all true points,
as MichaelJackson5 just mentioned, Michael Jackson isn't being singled out, any artist would have experienced a major dropoff if his/her appearance changed the way it did, and so drastically
it comes down if you believed in the false image, you're going to try and uphold the narrative of the past quarter century, or if you don't believe in the false image, you will not try and uphold that same narrative
that's what's so unfortunate about this story and the way it all has ended, it never had to be the way.....take the false image out of the equation, it's a guarantee, a shoe-in, a certainty that every single one of Michael Jackson's albums post-Thriller would have sold way more than they actually did, there's no way this would have not been the case, his albums would not have precipitously fell from the top of the charts the way they did only weeks after reaching the top......
Thriller SHOULD NOT have been his career pinnacle, this is why so many of the fans of the past quarter century keep trying to mention and highlight what he accomplished post-Thriller where they would not be in such a situation if the false image never existed......
when you lose half of your fanbase right after dropping the greatest selling album of all time, that can not be blamed on media bias, influence, scutiny, criticism....that alone is not gonna sway people to refrain from buying your album.......it's not like MJ's music featured derogatory lyrical content, there was a poignant message that people responded to from day one when he fronted the Jackson Five. It wasn't like he was in his 50s when he dropped BAD, he was only 29 years old
From the massive following MJ cultivated in his home country and around the globe with Thriller, the stage was set for that following to expand, THIS is what led MJ to believe his next album BAD would surpass Thriller, he was actually thinking logically in reaching that conclusion. If he maintains that current following while generating a new generation of music fans, BAD would have did just that, but the EXACT OPPOSITE occurred, where he lost 22 million people who bought Thriller, with 18-20 million of those fans he lost were right here in the United States alone, and ironically, BAD's international sales did not surpass the sales of Thriller, he lost fans internationally too, and this career trajectory continued with each subsequent album afterwards where he would lost approximately 5 million fans each time from what he had before
so during the run of each album, he would give explanation of why he was losing fans from the album that came before it, which caused greater levels of division between fans in the process, but it all stemmed from the the 50% of the fan support he lost after Thriller. So what started in 1987 and ended in 2009, in that 22 year span, what you have left is the majority of his current following being placed in a position in upholding the false narrative that he drove since that time, but it's not doing any good as we see book after book after book after book rehashing the same stuff over and over and over again but not willing or written from a perspective unwilling to dig deep in the heart of the matter to explain what really happened to Michael Jackson over time, and the root cause of it
The allegations is not really the blame because he lost half his fan support six years prior. The truth of the matter is he was pushed into making a life/career defininig choice by undergoing a physical transformation the likes we've never seen and the transformation alone is what caused his career to decline, there's no getting around that........and when he saw the response to it in his home country during the years of BAD, he focused his attention on becoming an exclusive international artist w/the hopes of compensating for the sales he lost by cultivating a new following that would embrace the false image w/out realizing what was really going on with him in truth, and why BAD did not sale the way he had expected, and when that didn't work with DANGEROUS, this is the moment where he brought the current narrative to life that has prolonged to this very day.
This is when his following of the present and his following of the past became divided when just eight years prior, his support was not fragmented in any way
But what's funny is that while giving the impression he no longer needed the support of his following from Thriller and years before, he spent the remainder of this career doing just that in context and would begin to show regret in undergoing the full transformation when we really start listening to the lyrics in his songs such as SCREAM and THEY DON'T REALLY CARE ABOUT US and STRANGER IN MOSCOW. But he couldn't deviate from the false image by that point because he enjoyed the adulation from the current support for projecting it and was forced to practically carry it on
what's most fortunate about this whole situation is that Michael Jackson definitely reach his potential but was not allowed to fulfill his promise, and this happened way before 2009, it happened the moment he released the follow up to the greatest selling album of all time. That should make us all pause and start to reconsider our positions on everything we beleive, and only when we start acknowledging the truth of what really happened to this immensely talented performer and what caused it, then the intent of his musical message as well as his legacy will resonate the way it was meant to
The estate in of itself can not accomplish this
[Edited 8/21/16 8:21am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Scorp said:
all true points,
as MichaelJackson5 just mentioned, Michael Jackson isn't being singled out, any artist would have experienced a major dropoff if his/her appearance changed the way it did, and so drastically
it comes down if you believed in the false image, you're going to try and uphold the narrative of the past quarter century, or if you don't believe in the false image, you will not try and uphold that same narrative
that's what's so unfortunate about this story and the way it all has ended, it never had to be the way.....take the false image out of the equation, it's a guarantee, a shoe-in, a certainty that every single one of Michael Jackson's albums post-Thriller would have sold way more than they actually did, there's no way this would have not been the case, his albums would not have precipitously fell from the top of the charts the way they did only weeks after reaching the top.....
Thriller SHOULD NOT have been his career pinnacle, this is why so many of the fans of the past quarter century keep trying to mention and highlight what he accomplished post-Thriller where they would not be in such a situation if the false image never existed.....
when you lose half of your fanbase right after dropping the greatest selling album of all time, that can not be blamed on media bias, influence, scutiny, criticism....that alone is not gonna sway people to refrain from buying your album.....it's not like MJ's music featured derogatory lyrical content, there was a poignant message that people responded to from day one when he fronted the Jackson Five. It wasn't like he was in his 50s when he dropped BAD, he was only 29 years old
From the massive following MJ cultivated in his home country and around the globe with Thriller, the stage was set for that following to expand, THIS is what led MJ to believe his next album BAD would surpass Thriller, he was actually thinking logically in reaching that conclusion. If he maintains that current following while generating a new generation of music fans, BAD would have did just that, but the EXACT OPPOSITE occurred, where he lost 22 million people who bought Thriller, with 18-20 million of those fans he lost were right here in the United States alone, and ironically, BAD's international sales did not surpass the sales of Thriller, he lost fans internationally too, and this career trajectory continued with each subsequent album afterwards where he would lost approximately 5 million fans each time from what he had before
so during the run of each album, he would give explanation of why he was losing fans from the album that came before it, which caused greater levels of division between fans in the process, but it all stemmed from the the 50% of the fan support he lost after Thriller. So what started in 1987 and ended in 2009, in that 22 year span, what you have left is the majority of his current following being placed in a position in upholding the false narrative that he drove since that time, but it's not doing any good as we see book after book after book after book rehashing the same stuff over and over and over again but not willing or written from a perspective unwilling to dig deep in the heart of the matter to explain what really happened to Michael Jackson over time, and the root cause of it
The allegations is not really the blame because he lost half his fan support six years prior. The truth of the matter is he was pushed into making a life/career defininig choice by undergoing a physical transformation the likes we've never seen and the transformation alone is what caused his career to decline, there's no getting around that.....and when he saw the response to it in his home country during the years of BAD, he focused his attention on becoming an exclusive international artist w/the hopes of compensating for the sales he lost by cultivating a new following that would embrace the false image w/out realizing what was really going on with him in truth, and why BAD did not sale the way he had expected, and when that didn't work with DANGEROUS, this is the moment where he brought the current narrative to life that has prolonged to this very day.
This is when his following of the present and his following of the past became divided when just eight years prior, his support was not fragmented in any way
But what's funny is that while giving the impression he no longer needed the support of his following from Thriller and years before, he spent the remainder of this career doing just that in context and would begin to show regret in undergoing the full transformation when we really start listening to the lyrics in his songs such as SCREAM and THEY DON'T REALLY CARE ABOUT US and STRANGER IN MOSCOW. But he couldn't deviate from the false image by that point because he enjoyed the adulation from the current support for projecting it and was forced to practically carry it on
what's most fortunate about this whole situation is that Michael Jackson definitely reach his potential but was not allowed to fulfill his promise, and this happened way before 2009, it happened the moment he released the follow up to the greatest selling album of all time. That should make us all pause and start to reconsider our positions on everything we beleive, and only when we start acknowledging the truth of what really happened to this immensely talented performer and what caused it, then the intent of his musical message as well as his legacy will resonate the way it was meant to
The estate in of itself can not accomplish this
[Edited 8/21/16 8:21am] I agree with you. MJ was responsible for his downfall. He was the one who never got therapy for his obvious emotional pathologies. He was the one who always refused to be honest with and about himself which led to him completely altering his appearance. When I watch the video of Motown 25 on youtube and then the interview of, say, MJ with Sawyer, I can't bring myself to think it's the same person in both videos. I just can't. He also got away from his musical roots by starting to make fast food pop music after Thriller because he thought that was what people wanted. He alienated his fanbase by changing his skin color (though he did have vitiligo) and then releasing a single called "Black and white". It's as if he didn't realize the kind of image he passed. Another proof of this is him walking the streets with surgical masks. Didn't he stop himself in his tracks and question what he was doing and what kind of image he was passing? And then he started appearing with little boys everywhere and sleeping with them. He should have been honest about himself. If you don't like yourself, how can you expect millions of people to? So he created an image in an attempt to create something fans would like (because, in his mind, they wouldn't like him for what he was). If MJ didn't start the madnesa he would have become the most successful musical act of all time, selling more than the Beatles, becoming the biggest act- musical or otherwise- ever. But he chose to lie, to act and to deceive even himself. MJ destroyed MJ. [Edited 8/21/16 12:25pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Can we all just agree that the change in appearance, the allegations, the eccentric behavior, and also the change in the music industry all played a role in Michael's decline in the US?
