 4 hours of you life with that crap

Second this. I loved it when I saw this for the very first time on big screen. HUman Nature is the best performance in the film.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 08/14/20 3:48am

EmmaMcG

Phase3 said:

Doalwa said:

I've watched it once 11 years ago and have never looked at it since...in my opinion, MJ probably wouldnt have wanted this footage to get out...he was a perfectionist and rehearsels were simply that...rehearsels, not meant for public consumption.



But I disagree when people say that he looked off, he was thin, true...but then again, he was probably getting in shape for the show and he was never a big man.



And his vocals on Human Nature were out of this world, dude still had it in him..but I can't help but think that his heart wasn't really in it, he probably only wanted a final paycheck and spent his time raising his children...dude was rocking it since being a little kid after all..had nothing left to prove.



Sadly he was robbed this opportunity.


I still havent seen "Leaving Neverland".It slipped my radar somehow.Do you recommend that I see it?


That depends on how interested you are in watching a documentary full of complete bullshit and lies.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 08/14/20 6:27am

ThatWhiteDude

avatar

EmmaMcG said:

I m a huge Michael Jackson fan. He's in my top 3 favourite artists of all time. But I hated This Is It. Hated it. First of all, it was a shameless cash in. I'd say his body wasn't even cold yet and his scummy family were thinking of ways they could cash in on his death. Not only that but the quality of the actual documentary was poor. Badly edited rehearsal footage of what was clearly not a well man just going through the motions is not my idea of a great send off for pop music's biggest ever star.

I can agree with this sentiment now. But 14 yeard old me didn't care, it was the best cinema experience I've ever had. Never before and after were people so quiet through the whole movie, the whole They don't care about us segment. I loved every bit of it. I will never forget this experience. But yeah, total cash grab at the estate's part. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 08/14/20 11:26am

EmmaMcG

ThatWhiteDude said:



EmmaMcG said:


I m a huge Michael Jackson fan. He's in my top 3 favourite artists of all time. But I hated This Is It. Hated it. First of all, it was a shameless cash in. I'd say his body wasn't even cold yet and his scummy family were thinking of ways they could cash in on his death. Not only that but the quality of the actual documentary was poor. Badly edited rehearsal footage of what was clearly not a well man just going through the motions is not my idea of a great send off for pop music's biggest ever star.

I can agree with this sentiment now. But 14 yeard old me didn't care, it was the best cinema experience I've ever had. Never before and after were people so quiet through the whole movie, the whole They don't care about us segment. I loved every bit of it. I will never forget this experience. But yeah, total cash grab at the estate's part. lol



I actually enjoyed it when I seen it in the cinema too, to be honest. I seen it on opening day and there was only myself, my cousin and 3 other people at the screening. Not much call for a Michael Jackson movie in my area. But I was hyped for it and it was that hype that made me look past a lot of the glaring issues it has. Some of the footage is really good though and it's interesting to see what was planned for those shows. Other footage is a bit... well, I've talked about that already in this thread. I just feel like they could have put together something more substantial with the good stuff had they taken some time and really committed to making something worthy of the man rather than going for the quick cash in.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 08/14/20 11:52am

alphastreet

I like the part where mj is on the cherry picker and goes weeeee lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 08/15/20 10:33am

ThatWhiteDude

avatar

EmmaMcG said:

ThatWhiteDude said:

I can agree with this sentiment now. But 14 yeard old me didn't care, it was the best cinema experience I've ever had. Never before and after were people so quiet through the whole movie, the whole They don't care about us segment. I loved every bit of it. I will never forget this experience. But yeah, total cash grab at the estate's part. lol

I actually enjoyed it when I seen it in the cinema too, to be honest. I seen it on opening day and there was only myself, my cousin and 3 other people at the screening. Not much call for a Michael Jackson movie in my area. But I was hyped for it and it was that hype that made me look past a lot of the glaring issues it has. Some of the footage is really good though and it's interesting to see what was planned for those shows. Other footage is a bit... well, I've talked about that already in this thread. I just feel like they could have put together something more substantial with the good stuff had they taken some time and really committed to making something worthy of the man rather than going for the quick cash in.

nod totally agree

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 08/15/20 3:32pm

PatrickS77

avatar

"EmmaMcG said:

Once again you think you know what I mean when I talk about MJ looking ill and once again you are completely and utterly wrong. And once again I will tell you that I was NOT referencing his death in any way. Read the words I write, not your own interpretation of them. I've been very clear on what I mean. The reason I bring up his unhealthy appearance is not because he died shortly afterwards. The reason I bring it up is because he looks tired, gaunt, too thin and lacking energy. You can put it down to it just being a rehearsal but I've taken part in enough of those kinds of rehearsals to know that what he was doing was just going through the motions. It didn't look to me like his heart was in it. That's not the kind of legacy he deserves."

Once more. Your interpretation on what he looked like or what you think he was supposed to look or appear like instead. To some people he looked ill, ever since he didn’t appear black anymore. To other people he looked ill, because he was thin. So, whatever. And really, who cares what rehearsals you have been in? You haven’t been in Michael Jackson rehearsals and whatever you’ve been in has nothing to do with him. So that’s irrelevant. And as far as I know, dance rehearsals are there to get through the motions, to get the shit right (at least for anyone who isn't Michael). The elevation of going beyond through the motions comes, when he performs in front of 15.000 screaming fans.


"Also, and this is another example of you not actually reading what I'm writing and instead attributing your own meaning to it, but I didn't say that no thought went into the This Is It shows. Read it again and you'll see I'm referring to the actual documentary itself. And if you can't see what I'm getting at with my criticism of it then I'd put that down to your lack of understanding of how these kinds of docs SHOULD be edited. But needless to say, editing together different clips of the same song during the one "performance" is not how to do it. Look, I know you're clearly a superfan so there's simply no getting through to you. Let's just agree to disagree and move on, yeah?"

Yeah. And if you read it again, you will see that I responded to both the documentary and the actual show, as it was not quite clear what you meant and wanted to cover both bases, just in case. Take whatever of that applies to you. And yes, editing together different clips is exactly what you do, when you either don’t have full songs or want to show that he actually was at rehearsals more than once. Also if you want to loosen things up, show different angles, want to make it less monotonous and want to show that it was a work in progress. And with him wearing different clothes for different rehearsals also no one can accuse the director of cheating, as it is obvious that different rehearsals were cut together. What you state is your preference, but there is no rule on what is right and what is wrong. But what I’m talking to you? You’re one who claimed to really enjoy the latest Star Wars movie, so you clearly talk but have no clue what you’re talking about (as the movie was a crap movie and a crap Star Wars movie). So on that basis alone, I can’t even take you serious. And yes, I feel bad for remembering that, but some people become memorable for the dumb shit they post. wink



It's been a while since I saw "This is it". I wanted to watch it last year at the anniversary of it's release, but didn't get around doing it. I wanted to watch it this year for the anniversary and also didn't get around doing it. 2 days ago, I finally watched it again (actually the whole BR) and I loved it every bit as I loved it then (minus the releasing strategy of Sony, who split bonus materials up on various formats, still hate them for doing that). They did the perfectly right thing in having Michael be front and center for the feature and have the talking heads shut up for the most part, as it isn't about them, but Michael. He is the star and we are only here for him. They got plenty of room to talk in the accompanying bonus footage on the BR, which perfectly rounds out the documentary. I love how it is not a glossy HD Hollywood production, but also incorporates lesser SD footage, different angles, different occasions and thus just emphasizes that lots of the footage was never meant to be in a documentary, but absolutely needed to be there in light of what happened and that fact that the show will never be. I'm just glad, that the opinions of some are insignificant and means jack shit and that the people who actually had a say in what was going to happen, could see the big picture and didn't care about what some small minded people would think. They made the absolutely right decision in showing that footage, HD or SD and let it mostly speak for itself and let Michael be the center. That documentary and accompaniyng bonus footage is exactly how it should be.


And anybody saying that Michael looked not well, not there, that he wasn't enjoying it and his heart wasn't in it, just needs to open their fucking eyes and objectively watch the fucking material again.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 08/15/20 3:33pm

PatrickS77

avatar

alphastreet said:

I like the part where mj is on the cherry picker and goes weeeeeeeee lol



Yeah. There were many little bits and pieces that showed Michael the person. Loved that too.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 08/15/20 3:38pm

alphastreet

PatrickS77 said:



alphastreet said:


I like the part where mj is on the cherry picker and goes weeeee lol



Yeah. There were many little bits and pieces that showed Michael the person. Loved that too.



I always enjoyed his personality and seeing that was adorable! Wish there was more of it in this is it. I was so heartbroken I never saw him in person cause by that time I was ready to finally see him at this is it and he didn’t live to do it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 08/15/20 8:02pm

Free2BMe

PatrickS77 said:

"EmmaMcG said:


Once again you think you know what I mean when I talk about MJ looking ill and once again you are completely and utterly wrong. And once again I will tell you that I was NOT referencing his death in any way. Read the words I write, not your own interpretation of them. I've been very clear on what I mean. The reason I bring up his unhealthy appearance is not because he died shortly afterwards. The reason I bring it up is because he looks tired, gaunt, too thin and lacking energy. You can put it down to it just being a rehearsal but I've taken part in enough of those kinds of rehearsals to know that what he was doing was just going through the motions. It didn't look to me like his heart was in it. That's not the kind of legacy he deserves."

Once more. Your interpretation on what he looked like or what you think he was supposed to look or appear like instead. To some people he looked ill, ever since he didn’t appear black anymore. To other people he looked ill, because he was thin. So, whatever. And really, who cares what rehearsals you have been in? You haven’t been in Michael Jackson rehearsals and whatever you’ve been in has nothing to do with him. So that’s irrelevant. And as far as I know, dance rehearsals are there to get through the motions, to get the shit right (at least for anyone who isn't Michael). The elevation of going beyond through the motions comes, when he performs in front of 15.000 screaming fans.



"Also, and this is another example of you not actually reading what I'm writing and instead attributing your own meaning to it, but I didn't say that no thought went into the This Is It shows. Read it again and you'll see I'm referring to the actual documentary itself. And if you can't see what I'm getting at with my criticism of it then I'd put that down to your lack of understanding of how these kinds of docs SHOULD be edited. But needless to say, editing together different clips of the same song during the one "performance" is not how to do it. Look, I know you're clearly a superfan so there's simply no getting through to you. Let's just agree to disagree and move on, yeah?"

Yeah. And if you read it again, you will see that I responded to both the documentary and the actual show, as it was not quite clear what you meant and wanted to cover both bases, just in case. Take whatever of that applies to you. And yes, editing together different clips is exactly what you do, when you either don’t have full songs or want to show that he actually was at rehearsals more than once. Also if you want to loosen things up, show different angles, want to make it less monotonous and want to show that it was a work in progress. And with him wearing different clothes for different rehearsals also no one can accuse the director of cheating, as it is obvious that different rehearsals were cut together. What you state is your preference, but there is no rule on what is right and what is wrong. But what I’m talking to you? You’re one who claimed to really enjoy the latest Star Wars movie, so you clearly talk but have no clue what you’re talking about (as the movie was a crap movie and a crap Star Wars movie). So on that basis alone, I can’t even take you serious. And yes, I feel bad for remembering that, but some people become memorable for the dumb shit they post. wink




It's been a while since I saw "This is it". I wanted to watch it last year at the anniversary of it's release, but didn't get around doing it. I wanted to watch it this year for the anniversary and also didn't get around doing it. 2 days ago, I finally watched it again (actually the whole BR) and I loved it every bit as I loved it then (minus the releasing strategy of Sony, who split bonus materials up on various formats, still hate them for doing that). They did the perfectly right thing in having Michael be front and center for the feature and have the talking heads shut up for the most part, as it isn't about them, but Michael. He is the star and we are only here for him. They got plenty of room to talk in the accompanying bonus footage on the BR, which perfectly rounds out the documentary. I love how it is not a glossy HD Hollywood production, but also incorporates lesser SD footage, different angles, different occasions and thus just emphasizes that lots of the footage was never meant to be in a documentary, but absolutely needed to be there in light of what happened and that fact that the show will never be. I'm just glad, that the opinions of some are insignificant and means jack shit and that the people who actually had a say in what was going to happen, could see the big picture and didn't care about what some small minded people would think. They made the absolutely right decision in showing that footage, HD or SD and let it mostly speak for itself and let Michael be the center. That documentary and accompaniyng bonus footage is exactly how it should be.



And anybody saying that Michael looked not well, not there, that he wasn't enjoying it and his heart wasn't in it, just needs to open their fucking eyes and objectively watch the fucking material again.




yeahthat
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > MJ's "This Is It" film,11 years later