SoulAlive said:

WaterInYourBath said:

Why is this thread so long? Over this? Omer looks nothing like some James DeBarge (and based on his daughter Christina, dude has some strong/dominant genes). All these years, the false "story" has been that's he's Michael's son (who he actually does resemble facially), and now he's somehow being connected to Janet? This is ludicrous. If Michael was really covering for Janet by "adopting" her supposed secret child, he would have done it when Omer was born, not when he was 10 years old in 1995 after meeting him in Europe. Janet needs to just speak out and end these fallacies.

I know she has spoken out in the past,but it's time for her to speak out AGGRESSIVELY,to show that she means business.She needs to be blunt,direct and to the point,if she wants to put this rumor to rest.And like I said before,she needs to threaten legal action against those who are spreading these lies.....to show that she ain't playin'!

I agree. And she is fully capable of doing that too. For Colored Girls proved that: "Red" was the real Janet Jackson; that wasn't acting. It's about time for her to use that cool, tough voice during interviews, lol.

SoulAlive said:

Ask Jacky… Does Janet Jackson Have a Secret Son?

So Jacky, I know you’ve been hearing for years that Janet Jackson had a child while married to James debarg!

While working on the set of Fame Janet (Miss Jackson if ya nasty) was very much pregnant. Not only was she pregnant but chain smoking like a train.. Then she later emerged with the control album little baby fat still on her body..

I’ve broken this story last year in one of my blind items and guess what? National Enquirer picked up on it and investigated my story, solving the mystery of Janet Jackson’s bastard child.

Janet Jackson has a 27 year old son and his name is Omer Bhatti. Don’t believe me? Ask Katherine Jackson.

Yours Truly,
Jacky J.

OMG! Janet is a chain smoker? Them Jacksons!

NaughtyKitty said:

SoulAlive said:

Ask Jacky… Does Janet Jackson Have a Secret Son?

I’ve broken this story last year in one of my blind items and guess what? National Enquirer picked up on it and investigated my story, solving the mystery of Janet Jackson’s bastard child.

Janet Jackson has a 27 year old son and his name is Omer Bhatti. Don’t believe me? Ask Katherine Jackson.

Yours Truly,
Jacky J.

OMG! Janet is a chain smoker? Them Jacksons!

Who the HELL is Jacky J?

Timmy84 said:

NaughtyKitty said:

OMG! Janet is a chain smoker? Them Jacksons!

Who the HELL is Jacky J?

Idk, another Hollywood gossip blogger looks like. I found this comment in response to his post tho:

NaughtyKitty said:

Timmy84 said:

Idk, another Hollywood gossip blogger looks like. I found this comment in response to his post tho:

Mr.Fantastic | August 25th, 2011 at 14:12

A friend of mine used to work on the set as a make-up artist , and says not only was miss Jackson demanding but was very pregnant and James visited the set regularly, One of the reason Erica Gimble quit the show was she was tired of debbie allens advances on her. Not surprising , long on going rumor around hollywood Ms. Allen turned out the whole female cast of a Different World.. If you pay close attention 1& 2nd season Jasmine guy was in the opening sequence in fame the first 2 seasons.

Jesus Christ.

mimi02 said:

jax85 said:

Exactly & I can not Believe people / Fans on her page are going along with this Bullcrap talking Yeah Mrs.DeBarge Omer Do look like James & The DeBarge's ........LOL

I'm like OK Did they Hear that Omer is Mikes Son & that Janet & James has A Daughter that The DeBarges themselves claimed was Named "Renee" & was raised by One of Janets Family members ......LOL

Like why are they Jumping on This Bandwagon too Just like With The "Renee" / Daughter thing Next year It'll Be Someone else & Another Girl ........LOL .

Cause Everyone should Remember them Claiming the Girl's Name was "Renee" & People Started Posting up Jackie Jackson's Daughter "Brandi" as Been Renee & Janet & James Daughter even though Brandi was born Years Earlier in 1982 .

Now Them Idiots are on this Omer been The Son & A DeBarge Bandwagon Once again With Them

I think Some fans are kissing asses & agreeing with Her Bullshit Which is not good cause what If they Find out it is A Girl they'll be looking Stupid if Its Actually A Daughter that Janet Had & her ass is going arounf thrown around its Omer for Attention which don't look good in her Favor.

[Edited 9/19/11 23:00pm]

I don't believe that this young man is a Jackson or a Debarge. But, like I posted previously, the Jackson family is very good at keeping private business....private. If Janet can be marriage for ten years and no one outside of her and Rene know that they're married, then who's to say that Janet and James didn't have a daughter (I'm going with daughter, because I'm still on the fence about the maternity of that young lady with Babyface of Debarge "Unsung") I mean, at the end of the day, so what if that union created a child. It's not like it's the first time in history that a celebrity couples had a child. It shouldn't change anyone's perception of either of them.

Toxic said:

mimi02 said:

I don't believe that this young man is a Jackson or a Debarge. But, like I posted previously, the Jackson family is very good at keeping private business....private. If Janet can be marriage for ten years and no one outside of her and Rene know that they're married, then who's to say that Janet and James didn't have a daughter (I'm going with daughter, because I'm still on the fence about the maternity of that young lady with Babyface of Debarge "Unsung"). I mean, at the end of the day, so what if that union created a child. It's not like it's the first time in history that a celebrity couples had a child. It shouldn't change anyone's perception of either of them.

James has never confirmed nor denied that he has a child by Janet. The only thing that I have ever heard him say on the matter was that there were things that went on in their marriage that had hurt them both. I do think that Janet was pregnant and that she "got rid" of the baby. Once the marriage ended, I think that there was some sort of gag order put in place to keep James quiet about it. Because of this, I think that's some of what's wrong with James. Knowing that one of these people (the boy or the girl) could be his child, is tearing him apart. And Janet is so stupid! She needs to grow up, wise up and realize that she is hurting this man. He needs to get this off his chest so that he can heal and move on. Did you see James crying in the little clip from the Dr. Drew show? He's hurting. Plain and simple. He needs healing from something more than just the drugs. The drugs are symptoms of a deeper problem.

alphastreet said:

Janet is stupid because she has a right over her body and the choice she makes? Really? I can imagine it being sad to lose a child, but I really don't believe there was one, and if there was, it was never born.

Timmy84 said:

That was James' own fault... and I still don't buy that Janet was even close to being pregnant. She was always chunky. But I guess people believe the stories printed back then and hold on to it as if the truth will come out. Well it's 27 years about, if it don't "come out" now, don't expect for it to ever be "revealed" and James has his own demons that he gotta fix. Ain't Janet's fault he turned into a junkie.

shortstuff45220 said:

purplethunder3121 said:

Look, in the end, twenty-something years of gossip and speculation are enough. Produce some evidence. If there was a "baby" that person would have gone in search of their heritage and would have surfaced by now or at least tried to get in contact with Janet or James. The "baby" would be a grown ass adult. Time for such speculation to just die.

thank you that child would have been almost 30 , they would have came looking for there birth parents by now and you would think if your adoptive and if this mystical child is Janet's there surly has to be a resmebalance and that person has herad hey you look like Janet Jackson and a light bulb would have gone oof, but even after all this time no one is coming foward to be this child.

and another thing there is a whole paper trail for adoption, somebody would have found something by now not to mention the whole process of given birth it's self no doctors ,no nurses came forwards ( yeah her persoanl doctor wouldn't have been able to come forward ) but other doctors at hosptial could a have certainlty nurses would have , espically if they have retired and would have been paid proabbly for the boom shell ) heck even somebody in some insurance department would have came across the claim so did she have the baby in the back woods,? cause there is just too many people involved for somedody not to notice

[Edited 9/20/11 17:57pm]

mimi02 said:

purplethunder3121 said:

Look, in the end, twenty-something years of gossip and speculation are enough. Produce some evidence. If there was a "baby" that person would have gone in search of their heritage and would have surfaced by now or at least tried to get in contact with Janet or James. The "baby" would be a grown ass adult. Time for such speculation to just die.

Not necessarily. Outside of the whole James/Janet connection, an adopted child do not always have a desire to meet their biological parents and if they do, we've all hear of the various horror stories of those who've tried. It's no small task. Now, factor in the James/Janet connection, and I would bet the farm that the terms of the adoption were made in such a way that the "child" would never be able to track either of them down. Again, we're talking about the Jacksons.

Ok, so let's look at this from yet another angle. Earlier someone brought up James' drug addiction and another person mentioned that Janet may have got an abortion. You may have hit on something by mentioning the drugs and possible abortion. Is it safe to say that if there were a child that Janet may had miscarried, the child could had been stillborn, had since passed away due to complication of being a drug-addicted child, or had been placed in an medical facility like Dorothy Dandridge's daughter? If the last option was the case, it could had been done with the help of a family friend or employee (lawyer, possibly) where the staff of the facility wouldn't had known who the parents of the child are. And that would explain way no one has come forward with any "proof".

P.S. I think a lot of what has been posted here has been based on looking at this thing from an average everyday citizen p-o-v. James and especially Janet were celebrities and we all know that how celebrities handle their problems business and how we handle ours is totally different.

WaterInYourBath said:

Why is this thread so long? Over this? Omer looks nothing like some James DeBarge (and based on his daughter Christina, dude has some strong/dominant genes). All these years, the false "story" has been that's he's Michael's son (who he actually does resemble facially), and now he's somehow being connected to Janet? This is ludicrous. If Michael was really covering for Janet by "adopting" her supposed secret child, he would have done it when Omer was born, not when he was 10 years old in 1995 after meeting him in Europe. Janet needs to just speak out and end these fallacies.

^I agree, Omer looks nothing like Michael nor any of the Jacksons for that matter.

prodigalfan said:

WaterInYourBath said:

Why is this thread so long? Over this? Omer looks nothing like some James DeBarge (and based on his daughter Christina, dude has some strong/dominant genes). All these years, the false "story" has been that's he's Michael's son (who he actually does resemble facially), and now he's somehow being connected to Janet? This is ludicrous. If Michael was really covering for Janet by "adopting" her supposed secret child, he would have done it when Omer was born, not when he was 10 years old in 1995 after meeting him in Europe. Janet needs to just speak out and end these fallacies.

I don't think Omer looks like MJ at all. He looks like the cosmetic surgey ALTERED MJ, but not the MJ of the J-5.

prodigalfan said:

mimi02 said:

I don't believe that this young man is a Jackson or a Debarge. But, like I posted previously, the Jackson family is very good at keeping private business....private. If Janet can be marriage for ten years and no one outside of her and Rene know that they're married, then who's to say that Janet and James didn't have a daughter (I'm going with daughter, because I'm still on the fence about the maternity of that young lady with Babyface of Debarge "Unsung") I mean, at the end of the day, so what if that union created a child. It's not like it's the first time in history that a celebrity couples had a child. It shouldn't change anyone's perception of either of them.

What young lady? Is it on the Debarge's Unsung episode? Funny, I think I just deleted that from my TIVO. So did the girl appear in the episode or was she discussed? And how does Babyface fit into this? I don't remember. Please refresh my memory. thanks

Towards the end of the Debarge's Unsung, Babyface was interviewed with Cristina. He had signed her to his label.

Timmy84 said:

NaughtyKitty said:

OMG! Janet is a chain smoker? Them Jacksons!

Who the HELL is Jacky J?

I guess he's some sort of celebrity gossip blogster.It's amazing how these guys spread so many lies and rumors on a daily basis,LOL.

prodigalfan said:

WaterInYourBath said:

Why is this thread so long? Over this? Omer looks nothing like some James DeBarge (and based on his daughter Christina, dude has some strong/dominant genes). All these years, the false "story" has been that's he's Michael's son (who he actually does resemble facially), and now he's somehow being connected to Janet? This is ludicrous. If Michael was really covering for Janet by "adopting" her supposed secret child, he would have done it when Omer was born, not when he was 10 years old in 1995 after meeting him in Europe. Janet needs to just speak out and end these fallacies.

I don't think Omer looks like MJ at all. He looks like the cosmetic surgey ALTERED MJ, but not the MJ of the J-5.

His eyes are very similar to Michael's, as well as the bone structure of his face. Are they identical though? Of course not.

mimi02 said:

prodigalfan said:

What young lady? Is it on the Debarge's Unsung episode? Funny, I think I just deleted that from my TIVO. So did the girl appear in the episode or was she discussed? And how does Babyface fit into this? I don't remember. Please refresh my memory. thanks

Towards the end of the Debarge's Unsung, Babyface was interviewed with Cristina. He had signed her to his label.

Its Kristinia James Oldest Daughter By mother ( Christna Or Christine ) Who's Nationality is of A Mixture of Things I Believe they had Kristinia in 1989 or 1990 .

its Kristinia ( Christina ) would be Her Mother .

Kristinia is on Babyface's Label "LaFace" & No shes not Janet & James , Her Mother is Christine Or Christina Or something thats Similar to Kristinia's Name & Yes She was on Unsung .

James also has 3 More Kids : Tori ( Another Daughter ) , James Jr , & Joshua who are Younger & then He has A Older Daughter with Christina Named : Kristinia DeBarge .

I don't Know rather if His Other 3 Kids Share the Same Mother Or Different Mothers But His 2 Sons Josh & James aren't that fare apart & one was Just born A year or 2 Years ago Maybe 3 years ago .

& Lets say All of James's Children look like him Especially the 2 Babies James Jr & Joshua & Then Kristinia looks like Etterlene & her Aunt Bunny & James , Tori I've Never Seen before .

So Omer Don't look like James Or any of his Kids who look like Him & The DeBarge Family ......LOL I'm not Sure why Etterlene Picked Omer he looks nothing like Her Son & His Kids.

& El's Oldest Daughter ( Adris ) & James's Daughter ( Kristinia ) Both look Very much alike almost Identical .

So If Janet Does have A kid the Baby would look like James But the Jackson's also have some Strong Genes too so Her Baby would look like either one Or A mix of Both .

But Nothing like Omer Bhatti who's west Indian & White.

[Edited 9/22/11 1:18am]

[Edited 9/22/11 1:28am]

[Edited 9/22/11 1:30am]

prodigalfan said:

mimi02 said:

Not necessarily. Outside of the whole James/Janet connection, an adopted child do not always have a desire to meet their biological parents and if they do, we've all hear of the various horror stories of those who've tried. It's no small task. Now, factor in the James/Janet connection, and I would bet the farm that the terms of the adoption were made in such a way that the "child" would never be able to track either of them down. Again, we're talking about the Jacksons.

Ok, so let's look at this from yet another angle. Earlier someone brought up James' drug addiction and another person mentioned that Janet may have got an abortion. You may have hit on something by mentioning the drugs and possible abortion. Is it safe to say that if there were a child that Janet may had miscarried, the child could had been stillborn, had since passed away due to complication of being a drug-addicted child, or had been placed in an medical facility like Dorothy Dandridge's daughter? If the last option was the case, it could had been done with the help of a family friend or employee (lawyer, possibly) where the staff of the facility wouldn't had known who the parents of the child are. And that would explain way no one has come forward with any "proof".

P.S. I think a lot of what has been posted here has been based on looking at this thing from an average everyday citizen p-o-v. James and especially Janet were celebrities and we all know that how celebrities handle their problems business and how we handle ours is totally different.

Never thought of that... and that is a possibility as well. Also the drug angle is a very good possibility. It could also be the final nail in the coffin of their marriage. (of course all speculation) but if they got married because of pg and then the drug addicition came out... and was the cause of the demise of the very reason for the marriage... I would say, end of story. a good theory.

@prodigalfan ,

So True I'm not sure why people would think A kid who's been put up for Adoption would be able to contact Janet & James Or would there be A paper trail , If done good Enough The Kid could be any of Us on this Board & never Know .

WaterInYourBath said:

prodigalfan said:

I don't think Omer looks like MJ at all. He looks like the cosmetic surgey ALTERED MJ, but not the MJ of the J-5.

His eyes are very similar to Michael's, as well as the bone structure of his face. Are they identical though? Of course not.

jax85 said:

prodigalfan said:

Never thought of that... and that is a possibility as well. Also the drug angle is a very good possibility. It could also be the final nail in the coffin of their marriage. (of course all speculation) but if they got married because of pg and then the drug addicition came out... and was the cause of the demise of the very reason for the marriage... I would say, end of story. a good theory.

@prodigalfan ,

So True I'm not sure why people would think A kid who's been put up for Adoption would be able to contact Janet & James Or would there be A paper trail , If done good Enough The Kid could be any of Us on this Board & never Know .

Ok,after we've been spent so many days trying to solve this mystery,here's what I truly believe....

***Janet WAS pregnant in 1985 (there's enough evidence to support this)

***She either had a miscarriage or an abortion

***Whatever the case...she was very discreet about it,which is probably why Etterlene assumes that the baby was born.

For the last time,

PENNY NEVER HAD STOMACH MUMPS!!!!!!!!!! She was chunky due to birth control pills. She's always been up and down with her weight. There was never a baby. The End.

SoulAlive said:

Ok,after we've been spent so many days trying to solve this mystery,here's what I truly believe....

***Janet WAS pregnant in 1985 (there's enough evidence to support this)

***She either had a miscarriage or an abortion

***Whatever the case...she was very discreet about it,which is probably why Etterlene assumes that the baby was born.

I Agree I mean if she had A Miscarriage Or Abortion Why not tell The Father & Family why all this Secret BS & after watching the Dr.Drew Show Yesterday with Bunny,Randy & James I actually started crying I felt & feel bad for James He seems like A very Loving Guy with A Troubled past & I mean If theres A Child Janet needs to let that man know like hell its been 26 or 29 years The kid would now be older & why would it be A Secret .

But I've heard she Had the Kid in 1982 I'm not sure if this is right Or true But Janet did Say In Both Her Book & On TV Interview about her Book That She Lost her Virginity at 15 or 16 which would be 81 or 82 to James DeBarge she stated in her TV Interview that She did it because she felt like she was Getting away with doing something BAD! since her Parents were So Strict .

So could it be possible she had the kid in 1982 at 16 Which is Possible , & Yes she was on TV on Different Strokes But Still Its Possible .

^ No it's not possible. James probably definitely used protection.

[Edited 9/22/11 20:18pm]

jax85 said:

SoulAlive said:

Ok,after we've been spent so many days trying to solve this mystery,here's what I truly believe....

***Janet WAS pregnant in 1985 (there's enough evidence to support this)

***She either had a miscarriage or an abortion

***Whatever the case...she was very discreet about it,which is probably why Etterlene assumes that the baby was born.

I Agree I mean if she had A Miscarriage Or Abortion Why not tell The Father & Family why all this Secret BS & after watching the Dr.Drew Show Yesterday with Bunny,Randy & James I actually started crying I felt & feel bad for James He seems like A very Loving Guy with A Troubled past & I mean If theres A Child Janet needs to let that man know like hell its been 26 or 29 years The kid would now be older & why would it be A Secret .

It's possible that James knows about the abortion or miscarriage but is not allowed to speak publicly about it.This could be a part of the annulment,where they both agreed not to discuss the marriage.

On a related note....am I the only one who thinks that Janet's 1993 song "Where Are You Now?" could be about James? Read the lyrics.

Timmy84 said:

^ No it's not possible. James probably used protection.

Did anyone even know about condoms back then? maybe Or she could have had the baby & whom ever adopted it changed its year of birth ......lol which is possible as well.

prodigalfan said:

jax85 said:

@prodigalfan ,

So True I'm not sure why people would think A kid who's been put up for Adoption would be able to contact Janet & James Or would there be A paper trail , If done good Enough The Kid could be any of Us on this Board & never Know .

No I agree that if there was a baby and was put up for adoption it is possible that the baby could never be privy to adoption information. I just am very very skeptical that a Jackson baby would be given to non-relatives to raise. I don't believe that for one minute.

So you think the Media wouldn't catch on or find out about Janet's Baby who's within The Family , Come on now with how the paparozi & media are I highly doubt the Jacksons would be able to hide a kid for 26 years within their Family the media would have digged up something like Adoption Papers or Birth Certificate or some sort of Trail leading A Child within The Family back to Janet .

It would sound more likely the Child was Adopted by A Non-Jackson Family Or Member of That Family which would explain why No one not even the Media has yet to Find anything on A Janet Jackson .

I doubt A Secret Child within the Jackson Family would be kept a secret even in the 90's when Latoya's ass was running around Talk about been Abused by Joe & all that stuff she Spilled out in the 90's Yet Nothing came out of her mouth about a secret Kid been Adopted by A Family that Belongs to Janet & James DeBarge I would think She would have told this as well.

I Believe If She did Have A Child & she Gave it up I don't think It was to A Family member at all Which would explain why theres No Pictures , No Kid has Came out & I would think been within The Family that Kid would wonder & be asking Not unless The kid is like myself who has Heard that My Aunt is my Real Mother Yet I've never asked or have I brung it up to her Otherwise I would think The kid would have started been curious about who they really belonged to .

[Edited 9/22/11 12:33pm]

[Edited 9/22/11 12:38pm]

jax85 said:

Timmy84 said:

^ No it's not possible. James probably used protection.

Did anyone even know about condoms back then? maybe Or she could have had the baby & whom ever adopted it changed its year of birth ......lol which is possible as well.

I can believe it. Contrary to popular belief, not everybody in the 1960s, '70s and '80s were barebacking it lol