Plus, as much as some of us are fans, we have to admit he was never going to outsell Thriller. It was a one time phenomenom. Every huge pop artist has that one project that has does numbers that are bigger than usual, just that his changed the music industry.
Prince did over 24 million with Purple Rain but only went gold by the time Lovesexy rolled around. George Michael did 25 million with Faith, LWP sold 8 million (and barely 2 million here in the states and by the time he was outed, was almost blacklisted here). That's how things go "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
good article "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Can we all just agree that the change in appearance, the allegations, the eccentric behavior, and also the change in the music industry all played a role in Michael's decline in the US?
Plus, as much as some of us are fans, we have to admit he was never going to outsell Thriller. It was a one time phenomenom. Every huge pop artist has that one project that has does numbers that are bigger than usual, just that his changed the music industry.
Prince did over 24 million with Purple Rain but only went gold by the time Lovesexy rolled around. George Michael did 25 million with Faith, LWP sold 8 million (and barely 2 million here in the states and by the time he was outed, was almost blacklisted here). That's how things go | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SO TRUE! Great points! I am so sick and tired of people trashing all of Michael's accomplishments after Thriller. Thriller was a once in a life time event and success. Nobody was never going to top that, not even Michael. I also think its absurd to argue that this was Michael fault without considering the change in music industry as well as other factors beyond just him specifically. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Are there any new news about LMP's divorce? I remember when she portrayed Lockwood as the perfect man for her while trashing MJ. Life is so ironic... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Indeed, so sick of that, actually i think that Thriller should have never ever sold as much as it did, it was his curse. [Edited 8/21/16 16:40pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I never really cared about his racial appearance then, just the fact, his music was still perfect. . I reallyw ant the Classic Pop magazine, if we get it here in New Zealand, it will be November and even later. It is only now Prince tribute issues are filtering through. I mean our shops are so slow they still have Bowie tribute issues on sale with "Just arrived" stickers on them. Got some kind of love for you, and I don't even know your name | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
that's ironic because at every chance, fans still go out of their way to prove how popular he still is
BAD sold 16 million copies worldwide 2 months after its release, even w/the supposed change on the musical landscape, even w/the rise of hip-hop, well on pace to outsell THRILLER buy a mile where THRILLER was released w/nowhere near the anticipation in comparison.
MJ sure thought BAD was a failure in his eyes because he fired everyone in sight, producer, manager, the whole nine
then with DANGEROUS not meeting expectations, he went full bore making one public appearance after another, and scheduling that interview with Oprah to boost sales....
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well according to the tabloids LMP is in rehab for pill and alcohol addiction......her people haven't confirmed it......so it must be true [Edited 8/21/16 21:40pm] Keep Calm & Listen To Prince | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
noone stays on top forever. Keep Calm & Listen To Prince | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's time for myths to end. "Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato
https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nobody stays on top forever?
Well for the past 7 years, post after post after post after post after post is highlighted that he still is on top as a posthumous artist........still saying that he's the best to this day
If Michael Jackson had maintained the support of the tremendously following he garnered up to Thriller, Bad would have sold more than it did, way more........Dangerous would have sold more than it did....History would have sold more than it did, even as a double disc set.......and Invicible would have sold more than it did, way more
He never would have did the interview with Oprah to boost record sales, he never would have did the prime time interview with Diane Sawyer to try and assure sales of an album that wasn't even released yet, and he would never have done the Bashir Documentary to try and restore his image......or featuring other contemporary artists/celebrities in his videos to try and regain what he knew he lost......none of those instances would have been necessary.....
to suggest that he could not have maintain what he had achieve early on is to discredit the impact he actually had, and that audience. The music industry was changing during the years of OTW and Thriller and it had no bearing on the eventual outcome. To say Thriller was some fluke discredits Michael Jackson because that album was 14 years in the making, it was no accident
he maintains that american following, there wouldn't be this push to make sure his work post-Thriller is held in the same esteem, the same breath......everything would have spoke for itself........
[Edited 8/22/16 3:59am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Scorp said:
Nobody stays on top forever?
Well for the past 7 years, post after post after post after post after post is highlighted that he still is on top as a posthumous artist.....still saying that he's the best to this day
If Michael Jackson had maintained the support of the tremendously following he garnered up to Thriller, Bad would have sold more than it did, way more.....Dangerous would have sold more than it did....History would have sold more than it did, even as a double disc set.....and Invicible would have sold more than it did, way more
He never would have did the interview with Oprah to boost record sales, he never would have did the prime time interview with Diane Sawyer to try and assure sales of an album that wasn't even released yet, and he would never have done the Bashir Documentary to try and restore his image.....or featuring other contemporary artists/celebrities in his videos to try and regain what he knew he lost.....none of those instances would have been necessary.....
to suggest that he could not have maintain what he had achieve early on is to discredit the impact he actually had, and that audience. The music industry was changing during the years of OTW and Thriller and it had no bearing on the eventual outcome. To say Thriller was some fluke discredits Michael Jackson because that album was 14 years in the making, it was no accident
he maintains that american following, there wouldn't be this push to make sure his work post-Thriller is held in the same esteem, the same breath.....everytuhing would have spoke for itself.....
[Edited 8/22/16 3:59am] I remember when MJ fans would compare Thriller to the Titanic movie and concluded that James Cameron could never top it so why should we have expected Jackson to top Thriller. Then Avatar was released and they never used that argument again. Maybe Thriller couldn't be outsold but sales of Bad should have at least sold in the vicinity of 12 million US by the end of 1989 and 15-16 million today. There is no logical reason for MJ's massive drop in popularity domestically except the major transformation in his appearance and his own attempt to "spice" up his public image planting crazy stories about hyperbaric chambers, elephant man, etc. To accept the 6 million sales of Bad is akin to saying MJ is nothing special, just a pop star with a fluke album when he was much more than that even before Thriller. It wouldn't surprise me to see OTW outsell Bad domestically and Dangerous internationally in the coming years. MJ changed the trajectory of his career with his facial transformation in 1987 and lost millions of fans in the process. [Edited 8/22/16 4:31am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Can we all just agree that the change in appearance, the allegations, the eccentric behavior, and also the change in the music industry all played a role in Michael's decline in the US?
Plus, as much as some of us are fans, we have to admit he was never going to outsell Thriller. It was a one time phenomenom. Every huge pop artist has that one project that has does numbers that are bigger than usual, just that his changed the music industry.
Prince did over 24 million with Purple Rain but only went gold by the time Lovesexy rolled around. George Michael did 25 million with Faith, LWP sold 8 million (and barely 2 million here in the states and by the time he was outed, was almost blacklisted here). That's how things go Its not as if Prince approached his albums the same way. He released Around The World one year after Purple Rain and many industry pundits were baffled by it. Had he chosen to space out his album releases the way MJ did he could have easily outsold Bad and Dangerous in America. George Michael was caught fellaing another man in a public rest room that families take their kids to. Of course his career would be over in the US after that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Can we all just agree that the change in appearance, the allegations, the eccentric behavior, and also the change in the music industry all played a role in Michael's decline in the US?
Plus, as much as some of us are fans, we have to admit he was never going to outsell Thriller. It was a one time phenomenom. Every huge pop artist has that one project that has does numbers that are bigger than usual, just that his changed the music industry.
