independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Queens Of The Stone Age
« Previous topic  Next topic »
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 02/06/03 8:03pm

Farfunknugin

avatar

Queens Of The Stone Age

waddaya'll think of this this disc? I've just d-loaded a couple trax but so far it hits me as much needed rock, the good kind..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 02/06/03 8:44pm

TRON

I've been on the verge of buying the album several times. I'll let you know once I do.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 02/06/03 10:24pm

VANITYSprisonB
YTCH

The album is a savior of rock!!! IMO...their live shows are no different. Check out their previous album 'R'..as well! You wont be disapointed...check out some of the following as well..

-The Dautsuns
-Iriaka Colt
-Division of Laura Lee
Every minute of last night is on my face today....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 02/07/03 1:41am

WildheartXXX

avatar

I've been a Queens fan for a couple of years now and all their albums are worth buying. Songs For The Deaf is their latest album and is terrific. It's not the "friendliest" of albums to get into though if youre a newcomer. Rated R which was their previous album is much more direct and contains more songs like No One Knows. "Songs" is a little more like their debut,big and psychedelic.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 02/07/03 5:06am

mrdespues

I expected this album to be great. I was more than a little disappointed. I love Dave Grohl's drumming but the songwriting gets repetitive and the actual production on the drums is all high end and no mids or lows. This album needed to sound LOUD! But the drum production prevented that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 02/07/03 2:21pm

WildheartXXX

avatar

mrdespues said:

I expected this album to be great. I was more than a little disappointed. I love Dave Grohl's drumming but the songwriting gets repetitive and the actual production on the drums is all high end and no mids or lows. This album needed to sound LOUD! But the drum production prevented that.


Yup as a whole its too dense, its not the songwriting. It's the production. Rated R is a more accessible album and their finest. Songs is still a great album but the production marrs it somewhat.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 02/07/03 5:27pm

JamesMarshallH
endrix

I started a thread on this band when Songs for Deaf came out and nobody responded.

This band is creative, intelligent and they FUCKING ROCK. As far as the production not having low end, I missed that (I'll listen again for that).

People don't get this music (generally) and I've seen them four times but they never sell-out. I guess their huge in England (can anybody confirm?)/

Rated R is good, their 1st album is great but check out the Desert Sessions (volumes 1-7).

Oh yeah, take drugs and listen with headphones, thats how it was created.
[This message was edited Fri Feb 7 9:29:02 PST 2003 by JamesMarshallHendrix]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 02/07/03 8:57pm

EllisDee

avatar

i bought it because i read that mark lanegan was handling the vocals on it... then, when i actually listened to it, i found out that he's only singing on a handful of tracks, so i got rid of it... i liked the songs that featured lanegan on lead vocals, but the actual lead singer gets on my nerves...
oral Mr. Ellis Dee-licious, the Official NPGigolo pimp2

Candy Dulfer is my boo... razz
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 02/08/03 2:11am

WildheartXXX

avatar

JamesMarshallHendrix said:

I started a thread on this band when Songs for Deaf came out and nobody responded.

This band is creative, intelligent and they FUCKING ROCK. As far as the production not having low end, I missed that (I'll listen again for that).

People don't get this music (generally) and I've seen them four times but they never sell-out. I guess their huge in England (can anybody confirm?)/

Rated R is good, their 1st album is great but check out the Desert Sessions (volumes 1-7).

Oh yeah, take drugs and listen with headphones, thats how it was created.
[This message was edited Fri Feb 7 9:29:02 PST 2003 by JamesMarshallHendrix]


Yeah they're big news over here in the UK. Their last two tours completely sold out and Songs debuted at Number 4 in the album charts. Ive seen them a few times live and theyre both fantastic and lazy. There is a real sense of detachment they have from their audience and this really kinda bothered me every time i saw them. Queens play for themselves. They're a very insular band. I have the Desert Sessions stuff and it is fantastic.

As for the guy who mentioned Mark Lanegan. Everytime that man came on stage on their last tour. Queens turned from a good band into a world class band, he has remarkable stage presence.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 02/11/03 1:50am

JamesMarshallH
endrix

WildheartXXX said:

JamesMarshallHendrix said:

I started a thread on this band when Songs for Deaf came out and nobody responded.

This band is creative, intelligent and they FUCKING ROCK. As far as the production not having low end, I missed that (I'll listen again for that).

People don't get this music (generally) and I've seen them four times but they never sell-out. I guess their huge in England (can anybody confirm?)/

Rated R is good, their 1st album is great but check out the Desert Sessions (volumes 1-7).

Oh yeah, take drugs and listen with headphones, thats how it was created.
[This message was edited Fri Feb 7 9:29:02 PST 2003 by JamesMarshallHendrix]


Yeah they're big news over here in the UK. Their last two tours completely sold out and Songs debuted at Number 4 in the album charts. Ive seen them a few times live and theyre both fantastic and lazy. There is a real sense of detachment they have from their audience and this really kinda bothered me every time i saw them. Queens play for themselves. They're a very insular band. I have the Desert Sessions stuff and it is fantastic.

As for the guy who mentioned Mark Lanegan. Everytime that man came on stage on their last tour. Queens turned from a good band into a world class band, he has remarkable stage presence.



Hey thanks for the response. Between this and the David Lee Roth thread (both on a Prince site), I'd hate to see how much music we have in common.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 02/11/03 2:40am

EllisDee

avatar

WildheartXXX said:


As for the guy who mentioned Mark Lanegan. Everytime that man came on stage on their last tour. Queens turned from a good band into a world class band, he has remarkable stage presence.


lanegan's been around for a long time... he was the lead singer in the screaming trees and has done a few solo albums for sub pop records... he is one of rock music's greatest vocalists... he has a great way of expressing depression and such as that... he is also the guy that taught "where did you sleep last night" to kurt cobain...

if he would have done more lead vocals, i would have liked that cd a lot more...
oral Mr. Ellis Dee-licious, the Official NPGigolo pimp2

Candy Dulfer is my boo... razz
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Queens Of The Stone Age