independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Bruce Springsteen: The Wrecking Ball Thread
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 5 12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 01/19/12 5:53am

Identity

Bruce Springsteen: The Wrecking Ball Thread

January 19, 2012

Link


We already knew that a new Bruce Sprinsteen album was imminent, and now details on that release have been issued.

This will be his 17th album, which is being previewed via a single titled “We Take Care of Our Own,” due out today (Jan. 19) and streaming below. The full-length record, Wrecking Ball, will surface on March 6.

The title track of the album has already surfaced in Springsteen’s live sets, and is thought to be a tribute to a venue he has played many times—“Wrecking Ball” is the nickname given to the former Giants Stadium in New Jersey.

The record was produced by Ron Aniello and includes a guest appearance by Tom Morello of Rage Against the Machine.

Wrecking Ball track list:

  1. "We Take Care of Our Own"
  2. "Easy Money"
  3. "Shackled and Down"
  4. "Jack of All Trades"
  5. "Death to My Hometown"
  6. "The Depression"
  7. "Wrecking Ball"
  8. "You’ve Got It"
  9. "Rocky Ground"
  10. "Land of Hope and Dreams"
  11. "We Are Live"
  12. "Swallowed Up" (iTunes Bonus Track)
  13. "American Land" (iTunes Bonus Track)


[Edited 2/10/12 15:37pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 01/19/12 5:59am

Identity

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 01/19/12 7:59am

sosgemini

avatar

Sounds just like everything else he's done of late.

Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 01/19/12 8:21am

Identity

It's uplifting and brimming with promise.

Just what I need from the Boss. The full album is gonna be rock solid.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 01/19/12 10:56am

DaveT

avatar

First album without Clarence? sad

Sounds like he's still in the pop-rock furrow that he got into with The Rising...which is no bad thing, but after three albums of it (Magic and Working On A Dream were poor man's Risings) I'd like to hear something different, see The Boss take a few risks again. I'll reserve judgment 'til the albums out.

www.filmsfilmsfilms.co.uk - The internet's best movie site!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 01/19/12 11:10am

xLiberiangirl

avatar

I really love the new single! It sounds good. cool

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 01/19/12 7:10pm

RRA

xLiberiangirl said:

I really love the new single! It sounds good. cool

I agree. Not really a Boss fan, and this track isn't rocket science, but I must admit...this single was very good.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 01/19/12 7:15pm

Identity

L.A. Times Music Blog

January 19, 2012


Bruce Springsteen released his new single, "We Take Care of Our Own," Thursday morning, and what's most striking about it on first listen is how much it sounds like ... The Boss. It's the first song from his forthcoming 11-track album, his 17th, "Wrecking Ball," which will be released on March 6.

Never one to stray too far from his core mission of crafting solidly structured rock songs built on a blueprint passed down from American generation to generation, "We Take Care of Our Own" -- except for one modern wash of guitar, a few echoed drum pops, and one (big) glaring absence -- sounds like a track that could have been on any his classic albums from 1975 to 1984, from "Born to Run" through "Born in the U.S.A." (excluding his acoustic "Nebraska"). These records are undeniably rock 'n' roll and constructed with the help of his E Street Band.

His first recording since the death of saxophonist Clarence Clemons, the new song is notable for what's not there -- the horn player's sonic bursts and furious tenor declarations. Absent too is an indication of whether the music is constructed by the E Street Band or whether, like his most recent studio album, "Working on a Dream," it is a solo record. The backing band suggests the former, as does the glockenspiel a la "She's the One," the hum of the organ and the piano melody, coupled with a Phil Spector-esque string section drifting above.

And then there are the lyrics, which offer an affirmation of national glory without ever uttering the word "America," suggest the economic struggles without calling them "economic struggles." Sings Springsteen in his husk of a voice: "I've been knocking on that door that holds the throne," and it's not clear whether the Boss is talking about death, desperation or desire -- or whether he's written a pointed response to Jay-Z and Kanye West's "Watch the Throne" (probably not, but it's fun to think about). "I've been looking for a map that leads me home/The road of good intentions has gone dry as a bone."

As the song unfolds, Springsteen clarifies his point: This is a song about the country and hardship, but also about community and pride: "We take care of our own/Wherever this flag is flown/We take care of our own."

Granted, the title phrase borders on jingoism, and in the wrong hands can be both used to justify actions noble and contemptible, from coming together as a family to help kin, to protecting territory from outsiders a la "Deliverance." "There ain't no help the cavalry stayed at home," he sings, "There ain't no one hearing the bugle blowing" (a veiled reference to Clemons?).

Is it classic Springsteen? Comments are open for your response. But mostly it depends on which Bruce you like: the one who sets out to be the Voice of the People and speak for the 99% a la Woody Guthrie, or the one who goes small and captures the voice of a single character a la "The Ghost of Tom Joad" and "State Trooper." The new song is much more the former than the latter; Springsteen obviously knows what time it is, and it's time to step up and say something big.

http://latimesblogs.latim...r-own.html

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 01/19/12 9:45pm

Ace

Meh. It's paint-by-numbers Boss. Engineered for an election year tour (Barack, do I hear a campaign song?).

A marked improvement over 99% of Working on a Dream and 90% of Magic (Buh-bye, Brendan O'Brien! Don't let the door hit ya in the ass on the way out!), but it's melodically bland and lyrically middle-tier Bruce.

Doesn't mean I won't be there when he swings through my burgh, though.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 01/19/12 9:46pm

Timmy84

Doesn't he release albums every political year? It's like a trend with his ass. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 01/19/12 9:50pm

Ace

Timmy84 said:

Doesn't he release albums every political year? It's like a trend with his ass. lol

Very astute of you to notice, Timmy. It ain't no coincidence.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 01/19/12 9:51pm

Timmy84

Ace said:

Timmy84 said:

Doesn't he release albums every political year? It's like a trend with his ass. lol

Very astute of you to notice, Timmy. It ain't no coincidence.

I mean it's like clockwork. evillol I mean I ain't knocking his hustle but it's getting quite redundant. But you know what that means? With every Springsteen album, there'll come a U2 record around the same time. JUST WATCH! lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 01/19/12 9:54pm

Ace

Timmy84 said:

Ace said:

Very astute of you to notice, Timmy. It ain't no coincidence.

I mean it's like clockwork. evillol I mean I ain't knocking his hustle but it's getting quite redundant.

It's his thing. shrug

But you know what that means? With every Springsteen album, there'll come a U2 record around the same time. JUST WATCH! lol

Despite liking a U2 tune here and there, I can't stand Bono. barf

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 01/19/12 10:02pm

Timmy84

Ace said:

Timmy84 said:

It's his thing. shrug

But you know what that means? With every Springsteen album, there'll come a U2 record around the same time. JUST WATCH! lol

Despite liking a U2 tune here and there, I can't stand Bono. barf

Hah yeah I know. nod

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 01/20/12 8:07am

2020

avatar

I like it - yes its classic Springsteen and that is a good thing.

Only thing missing is Clarence blowing his horn at the end of the song...would've been great.

The greatest live performer of our times was is and always will be Prince.

Remember there is only one destination and that place is U
All of it. Everything. Is U.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 01/20/12 8:44am

peedub

avatar

i like it...this song speaks for alot of people in this country at the mo. it sounds especially good on headphones.

but, yeah, clarence sure is missed.

does anybody know if this is a solo effort or an e street band release?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 01/20/12 9:28am

JoeTyler

not excited, the song is ok, NOT a new classic

on paper the album looks like the third part of Magic-Working on a Dream, murky and repetitive albums

and the E Street without Clarence is pointless

then again, the last Springsteen album that I liked was The Rising...

and Land of Hope and Dreams??? again? is it the studio version?

and btw I'M TIRED of the BOSS tryin' to speak for the whole country (world) everytime he releases a new album, he has been doing the same thing since the Ghost of Tom Joad (95), I mean, it's predictable and pointless: Magic (these are dark, nasty times, fuck yo Bush), WOAD (We can do it people, Obama you rock), WB (ahhh the country is still a mess, but pain will make us stronger, and screw the rotten souls who ignited the crisis to begin with).

It sounds forced, really, and it kinda erases the power of the music...the Boss used to find the perfect balance between rock power, fun, personal lyrics, drama, anger and political stuff...NOT ANYMORE

[Edited 1/20/12 9:55am]

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 01/20/12 9:42am

xLiberiangirl

avatar

peedub said:

i like it...this song speaks for alot of people in this country at the mo. it sounds especially good on headphones.

but, yeah, clarence sure is missed.

does anybody know if this is a solo effort or an e street band release?

I heard it's with the E street band.. not sure about that.

I agree, Clarence is truly missed... sad

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 01/20/12 9:59am

thesoulbrother

avatar

I love the Boss as much as the next cat but it's not the same without the Big Man.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 01/20/12 10:53am

Timmy84

I think the E Street Band will break up after this. I can't see how they can carry on without Clarence. Sure Bruce is the band's leader but Clarence was the heart and soul of that band. Just...no. hmph!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 01/20/12 10:55am

CrabalockerFis
hwife

avatar

JoeTyler said:

not excited, the song is ok, NOT a new classic

on paper the album looks like the third part of Magic-Working on a Dream, murky and repetitive albums

and the E Street without Clarence is pointless

then again, the last Springsteen album that I liked was The Rising...

and Land of Hope and Dreams??? again? is it the studio version?

and btw I'M TIRED of the BOSS tryin' to speak for the whole country (world) everytime he releases a new album, he has been doing the same thing since the Ghost of Tom Joad (95), I mean, it's predictable and pointless: Magic (these are dark, nasty times, fuck yo Bush), WOAD (We can do it people, Obama you rock), WB (ahhh the country is still a mess, but pain will make us stronger, and screw the rotten souls who ignited the crisis to begin with).

It sounds forced, really, and it kinda erases the power of the music...the Boss used to find the perfect balance between rock power, fun, personal lyrics, drama, anger and political stuff...NOT ANYMORE

[Edited 1/20/12 9:55am]

I agree with this. But I thought The Rising was a great, near classic album.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 01/20/12 10:58am

Timmy84

JoeTyler said:

not excited, the song is ok, NOT a new classic

on paper the album looks like the third part of Magic-Working on a Dream, murky and repetitive albums

and the E Street without Clarence is pointless

then again, the last Springsteen album that I liked was The Rising...

and Land of Hope and Dreams??? again? is it the studio version?

and btw I'M TIRED of the BOSS tryin' to speak for the whole country (world) everytime he releases a new album, he has been doing the same thing since the Ghost of Tom Joad (95), I mean, it's predictable and pointless: Magic (these are dark, nasty times, fuck yo Bush), WOAD (We can do it people, Obama you rock), WB (ahhh the country is still a mess, but pain will make us stronger, and screw the rotten souls who ignited the crisis to begin with).

It sounds forced, really, and it kinda erases the power of the music...the Boss used to find the perfect balance between rock power, fun, personal lyrics, drama, anger and political stuff...NOT ANYMORE

[Edited 1/20/12 9:55am]

I got tired of Stevie Wonder's new music for the same shit.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 01/20/12 11:11am

JoeTyler

Timmy84 said:

JoeTyler said:

not excited, the song is ok, NOT a new classic

on paper the album looks like the third part of Magic-Working on a Dream, murky and repetitive albums

and the E Street without Clarence is pointless

then again, the last Springsteen album that I liked was The Rising...

and Land of Hope and Dreams??? again? is it the studio version?

and btw I'M TIRED of the BOSS tryin' to speak for the whole country (world) everytime he releases a new album, he has been doing the same thing since the Ghost of Tom Joad (95), I mean, it's predictable and pointless: Magic (these are dark, nasty times, fuck yo Bush), WOAD (We can do it people, Obama you rock), WB (ahhh the country is still a mess, but pain will make us stronger, and screw the rotten souls who ignited the crisis to begin with).

It sounds forced, really, and it kinda erases the power of the music...the Boss used to find the perfect balance between rock power, fun, personal lyrics, drama, anger and political stuff...NOT ANYMORE

[Edited 1/20/12 9:55am]

I got tired of Stevie Wonder's new music for the same shit.

I loved A Time to Love so I don't agree , lol lol

Bruce has been writing "state of the world/straighforward/third person/non-personal" lyrics since 1995, it's boring already, like a predictable observer/repetitive narrator...

at least Devils & Dust and The Seeger Sessions offered something different...

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 01/20/12 11:12am

Timmy84

JoeTyler said:

Timmy84 said:

I got tired of Stevie Wonder's new music for the same shit.

I loved A Time to Love so I don't agree , lol lol

Bruce has been writing "state of the world/straighforward/third person/non-personal" lyrics since 1995, it's boring already, like a predictable observer/repetitive narrator...

at least Devils & Dust and The Seeger Sessions offered something different...

I meant post-A Time to Love. smile

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 01/20/12 11:14am

Timmy84

But I agree, Joe, his music seemed to have stale after "The Streets of Philadelphia". I'm guessing this is what happens with some of these rock legends once they get to a point that if they were selling shit on a stick, people will blindly buy it.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 01/20/12 11:14am

JoeTyler

Timmy84 said:

JoeTyler said:

I loved A Time to Love so I don't agree , lol lol

Bruce has been writing "state of the world/straighforward/third person/non-personal" lyrics since 1995, it's boring already, like a predictable observer/repetitive narrator...

at least Devils & Dust and The Seeger Sessions offered something different...

I meant post-A Time to Love. smile

frankly, I can't even remember the titles of the post-ATTL songs boxed lol

don¡t throw stones, people!,lol

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 01/20/12 11:15am

Timmy84

JoeTyler said:

Timmy84 said:

I meant post-A Time to Love. smile

frankly, I can't even remember the titles of the post-ATTL songs boxed lol

don¡t throw stones, people!,lol

comfort I won't. They're that forgettable. biggrin

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 01/20/12 11:16am

purplethunder3
121

avatar

I want another album like "The River." hmph!

"Music gives a soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination and life to everything." --Plato

https://youtu.be/CVwv9LZMah0
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 01/20/12 11:18am

JoeTyler

Timmy84 said:

But I agree, Joe, his music seemed to have stale after "The Streets of Philadelphia". I'm guessing this is what happens with some of these rock legends once they get to a point that if they were selling shit on a stick, people will blindly buy it.

yeah :s , but hey, I like the fact that someone like the Boss is still releasing new albums, but it bugs me when these "decent, ok" new albums get A+/4,5 stars reviews, rolleyes

I mean, I'd rate the Rising with a solid A, but the rest of his E Street 00s albums with a B or even a B-

tinkerbell
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 01/20/12 11:21am

Timmy84

JoeTyler said:

Timmy84 said:

But I agree, Joe, his music seemed to have stale after "The Streets of Philadelphia". I'm guessing this is what happens with some of these rock legends once they get to a point that if they were selling shit on a stick, people will blindly buy it.

yeah :s , but hey, I like the fact that someone like the Boss is still releasing new albums, but it bugs me when these "decent, ok" new albums get A+/4,5 stars reviews, rolleyes

I mean, I'd rate the Rising with a solid A, but the rest of his E Street 00s albums with a B or even a B-

They give any rock legend that. neutral Especially U2. It's like once you reach legend/elder statesman status, anything you put out will be above a B by critics but they undervalued these same legends when their music was still hot lol well I doubt that was a case with Bruce though because in the '70s and '80s he actually delivered but now, nah lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 5 12345>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Bruce Springsteen: The Wrecking Ball Thread