independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > RIAA - $105M, Artists - $0, Filesharing - Still Priceless!
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 05/17/11 8:45am

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

RIAA - $105M, Artists - $0, Filesharing - Still Priceless!

http://www.huffingtonpost...62725.html

Limewire Settlement: RIAA, Record Labels Win $105M; Artists To See $0

Riaa Limewire Piracy

The Recording Industry Association of America's (RIAA) ruthless pursuit of music pirates was firmly rooted in the belief that it's better to be feared than loved. Last week, defunct peer-to-peer client Limewire agreed pay $105M to the major record labels represented by the copyright watchdog for 9,715 pirated tracks, and even this was pocket change compared to the theoretical maximum of $1.46B the jury could have awarded. As if that weren't ambitious enough, the RIAA had initially wanted Limewire to pay more than the GDP of planet Earth.

But with the revelation that none of that money will go to the artists whose music was being stolen, the RIAA's methods stand to draw more contempt, likely without being responsible for the (relatively) declining r...sic piracy.

The group, in other words, may soon be neither feared nor loved. It will just be annoying, since media executives acknowledge that "piracy will always be with us," and sites like Last.fm and Pandora have proven that free music isn't necessarily a bad business model. The official position from the RIAA is here, and here is one response from the filesharing community.

hah!

RIAA spokesman Jonathan Lamy previously told TorrentFreak that the ‘damages’ accrued from piracy-related lawsuits will not go to any of the artists, but towards funding more anti-piracy campaigns. “Any funds recouped are re-invested into our ongoing education and anti-piracy programs,” he said.

Thus far the RIAA has not announced officially how the LimeWire settlement will be spent, but we don’t expect them to steer away from their previous course. This makes today’s decision on compensation a victory for the major labels, but certainly not one for musicians.

Oops! redface

I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 05/17/11 8:46am

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

Seriously, though. Who EXACTLY are the Pirates? hmmm

I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 05/17/11 8:51am

Graycap23

Does Limewire have those type of resources?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 05/17/11 8:59am

robertlove

Graycap23 said:

Does Limewire have those type of resources?

I'm suprised about that too...how do they make money?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 05/17/11 9:51am

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

Graycap23 said:

Does Limewire have those type of resources?

I hadn't used Limewire since the early, early days of it but didn't they eventually offer "premium upgrades" for a fee...which resulted in getting them busted, in the first place? I'm guessing that would be where, they got the money from. shrug

I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 05/17/11 2:32pm

robertlove

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

Graycap23 said:

Does Limewire have those type of resources?

I hadn't used Limewire since the early, early days of it but didn't they eventually offer "premium upgrades" for a fee...which resulted in getting them busted, in the first place? I'm guessing that would be where, they got the money from. shrug

Probably, but 105M...that's a lot of premium upgrades!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 05/17/11 3:04pm

bboy87

avatar

Graycap23 said:

Does Limewire have those type of resources?

Same thing I was thinking. and who uses Limewire these days?

"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 05/17/11 3:19pm

vainandy

avatar

So the artists got none of the money? That figures.

Like I always say...."Download on motherfuckers, download on"....The labels deserve to go broke.

Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 05/17/11 3:58pm

lastdecember

avatar

vainandy said:

So the artists got none of the money? That figures.

Like I always say...."Download on motherfuckers, download on"....The labels deserve to go broke.

Labels will never go broke because everyone now signs a 360 deal, they make more than ever now, thats why you have an enormous amount of straight out the box and gone tomorrow artists, its easy turnover no investment etc...

As for the downloading thing, did anyone think ARTISTS would be paid? as Prince says, artists never get paid to begin with, why now, and considering ALOT of the artists in this suit, are new they have shit deals anyway, i know people think people Rihanna makes tons on their music, but they dont, they make their $$ on other nonsense like photoshoots perfume etc..


"We went where our music was appreciated, and that was everywhere but the USA, we knew we had fans, but there is only so much of the world you can play at once" Magne F
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 05/17/11 4:49pm

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

lastdecember said:

vainandy said:

So the artists got none of the money? That figures.

Like I always say...."Download on motherfuckers, download on"....The labels deserve to go broke.

Labels will never go broke because everyone now signs a 360 deal, they make more than ever now, thats why you have an enormous amount of straight out the box and gone tomorrow artists, its easy turnover no investment etc...

As for the downloading thing, did anyone think ARTISTS would be paid? as Prince says, artists never get paid to begin with, why now, and considering ALOT of the artists in this suit, are new they have shit deals anyway, i know people think people Rihanna makes tons on their music, but they dont, they make their $$ on other nonsense like photoshoots perfume etc..

Since the RIAA originally thought they could get as much as $75 Trillion...yes...$75 TRILLION!

http://www.pcworld.com/ar...mages.html

I'm sure the thousands of "artists" they presented as the "victims" in the case, thought they were at least gonna get...a little something something. shrug

I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 05/17/11 5:09pm

lastdecember

avatar

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

lastdecember said:

Labels will never go broke because everyone now signs a 360 deal, they make more than ever now, thats why you have an enormous amount of straight out the box and gone tomorrow artists, its easy turnover no investment etc...

As for the downloading thing, did anyone think ARTISTS would be paid? as Prince says, artists never get paid to begin with, why now, and considering ALOT of the artists in this suit, are new they have shit deals anyway, i know people think people Rihanna makes tons on their music, but they dont, they make their $$ on other nonsense like photoshoots perfume etc..

Since the RIAA originally thought they could get as much as $75 Trillion...yes...$75 TRILLION!

http://www.pcworld.com/ar...mages.html

I'm sure the thousands of "artists" they presented as the "victims" in the case, thought they were at least gonna get...a little something something. shrug

Not going to happen, artists unless on their own will never get their share, if your on a label you got a bad deal no matter how you spin it


"We went where our music was appreciated, and that was everywhere but the USA, we knew we had fans, but there is only so much of the world you can play at once" Magne F
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 05/17/11 5:19pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

Since the RIAA originally thought they could get as much as $75 Trillion...yes...$75 TRILLION!

http://www.pcworld.com/ar...mages.html

I'm sure the thousands of "artists" they presented as the "victims" in the case, thought they were at least gonna get...a little something something. shrug

Ever since the record business began, they've ripped off the performers, that's why many of them die broke and/or forced to do "oldies" shows to make a living. People like Bonnie Raitt started funds for old blues and R&B singers. Many of the music laws (such as copyright/publishing) were started by the labels, for their benefit. The companies only complain when they lose money.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 05/17/11 5:49pm

HatrinaHaterwi
tz

avatar

MickyDolenz said:

HatrinaHaterwitz said:

Since the RIAA originally thought they could get as much as $75 Trillion...yes...$75 TRILLION!

http://www.pcworld.com/ar...mages.html

I'm sure the thousands of "artists" they presented as the "victims" in the case, thought they were at least gonna get...a little something something. shrug

Ever since the record business began, they've ripped off the performers, that's why many of them die broke and/or forced to do "oldies" shows to make a living. People like Bonnie Raitt started funds for old blues and R&B singers. Many of the music laws (such as copyright/publishing) were started by the labels, for their benefit. The companies only complain when they lose money.

Y'all get no arguments from me on that. I just pointed out that some artists sided with the RIAA because they thought it would lead to a big payday. The irony is...they're getting none of the $105M and if by some totally ridiculous chance the RIAA could have gotten a judgement and a payout of $75T, the artists that were used as the victims, would have gotten none of that either. shrug

.


[Edited 5/17/11 17:52pm]

I knew from the start that I loved you with all my heart.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 05/17/11 6:02pm

MickyDolenz

avatar

^^^It's not even mandatory for the labels to report to the RIAA, and they don't audit the numbers of the ones that do.

You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 05/17/11 6:40pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

bboy87 said:

Graycap23 said:

Does Limewire have those type of resources?

Same thing I was thinking. and who uses Limewire these days?

Frostwire users! wink

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 05/17/11 6:50pm

TonyVanDam

avatar

lastdecember said:

vainandy said:

So the artists got none of the money? That figures.

Like I always say...."Download on motherfuckers, download on"....The labels deserve to go broke.

Labels will never go broke because everyone now signs a 360 deal, they make more than ever now, thats why you have an enormous amount of straight out the box and gone tomorrow artists, its easy turnover no investment etc...

As for the downloading thing, did anyone think ARTISTS would be paid? as Prince says, artists never get paid to begin with, why now, and considering ALOT of the artists in this suit, are new they have shit deals anyway, i know people think people Rihanna makes tons on their music, but they dont, they make their $$ on other nonsense like photoshoots perfume etc..

Knowing what we always knew for the last 10+ years, all of the RIAA-driven artists from Metallica to Nelly have to feel kind of stupid right about now. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 05/17/11 8:19pm

jpnyc

lastdecember said:

vainandy said:

So the artists got none of the money? That figures.

Like I always say...."Download on motherfuckers, download on"....The labels deserve to go broke.

Labels will never go broke because everyone now signs a 360 deal, they make more than ever now, thats why you have an enormous amount of straight out the box and gone tomorrow artists, its easy turnover no investment etc...

As for the downloading thing, did anyone think ARTISTS would be paid? as Prince says, artists never get paid to begin with, why now, and considering ALOT of the artists in this suit, are new they have shit deals anyway, i know people think people Rihanna makes tons on their music, but they dont, they make their $$ on other nonsense like photoshoots perfume etc..

360 deals can't save this industry. Ticket sales are just as bad as album sales, and when ticket sales are in the toilet so are merch sales. In other words, 99% of diddly squat is still diddly squat.

Anyway, BFD. The RIAA knocked out a filesharing service that most people stopped using at least five years ago. They can't shut downt the remaining torrent sites or the digital locker sites. It's a losing battle.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 05/18/11 1:55am

BlaqueKnight

avatar

So they won the money and they kept it to "re-invest" in continuing the campaigns, aka pay their own people...wait, what? hmmm

So doesn't that make them something like a...

[img:$uid]http://www.hummuslim.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Captain-Jack-Sparrow0.jpg[/img:$uid]

"PIRATE!"

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > RIAA - $105M, Artists - $0, Filesharing - Still Priceless!