independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Justin Timberlake finalizing terms to perform at Superbowl 52
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 09/29/17 12:06pm

namepeace

MotownSubdivision said:

namepeace said:


Fair point. He's been there before.

You're right; not many big names left. Has Taylor Swift done one?

She hasn't and quite frankly, she would be a much worse performer than Timberlake. Taylor Swift is nothing worth watching live from what I've seen. Would've been cool if Metallica performed alongside Gaga earlier this year.


I don't disagree about TS but she's a tentpole act for the industry.

She doesn't seem to have much interest in it.

Metallica would have shaken things up a bit.

Good night, sweet Prince | 7 June 1958 - 21 April 2016

Props will be withheld until the showing and proving has commenced. -- Aaron McGruder
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 09/29/17 12:14pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

^^I think the NFL is not going to have that much of problem with Justin in the general public, not like with people and the president complaining about players protesting the anthem & flag. Trump talking about he would fire the protestors and calling them a name. I think patriotism fans are probably a bigger thing than Janet fans and might have a bigger influence on the NFL overall.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 09/29/17 12:26pm

Musicslave

MickyDolenz said:

^^I think the NFL is not going to have that much of problem with Justin in the general public, not like with people and the president complaining about players protesting the anthem & flag. Trump talking about he would fire the protestors and calling them a name. I think patriotism fans are probably a bigger thing than Janet fans and might have a bigger influence on the NFL overall.

-

If they didn't consider him a safe bet, they wouldn't have gone with him.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 09/29/17 12:49pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

Musicslave said:

If they didn't consider him a safe bet, they wouldn't have gone with him.

Yeah, they didn't invite Ted Nugent to perform. razz

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 09/29/17 12:57pm

purplethunder3
121

avatar

MickyDolenz said:

Musicslave said:

If they didn't consider him a safe bet, they wouldn't have gone with him.

Yeah, they didn't invite Ted Nugent to perform. razz

Related image

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 09/29/17 2:14pm

Hudson

avatar

Jeezus it's gotta be Bruno every year with you people.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 09/29/17 2:47pm

214

Hudson said:

Jeezus it's gotta be Bruno every year with you people.

lol lol lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 09/29/17 3:23pm

MotownSubdivis
ion

namepeace said:



MotownSubdivision said:


namepeace said:



Fair point. He's been there before.

You're right; not many big names left. Has Taylor Swift done one?



She hasn't and quite frankly, she would be a much worse performer than Timberlake. Taylor Swift is nothing worth watching live from what I've seen. Would've been cool if Metallica performed alongside Gaga earlier this year.


I don't disagree about TS but she's a tentpole act for the industry.

She doesn't seem to have much interest in it.

Metallica would have shaken things up a bit.

That is (unfortunately) true.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 10/01/17 3:05pm

206Michelle

StrangeButTrue said:

I hope he does his new cover of A Change Is Gonna Come, then maybe SexyBack and like an Nysnc reunion. You know, a great inconsistent American shitshow. He needs male rappers and Joey Fatone and like no women on stage OR maybe Janet in one of those full body suits she is all about these days via satellite.


I would LOVE an *NSYNC reunion!!! love2
Live 4 Love ~ Love is God, God is love, Girls and boys love God above
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 10/01/17 3:19pm

TrivialPursuit

avatar

206Michelle said:

StrangeButTrue said:

I hope he does his new cover of A Change Is Gonna Come, then maybe SexyBack and like an Nysnc reunion. You know, a great inconsistent American shitshow. He needs male rappers and Joey Fatone and like no women on stage OR maybe Janet in one of those full body suits she is all about these days via satellite.

I would LOVE an *NSYNC reunion!!! love2


Did ya miss this??? Cuz if ya did, it ain't gonna happen again.

Sorry, it's the Hodgkin's talking.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 10/03/17 8:35pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 10/03/17 8:51pm

206Michelle

laurarichardson said:

CharismaDove said:

His music is just aight but JT is one smart motherfucker. He knows how to play it perfectly so that he has respect from both the R&B/rap audience and middle-of-the-road general public that watch his movies

RnB audiences do not respect this bum. He was also in a serious of bomb films because he cannot act.

THe NFL is trying to appeal to as much of the American public as possible, not just fans of one particular genre of music.

Live 4 Love ~ Love is God, God is love, Girls and boys love God above
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 10/04/17 11:37am

StrangeButTrue

avatar

You guys Joey Fat One was on TMZ saying Nsync might happen nuts this is so exciting fishslap next comes Janet duh

if it was just a dream, call me a dreamer 2
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 10/22/17 11:09am

MickyDolenz

avatar

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 10/22/17 12:37pm

2freaky4church
1

avatar

Lame.

All you others say Hell Yea!! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 10/22/17 6:14pm

isthisdadawn

avatar

i ASSUME Janet is still banned?!?

Timberfake is such a sell out.. Threw JANET under the bus and lost his black card a long time ago

I WONT BE WATCHING! neutral

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 10/22/17 10:23pm

Goddess4Real

avatar

isthisdadawn said:

i ASSUME Janet is still banned?!?

Timberfake is such a sell out.. Threw JANET under the bus and lost his black card a long time ago

I WONT BE WATCHING! neutral

Yup and I think she is still banned from the Grammys as well shrug

Keep Calm & Listen To Prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 10/23/17 2:23am

PatrickS77

avatar

What a bunch of losers. As if any NFL fan really wants to see that wanker. And that aside, why is he allowed back, when Janet supposedly is still a persona non grata? The only way this could be right is, if she gets a guest spot.

[Edited 10/23/17 2:24am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 10/23/17 4:21am

Chancellor

avatar

Do ya'll wanna place Bets on whether or not Justin is gonna allow an Nsync Reunion?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 10/23/17 11:20am

Musicslave

PatrickS77 said:

What a bunch of losers. As if any NFL fan really wants to see that wanker. And that aside, why is he allowed back, when Janet supposedly is still a persona non grata? The only way this could be right is, if she gets a guest spot.

[Edited 10/23/17 2:24am]

-

Because he played the corporate game, the victim role and agreed to apologize on national television during the Grammys. After Janet did her personal youtube apology for all offended, she refused to apologize again as Justin did. She was uninvited that year and apparently ever since....

-

-

-

-

America is harsher on women and America unfairly harsh on ethnic people...Does he make an argument for white privilege here at the end?

-

-

-

-

It's hilarious to me that this guy once worshipped the woman publically but after this...she's "ethnic people." GTFOOHWTBS lol lol lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 10/23/17 11:37am

Musicslave

-

http://ew.com/music/2017/10/23/justin-timberlake-justice-for-janet-super-bowl-halftime/

-

Justin Timberlake Super Bowl Halftime news sparks #JusticeForJanet outrage: 'White male privilege, ladies'

-

Justin Timberlake will headline the 2018 Super B...ftime show in February — but many Twitter users aren’t willing to look past his performance alongside Janet Jackson at the 2004 Super Bowl.

-

Using #JusticeForJanet, people are calling out the NFL for selecting Timberlake given his involvement in Jackson’s infamous “wardrobe malfunction” during the Halftime show 14 years ago. Near the end of the number, Timberlake ripped off a piece of headliner Jackson’s top, revealing Jackson’s right pierced nipple as about 90 million viewers watched live. As a result of the scandal, a.k.a. “Nipplegate,” CBS was fined $550,000 by the Federal Communications Commission and a five-second delay was instituted for halftime shows. Jackson arguably faced the brunt of the blame, as the years following the incident saw a downtick in her career as Timberlake flourished.

-

A rep for Jackson previously claimed that only part of Jackson’s ensemble was supposed to be removed, saying the malfunction “was not intentional,” and both Jackson and Timberlake have apologized for what happened. Still, fans are demanding an apology from Timberlake and the opportunity for Jackson to return to the Halftime stage.

-

-

I guess the folks demanding Justin have Janet on stage doesn't realize it's not up to him.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 10/23/17 11:43am

CynicKill

Though seeing Janet back on the Superbowl stage might be good for us, she does have a successful tour and well recieved new album out.

Plus a new baby and she looks like a million bucks.

I think she's good.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 10/23/17 12:09pm

Musicslave

CynicKill said:

Though seeing Janet back on the Superbowl stage might be good for us, she does have a successful tour and well recieved new album out.

Plus a new baby and she looks like a million bucks.

I think she's good.

-

I agree.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 10/23/17 1:45pm

Goddess4Real

avatar

http://www.laineygossip.c...show/48221

Justin Timberlake’s Super Bowl
October 24, 2017 at 12:27 AM by Lainey

It’s official. Justin Timberlake will headline the halftime show at Super Bowl LII in Minneapolis. I’ve written about this already – twice. I wrote about it when the rumours first started back in August and again a month later when it was reported that JT was in final negotiations. So I don’t want to repeat what I said. Because…again… I told you. I told you back in February, after the last Super Bowl, when he appeared in a Super Bowl ad for some energy drink he was promoting. This is what I told you:


JT wasn’t at the Super Bowl. But this ad gave him a presence at the Super Bowl. And anytime he’s comes anywhere near the Super Bowl… well… if you’ve been reading this blog for a while, you know what I’m thinking.

#NeverForget

So he gets to make money from the Super Bowl and …what about Janet? Is anyone asking Janet Jackson to front a Super Bowl commercial? Has anybody asked Janet to front anything since he exposed her nipple over a decade ago? That would be no, because she’s permanently banned from the Super Bowl. Meanwhile, he gets to make Super Bowl ads and it’s only a matter of time. A matter of time before he gets invited to be the halftime performer.

This, then, should not be a surprise. How is it a surprise? White men who step on women succeed all the time. White men who step on black woman succeed even more. It’s gross. But what’s grosser is that it’s actually not that gross for a lot of people. Probably for a majority of people. Those are the people who are excited about this announcement. They’re the people who keep telling the rest of us to “get over it”, it happened a long time ago, and that we all need to move on. Because “moving on” is its own privilege. Two people were up there on that stage on February 1, 2004. One of them, at the time, was the bigger star. In 2004, Janet Jackson was the legend, one of the most successful women in music. She and her brother, Michael, endorsed Justin Timberlake. THEY HELPED HIM WITH HIS CAREER. How did he repay her? By running for cover, the weasel punk f-ck that he is, and leaving her for dead. Two people were up on that stage that night. One was blacklisted and banned. The other was invited to every party and would go on to become one of the most successful solo artists of the decade. Not everyone, then, is allowed to “move on”. The same people, over and over again, get to “move on”. Others have to keep eating sh-t until someone else decides that they’re ready to be let out of the doghouse.

Is it possible that JT will invite Janet to join him at the Super Bowl, to right the wrong, to formally apologise for what happened? This is what’s been suggested. He would need, though, to clear it through the NFL and Pepsi first. Which would mean that Janet would need PERMISSION from the NFL, the people who blacklisted and banned her in the first place. Just the thought of this makes me sick – imagining Janet having to SEEK PERMISSION, like approval, like a “pass” from those people to be allowed to come back.


Do we really want that for her? Do we want to put her return to the Super Bowl in the hands of a group of white owners sitting at a boardroom, deliberating over whether or not to grant entrance to Janet Jackson? I want you to picture that. I want you to picture those men, smoking their cigars, inflated by their self-importance, gathered together judging Janet’s suitability for the Super Bowl in between deciding what to have for lunch and where to take their mistresses for dinner. Like THEY get to decide whether or not she would be welcome? As an act of magnanimity?

F-ck that. F-CK THAT SO HARD.

And also? If not them, who else do you think will get all the credit, and I mean ALL THE CREDIT, if Janet actually shows up to perform with him? When has Justin Timberlake ever walked away from taking all the credit, and turning any situation into a showcase for himself?

Finally, there’s another factor to consider: the NFL’s ratings have been on the decline. And players continue to kneel during the national anthem. These have been the major headlines surrounding the league for months as deep divisions between owners and players and players and fans continue to dominate the discussion. THAT’s the Super Bowl Justin Timberlake is stepping into. That might be the only positive takeaway from this story?
[Edited 10/23/17 13:46pm]
Keep Calm & Listen To Prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 10/23/17 1:48pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

PatrickS77 said:

And that aside, why is he allowed back, when Janet supposedly is still a persona non grata?

A lot of the general public turned on Janet. That has nothing to do with the NFL or CBS getting sued or Janet & Justin giving an apology. They didn't turn on Justin, a lot people still bought his records after the Superbowl. He still got on TV and got movie roles and recieved radio airplay. The NFL has no influence on Janet and Justin getting on the radio or the public supporting them. It's like many football fans don't seem to care about what the players do, in which some have done all kinds of things like beating spouses/girlfriends. Except maybe Michael Vick's dogfighting, and he was later forgiven and allowed to play again after he got out of jail. Men are more likely to be forgiven. People know about Trump, but they voted for him anyway. People complain about women breastfeeding in public and shame them. It was the Dixie Chicks who was banned on country radio stations and some country fans turned on them too for talking about Dubya. So it's more society than the NFL.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 10/23/17 2:10pm

PatrickS77

avatar

Goddess4Real said:

http://www.laineygossip.com/justin-timberlake-confirms-he-will-headline-super-bowl-halftime-show/48221

Justin Timberlake’s Super Bowl
October 24, 2017 at 12:27 AM by Lainey

It’s official. Justin Timberlake will headline the halftime show at Super Bowl LII in Minneapolis. I’ve written about this already – twice. I wrote about it when the rumours first started back in August and again a month later when it was reported that JT was in final negotiations. So I don’t want to repeat what I said. Because…again… I told you. I told you back in February, after the last Super Bowl, when he appeared in a Super Bowl ad for some energy drink he was promoting. This is what I told you:


JT wasn’t at the Super Bowl. But this ad gave him a presence at the Super Bowl. And anytime he’s comes anywhere near the Super Bowl… well… if you’ve been reading this blog for a while, you know what I’m thinking.

#NeverForget

So he gets to make money from the Super Bowl and …what about Janet? Is anyone asking Janet Jackson to front a Super Bowl commercial? Has anybody asked Janet to front anything since he exposed her nipple over a decade ago? That would be no, because she’s permanently banned from the Super Bowl. Meanwhile, he gets to make Super Bowl ads and it’s only a matter of time. A matter of time before he gets invited to be the halftime performer.

This, then, should not be a surprise. How is it a surprise? White men who step on women succeed all the time. White men who step on black woman succeed even more. It’s gross. But what’s grosser is that it’s actually not that gross for a lot of people. Probably for a majority of people. Those are the people who are excited about this announcement. They’re the people who keep telling the rest of us to “get over it”, it happened a long time ago, and that we all need to move on. Because “moving on” is its own privilege. Two people were up there on that stage on February 1, 2004. One of them, at the time, was the bigger star. In 2004, Janet Jackson was the legend, one of the most successful women in music. She and her brother, Michael, endorsed Justin Timberlake. THEY HELPED HIM WITH HIS CAREER. How did he repay her? By running for cover, the weasel punk f-ck that he is, and leaving her for dead. Two people were up on that stage that night. One was blacklisted and banned. The other was invited to every party and would go on to become one of the most successful solo artists of the decade. Not everyone, then, is allowed to “move on”. The same people, over and over again, get to “move on”. Others have to keep eating sh-t until someone else decides that they’re ready to be let out of the doghouse.

Is it possible that JT will invite Janet to join him at the Super Bowl, to right the wrong, to formally apologise for what happened? This is what’s been suggested. He would need, though, to clear it through the NFL and Pepsi first. Which would mean that Janet would need PERMISSION from the NFL, the people who blacklisted and banned her in the first place. Just the thought of this makes me sick – imagining Janet having to SEEK PERMISSION, like approval, like a “pass” from those people to be allowed to come back.


Do we really want that for her? Do we want to put her return to the Super Bowl in the hands of a group of white owners sitting at a boardroom, deliberating over whether or not to grant entrance to Janet Jackson? I want you to picture that. I want you to picture those men, smoking their cigars, inflated by their self-importance, gathered together judging Janet’s suitability for the Super Bowl in between deciding what to have for lunch and where to take their mistresses for dinner. Like THEY get to decide whether or not she would be welcome? As an act of magnanimity?

F-ck that. F-CK THAT SO HARD.

And also? If not them, who else do you think will get all the credit, and I mean ALL THE CREDIT, if Janet actually shows up to perform with him? When has Justin Timberlake ever walked away from taking all the credit, and turning any situation into a showcase for himself?

Finally, there’s another factor to consider: the NFL’s ratings have been on the decline. And players continue to kneel during the national anthem. These have been the major headlines surrounding the league for months as deep divisions between owners and players and players and fans continue to dominate the discussion. THAT’s the Super Bowl Justin Timberlake is stepping into. That might be the only positive takeaway from this story?
[Edited 10/23/17 13:46pm]


I so agree. I just think they should allow her to get back on that stage and then she should tell them to go fuck themselves.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 10/23/17 2:12pm

PatrickS77

avatar

MickyDolenz said:

PatrickS77 said:

And that aside, why is he allowed back, when Janet supposedly is still a persona non grata?

A lot of the general public turned on Janet. That has nothing to do with the NFL or CBS getting sued or Janet & Justin giving an apology. They didn't turn on Justin, a lot people still bought his records after the Superbowl. He still got on TV and got movie roles and recieved radio airplay. The NFL has no influence on Janet and Justin getting on the radio or the public supporting them. It's like many football fans don't seem to care about what the players do, in which some have done all kinds of things like beating spouses/girlfriends. Except maybe Michael Vick's dogfighting, and he was later forgiven and allowed to play again after he got out of jail. Men are more likely to be forgiven. People know about Trump, but they voted for him anyway. People complain about women breastfeeding in public and shame them. It was the Dixie Chicks who was banned on country radio stations and some country fans turned on them too for talking about Dubya. So it's more society than the NFL.

So what? She's still selling out arenas. Despite postponing her tour twice. Her last album was a #1 album and she's still Janet Jackson.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 10/23/17 6:59pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

PatrickS77 said:

So what? She's still selling out arenas. Despite postponing her tour twice. Her last album was a #1 album and she's still Janet Jackson.

Janet's fans going to see her concerts has nothing to do with with Justin being invited to perform at the Superbowl and Janet's lack of Top 40 radio airplay afterwards. Or Justin's popularity today with the mainstream and his ability to get a lot of promotion. Which is what you asked about. That's why I mentioned the Dixie Chicks were also banned from radio stations at the time of their controversy. But they're still popular on the concert circuit too. It's like during the Hollywood Studio days when actors & directors were blacklisted for accusations of being communists.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 10/23/17 7:03pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

Justin was recruited to sing on this and it was years after the the wardrobe malfunction.


You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 10/23/17 7:09pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

Justin also performed at the 2013 BET Awards. So it's not just the white audience.


You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Justin Timberlake finalizing terms to perform at Superbowl 52