SEANMAN said:

Marrk said:

My point is...

You don't have one, and you never fucking do. And now, I'll let Janet say it for me...

Job done.

Marrk said:

SEANMAN said:

You don't have one, and you never fucking do. And now, I'll let Janet say it for me...

Job done.

but if you dont like janet and you dont like seanman why do you always come into his threads about janet? that kinda sorta is trolling.

lowkey said:

Marrk said:

Job done.

but if you dont like janet and you dont like seanman why do you always come into his threads about janet? that kinda sorta is trolling.

Oh i don't mind both at all. I owned lots of Janet up to 'All For You'. If she brings out a new album, i'll give it a go. I just hate threads on dull trivia. Lists and charts, all bollocks to me.

Marrk said:

lowkey said:

but if you dont like janet and you dont like seanman why do you always come into his threads about janet? that kinda sorta is trolling.

Oh i don't mind both at all. I owned lots of Janet up to 'All For You'. If she brings out a new album, i'll give it a go. I just hate threads on dull trivia. Lists and charts, all bollocks to me.

i can understand that i dont really pay attention to stuff like that either, but to be fair the op didnt make the list, its a actual billboard list. some fans love charts and stats, including alot of mj fans,so i dont see why its a problem for fans of other artists to post stuff like this .i mean look how quick fans were to point out how mj is the biggest selling and so-on, i think everybody knows mj's accomplishments.

great was the day when there wasn't no beef regarding this family of entetainment

when the talents of everyone was appreciated

I'm glad I had the opportunity to experience that firsthand because it's a very slim chance it ever returns to that

it is sorta strange how MJ fans and Janet fans battle each other...trying to prove that one artist was bigger than the other I never saw them as direct competition with each other at all

SoulAlive said:

it is sorta strange how MJ fans and Janet fans battle each other...trying to prove that one artist was bigger than the other I never saw them as direct competition with each other at all

neither did i, its really strange to me how fans pit them against each other. but its a fact that since mj died his fans have been on a anti jacksons crusade,especially janet.I could be wrong but show me a mj thread where janet fans come up in there for the sole purpose of trolling.

lowkey said:

LiLi1992 said:

Yes, but this is a Janet fan started this thread to convince others that she is bigger than her brothers.

so what a janet fan posted it, do mj fans not post articles about him? its just crazy that instead of realizing the amazing success one family has had in music it turns into a sibling vs sibling thread.

this means that he must understand that will involve into discussion MJ fans or Jackson 5, if his and band name is repeatedly mentioned in this article.

the article is not called "the Musical legacy of the Jacksons", but "Janet Jackson Outsells MJ...on Singles" which is a blatant and outright lie, because the list itself is built on a system of points

his reaction to the comments inappropriate and aggressive. it is clear that he started this thread to fight.

lowkey said:

LiLi1992 said:

lowkey said:

so what a janet fan posted it, do mj fans not post articles about him? its just crazy that instead of realizing the amazing success one family has had in music it turns into a sibling vs sibling thread.

this means that he must understand that will involve into discussion MJ fans or Jackson 5, if his and band name is repeatedly mentioned in this article.

the article is not called "the Musical legacy of the Jacksons", but "Janet Jackson Outsells MJ...on Singles" which is a blatant and outright lie, because the list itself is built on a system of points

his reaction to the comments inappropriate and aggressive. it is clear that he started this thread to fight.

yeah but seanman didnt write the article so why would you wanna fight with him just because he posted it? he's a big time janet fan,he's gonna always post anything positive about her. if this same article was posted and switch mj's name with janet's some mj fan would have posted it. then you have people in the thread claiming singles dont mean nothing, which is a lie, but if they dont mean nothing why does it even matter?

lowkey said:

Marrk said:

Job done.

but if you dont like janet and you dont like seanman why do you always come into his threads about janet? that kinda sorta is trolling.

It is trolling, which makes it kind of pathetic.

LiLi1992 said:

lowkey said:

so what a janet fan posted it, do mj fans not post articles about him? its just crazy that instead of realizing the amazing success one family has had in music it turns into a sibling vs sibling thread.

this means that he must understand that will involve into discussion MJ fans or Jackson 5, if his and band name is repeatedly mentioned in this article.

the article is not called "the Musical legacy of the Jacksons", but "Janet Jackson Outsells MJ...on Singles" which is a blatant and outright lie, because the list itself is built on a system of points

his reaction to the comments inappropriate and aggressive. it is clear that he started this thread to fight.

It's official...you're a fucking moron.

lowkey said:

LiLi1992 said:

this means that he must understand that will involve into discussion MJ fans or Jackson 5, if his and band name is repeatedly mentioned in this article.

the article is not called "the Musical legacy of the Jacksons", but "Janet Jackson Outsells MJ...on Singles" which is a blatant and outright lie, because the list itself is built on a system of points

his reaction to the comments inappropriate and aggressive. it is clear that he started this thread to fight.

yeah but seanman didnt write the article so why would you wanna fight with him just because he posted it? he's a big time janet fan,he's gonna always post anything positive about her. if this same article was posted and switch mj's name with janet's some mj fan would have posted it. then you have people in the thread claiming singles dont mean nothing, which is a lie, but if they dont mean nothing why does it even matter?

Thanks lowkey, but LiLi1992 is an idiot. I could post anything about Janet and people like LiLi and Marrk would find something to troll about or debate about. This was an article written by Billboard. I posted it because, as a Janet fan, I like to post good articles about her. Despite the fact that he's a part of the article, my posting it had zero to do with Michael Joseph Jackson. This is something these trolls either just don't understand, or they understand but choose to dissect it because, well, they're trolls.

[Edited 2/26/15 15:20pm]

Marrk said:

lowkey said:

but if you dont like janet and you dont like seanman why do you always come into his threads about janet? that kinda sorta is trolling.

I just hate threads on dull trivia. Lists and charts, all bollocks to me.

Well that makes a whole hell of a lot of sense. Going into and contributing to a thread based on a topic that you hate and find dull. It literally gives new meaning to the word 'counterproductive'.

lowkey said:

MotownSubdivision said:

Is it not possible for a Janet fan to also be an MHM fan and vice-versa? Based on people's comments on here, you'd think that's impossible.

im a jackson family fan even though janet is my favorite. i respect and appreciate all of their accomplishments but for some reason alot of mj fans find it hard to give credit to his siblings for the things they have done. you got 3 iconic acts from 1 family,that should be celebrated.

Its funny you say that because MOST MJ fans ARE Janet fans. Also, from my experience its the other way around. Janet fans are the ones to diss MJ first professionally. MJ fans like to blame her and his family for comments made after he died or whatever their take is on what happened when he was alive. Most MJ fans never try to come for Janet when it comes to whose a better dancer, singer, who sold more when, who did better in Scream, etc. Homestly the brothers get it worse than she does(professionally). Honestly, its just redic FROM BOTH SIDES.

purple05 said:

Its funny you say that because MOST MJ fans ARE Janet fans. Also, from my experience its the other way around. Janet fans are the ones to diss MJ first professionally. MJ fans like to blame her and his family for comments made after he died or whatever their take is on what happened when he was alive. Most MJ fans never try to come for Janet when it comes to whose a better dancer, singer, who sold more when, who did better in Scream, etc.

and most of the other bs is only in response to people putting MJ down.

[Edited 2/28/15 6:07am]

SEANMAN said:

LiLi1992 said:

this means that he must understand that will involve into discussion MJ fans or Jackson 5, if his and band name is repeatedly mentioned in this article.

the article is not called "the Musical legacy of the Jacksons", but "Janet Jackson Outsells MJ...on Singles" which is a blatant and outright lie, because the list itself is built on a system of points

his reaction to the comments inappropriate and aggressive. it is clear that he started this thread to fight.

It's official...you're a fucking moron.

Lill1992 would within their right to report you for that response. You've resorted to personal insults. Low.

purple05 said:

lowkey said:

im a jackson family fan even though janet is my favorite. i respect and appreciate all of their accomplishments but for some reason alot of mj fans find it hard to give credit to his siblings for the things they have done. you got 3 iconic acts from 1 family,that should be celebrated.

Its funny you say that because MOST MJ fans ARE Janet fans. Also, from my experience its the other way around. Janet fans are the ones to diss MJ first professionally. MJ fans like to blame her and his family for comments made after he died or whatever their take is on what happened when he was alive. Most MJ fans never try to come for Janet when it comes to whose a better dancer, singer, who sold more when, who did better in Scream, etc. Homestly the brothers get it worse than she does(professionally). Honestly, its just redic FROM BOTH SIDES.

i cant believe you really typed this. im a member of several janet sites and mj is hardly ever mentioned. truth is a large number of her fans are not really fans of mj's music so there is not a reason to bring him up.for you to say that mj fans only attack janet and his other family because of things said about him is total bullshit. i have never in life head a janet fan say she sold more records or is bigger than mj, however there are those who feel her dancing or her music is better, which is their opinion and they have the right to express it. a big problem when it comes to some mj fans is if somebody dont feel he is the greatest at everything or if they like another artist's music better than his ,that somehow means they are bashing him or they are delusional. of course there are alot of people who are fans of both, im a fan of the entire family. im a bigger fan of janet's music, i dont think her and mike make the same music so how is me saying i enjoy her work more than his bashing him?

Marrk said:

SEANMAN said:

It's official...you're a fucking moron.

Lill1992 would within their right to report you for that response. You've resorted to personal insults. Low.

I could've also reported Lili for accusing me in my own thread, no less, of starting the thread just to "fight" with MJ fans. It's unnecessary and untrue trolling. I've explained why I began the thread and that's the end of it.

SEANMAN said:

Marrk said:

Lill1992 would within their right to report you for that response. You've resorted to personal insults. Low.

I could've also reported Lili for accusing me in my own thread, no less, of starting the thread just to "fight" with MJ fans. It's unnecessary and untrue trolling. I've explained why I began the thread and that's the end of it.

"Boohoo. Lili said some mean things to me, I'm gonna tell Mommy.". How pathetic.

Still can't get past "If -you-don't-love-Janet Jackson-you-cannot-speak" I see.

PatrickS77 said:

PatrickS77 said:

SEANMAN said:

I could've also reported Lili for accusing me in my own thread, no less, of starting the thread just to "fight" with MJ fans. It's unnecessary and untrue trolling. I've explained why I began the thread and that's the end of it.

"Boohoo. Lili said some mean things to me, I'm gonna tell Mommy.". How pathetic.

Et tu, Brute? I believe that the bulk of you are angry because Billboard published an article that showed Janet in a flattering light, and with this being the Org, we all know that Janet and positivity don't always go hand in hand. But guess what? You can kiss my Janet-lovin' ass as well, Skippy. Go tell that to MJ. Oh, wait...

Free2BMe said:

PatrickS77 said:

"Boohoo. Lili said some mean things to me, I'm gonna tell Mommy.". How pathetic.

Patrick you are correct. It is pathetic. Very hypocritical that they can dish it out; but, can't handle it when it is thrown back at them. Btw, what did Lili say that was so bad? Maybe I missed something. I also find it very hypocritical that Janet fans can disagree with MJ fans about something; yet, we just have to sit back and agree and ACCEPT what they say without question, only because it is Janet. Of course, Janet is not supposed to be questioned. [Edited 3/1/15 13:40pm] [Edited 3/1/15 13:41pm]

as mentioned earlier, before the family dynamic was devastated

these debates and ill will did not exist then....it was awesome to be a part of

SEANMAN said:

Free2BMe said:

I love the Janet threads lots of bitchy put-downs,intense drama and hilarious memes...LMAO

Free2BMe said:

Free2BMe said:

Free2BMe said: What an immature and ignorant response. Why would a so-called "intelligent" person, as you profess yourself to be,make light of a person who was murdered/killed?You Janet stans would die if someone made light of Janet if she had been killed or had died. This the hypocritical crap that makes me sick about you Janet Stans. Btw, before you get all defensive and come back with your weak rebuke, their is not a MJ fan anywhere who would take the low blows about Janet if she was dead, as you pathetic, yes pathetic, stans do about Michael,when you have no other recourse to defend your drivel. It's sad and makes you and others like you look desperate.

um ive seen mj fans actually wish death on janet so the thought of them throwing low blows if god forbid she was dead is pretty much expected. why does mj fans get so upset everytime there is a janet thread?you all have hundreds of sticky threads yet still show up anytime a janet fan makes a thread about for the sole purpose of bitching and showing your insecurities.

Free2BMe said:

Free2BMe said: What an immature and ignorant response. Why would a so-called "intelligent" person, as you profess yourself to be,make light of a person who was murdered/killed?You Janet stans would die if someone made light of Janet if she had been killed or had died. This the hypocritical crap that makes me sick about you Janet Stans. Btw, before you get all defensive and come back with your weak rebuke, their is not a MJ fan anywhere who would take the low blows about Janet if she was dead, as you pathetic, yes pathetic, stans do about Michael,when you have no other recourse to defend your drivel. It's sad and makes you and others like you look desperate.

It's "there", not "their". Learn to spell and then maybe I'll dignify everything else you have to say with a response. I don't have the time or the interest otherwise.