LBrent said:

mjscarousal said:

PatrickS77 said:

mjscarousal said:

Why is there still a MJ sticky here? serious question

Yes. And why is not even a birthday thread allowed??? Now that both are dead, Prince fans are still threatened. Pathetic.

There threatened and the mods here are very immature. There is nomassive influx of Michael topics. Its been 7 years since he passed away, they can remove the sticky. The sticky exists because they don't like MJ or his fans and yes pathetic indeed.

I'm sorry you feel slighted, but wouldn't a fan of David Bowie prefer to be on a site dedicated to him instead a slice of a Queen site?

It would make sense, no?

I doubt Queen fans hate Bowie fans, but discussion about him on a Queen site would be unnecessary (unless it was about them working together or something).

Doesn't mean Queen fans feel threatened or hate Bowie fans.

What I don't understand is why the fans of one artist want to be at a site that isn't for their favorite artist yet be upset because they want to discuss their favorite artist and people object.

Bowie fans shouldn't expect special treatment at a Queen fan site. It's not for them.
Queen fans shouldn't expect special treatment at a Bowie fan site. It's not for them.

I think it becomes an issue when fans want to see how they can push the other fans buttons on their own favorite artist's fan site and claim that's not what they're doing cuz they're "a fan of both".

Uh huh

I'll bet when they were both alive the mods really had their hands full and after 2009 there was a dramatic drop in the people who claimed to " love them both".

Well, whatever. Doesn't affect me. I just saw the thread topic and wandered in.

Carry on.

[Edited 9/2/16 4:18am]

PatrickS77 said:

LBrent said:

I'm sorry you feel slighted, but wouldn't a fan of David Bowie prefer to be on a site dedicated to him instead a slice of a Queen site? It would make sense, no? I doubt Queen fans hate Bowie fans, but discussion about him on a Queen site would be unnecessary (unless it was about them working together or something). Doesn't mean Queen fans feel threatened or hate Bowie fans. What I don't understand is why the fans of one artist want to be at a site that isn't for their favorite artist yet be upset because they want to discuss their favorite artist and people object. Bowie fans shouldn't expect special treatment at a Queen fan site. It's not for them. Queen fans shouldn't expect special treatment at a Bowie fan site. It's not for them. I think it becomes an issue when fans want to see how they can push the other fans buttons on their own favorite artist's fan site and claim that's not what they're doing cuz they're "a fan of both". Uh huh I'll bet when they were both alive the mods really had their hands full and after 2009 there was a dramatic drop in the people who claimed to " love them both". Well, whatever. Doesn't affect me. I just saw the thread topic and wandered in. Carry on. [Edited 9/2/16 4:18am]

What you fail to realize is, this is the "Music: Non-Prince" section of this site. So we can talk about whomever we want. And if people want to talk about one aspect of one artist, they shouldn't be condemned to one thread, which is all over the place and doesn't follow one clear topic. Also we don't only talk about Michael, we talk about music, so why should we go to a MJ forum? And believe it or not, some of us are fans of both. So really, this sticky is nothing more than pettiness of immature Prince fans.

Pretty much. The Irony of it is that there are a BUNCH of artists that get talked about excesively here WAY more than Michael.

Closing a thread that acknowledges his birthday I mean c'mon, thats petty as hell. It could have been left opened. There wasn't even a lot of people posting in it.

Until I saw this video, I thought MJ underwent extensive plastic surgery. But anyone can see that the changes in his appearance were mostly due to the natural process of aging and the dreaded vitiligo he suffered from. His appearance barely changed over the years:

Michael Jackson's Estate and Cirque du Soleil Celebrated the King of Pop's Birthday in Vegas With Style http://www.complex.com/mu...elebration

8 Of Michael Jackson's Most Iconic Dance Moves http://www.refinery29.com...-pop#slide

Remembering The Magic Of Michael Jackson | Michael Jackson Documentary

Bluebells dancer Rosalie Williams recounts healing Michael Jackson http://www.nzherald.co.nz...d=11703198

PatrickS77 said:

LBrent said:

I'm sorry you feel slighted, but wouldn't a fan of David Bowie prefer to be on a site dedicated to him instead a slice of a Queen site?

It would make sense, no?

I doubt Queen fans hate Bowie fans, but discussion about him on a Queen site would be unnecessary (unless it was about them working together or something).

Doesn't mean Queen fans feel threatened or hate Bowie fans.

What I don't understand is why the fans of one artist want to be at a site that isn't for their favorite artist yet be upset because they want to discuss their favorite artist and people object.

Bowie fans shouldn't expect special treatment at a Queen fan site. It's not for them.
Queen fans shouldn't expect special treatment at a Bowie fan site. It's not for them.

I think it becomes an issue when fans want to see how they can push the other fans buttons on their own favorite artist's fan site and claim that's not what they're doing cuz they're "a fan of both".

Uh huh

I'll bet when they were both alive the mods really had their hands full and after 2009 there was a dramatic drop in the people who claimed to " love them both".

Well, whatever. Doesn't affect me. I just saw the thread topic and wandered in.

Carry on.

[Edited 9/2/16 4:18am]

What you fail to realize is, this is the "Music: Non-Prince" section of this site. So we can talk about whomever we want. And if people want to talk about one aspect of one artist, they shouldn't be condemned to one thread, which is all over the place and doesn't follow one clear topic. Also we don't only talk about Michael, we talk about music, so why should we go to a MJ forum? And believe it or not, some of us are fans of both. So really, this sticky is nothing more than pettiness of immature Prince fans.

LBrent said:

PatrickS77 said:

What you fail to realize is, this is the "Music: Non-Prince" section of this site. So we can talk about whomever we want. And if people want to talk about one aspect of one artist, they shouldn't be condemned to one thread, which is all over the place and doesn't follow one clear topic. Also we don't only talk about Michael, we talk about music, so why should we go to a MJ forum? And believe it or not, some of us are fans of both. So really, this sticky is nothing more than pettiness of immature Prince fans.

M'kay. Everything seems to be working as it should be working here.

Y'all have a nice day.

MichaelJackson5 said:

Until I saw this video, I thought MJ underwent extensive plastic surgery. But anyone can see that the changes in his appearance were mostly due to the natural process of aging and the dreaded vitiligo he suffered from. His appearance barely changed over the years:

LBrent said:

M'kay. Everything seems to be working as it should be working here. Y'all have a nice day.

mjscarousal said:

Closing a thread that acknowledges his birthday I mean c'mon, thats petty as hell. It could have been left opened. There wasn't even a lot of people posting in it.

thedoorkeeper said:

mjscarousal said:

Closing a thread that acknowledges his birthday I mean c'mon, thats petty as hell. It could have been left opened. There wasn't even a lot of people posting in it.

Agreed. I was surprised it got closed so quickly. Could have been left open for the whole day. It was his birthday - what would it have hurt to leave that one thread open for 24 hours so fans could share their feelings?

Because the mods are immature assholes here.

Someone posted this in the Prince forum and the thread was locked. Skip forward to about 2:15.

When MJ asked P to be on "Bad" he sent P a copy of the song. P couldn't believe MJ had the nerve to claim he was "bad". As we know P declined the guest spot... I'd never heard that Prince had also re-recorded "Bad" and sent it back to MJ.

Cold.

What's not clear is when SM says "Prince re-recorded it how it SHOULD sound"... is she implying Prince did a parody (I'm a wuss)... Or that Prince kept the lyrics and made it funky?

thedoorkeeper said:

Well I wouldn't call them immature assholes but I do feel they could have been a little more compassionate. They do a great job with this site but I think they dropped the ball in this case.

Well I disagree. They have disrespected Michael in the past as well.

thedoorkeeper said:

Well I wouldn't call them immature assholes but I do feel they could have been a little more compassionate. They do a great job with this site but I think they dropped the ball in this case.

Very very insecure people just like their hero.

15 years ago today, Michael's 30th anniversary shows took place in New York:

https://www.instagram.com/p/BKEWrVNjhlr

20 years ago today, Michael's HIStory tour kicked off in Prague:

https://www.instagram.com/p/BKELTQsD064

[Edited 9/7/16 16:27pm]

Michael Jackson's Best Five Songs http://www.inquisitr.com/...est-songs/

Goddess4Real said:

Michael Jackson's Best Five Songs http://www.inquisitr.com/...est-songs/

?

Goddess4Real said:

Michael Jackson's Best Five Songs http://www.inquisitr.com/...est-songs/

Interesting note: the only MJ-penned song on that list is Earth Song.

MichaelJackson5 said:

My top 5 MJ songs that I listen to at the moment

1. Don't Stop Til You Get Enough

2. Billie Jean

3. Money

4. Butterflies

5. Speed Demon

Goddess4Real said:

My top 5 MJ songs that I listen to at the moment

1. Don't Stop Til You Get Enough

2. Billie Jean

3. Money

4. Butterflies

5. Speed Demon

Cloudbuster said:

Goddess4Real said:

Michael Jackson's Best Five Songs http://www.inquisitr.com/...est-songs/

?

To me the best song from him.

Billie Jean

Give in to me

Is it scary

certainly would be in my top 5.