Hey there has anyone seen this documentary?

http://paulreallyisdead.com/

More of "Faul": http://plasticmacca.blogs...times.html

It is on Netflix - I watched it the other night and if anything it is an amusing, somewhat ridiculous conspiracy theory.

Some highlights for me include:

The headless dolls on the "Yesterday and Today" cover, the explanation of Revolver's artwork, the photoshoot angles, and the Sgt. Pepper's cover as well as Eleanor Rigby and A Day In The Life.

Any thoughts?

they were illuminati too

more nonsense

http://plasticmacca.blogs...chive.html

You just scared me shitless.

This is nothing new. This story came out in the late 1960's. It's partly what the song Glass Onion is about, people reading things into songs that aren't there.

[Edited 3/26/11 15:54pm]

A bunch of stoned college students looking for clues in Beatles songs and album covers.

McCartney went off the grid at the end of the year, and supposedly Allen Klein had played games in delaying his royalty checks as a way to get him to get on board with the other 3 Beatles. He had just had a kid, Abbey Road had just come out, but around September, they basically broke up and just wanted some time with his family, and not think about the band for a while.

MickyDolenz said:

This is nothing new. This story came out in the late 1960's. It's partly what the song Glass Onion is about, people reading things into songs that aren't there.

[Edited 3/26/11 15:54pm]

dalsh327 said:

clues in Beatles songs and album covers.

I have played the record of Cry Baby Cry backwards at the end, and it does sound a little like "Paul is dead man, miss him". But the "cranberry sauce" comment on Strawberry Fields sounds nothing like "I buried Paul". I remember there was a rumor in the mid 1980's that the actor Alfonso Ribeiro died when he broke his neck breakdancing.

I read that one, too. Suppossedly, he was sacrificed to the devil.

MickyDolenz said:

This is nothing new. This story came out in the late 1960's. It's partly what the song Glass Onion is about, people reading things into songs that aren't there.

[Edited 3/26/11 15:54pm]

angel345 said:

I read that one, too. Suppossedly, he was sacrificed to the devil.

Who? Alfonso? I've never heard that part before.

MickyDolenz said:

angel345 said:

I read that one, too. Suppossedly, he was sacrificed to the devil.

Who? Alfonso? I've never heard that part before.

No, Paul.

angel345 said:

MickyDolenz said:

Who? Alfonso? I've never heard that part before.

No, Paul.

I never heard of that with Paul's "death" either. The only thing I've heard that is similar was that Robert Johnson sold his soul to the devil for guitar skills.

Anyone wanna break down that "Abbey Road" cover?

The Beatles always had fun with that kinda stuff.

MickyDolenz said:

angel345 said:

No, Paul.

I never heard of that with Paul's "death" either. The only thing I've heard that is similar was that Robert Johnson sold his soul to the devil for guitar skills.

Yeah Paul never was accused of selling his soul to the devil. Robert Johnson didn't sell his soul to the devil either. That was a metaphorical statement for someone who decided to do secular music. Sam Cooke was accused of doing the same thing after leaving the Soul Stirrers.

StonedImmaculate said:

Anyone wanna break down that "Abbey Road" cover?

The Beatles always had fun with that kinda stuff.

He is barefoot with his eyes closed and in an old style beat up suit like a corpse. He is smoking with the other hand then he does in interviews (or like his body was after a fiery crash). Also there appears to be a cut on his head.

And I think that the black van that allegedly took the other beatles to the accident scene is also parked on the street with a man representing "Maxwell" standing next to it and looking at them.

Some conspiracy theories are silly and this was one of the silliest.

I watched it just this afternoon on cable TV

I'm in Chile and was like "WTF", until the host of the programm said it was all false info

Thanx for posting

It was interesting to see so many lies together...

tritoncin said:

it was all false info

It's obviously false if Paul is still alive and performing. Also, if Paul really died back then, Michael Jackson would have never bought the land that became Neverland.

[Edited 3/26/11 19:31pm]

MickyDolenz said:

tritoncin said:

it was all false info

It's obviously false if Paul is still alive and performing. Also, if Paul really died back then, Michael Jackson would have never bought the land that became Neverland.

[Edited 3/26/11 19:31pm]

If that was really Michael Jackson.

jeidee said:

StonedImmaculate said:

Anyone wanna break down that "Abbey Road" cover?

The Beatles always had fun with that kinda stuff.

He is barefoot with his eyes closed and in an old style beat up suit like a corpse. He is smoking with the other hand then he does in interviews (or like his body was after a fiery crash). Also there appears to be a cut on his head.

And I think that the black van that allegedly took the other beatles to the accident scene is also parked on the street with a man representing "Maxwell" standing next to it and looking at them.

All right...got my "Abbey Road" CD out so here goes...

John is leading the way, dressed in white....the angel who will plead Paul's case when he gets to the pearly gates (or something like that).

Next comes Ringo dressed in a black suit...the preacher to deliver the sermon at the funeral.

Next comes Paul and as you said...he's in his burial suit and barefoot as Englishmen are buried (?)

Next comes George in denim, dressed as a working man...he will pile the dirt onto the casket.

And finally, the fifth Beatle...the white VW parked on the left side of the street. License plate reads LMW-28IF..."28 if he would have lived".

I think I messed some of it up...someone broke it down for me years ago. Im sure someone around here can clean up anything I got wrong.

Dont know if the boys purposely did this, but I think they did...just for fun.

STOP SCARING ME HALF TO DEATH!

You'll be hearin' from Paulie's lawyers soon...

StonedImmaculate said:

And finally, the fifth Beatle...the white VW parked on the left side of the street. License plate reads LMW-28IF..."28 if he would have lived".

Paul released this live album in 1993. It's kinda dark in this picture, but the license plate on the car says 51-IS.

SherryJackson said:

STOP SCARING ME HALF TO DEATH!

Yeah, I think the title of the thread should be changed. It gives a false idea of what it's about.

Timmy84 said:

MickyDolenz said:

I never heard of that with Paul's "death" either. The only thing I've heard that is similar was that Robert Johnson sold his soul to the devil for guitar skills.

Yeah Paul never was accused of selling his soul to the devil. Robert Johnson didn't sell his soul to the devil either. That was a metaphorical statement for someone who decided to do secular music. Sam Cooke was accused of doing the same thing after leaving the Soul Stirrers.

You're right whereas the devil cannot take something that was never his. Have you read Tiffany Evan's tweet? For what I've read and heard, the Beatles were heavily into the occult. Supposedly, the Paul that you see is not the same Paul of the sixies because he was killed off. Maybe that one is outrageous, but I didn't say it. Just what I've looked up.

angel345 said:

Timmy84 said:

Yeah Paul never was accused of selling his soul to the devil. Robert Johnson didn't sell his soul to the devil either. That was a metaphorical statement for someone who decided to do secular music. Sam Cooke was accused of doing the same thing after leaving the Soul Stirrers.

You're right whereas the devil cannot take something that was never his. Have you read Tiffany Evan's tweet? For what I've read and heard, the Beatles were heavily into the occult. Supposedly, the Paul that you see is not the same Paul of the sixies because he was killed off. Maybe that one is outrageous, but I didn't say it. Just what I've looked up.

There's an episode of The Monkees called The Devil And Peter Tork, where Peter sells his soul to Lucifer so he can play the harp. When the devil comes to collect, the other 3 Monkees go to court to try to find a loophole in the contract Peter signed.

MickyDolenz said:

angel345 said:

You're right whereas the devil cannot take something that was never his. Have you read Tiffany Evan's tweet? For what I've read and heard, the Beatles were heavily into the occult. Supposedly, the Paul that you see is not the same Paul of the sixies because he was killed off. Maybe that one is outrageous, but I didn't say it. Just what I've looked up.

There's an episode of The Monkees called The Devil And Peter Tork, where Peter sells his soul to Lucifer so he can play the harp. When the devil comes to collect, the other 3 Monkees go to court to try to find a loophole in the contract Peter signed.

I didn't see the episode, but the devil tried to get Jesus to worship him. He would give Him all the riches and things of the world, of which none if it is his to give. Jesus knew that. Therefore, selling your soul means giving a oath. You're giving the devil more leverage than he deserve or even has. Tiffany Evans was saying there's a lot of blood sacrifices included in the oath with the music industry. I figured for her to be in the music, she saw or knew something. Whether people choose to believe it or not, that's their belief.

The interpretation for "Abbey Road" is also The Beatles are walking away from the studio. But there's also photos of them walking towards the studio. It was just paying homage to the studio after all those years, and even though they tried building their own studio, still went back to record. Prob. one of the fastest photo shoots for an album cover - 10-15 minutes.

angel345 said:

Timmy84 said:

Yeah Paul never was accused of selling his soul to the devil. Robert Johnson didn't sell his soul to the devil either. That was a metaphorical statement for someone who decided to do secular music. Sam Cooke was accused of doing the same thing after leaving the Soul Stirrers.

You're right whereas the devil cannot take something that was never his. Have you read Tiffany Evan's tweet? For what I've read and heard, the Beatles were heavily into the occult. Supposedly, the Paul that you see is not the same Paul of the sixies because he was killed off. Maybe that one is outrageous, but I didn't say it. Just what I've looked up.

Sorry I don't believe that one-hit wonder knows anything about the occult considering she only been out for a year and couldn't sell. If she knew there was some kind of cult, then she shouldn't have joined Jay-Z's father-in-law's label. But that's another topic. And Paul McCartney is Paul McCartney. END OF.

dalsh327 said:

The interpretation for "Abbey Road" is also The Beatles are walking away from the studio. But there's also photos of them walking towards the studio. It was just paying homage to the studio after all those years, and even though they tried building their own studio, still went back to record. Prob. one of the fastest photo shoots for an album cover - 10-15 minutes.

And one of the greatest.

angel345 said:

I didn't see the episode

Timmy84 said:

angel345 said:

You're right whereas the devil cannot take something that was never his. Have you read Tiffany Evan's tweet? For what I've read and heard, the Beatles were heavily into the occult. Supposedly, the Paul that you see is not the same Paul of the sixies because he was killed off. Maybe that one is outrageous, but I didn't say it. Just what I've looked up.

Sorry I don't believe that one-hit wonder knows anything about the occult considering she only been out for a year and couldn't sell. If she knew there was some kind of cult, then she shouldn't have joined Jay-Z's father-in-law's label. But that's another topic. And Paul McCartney is Paul McCartney. END OF.

Sure doll, we can end this discussion. Your opinion.