Author | Message |
A Condensed, but Case by Case undermining of each molestation accusation against Michael Jackson from 1993 to present I know that there are already a number of threads about this topic, however this link pretty much reveals each case of molestation against Michael Jackson as an effort to extricate money from him using heavily researched phone transcripts, court records among other documents. * * https://mimeticmargins.co...neverland/ * * For me, the real point of interest are the 1993 allegations, which initiated the entire controversy. * And this concurrently widely known yet underreported GQ article from 1994 (admittedly parlayed through a Michael Jackson support site) is the real clincher since it was the first to scrutinize the accusers and their motives with substantial research. https://mjjtruthnow.wordp...legations/ * * It seems unbelievable that all of this information was not widely dissemenated to the public during 1993-1994, yet its also worth pointing out that the media coverage that time largely consisted of television, print and radio as the dominant avenues, easily emanating one sided sensationalist coverage without inspecting the other side. * * It's pretty much up to the public to do the research themselves, as I did not no many massive details about the accusers from the 1993 case despite it being one of the most sensationalized media stories of the 1990s. * * It is simply unfortunate that Michael Jackson put himself in such a susceptible position irrespective of any of his intenions. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mnbvc said:[quote] I know that there are already a number of threads about this topic, however this link pretty much reveals each case of molestation against Michael Jackson as an effort to extricate money from him using heavily researched phone transcripts, court records among other documents. * * https://mimeticmargins.co...neverland/ * * For me, the real point of interest are the 1993 allegations, which initiated the entire controversy. * And this concurrently widely known yet underreported GQ article from 1994 (admittedly parlayed through a Michael Jackson support site) is the real clincher since it was the first to scrutinize the accusers and their motives with substantial research. https://mjjtruthnow.wordp...legations/ * * It seems unbelievable that all of this information was not widely dissemenated to the public during 1993-1994, yet its also worth pointing out that the media coverage that time largely consisted of television, print and radio as the dominant avenues, easily emanating one sided sensationalist coverage without inspecting the other side. * * It's pretty much up to the public to do the research themselves, as I did not no many massive details about the accusers from the 1993 case despite it being one of the most sensationalized media stories of the 1990s. * * Hmmm, even a REAL child sex abuse victim knows that these liars are not victims, and that actual victims are being used in this scam starring two grown men with pedophilic fantasies and a child porn director who encouraged these sick child porn fantasies. 🤮 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
If Macaulay Culkin and/or Corey Feldman came out & said MJJ touched them inappropiately, then i'd probably believe it!!! Until then...........BULLSH*T!!!! Didn't Someone's Father hang Himself over the guilt of LYING about MJJ???
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
My God, just let it go already, the man is dead and gone! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |