Author | Message |
Better Frontman, Freddie Mercury vs Mick Jagger? I can't even chose.
Their both so exciting and free.
[Edited 8/3/11 11:03am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Just imagine a concert with "Queen&The Rolling Stones" together. Makes my big toe curl. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I prefer Jagger by a wide margin. * * *
Prince's Classic Finally Expanded The Deluxe 'Purple Rain' Reissue http://www.popmatters.com...n-reissue/ | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
freddie baby. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Jagger put on the better show.
Mercury had the better voice. "I don't think you'd do well in captivity." - random person's comment to me the other day | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Jagger had the showmanship, stamina, drama and a little glamour mixed with a bad boy reputation. Mercury had the showmanship, voice, stamina, drama and a little glamour.
They both are great frontmen in their own way.
Hmm, this is a little hard to say who was better but I can see how Jagger or Mercury could be "the better frontman" but we can go all day discussing that. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Freddie of course | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Good points. I agree.
I can't choose. Both are great in their own way.
"And When The Groove Is Dead And Gone, You Know That Love Survives, So We Can Rock Forever" RIP MJ
"Baby, that was much too fast"...Goodnight dear sweet Prince. I'll love you always | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Both were perfect 4 the situation they were in.
I like Mercury way better but I don't think they could have switched bands and it would have worked. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Exactly. It's what they call "fate". Like Mick was destined to work with Keith, Charlie, Brian, Bill and 'em and Freddie would end up with Brian, Roger and John. I can never imagine Mick with Queen and Freddie with the Stones, extreme opposites. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
My vote goes to "Get Ready" Freddie Mercury. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I can say with quite a degree of certainty that Mick Jagger is superior to Freddie Mercury and all Mercury-affiliated materials in every way. It's not even a debate. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Oh snap lol the Mercury fans are not gonna like this lol But you saw how dude STOPPED the show at the Grammys. I'm still like "wow!" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I didn't, Grammys never shown in Europe.. The entire realm of '70s spandex cat-suit rock is unlistenable to me.
Heard that the Ali G/Bruno guy's gonna play Freddie in a biopic. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Freddie Mercury! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
From what I've read, it's either a rumor or he was considered. Don't know what's going on with that biopic. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
yes, the stones are a dirtier bluesier band, and queen is a more melodic and dramatic band. They were both as good as they could have possibly been for their respective bands My Legacy
http://prince.org/msg/8/192731 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Tough, tough call....
....disregarding the the other band members around them (Keith is THE man!!)...and their material, you gotta go with Freddie....
....MUCH better voice, better sense of humour, bigger presence, equal to Jagger in the energy stakes. www.filmsfilmsfilms.co.uk - The internet's best movie site! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |