| Author | Message |
What do you think of The Beatles? Please help me out! Hello all
Are there any songs you could recommend? The reason I ask is because I hear their catalogue is diverse and deep, people's who opinions I trust on such matters tell me they are amazing, but all I hear is bland, soulless music.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Don't waste your breath mane. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh, Timmy don't dig no Beatles? [Edited 3/25/12 15:28pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Some. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I feel you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
They rate them too motherfucking high... they were good at what they did but there were better groups who had better material... real talk. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Really though. I think at some point it kind of supersedes the music. I mean they were good, but I've never seen them as the greatest ever. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"Mr. Moonlight" "Wild Honey Pie" "What's The New Mary Jane" "You Know My Name (Look Up The Number)" The Census Bureau estimates that there are 2,518 American Indians and Alaska Natives currently living in the city of Long Beach. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Two or three tracks ain't enough to measure the wealth of their material. Examine the whole catalog and then come back in a week and share your assessment. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I am a huge fan of the Beatles. For some people it's a cliche, but I sincerely believe that the Beatles - the best ever.
Eleanor Rigby And I Love Her Here Comes The Sun Across The Universe Dear Prudence Hey Jude Come Together Michelle From Me To You Can't Buy Me Love The Ballad Of John And Yoko Yesterday
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No, I have heard many of their songs, I meant only 2-3 were good. Having said that, I haven't listened to their whole discography! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Pretty much every great pop song ever written has at least one Beatles song to thank for its existence.
And pretty much any innovation in music that you can think of, the Beatles did it first and did it best.
Pick up any of their greatest hits album and as you listen to the songs, keep telling yourself this: "These guys wrote all these songs and no one had ever written anything like them before. The Beatles didn't borrow ANY of this from ANYBODY. They created it all by themselves".
(Yes, I know they did a lot of rock-a-billy and blues covers early on. But you all know exactly what I mean.) | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I dont think the OP was trying to downplay The Beatles at all. Correct me if Im wrong but I think he just wanted suggestions on soulful, R&b or funk non pop inspired tracks the Beatles have done and TO BE HONEST.......... I can't think of any either.
They have covered more than one genre (from the songs that Ive heard) but a funk song or soulful song just doesnt stick out to me or maybe I should listen to a little bit more of their music too.
I think their are better bands that have done funk, soul and r&b.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
They always top all the polls but I don't know if they are necessarily the greatest I think they were more the first in pop music to do a lot of things Revolver and Sgt Peppers is what u really need to hear | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I think their greatest comes from the fact that there weren't many popular music genres in existance back then. They combined things no one had before. If it weren't for the Beatles, there would likely be no sitar on the song "7". They popularized the indian classical instrument in pop music. Jimi Hendrix invented rock and roll guitar as we know it. BECAUSE of what he did there are people now who can play circles around him in terms of athletic skill.
The Beatles broke new and more ground than Prince. That doesn't mean people haven't taken their innovations and expanded them in new and exciting ways.
This "argument" is like stating that a 2012 Cadillac Escalade is better than an overrated Model T Ford. No shit. HOWEVER, you wouldn't have the Corvette without Henry Ford and you wouldn't have your Little Red Corvette without the Beatles.
REAL TALK | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Even though they are my avi picture they are not my favorite artist of all time .. but I do feel they were good at what they did. I didn't start really gettng into them till a year or two ago but i'm happy I finally expose myself to them. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'm curious what the "2-3" good songs are and which songs you didn't like. "Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lol I don't know what he was looking for because the Beatles didn't do anything funky, soulful or even anything close to R&B.
The Beats were like the antithesis of the rebellious '50s R&B/rockabilly rebels of early rock (Little Rich, the original Sir Chuck, The Killer, "The King", etc.) The European equivalent of the Everly Brothers (which is who they actually idolized)... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yep, me too.
I think the blue album era(67-70) is what really draw my attention. They and George Martin put their ALL in that studio during that period.
If George Clinton cited "The White Album" as an inspiration, you know those boys weren't the novelty joke as many folks(me included, once) thought they were. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Stevie was influenced by the Beatles too but eh... just made them better | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Even bands like Parliament/ Sly Family Stone experimented with Rock, Soul, R&B, Funk, Pop, etc but you dont see them ranked as high but Ill keep the rest of my comments to myself
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said:
lol I don't know what he was looking for because the Beatles didn't do anything funky, soulful or even anything close to R&B.
The Beats were like the antithesis of the rebellious '50s R&B/rockabilly rebels of early rock (Little Rich, the original Sir Chuck, The Killer, "The King", etc.) The European equivalent of the Everly Brothers (which is who they actually idolized)... I'd be wary of trying to pigeonhole the Beatles. The group had all but broken up by the time funk went mainstream, but they definitely used elements of various genres in a number of ways. For instance, I can certainly hear what made Ike & Tina want to cover "Come Together." And while I wouldn't call John Lennon a "soul singer" by any stretch, there's something in both the music and the delivery of, say, "Don't Let Me Down" that is soulful IMO. I'd also argue that songs like "Let It Be" aren't too far away from some form of R&B, as it were. All that being said, why classify at all? The Beatles wrote and performed great songs. Anyone who can't hear that... well, that's their loss. "Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I greatly agree with that.
They did have alot of soulful delivery on alot of their songs while they didnt sing soul music.... I would classify Let It Be as more along the lines of gospel than R&B. I dont think no one is trying to pigeonhole the Beatles but it is interesting in putting alot of their music in perspective. They had alot of great songs and lyrics but they didnt do alot of experimentation with those genres mentioned which this thread exactly made me realize even more. It doesnt take anything away from them.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Paula and John were brilliant lyricist and music composers. Yes, Leonard Bernstein compared them to the Gershwin brothers and I couldn't agree more.
I say all that to say this...
A lil of the Beatles go a long way for me. During their time, my time I wanted to dance... they weren't making my kind of music to do that to. So there it is. (MHO)
=================================== [Edited 3/26/12 6:09am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Hmm, so I'm supposed to just not say how I feel about the Beats? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well damn Paula?
I agree though about them as lyricists/composers. Their strength was really in songwriting then it was the overall package. That's where I give them props. George Harrison wasn't a bad one either. Everyone and their mama covered his "Something". | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
It's not just you; I'm always trying to reconcile how people worship and praise them with what I actually hear when I listen to their music, they've always seemed totally overrated to me barring a handful of songs. 비 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |