independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Billboard chart analysis and rank of Jackson Family singles
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 02/25/15 3:02pm

Marrk

avatar

SEANMAN said:

Marrk said:

My point is...

You don't have one, and you never fucking do. And now, I'll let Janet say it for me...

Job done. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 02/25/15 3:19pm

lowkey

Marrk said:

SEANMAN said:

You don't have one, and you never fucking do. And now, I'll let Janet say it for me...

Job done. lol

but if you dont like janet and you dont like seanman why do you always come into his threads about janet? that kinda sorta is trolling.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 02/25/15 4:26pm

Marrk

avatar

lowkey said:

Marrk said:

Job done. lol

but if you dont like janet and you dont like seanman why do you always come into his threads about janet? that kinda sorta is trolling.

Oh i don't mind both at all. I owned lots of Janet up to 'All For You'. If she brings out a new album, i'll give it a go. I just hate threads on dull trivia. Lists and charts, all bollocks to me.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 02/25/15 5:45pm

lowkey

Marrk said:

lowkey said:

but if you dont like janet and you dont like seanman why do you always come into his threads about janet? that kinda sorta is trolling.

Oh i don't mind both at all. I owned lots of Janet up to 'All For You'. If she brings out a new album, i'll give it a go. I just hate threads on dull trivia. Lists and charts, all bollocks to me.

i can understand that i dont really pay attention to stuff like that either, but to be fair the op didnt make the list, its a actual billboard list. some fans love charts and stats, including alot of mj fans,so i dont see why its a problem for fans of other artists to post stuff like this .i mean look how quick fans were to point out how mj is the biggest selling and so-on, i think everybody knows mj's accomplishments.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 02/25/15 8:50pm

Scorp

great was the day when there wasn't no beef regarding this family of entetainment

when the talents of everyone was appreciated

I'm glad I had the opportunity to experience that firsthand because it's a very slim chance it ever returns to that

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 02/25/15 9:06pm

SoulAlive

it is sorta strange how MJ fans and Janet fans battle each other...trying to prove that one artist was bigger than the other lol I never saw them as direct competition with each other at all

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 02/25/15 10:48pm

lowkey

SoulAlive said:

it is sorta strange how MJ fans and Janet fans battle each other...trying to prove that one artist was bigger than the other lol I never saw them as direct competition with each other at all

neither did i, its really strange to me how fans pit them against each other. but its a fact that since mj died his fans have been on a anti jacksons crusade,especially janet.I could be wrong but show me a mj thread where janet fans come up in there for the sole purpose of trolling.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 02/26/15 1:08am

LiLi1992

avatar

lowkey said:

LiLi1992 said:

Yes, but this is a Janet fan started this thread to convince others that she is bigger than her brothers.

so what a janet fan posted it, do mj fans not post articles about him? its just crazy that instead of realizing the amazing success one family has had in music it turns into a sibling vs sibling thread.

this means that he must understand that will involve into discussion MJ fans or Jackson 5, if his and band name is repeatedly mentioned in this article.

the article is not called "the Musical legacy of the Jacksons", but "Janet Jackson Outsells MJ...on Singles" which is a blatant and outright lie, because the list itself is built on a system of points

his reaction to the comments inappropriate and aggressive. it is clear that he started this thread to fight.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 02/26/15 4:37am

BlackCat1985

avatar

lowkey said:



MotownSubdivision said:


Is it not possible for a Janet fan to also be an MHM fan and vice-versa? Based on people's comments on here, you'd think that's impossible.

im a jackson family fan even though janet is my favorite. i respect and appreciate all of their accomplishments but for some reason alot of mj fans find it hard to give credit to his siblings for the things they have done. you got 3 iconic acts from 1 family,that should be celebrated.


This!!! I don't care what anybody says about the Jacksons. You can not deny their influnce on the music industry. It is unheard of that 3 major acts can emerge from one family. That fact along makes them The First Family of music. They will always be remembered. #blackexcellence
[Edited 2/26/15 4:38am]
[Edited 2/26/15 4:40am]
BlackCat1985
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 02/26/15 8:41am

lowkey

LiLi1992 said:

lowkey said:

so what a janet fan posted it, do mj fans not post articles about him? its just crazy that instead of realizing the amazing success one family has had in music it turns into a sibling vs sibling thread.

this means that he must understand that will involve into discussion MJ fans or Jackson 5, if his and band name is repeatedly mentioned in this article.

the article is not called "the Musical legacy of the Jacksons", but "Janet Jackson Outsells MJ...on Singles" which is a blatant and outright lie, because the list itself is built on a system of points

his reaction to the comments inappropriate and aggressive. it is clear that he started this thread to fight.

yeah but seanman didnt write the article so why would you wanna fight with him just because he posted it? he's a big time janet fan,he's gonna always post anything positive about her. if this same article was posted and switch mj's name with janet's some mj fan would have posted it. then you have people in the thread claiming singles dont mean nothing, which is a lie, but if they dont mean nothing why does it even matter?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 02/26/15 3:07pm

SEANMAN

avatar

lowkey said:

Marrk said:

Job done. lol

but if you dont like janet and you dont like seanman why do you always come into his threads about janet? that kinda sorta is trolling.

lol It is trolling, which makes it kind of pathetic.

"Get up off that grey line"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 02/26/15 3:09pm

SEANMAN

avatar

LiLi1992 said:

lowkey said:

so what a janet fan posted it, do mj fans not post articles about him? its just crazy that instead of realizing the amazing success one family has had in music it turns into a sibling vs sibling thread.

this means that he must understand that will involve into discussion MJ fans or Jackson 5, if his and band name is repeatedly mentioned in this article.

the article is not called "the Musical legacy of the Jacksons", but "Janet Jackson Outsells MJ...on Singles" which is a blatant and outright lie, because the list itself is built on a system of points

his reaction to the comments inappropriate and aggressive. it is clear that he started this thread to fight.

It's official...you're a fucking moron. lol

"Get up off that grey line"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 02/26/15 3:13pm

SEANMAN

avatar

lowkey said:

LiLi1992 said:

this means that he must understand that will involve into discussion MJ fans or Jackson 5, if his and band name is repeatedly mentioned in this article.

the article is not called "the Musical legacy of the Jacksons", but "Janet Jackson Outsells MJ...on Singles" which is a blatant and outright lie, because the list itself is built on a system of points

his reaction to the comments inappropriate and aggressive. it is clear that he started this thread to fight.

yeah but seanman didnt write the article so why would you wanna fight with him just because he posted it? he's a big time janet fan,he's gonna always post anything positive about her. if this same article was posted and switch mj's name with janet's some mj fan would have posted it. then you have people in the thread claiming singles dont mean nothing, which is a lie, but if they dont mean nothing why does it even matter?

Thanks lowkey, but LiLi1992 is an idiot. I could post anything about Janet and people like LiLi and Marrk would find something to troll about or debate about. This was an article written by Billboard. I posted it because, as a Janet fan, I like to post good articles about her. Despite the fact that he's a part of the article, my posting it had zero to do with Michael Joseph Jackson. This is something these trolls either just don't understand, or they understand but choose to dissect it because, well, they're trolls.

[Edited 2/26/15 15:20pm]

"Get up off that grey line"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 02/26/15 3:17pm

SEANMAN

avatar

Marrk said:

lowkey said:

but if you dont like janet and you dont like seanman why do you always come into his threads about janet? that kinda sorta is trolling.

I just hate threads on dull trivia. Lists and charts, all bollocks to me.

Well that makes a whole hell of a lot of sense. Going into and contributing to a thread based on a topic that you hate and find dull. It literally gives new meaning to the word 'counterproductive'. lol

"Get up off that grey line"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 02/27/15 8:28pm

purple05

lowkey said:

MotownSubdivision said:

Is it not possible for a Janet fan to also be an MHM fan and vice-versa? Based on people's comments on here, you'd think that's impossible.

im a jackson family fan even though janet is my favorite. i respect and appreciate all of their accomplishments but for some reason alot of mj fans find it hard to give credit to his siblings for the things they have done. you got 3 iconic acts from 1 family,that should be celebrated.

Its funny you say that because MOST MJ fans ARE Janet fans. Also, from my experience its the other way around. Janet fans are the ones to diss MJ first professionally. MJ fans like to blame her and his family for comments made after he died or whatever their take is on what happened when he was alive. Most MJ fans never try to come for Janet when it comes to whose a better dancer, singer, who sold more when, who did better in Scream, etc. Homestly the brothers get it worse than she does(professionally). Honestly, its just redic FROM BOTH SIDES.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 02/28/15 6:05am

PatrickS77

avatar

purple05 said:

Its funny you say that because MOST MJ fans ARE Janet fans. Also, from my experience its the other way around. Janet fans are the ones to diss MJ first professionally. MJ fans like to blame her and his family for comments made after he died or whatever their take is on what happened when he was alive. Most MJ fans never try to come for Janet when it comes to whose a better dancer, singer, who sold more when, who did better in Scream, etc.

yeahthat and most of the other bs is only in response to people putting MJ down.

[Edited 2/28/15 6:07am]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 02/28/15 3:24pm

Marrk

avatar

SEANMAN said:

LiLi1992 said:

this means that he must understand that will involve into discussion MJ fans or Jackson 5, if his and band name is repeatedly mentioned in this article.

the article is not called "the Musical legacy of the Jacksons", but "Janet Jackson Outsells MJ...on Singles" which is a blatant and outright lie, because the list itself is built on a system of points

his reaction to the comments inappropriate and aggressive. it is clear that he started this thread to fight.

It's official...you're a fucking moron. lol

Lill1992 would within their right to report you for that response. You've resorted to personal insults. Low.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 02/28/15 5:47pm

lowkey

purple05 said:

lowkey said:

im a jackson family fan even though janet is my favorite. i respect and appreciate all of their accomplishments but for some reason alot of mj fans find it hard to give credit to his siblings for the things they have done. you got 3 iconic acts from 1 family,that should be celebrated.

Its funny you say that because MOST MJ fans ARE Janet fans. Also, from my experience its the other way around. Janet fans are the ones to diss MJ first professionally. MJ fans like to blame her and his family for comments made after he died or whatever their take is on what happened when he was alive. Most MJ fans never try to come for Janet when it comes to whose a better dancer, singer, who sold more when, who did better in Scream, etc. Homestly the brothers get it worse than she does(professionally). Honestly, its just redic FROM BOTH SIDES.

i cant believe you really typed this. im a member of several janet sites and mj is hardly ever mentioned. truth is a large number of her fans are not really fans of mj's music so there is not a reason to bring him up.for you to say that mj fans only attack janet and his other family because of things said about him is total bullshit. i have never in life head a janet fan say she sold more records or is bigger than mj, however there are those who feel her dancing or her music is better, which is their opinion and they have the right to express it. a big problem when it comes to some mj fans is if somebody dont feel he is the greatest at everything or if they like another artist's music better than his ,that somehow means they are bashing him or they are delusional. of course there are alot of people who are fans of both, im a fan of the entire family. im a bigger fan of janet's music, i dont think her and mike make the same music so how is me saying i enjoy her work more than his bashing him?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 03/01/15 8:27am

SEANMAN

avatar

Marrk said:

SEANMAN said:

It's official...you're a fucking moron. lol

Lill1992 would within their right to report you for that response. You've resorted to personal insults. Low.

I could've also reported Lili for accusing me in my own thread, no less, of starting the thread just to "fight" with MJ fans. It's unnecessary and untrue trolling. I've explained why I began the thread and that's the end of it.

"Get up off that grey line"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 03/01/15 8:55am

PatrickS77

avatar

SEANMAN said:

Marrk said:

Lill1992 would within their right to report you for that response. You've resorted to personal insults. Low.

I could've also reported Lili for accusing me in my own thread, no less, of starting the thread just to "fight" with MJ fans. It's unnecessary and untrue trolling. I've explained why I began the thread and that's the end of it.

"Boohoo. Lili said some mean things to me, I'm gonna tell Mommy.". How pathetic.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 03/01/15 12:29pm

SUPRMAN

avatar

Still can't get past "If -you-don't-love-Janet Jackson-you-cannot-speak" I see.

I don't want you to think like me. I just want you to think.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 03/01/15 12:56pm

Free2BMe

PatrickS77 said:



SEANMAN said:




Marrk said:




Lill1992 would within their right to report you for that response. You've resorted to personal insults. Low.



I could've also reported Lili for accusing me in my own thread, no less, of starting the thread just to "fight" with MJ fans. It's unnecessary and untrue trolling. I've explained why I began the thread and that's the end of it.




"Boohoo. Lili said some mean things to me, I'm gonna tell Mommy.". How pathetic.



Patrick you are correct. It is pathetic. Very hypocritical that they can dish it out; but, can't handle it when it is thrown back at them. Btw, what did Lili say that was so bad? Maybe I missed something. I also find it very hypocritical that Janet fans can disagree with MJ fans about something; yet, we just have to sit back and agree and ACCEPT what they say without question, only because it is Janet. Of course, Janet is not supposed to be questioned.
[Edited 3/1/15 13:40pm]
[Edited 3/1/15 13:41pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 03/01/15 3:08pm

SEANMAN

avatar

PatrickS77 said:

SEANMAN said:

I could've also reported Lili for accusing me in my own thread, no less, of starting the thread just to "fight" with MJ fans. It's unnecessary and untrue trolling. I've explained why I began the thread and that's the end of it.

"Boohoo. Lili said some mean things to me, I'm gonna tell Mommy.". How pathetic.

lol Et tu, Brute? I believe that the bulk of you are angry because Billboard published an article that showed Janet in a flattering light, and with this being the Org, we all know that Janet and positivity don't always go hand in hand. But guess what? You can kiss my Janet-lovin' ass as well, Skippy. Go tell that to MJ. Oh, wait...

"Get up off that grey line"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 03/01/15 3:15pm

Scorp

Free2BMe said:

PatrickS77 said:

"Boohoo. Lili said some mean things to me, I'm gonna tell Mommy.". How pathetic.

Patrick you are correct. It is pathetic. Very hypocritical that they can dish it out; but, can't handle it when it is thrown back at them. Btw, what did Lili say that was so bad? Maybe I missed something. I also find it very hypocritical that Janet fans can disagree with MJ fans about something; yet, we just have to sit back and agree and ACCEPT what they say without question, only because it is Janet. Of course, Janet is not supposed to be questioned. [Edited 3/1/15 13:40pm] [Edited 3/1/15 13:41pm]

as mentioned earlier, before the family dynamic was devastated

these debates and ill will did not exist then....it was awesome to be a part of

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 03/01/15 3:48pm

Free2BMe

SEANMAN said:



PatrickS77 said:






[Edited 3/1/15 16:06pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 03/01/15 3:49pm

Free2BMe

Free2BMe said:

SEANMAN said:



PatrickS77 said:




SEANMAN said:



I could've also reported Lili for accusing me in my own thread, no less, of starting the thread just to "fight" with MJ fans. It's unnecessary and untrue trolling. I've explained why I began the thread and that's the end of it.




"Boohoo. Lili said some mean things to me, I'm gonna tell Mommy.". How pathetic.



lol Et tu, Brute? I believe that the bulk of you are angry because Billboard published an article that showed Janet in a flattering light, and with this being the Org, we all know that Janet and positivity don't always go hand in hand. But guess what? You can kiss my Janet-lovin' ass as well, Skippy. Go tell that to MJ. Oh, wait...



  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 03/01/15 3:58pm

SoulAlive

I love the Janet threads biggrin lots of bitchy put-downs,intense drama and hilarious memes...LMAO

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 03/01/15 4:02pm

Free2BMe

Free2BMe said:

SEANMAN said:



PatrickS77 said:




SEANMAN said:



I could've also reported Lili for accusing me in my own thread, no less, of starting the thread just to "fight" with MJ fans. It's unnecessary and untrue trolling. I've explained why I began the thread and that's the end of it.




"Boohoo. Lili said some mean things to me, I'm gonna tell Mommy.". How pathetic.



lol Et tu, Brute? I believe that the bulk of you are angry because

Billboard published an article that showed Janet in a flattering light, and with this being the Org, we all know that Janet and positivity don't always go hand in hand. But guess what? You can kiss my Janet-lovin' ass as well, Skippy. Go tell that to MJ. Oh, wait...





What an immature and ignorant response. Why would a so-called "intelligent" person, as you profess yourself to be,make light of a person who was murdered/killed?You Janet stans would die if someone made light of Janet if she had been killed or had died. This the hypocritical crap that makes me sick about you Janet Stans. Btw, before you get all defensive and come back with your weak rebuke, their is not a MJ fan anywhere who would take the low blows about Janet if she was dead, as you pathetic, yes pathetic, stans do about Michael,when you have no other recourse to defend your drivel. It's sad and makes you and others like you look desperate.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 03/01/15 5:26pm

lowkey

Free2BMe said:

Free2BMe said: What an immature and ignorant response. Why would a so-called "intelligent" person, as you profess yourself to be,make light of a person who was murdered/killed?You Janet stans would die if someone made light of Janet if she had been killed or had died. This the hypocritical crap that makes me sick about you Janet Stans. Btw, before you get all defensive and come back with your weak rebuke, their is not a MJ fan anywhere who would take the low blows about Janet if she was dead, as you pathetic, yes pathetic, stans do about Michael,when you have no other recourse to defend your drivel. It's sad and makes you and others like you look desperate.

um ive seen mj fans actually wish death on janet so the thought of them throwing low blows if god forbid she was dead is pretty much expected. why does mj fans get so upset everytime there is a janet thread?you all have hundreds of sticky threads yet still show up anytime a janet fan makes a thread about for the sole purpose of bitching and showing your insecurities.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 03/01/15 8:31pm

SEANMAN

avatar

Free2BMe said:

Free2BMe said: What an immature and ignorant response. Why would a so-called "intelligent" person, as you profess yourself to be,make light of a person who was murdered/killed?You Janet stans would die if someone made light of Janet if she had been killed or had died. This the hypocritical crap that makes me sick about you Janet Stans. Btw, before you get all defensive and come back with your weak rebuke, their is not a MJ fan anywhere who would take the low blows about Janet if she was dead, as you pathetic, yes pathetic, stans do about Michael,when you have no other recourse to defend your drivel. It's sad and makes you and others like you look desperate.

It's "there", not "their". Learn to spell and then maybe I'll dignify everything else you have to say with a response. I don't have the time or the interest otherwise.

"Get up off that grey line"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Billboard chart analysis and rank of Jackson Family singles