Prince did over 24 million with Purple Rain but only went gold by the time Lovesexy rolled around. George Michael did 25 million with Faith, LWP sold 8 million (and barely 2 million here in the states and by the time he was outed, was almost blacklisted here). That's how things go Its not as if Prince approached his albums the same way. He released Around The World one year after Purple Rain and many industry pundits were baffled by it. Had he chosen to space out his album releases the way MJ did he could have easily outsold Bad and Dangerous in America. George Michael was caught fellaing another man in a public rest room that families take their kids to. Of course his career would be over in the US after that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MichaelJackson5 said: Scorp said:
Nobody stays on top forever?
Well for the past 7 years, post after post after post after post after post is highlighted that he still is on top as a posthumous artist.....still saying that he's the best to this day
If Michael Jackson had maintained the support of the tremendously following he garnered up to Thriller, Bad would have sold more than it did, way more.....Dangerous would have sold more than it did....History would have sold more than it did, even as a double disc set.....and Invicible would have sold more than it did, way more
He never would have did the interview with Oprah to boost record sales, he never would have did the prime time interview with Diane Sawyer to try and assure sales of an album that wasn't even released yet, and he would never have done the Bashir Documentary to try and restore his image.....or featuring other contemporary artists/celebrities in his videos to try and regain what he knew he lost.....none of those instances would have been necessary.....
to suggest that he could not have maintain what he had achieve early on is to discredit the impact he actually had, and that audience. The music industry was changing during the years of OTW and Thriller and it had no bearing on the eventual outcome. To say Thriller was some fluke discredits Michael Jackson because that album was 14 years in the making, it was no accident
he maintains that american following, there wouldn't be this push to make sure his work post-Thriller is held in the same esteem, the same breath.....everytuhing would have spoke for itself.....
[Edited 8/22/16 3:59am] I remember when MJ fans would compare Thriller to the Titanic movie and concluded that James Cameron could never top it so why should we have expected Jackson to top Thriller. Then Avatar was released and they never used that argument again. If anything OTW is The Titanic and Thriller is Avatar. MJ had nothing more to prove after OTW just like James Cameron had nothing more to prove after The Titanic but did anyway. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nuff said. "Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato
https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
For me, OTW is more like Cameron's Terminator 2. The reason I feel Bad wasn't a success in America (6 million units in 2 years) is because it was one of the most anticipated albums in the history of pop music.
Many artists could only dream of selling 6 million copies of an album but this is Michael Jackson we're talking about with Bad being only the solo third album he released with Epic Records. If he was happy with those sales, he'd have stuck with Quincy Jones for Dangerous. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janelle Monae Pays Homage To The Jackson 5 On “Hum Along & Dance (Gotta Get Down).” http://www.vibe.com/2016/...oundtrack/ I really like this and I can't wait to see Hidden Figures its an important film about the space race and by those who played a very major part.
[Edited 8/22/16 20:30pm] [Edited 8/22/16 20:53pm] Keep Calm & Listen To Prince | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Or he was going to split from Q no matter what. "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
when BAD didn't meet his expectations, everyone's head went to rollin, which the handwriting was on the wall, Frank Dileo was gone as well as Quincy Jones
but as he began working on his last studio album that became known as Invincible, during the spring of 1999, when he was searching for a producer, Rodney Jerkins was not his first choice, MJ was looking to reunite with Quincy Jones to "re-create the magic"......
just as he reunited with John Landis to try and recreate the magic of the Thriller video as he was beginning to work on the Black and White video
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said:
Or he was going to split from Q no matter what. Quincy Jones was integral to MJ's success the way George Martin is viewed as the 5th Beatle. There was a special chemistry between Jackson and Jones. Had Jones been involved with Dangerous he would have made the album more uniform removing filler songs such as Gone Too Soon which should have been a b-side of a single at most. Bad, while not as great as Thriller, was tight. Every song on it was strong enough to be a single. Even Leave Me Alone, which was a bonus for the CD. Had Bad managed to sell 25 million units in the US I don't see MJ ditching him for Teddy Riley. At this stage MJ was following music trends as New Jack had been established in the late 80s by others like Bobby Brown. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
After Thriller MJ's priority was sales. Selling. He should have focused on making great music. Instead, he became obsessed with sales and made music accordingly. Thus his music became fast-food-easy-listening-music, thought especially to sell as much as possible. He confined himself to what would sell and whatever was popular with the goal of selling, selling, selling. Hence the decline in the great music until Thriller. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |