Author | Message |
The evolution of the pop song from three chords to four chords When I was growing up, the pop song was constructed using three chords in the verse, and adding in the minor chords for the chorus.
It worked pretty well - probably 100,000 hit songs or so were written using that model or a variation thereof.
Every musician in the world knows/knew what you meant when you said, "OK guys, this is a three-chord rocker in G".
Well, a few years ago I decided to learn some Katy Perry songs. They were all exactly the same, which is no crime.
But they were all based on FOUR chord progressions - usually something like G-Em-C-D. The choruses were the same chords.
Then I got into Taylor Swift and her best songs were the same structure. She'd vary the chorus, and start it with the minor chord, but it was usually the same chords as the verses.
There are plenty of YouTube videos where some guy plays 25 songs in 3 minutes, and they're all G-Em-C-D progression songs.
So it seems the four chord progression is the norm in pop now.
My question is, when did this happen? Who was the first to really get successful with this new progression? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Axis Of Awesome explained it a few years ago.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
The "three-chord rocker in G" is probably just a basic Blues progression (I-IV-V) "Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
There are tons of variations you could pull off with these four chords. And because of these variations, there are similarly tons of melodic inventions available as well. Passing chords nestled in between others could serve to add color to tunes; and ear training and theory would be able to help songwriters compose middle eights and interesting bridges as well.
The problem with pop music today is that it is largely devoid of originality, personality and inventiveness: those involved are more concerned with utilizing a blueprint for financial reasons as opposed to musical innovation. There ain't nothing wrong with this, but I would wager it goes a long way in explaining why pop music seems to be static.
But for pop, the Beatles are still #1 in my book. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I know. The doo-wop songs of the fifties were mostly all that progression.
I'm just interested in how that progression reappeared and now dominates pop songs. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Advice: switch 2 FUNK. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Good advice!
But don't forget about country music. That's where the best players are these days, and the best songwriters. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Lol....I would not listen 2 country if u paid me big money. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thanks for the music history lesson t.A. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
For 100 million dollars you would!!! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Thanks - that was very enlightening! Like a superhero, you swooped in and got to the point!
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Don't think so......... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I learned the term on some cover band gigs years ago. "Ya see, we're not interested in what you know...but what you are willing to learn. C'mon y'all." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Nobody said nothing about Johnny Cash's hits in the same chord..sometimes sounds as if it was the same guitar through all the years... Straight Jacket Funk Affair
Album plays and love for vinyl records. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |