Page 10 of 10
<12345678910
Reply #270 posted 05/09/11 3:30pm
MickyDolenz 
|
MJJstudent said:
MickyDolenz said:
If Michael Jackson hadn't went to CBS, would you be talking about him now? Had they remained on Motown, the J5 would just be an oldies group. You see that Motown didn't really do anything with Jermaine's records, (and he was Gordy's son-in-law). That's probably why he was doing A&R work at the label. If they really pushed his stuff, would he have found Switch/DeBarge?
probably not... and that's perfectly okay. people who know me well enough know i prefer michael outside of 'song and dance'.
i truly think he would have found his way of teaching the world in other ways. i truly think he shined mostly outside of music, doing his active-ist work. i wish that was emphasized more than it is.
Without Thriller, Mike wouldn't have been in the same financial situation, so you can't say he would have done this. He wouldn't have worked with Paul McCartney, who is indirectly responsible for Neverland and the ATV catalogue purchase. Although, Mike couldn't have afforded it anyway.
music was a catalyst through that work; but i think he would have made it in some other art, if not music. perhaps film...
and even if he didn't do the arts, i think he would have utilized his virgo healing nature, even if it was in his neighborhood or local community. he mentioned something to this affect at the age of 5.
I've never followed astrology, so don't know what this means.
You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #271 posted 05/09/11 5:21pm
Unholyalliance |
MickyDolenz said:
Without Thriller, Mike wouldn't have been in the same financial situation, so you can't say he would have done this. He wouldn't have worked with Paul McCartney, who is indirectly responsible for Neverland and the ATV catalogue purchase. Although, Mike couldn't have afforded it anyway.
Wat?! |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #272 posted 05/09/11 5:23pm
Timmy84 |
MickyDolenz said:
MJJstudent said:
probably not... and that's perfectly okay. people who know me well enough know i prefer michael outside of 'song and dance'.
i truly think he would have found his way of teaching the world in other ways. i truly think he shined mostly outside of music, doing his active-ist work. i wish that was emphasized more than it is.
Without Thriller, Mike wouldn't have been in the same financial situation, so you can't say he would have done this. He wouldn't have worked with Paul McCartney, who is indirectly responsible for Neverland and the ATV catalogue purchase. Although, Mike couldn't have afforded it anyway.
music was a catalyst through that work; but i think he would have made it in some other art, if not music. perhaps film...
and even if he didn't do the arts, i think he would have utilized his virgo healing nature, even if it was in his neighborhood or local community. he mentioned something to this affect at the age of 5.
I've never followed astrology, so don't know what this means.
Well technically they did work together around '79 but inadvertently with "Girlfriend" so I wouldn't go that far.  |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #273 posted 05/09/11 5:44pm
MickyDolenz 
|
Unholyalliance said:
MickyDolenz said:
Without Thriller, Mike wouldn't have been in the same financial situation, so you can't say he would have done this. He wouldn't have worked with Paul McCartney, who is indirectly responsible for Neverland and the ATV catalogue purchase. Although, Mike couldn't have afforded it anyway.
Wat?!
What do you mean? We were talking about if the brothers had remained on Motown, and not signed with Epic. You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #274 posted 05/09/11 5:47pm
MickyDolenz 
|
Timmy84 said:
Well technically they did work together around '79 but inadvertently with "Girlfriend" so I wouldn't go that far. 
But that happened at Epic, and was partly Quincy Jones doing. Would that have happened if the brothers stayed on Motown? We were talking about the J5 staying on Motown. You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #275 posted 05/09/11 5:53pm
Timmy84 |
MickyDolenz said:
Timmy84 said:
Well technically they did work together around '79 but inadvertently with "Girlfriend" so I wouldn't go that far. 
But that happened at Epic, and was partly Quincy Jones doing. Would that have happened if the brothers stayed on Motown? We were talking about the J5 staying on Motown.
Oh OK. I get it now.  |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #276 posted 05/09/11 7:07pm
babybugz 
|
I do think if Michael started later on that off the wall still would have happen but not thriller for some reason and also he would have had a childhood , he most likely would have been looked at as just another 80’s R&B act. I think Michael could have ended his career after thriller but he loved singing. I just felt the pressure became too much for him after thriller. |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #277 posted 05/09/11 7:14pm
Timmy84 |
babybugz said:
I do think if Michael started later on that off the wall still would have happen but not thriller for some reason and also he would have had a childhood , he most likely would have been looked at as just another 80’s R&B act. I think Michael could have ended his career after thriller but he loved singing. I just felt the pressure became too much for him after thriller.
True. |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #278 posted 05/09/11 7:16pm
Reply #279 posted 05/09/11 7:19pm
Timmy84 |
JoeTyler said:
!!!
!!!
!!!
You fool.  |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #280 posted 05/09/11 7:23pm
JoeTyler |
Timmy84 said:
JoeTyler said:
!!!
!!!
!!!
You fool. 

|
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #281 posted 05/09/11 7:53pm
MickyDolenz 
|
babybugz said:
I do think if Michael started later on that off the wall still would have happen but not thriller for some reason and also he would have had a childhood , he most likely would have been looked at as just another 80’s R&B act. I think Michael could have ended his career after thriller but he loved singing. I just felt the pressure became too much for him after thriller.
Not likely, because the J5 most likely wouldn't have been on Motown, and so Berry Gordy wouldn't have put Mike in The Wiz. So he wouldn't have worked with Quincy Jones, who supervised the soundtrack, and Mike couldn't have asked him to do an album. Depending on what label Mike might have been on, it (record label) might not have been able to afford Quincy. You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #282 posted 05/09/11 7:56pm
babybugz 
|
MickyDolenz said:
babybugz said:
I do think if Michael started later on that off the wall still would have happen but not thriller for some reason and also he would have had a childhood , he most likely would have been looked at as just another 80’s R&B act. I think Michael could have ended his career after thriller but he loved singing. I just felt the pressure became too much for him after thriller.
Not likely, because the J5 most likely wouldn't have been on Motown, and so Berry Gordy wouldn't have put Mike in The Wiz. So he wouldn't have worked with Quincy Jones, who supervised the soundtrack, and Mike couldn't have asked him to do an album. Depending on what label Mike might have been on, it (record label) might not have been able to afford Quincy.
I disagree with the Motown thing and we wouldn’t know Michael’s circles at that time he still could have done something with Quincy. I know he definitely would have went out on his own like he did with off the wall even though he still was with the jacksons but I still think off the wall would have happened or something similar. |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #283 posted 05/09/11 8:11pm
MickyDolenz 
|
babybugz said:
MickyDolenz said:
Not likely, because the J5 most likely wouldn't have been on Motown, and so Berry Gordy wouldn't have put Mike in The Wiz. So he wouldn't have worked with Quincy Jones, who supervised the soundtrack, and Mike couldn't have asked him to do an album. Depending on what label Mike might have been on, it (record label) might not have been able to afford Quincy.
I disagree with the Motown thing and we wouldn’t know Michael’s circles at that time he still could have done something with Quincy. I know he definitely would have went out on his own like he did with off the wall even though he still was with the jacksons but I still think off the wall would have happened or something similar.
That doesn't mean that it would be successful. Members of The Sylvers, The Rolling Stones, Pointer Sisters, The Osmonds, and other groups released solo records, but didn't have much success with it. There's very few acts who had success with solo projects while still doing the main group. Such as New Edition & Genesis. You can take a black guy to Nashville from right out of the cotton fields with bib overalls, and they will call him R&B. You can take a white guy in a pin-stripe suit who’s never seen a cotton field, and they will call him country. ~ O. B. McClinton |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #284 posted 05/09/11 8:14pm
babybugz 
|
MickyDolenz said:
babybugz said:
I disagree with the Motown thing and we wouldn’t know Michael’s circles at that time he still could have done something with Quincy. I know he definitely would have went out on his own like he did with off the wall even though he still was with the jacksons but I still think off the wall would have happened or something similar.
That doesn't mean that it would be successful. Members of The Sylvers, The Rolling Stones, Pointer Sisters, The Osmonds, and other groups released solo records, but didn't have much success with it. There's very few acts who had success with solo projects while still doing the main group. Such as New Edition & Genesis.
I didn’t say that I said he would have eventually went out on his own and made a album is what I’m saying. I said earlier in the post that he could have been just another 80's R&B act at the end of the day. [Edited 5/9/11 13:16pm] |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #285 posted 05/09/11 8:15pm
Timmy84 |
In Motown, you couldn't leave the group for a solo career unless it was to hype the interest in the group and continue it as a brand. The reason the Jackson 5 got away with doing solo projects was because they were a brand after 1970. Other groups didn't have that luxury. Eddie Kendricks wanted to go solo as far back as 1965 but wasn't allowed to. |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #286 posted 05/09/11 8:19pm
babybugz 
|
Timmy84 said:
In Motown, you couldn't leave the group for a solo career unless it was to hype the interest in the group and continue it as a brand. The reason the Jackson 5 got away with doing solo projects was because they were a brand after 1970. Other groups didn't have that luxury. Eddie Kendricks wanted to go solo as far back as 1965 but wasn't allowed to.
Good point I feel either way Michael would have went solo would it have been successful we don’t know . |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #287 posted 05/09/11 9:05pm
Timmy84 |
babybugz said:
Timmy84 said:
In Motown, you couldn't leave the group for a solo career unless it was to hype the interest in the group and continue it as a brand. The reason the Jackson 5 got away with doing solo projects was because they were a brand after 1970. Other groups didn't have that luxury. Eddie Kendricks wanted to go solo as far back as 1965 but wasn't allowed to.
Good point I feel either way Michael would have went solo would it have been successful we don’t know .
Yeah who knows... like I said maybe it was fate his career turned out the way it did. |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #288 posted 05/09/11 11:31pm
gunner82 |
JoeTyler said:
Timmy84 said:
You fool. 

What is with people trying to get my threads locked? Is someone jealous or something? I'm not saying every thread I've started is the greatest, BUT DAMN, this is like the third one I'm seeing locks on.....  |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Reply #289 posted 05/10/11 3:44am
luv4u Moderator
moderator
|
reported thread.
Please use the MJ sticky, thanks.
Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben |
| | - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Page 10 of 10
<12345678910
copyright © 1998-2025 prince.org. all rights reserved.