I'm actually done with the whole thing. U trying to make me out to be a MJ hater which i'm not. I'm just stating the truth which I dug out the Jimmy J. interview to prove. I'm sticking up for my girl. I've proven my point. will ALWAYS think of like a "ACT OF GOD"! N another realm. mean of all people who might of been aliens or angels.if found out that wasn't of this earth, would not have been that surprised. R.I.P. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
no, you haven't. not at all. all of your contradictions and half-truths and speculations are blatantly obvious and have been shown to be so. jimmy's statements don't prove anything. you're choosing to manipulate his words to suit your argument. he never said mj was jealous or trying to outshine janet. you're saying that.
you're sticking up for your girl, that's the only truthful statement about this whole episode that you've made. [Edited 6/13/12 15:09pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Co sign!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This damn thread again I say Fuck Oprah! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Go kibbles and mjscarousel!!!!!!!! rep for Mike with the truth!!!!!!
As for the Oprah interview, it just continues to amaze me why some of the Jackson's do what they do. We KNOW they are aware of Oprah's comments as it relates to Michael (Randy and Taj confirmed that), so why choose to ignore it? why choose to be chummy with her? They can chat up with her all they want, their call, but to have that woman around MJ's children, pretending like she gives a damn is just disrespectful!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hmm... I remember in one of Oprah's shows on ABC before she killed her ultra-successful talk show for her sinking ship of a network that she reviewed her interview of MJ and noted that she didn't want to end up like MJ... I think she meant with being in the constant spotlight and needing to be in it, along with all the negativity associated with that. Maybe she had a stroke of momentary realization with what he had to deal with. I don't know, and I don't care. Still, it seems to me that she is getting some of what she wanted to avoid... "Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato
https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oprah is a very fake person. Her situation is totally different from Michaels. Michael was naive but sweet. Oprah doesnt give a fuck about anything or anybody but Oprah! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Wow,I didn't know this.Janet always seemed so loyal to Michael.It was LaToya who turned on him in the early 90s,when he was going through the first set of accusations. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yea it really surprised me to. Go look at all her 2009 interviews where she talks about Michael. I would post some of them but dont want to completely change the thread. She said alot of misleading open end remarks and when Oprah said her bullshit Janet didnt speak out against it. Janet didnt know what the hell she was talking about... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You guys really think this?
Obviously, she knew little, as she rarely saw Michael. But she DID NOT throw him under the bus. She was one of the FEW who tried to help him when he was still alive! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janet implied that Michael had issues with prescription drugs and as a result that was how he died. She implied Michael was drug addict.
Prescription Drugs had NOTHING to do with how and why he died. She spoke as if she was close with Michael when it was clear she wasnt. She should have made it clear that she was only speaking of what she thought was going on instead of labeling things that she thought went on with Michael which was not true. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
That's not true. I've heard her say, on many occasions, that Murray was at fault as he was the one adminstrating the drugs.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Some of you say that Michael doesn't need to try to out sing janet (which I agree), but re-recording vocals would actually suggest otherwise TBH.
As far as jealousy is concerned, I don't think either were jealous of eachother. Competitive, yes. Jealous, no!
And remember this, Janet DIDN'T have to support her brother. How many others would do the same, at the peak of their career - support their brother, who just paid off $20 million to a child who had accused him of molestation, whether they were Innoncent or guilty. Coz for sure, Latoya didn't. [Edited 6/15/12 7:54am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Enormous amounts of prescription drugs certainly did not help his health, IMO. It appears that MJ turned his back on his own family thus putting trust in so called friends and enablers who did not have his best interest, IMO. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I don't really understand how you could interpret that in a negative way?
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Im not specifically stating that is what she said but that was what she implied. In ALL the interviews regarding Michaels death, she spends most of the time talking about prescription drug use and interventions that change up in every interview.
I love Janet if I thought she was being accurate and fair I wouldnt be criticising her for the way she handle the interviews. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Re-record vocals doesnt suggest that he was trying to outsing her and its clear that Jimmys OPINION is up for his OWN interpretation of what HE thought. There is no evidence that shows that Michael wanted to sing better than Janet
Michael was known for being a perfectionist. What I got from Jimmys comments was that Michael admire Janets delivery and thought he should improve his vocals maybe but not to necessarily out sing her as Kool was implying. Jimmy Jam from HIS opinion made it seem as that was what Michael was doing when that isnt true.
Janet did defend Michael during that period but it is unfair how she gave misleading remarks that she was unsure about herslef when her brother was not here to defend himself.
She does have a right as a sister to express what she thought was going on with her brother but she should have made those comments more clearer in KNOWING that anything said about him could be manipulated and interpreted differently. She could have been more assertive instead of bringing up what SHE thought went on with him and how he ultimately ended up passing away. She insisted that Prescription drugs was how he passed as well and played a major role in it. She hardly ever blamed Murray and I looked at ALL her interviews since Michael passing. She only mentions Murray when THE INTERVIEWER brings him up but besides that shes insisting her brother was a drug addict and going along with media reports instead of doing more research of the cause of death. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I would to from a family who insists I was a drug addict, who are not close themself, who exploits my children and me after death.
The Jacksons are a mess. They saw Michael as a money machine and used him. Even in death they still after his money. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You are clearly more informed than me so I won't say much more. I don't think that's fair to say though
[Edited 6/15/12 8:29am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Agreed | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nevermind Disregard last post..I will just say you have to watch all the interviews to understand where Im coming from. [Edited 6/15/12 10:35am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thats fine, everyone has their opinion
I just think Janet conducted her interviews leaving the public open to interpret it how they want to but her insisting that Michael was taking prescription drugs didnt help his image or Murrays guilt.
She didnt know if Michael was taking prescriptions drugs, so why would she say it just because that was what she thought?
She even states in one or two interviews that she didnt know what was going on with him, so how could she know that he was still taking prescription drugs?
To be honest, no one knows if Michael was taking prescrition drugs or not, we can only go on what was found in his body and there was NONE. So more than likely he was not taking any leading up to his death. He overdosed on Propofol and he was given other drugs by Murray but they were non prescription. The drugs that Michael was given by Murray were other anestheia medications and you can not get addicted to anesthesia being your unconscious of feeling, surrounds etc and it just puts you to sleep.
That was just my only issue with alot of the interviews Janet conducted after Michael passed. I felt she could have spent more time talking about Murray and seeking justice for her brother but instead she spent more time in painting her brother to be a helpless drug addict but she sure was quick to tell interviewers to not ask any more questions about him when it came to promoting her tour and book [Edited 6/15/12 8:47am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |