musicjunky318 said:

Regardless...Evita was critically acclaimed. That's the point.

That movie was a piece of shit.

Unholyalliance said:

musicjunky318 said:

Regardless...Evita was critically acclaimed. That's the point.

That movie was a piece of shit.

Tell us how you really feel.

Evita is a meaningful movie that served a purpose.

SchlomoThaHomo said:

I love them both but I had to chuckle at Madonna saying those words to Janet especially after Janet's '93 cuntiness towards her.

It was only a few short years later that Janet out-whored Madonna by bragging about her Velvet Rope-burns and little lezzie phone sex interludes about how her "coochie gonna swell up and fall apart." How "classy," Jan! Not to mention all the whorishness between that and the whole Nipplegate fiasco!

And now almost 20 years after the initial comment, hearing Madonna be snide about Janet's whorishness (of all things) and basically throwing that cuntiness right back in her face...well...it's kinda refreshing, not to mention karmic. Touché bitch!!!

That's when I started to lose interest in JJ, after her comments about M she went and did the exact same thing except in a more obvious and less interesting way again and again and again. She relied on sex for far too long whereas once M had made her statement about it (with 'Erotica' and the Sex book etc) she moved on.

I don't think M was having a pop at her though, just attempting humour. I think both ladies have put aside any differences they may have had.

loved evita....madonna impressed me with that...sadly/thankfully thats the only good movie she will ever be apart of

I'm interested in how well she directed W.E. and Desperately Seeking Susan was totally camp but entertaining.

alphastreet said:

I'm a huge fan of them both and though I would have been mad at Madonna years ago, I just don't give a fuck anymore. I already know she's an attention seeker and it will never change, and she KILLS me with her antics

love em both, JJ is equally as big an attention whore, easily

badujunkie said:

alphastreet said:

I'm a huge fan of them both and though I would have been mad at Madonna years ago, I just don't give a fuck anymore. I already know she's an attention seeker and it will never change, and she KILLS me with her antics

love em both, JJ is equally as big an attention whore, easily

She is capable of it, but I haven't seen it in recent years, at least not intentionally. All her interviews are the same now though and she's everywhere if michael or the kids are mentioned in it.

[Edited 1/27/12 7:44am]

IDRAG4MJ said:

“You don’t have to show nipples to be interesting or/and it doesn’t necessarily mean you’re cutting edge if you do, right?”

http://concreteloop.com/2...n=wordtwit

Janet would totally agree with this statement.

Besides, the interviewer's question alludes to Janet so of course Madonna's answer will allude to Janet as well.

I don't give a fuck.

Janet said the same shit about Madonna back in the day.

I love Madonna and Janet, but that nipplegate thing was just a stupid thing to do.

alphastreet said:

badujunkie said:

love em both, JJ is equally as big an attention whore, easily

She is capable of it, but I haven't seen it in recent years, at least not intentionally. All her interviews are the same now though and she's everywhere if michael or the kids are mentioned in it.

[Edited 1/27/12 7:44am]

oh pls...she packages and sells her eating disorder. attention. whore. still love her to pieces.

rlittler81 said:

SchlomoThaHomo said:

I love them both but I had to chuckle at Madonna saying those words to Janet especially after Janet's '93 cuntiness towards her.

It was only a few short years later that Janet out-whored Madonna by bragging about her Velvet Rope-burns and little lezzie phone sex interludes about how her "coochie gonna swell up and fall apart." How "classy," Jan! Not to mention all the whorishness between that and the whole Nipplegate fiasco!

And now almost 20 years after the initial comment, hearing Madonna be snide about Janet's whorishness (of all things) and basically throwing that cuntiness right back in her face...well...it's kinda refreshing, not to mention karmic. Touché bitch!!!

That's when I started to lose interest in JJ, after her comments about M she went and did the exact same thing except in a more obvious and less interesting way again and again and again. She relied on sex for far too long whereas once M had made her statement about it (with 'Erotica' and the Sex book etc) she moved on.

I don't think M was having a pop at her though, just attempting humour. I think both ladies have put aside any differences they may have had.

Exactly!

alphastreet said:

Evita is a meaningful movie that served a purpose.

To let let other people know about the existence of a very influential woman right? I can agree with that. That's all I can agree with actually. Though, I hope that, one day, they can release a GOOD movie that she really deserves.

This Janet fans vs Madonna fans war is both amusing and pathetic

badujunkie said:

alphastreet said:

She is capable of it, but I haven't seen it in recent years, at least not intentionally. All her interviews are the same now though and she's everywhere if michael or the kids are mentioned in it.

[Edited 1/27/12 7:44am]

oh pls...she packages and sells her eating disorder. attention. whore. still love her to pieces.

If I tried combining clips of how many times she spoke about binding her chest, I wonder what the number would be Love her too, but she went from breaking records to being a broken record

JoeTyler said:

This Janet fans vs Madonna fans war is both amusing and pathetic

Blame the Madonna stans they started the shit... I dont even know how this became about stans.. O never mind I know how... A poster brought up Janet stans bitching thats how it got started

mjscarousal said:

JoeTyler said:

This Janet fans vs Madonna fans war is both amusing and pathetic

Blame the Madonna stans they started the shit... I dont even know how this became about stans.. O never mind I know how... A poster brought up Janet stans bitching thats how it got started

i hate to say that madonna fans never gave a f**k about Janet until that janet./erotica-era vibe magazine article...

JoeTyler said:

This Janet fans vs Madonna fans war is both amusing and pathetic

Amen my brother. I love them both. They can say what they can say about each other, I don't give a fuck.

badujunkie said:

mjscarousal said:

Blame the Madonna stans they started the shit... I dont even know how this became about stans.. O never mind I know how... A poster brought up Janet stans bitching thats how it got started

i hate to say that madonna fans never gave a f**k about Janet until that janet./erotica-era vibe magazine article...

Understandable but that occurred almost 20 years ago... but what exactly does that HAVE to do with Madonnas comments? I am still trying to understand how this became about Madonna Stans versus Janet stans

Madonna made childish remarks.. period. And if she honestly didnt care about Janet should would not have mentioned the shit... she loves attention and people fell right into it..

i thought the feud was over

Timmy84 said:

JoeTyler said:

This Janet fans vs Madonna fans war is both amusing and pathetic

Amen my brother. I love them both. They can say what they can say about each other, I don't give a fuck.

but hey, M's words disappoint me, I was expecting some huge cleavage at least, lol

JoeTyler said:

Timmy84 said:

Amen my brother. I love them both. They can say what they can say about each other, I don't give a fuck.

but hey, M's words disappoint me, I was expecting some huge cleavage at least, lol

Her statement is proof she is in fact getting older. I bet if 1993 Madonna was asked about her Super Bowl performance, she'd be like "I'm gonna do whatever I want. " And we'd be waiting to seeing her nipple. Have to admit I was disappointed too. Least show some ass or something lol but looking at all the rumored guests on her set list, this is gonna suck.

Timmy84 said:

JoeTyler said:

but hey, M's words disappoint me, I was expecting some huge cleavage at least, lol

Her statement is proof she is in fact getting older. I bet if 1993 Madonna was asked about her Super Bowl performance, she'd be like "I'm gonna do whatever I want. " And we'd be waiting to seeing her nipple. Have to admit I was disappointed too. Least show some ass or something lol but looking at all the rumored guests on her set list, this is gonna suck.

at least she could show some hard ass! like she did during the Confessions/HC tours... her ass is FINE

hell, a superbowl in 1993???? 1993??????????????????? one word: orgy Second Civil War

lol

JoeTyler said:

Timmy84 said:

Her statement is proof she is in fact getting older. I bet if 1993 Madonna was asked about her Super Bowl performance, she'd be like "I'm gonna do whatever I want. " And we'd be waiting to seeing her nipple. Have to admit I was disappointed too. Least show some ass or something lol but looking at all the rumored guests on her set list, this is gonna suck.

at least she could show some hard ass! like she did during the Confessions/HC tours... her ass is FINE

hell, a superbowl in 1993???? 1993??????????????????? one word: orgy Second Civil War

lol

That would've been the best. Bodies everywhere. Men jacking off to Madonna's tits and ass. That would've been so controversial the Super Bowl wouldn't have the FCC on their case, they would've had to cancel the whole goddamn Super Bowl halftime show for good!

Timmy84 said:

JoeTyler said:

at least she could show some hard ass! like she did during the Confessions/HC tours... her ass is FINE

hell, a superbowl in 1993???? 1993??????????????????? one word: orgy Second Civil War

lol

That would've been the best. Bodies everywhere. Men jacking off to Madonna's tits and ass. That would've been so controversial the Super Bowl wouldn't have the FCC on their case, they would've had to cancel the whole goddamn Super Bowl halftime show for good!

hell I'm "glad" nobody opened that Pandora's Box, lol

superbowl in 1993 !!!!!

lol

JoeTyler said:

Timmy84 said:

That would've been the best. Bodies everywhere. Men jacking off to Madonna's tits and ass. That would've been so controversial the Super Bowl wouldn't have the FCC on their case, they would've had to cancel the whole goddamn Super Bowl halftime show for good!

hell I'm "glad" nobody opened that Pandora's Box, lol

superbowl in 1993 !!!!!

lol

Yeah I can see why they picked Michael. Janet in '93 (or '94 since "janet." didn't come out until May '93) would've been too much for them too. I don't think a nipple would've popped off - because Janet would've done it solo, but I could still imagine the headlines were "Janet proves too risque for halftime show". And that's without having some horny boy ripping a part of someone's costume going all herp derp.

From everything I'm hearing she's got some many guest stars, that she's basically just going to be emceeing the damn thing.

[Edited 1/27/12 11:40am]

lazycrockett said:

From everything I'm hearing she's got some many guest stars, that she's basically just going to be emceeing the damn thing.

[Edited 1/27/12 11:40am]

I know right?

Timmy84 said:

lazycrockett said:

From everything I'm hearing she's got some many guest stars, that she's basically just going to be emceeing the damn thing.

[Edited 1/27/12 11:40am]

I know right?

At first I was a little understanding having Nicki Minaj & M.I.A featured with her. She is promoting her new single with the performance afterall. Cool. Now, with LMAO featured (has that been confirmed btw) I'm not as excited as I was at first. Ceelo arranging her set sounds cool but again M doesn't need all the extra. Oh... and Janet didn't need to bring Justin on stage either. (Two Pennies)