independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Aretha Franklin: I Didn't Have Gastric Bypass
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Author

Tweet     Share

Message
Thread started 03/12/11 9:16pm

musicjunky318

avatar

Aretha Franklin: I Didn't Have Gastric Bypass

Surgery helped Aretha Franklin lose 85 lbs. – just not that surgery.

That's the story the Queen of Soul's sticking to as she once again shoots down rumors about her health, this time the theory that she underwent gastric bypass surgery to drop weight.

"Definitely not – and would not," Franklin, 68, tells Access Hollywood in a two-part interview to air Monday and Tuesday. "I heard that [rumor]. I said, 'That is crazy.' "

Since undergoing a mysterious surgical procedure in December for reasons she refuses to reveal, Franklin's health and weight loss have been much-buzzed-about topics. In January, she said she was "not going to even deal with" rumors that she had pancreatic cancer.

She did, however, offer a small clue about that surgery, saying that the weight came off "from the surgery that I had," although she did not specify the procedure.

"But it definitely was not the bariatric or, what is it, gastric by- – Yeah, I can't even tell you the correct name of it," she says, adding, "It's really not necessary to talk about one's personal medical [health]."
Last week, Franklin told Wendy Williams that she ditched fatty foods to drop the weight.

Rumors aside, Franklin says it's not just about being lighter, but feeling lighter and having "more energy."

"The doctor did say to me, he said, 'Mrs. Franklin, you are going to feel better than you have felt maybe in 10 or 15 years,' " she says. " 'The surgery that you had is going to add 15 years to your life.' "

http://www.people.com/peo...02,00.html

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #1 posted 03/12/11 9:30pm

errant

avatar

if she's throwing around the word "bariatric" and then deflecting by adding "gastric bypass" to dumb it down and use the common terminology, she's very familiar with the procedure.

[Edited 3/12/11 21:31pm]

"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #2 posted 03/12/11 9:41pm

luv4u

Moderator

avatar

moderator

errant said:

if she's throwing around the word "bariatric" and then deflecting by adding "gastric bypass" to dumb it down and use the common terminology, she's very familiar with the procedure.

[Edited 3/12/11 21:31pm]

That's a possibility

canada

Ohh purple joy oh purple bliss oh purple rapture!
REAL MUSIC by REAL MUSICIANS - Prince
"I kind of wish there was a reason for Prince to make the site crash more" ~~ Ben
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #3 posted 03/13/11 11:38am

HuMpThAnG

Just 85 lbs????

Homegorl is full of it lol

She was a big woman..

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #4 posted 03/13/11 11:42am

Timmy84

HuMpThAnG said:

Just 85 lbs????

Homegorl is full of it lol

She was a big woman..

She actually lost 100 lbs pre-surgery. I could tell she had lost weight around her face when you watched her performance at Albertina Walker's funeral. So I wouldn't say she was "full of it" to that degree. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #5 posted 03/13/11 11:51am

HuMpThAnG

lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #6 posted 03/13/11 12:54pm

shorttrini

avatar

I'm thinking that she had the "lap-band", procedure. So, she's right, it wasn't Gastric Bypass.

"Love is like peeing in your pants, everyone sees it but only you feel its warmth"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #7 posted 03/13/11 1:21pm

Wowugotit

shorttrini said:

I'm thinking that she had the "lap-band", procedure. So, she's right, it wasn't Gastric Bypass.

lmao!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #8 posted 03/13/11 9:38pm

PDogz

avatar

And I think Patti LaBelle had it right from the beginning. I don't believe Patti would have made that story up, lied, or been misinformed. Then on top of that, I don't blame Aretha for not wanting to speak on it. If it was just some casual, non-life threatening condition, it's likely she would have put it out there.

I trust that what Patti said was true and accurate, and only wish Aretha the best!

"There's Nothing That The Proper Attitude Won't Render Funkable!"

star
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #9 posted 03/13/11 9:40pm

Timmy84

PDogz said:

And I think Patti LaBelle had it right from the beginning. I don't believe Patti would have made that story up, lied, or been misinformed. Then on top of that, I don't blame Aretha for not wanting to speak on it. If it was just some casual, non-life threatening condition, it's likely she would have put it out there.

I trust that what Patti said was true and accurate, and only wish Aretha the best!

So you mean you believed her when she said she knew Aretha had pancreatic cancer? Well I can't say for sure anymore if that's what she has. I just think Aretha just likes to be private. We'll see what happens though but I doubt it's that bad.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #10 posted 03/13/11 10:29pm

RnBAmbassador

avatar

The problem with the Patti Labelle alleged quote is the media source it came from. A star of LaBelle's magnitude would have garnered more mainstream media coverage - but only that one source said she said it in an interview. If Aretha Franklin has pancreatic cancer, she is the world's best and absolute liar.

Being forthcoming is not her greatest attribute - but to totally said she doesn't have it and then that end ou being the situation would be a total collapse of any respect she could ever hope to have from fans, media and peers.

Also surgery for pancreatic cancer does not add 15 years to one's life, Pancreatic cancer is terminal to my knowledge - not a curable form of the dreaded disease.

Timmy84 said:

PDogz said:

And I think Patti LaBelle had it right from the beginning. I don't believe Patti would have made that story up, lied, or been misinformed. Then on top of that, I don't blame Aretha for not wanting to speak on it. If it was just some casual, non-life threatening condition, it's likely she would have put it out there.

I trust that what Patti said was true and accurate, and only wish Aretha the best!

So you mean you believed her when she said she knew Aretha had pancreatic cancer? Well I can't say for sure anymore if that's what she has. I just think Aretha just likes to be private. We'll see what happens though but I doubt it's that bad.

Music Royalty in Motion
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #11 posted 03/13/11 10:38pm

trueiopian

Aretha needs to stop bullshitting.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #12 posted 03/13/11 10:48pm

PDogz

avatar

Timmy84 said:

PDogz said:

And I think Patti LaBelle had it right from the beginning. I don't believe Patti would have made that story up, lied, or been misinformed. Then on top of that, I don't blame Aretha for not wanting to speak on it. If it was just some casual, non-life threatening condition, it's likely she would have put it out there.

I trust that what Patti said was true and accurate, and only wish Aretha the best!

So you mean you believed her when she said she knew Aretha had pancreatic cancer?

nod

"There's Nothing That The Proper Attitude Won't Render Funkable!"

star
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #13 posted 03/13/11 11:00pm

HuMpThAnG

trueiopian said:

Aretha needs to stop bullshitting.

yup

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #14 posted 03/13/11 11:07pm

PDogz

avatar

RnBAmbassador said:

The problem with the Patti Labelle alleged quote is the media source it came from. A star of LaBelle's magnitude would have garnered more mainstream media coverage - but only that one source said she said it in an interview.

ALLEGED quote?!? As I remember it (though I can't recall the source at this time), but it was a video clip of Patti speaking about Aretha's condition. It wasn't a matter of "he said she said", like someone "heard" Patti say... Patti was saying it directly to the camera. I saw it, and remember it well. Then she went on to say how she was waiting to find out where to have flowers delivered to Aretha. Naturally that footage would have been pulled the minute Aretha learned of it.

RnBAmbassador said:

If Aretha Franklin has pancreatic cancer, she is the world's best and absolute liar.

I don't think it would take any great level of lying skills to say "I don't have cancer", if in fact you do.

RnBAmbassador said:


Being forthcoming is not her greatest attribute - but to totally said she doesn't have it and then that end ou being the situation would be a total collapse of any respect she could ever hope to have from fans, media and peers.

Perhaps, or maybe sympathetic fans would realize that she's just saying what she needs to say in order to keep her personal issues PRIVATE. I don't think an Aries like Aretha would take very kindly to people approaching her with: "We KNOW you have cancer, and you better tell us about it!", which is essentially what the media and fans have been doing.

RnBAmbassador said:


Also surgery for pancreatic cancer does not add 15 years to one's life, Pancreatic cancer is terminal to my knowledge - not a curable form of the dreaded disease.

All the more reason to not want to talk about it. I would disregard the "15 years added to life" part.

"There's Nothing That The Proper Attitude Won't Render Funkable!"

star
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #15 posted 03/13/11 11:08pm

prodigalfan

avatar

Just don't say anything at all. Don't outright lie.

And Shorttrini is probably on the right track. Lap band is not GASTRIC BYPASS. The stomach is not bypassed, it is banded and made smaller.

I guess if that is the case, Aretha did not lie... but she still concealed the truth.

Just say "no comment". Anything else only add fuel to the fire.

[Edited 3/13/11 23:09pm]

"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #16 posted 03/13/11 11:20pm

PDogz

avatar

prodigalfan said:

Just don't say anything at all. Don't outright lie.

Just say "no comment". Anything else only add fuel to the fire.

Seems to me she's been trying with all her might to do exactly THAT... "No Comment" and "I don't speak about my personal business", and people mow right over that and just keep coming at her with... "TELL US ABOUT THE CANCER!".

In light of how the media & fans relentlessly continue to disregard her wishes to not speak about her medical issues, I think she's thoroughly justified to lie all she wants if that's what it takes to maintain privacy over an issue that she absolutely doesn't want to talk about.

Seems to me people would just drop it. shrug They're not going to get Aretha to spit out anything she doesn't want to, and at some point it becomes wildly disrespectful that they continue trying.

.

.

[Edited 3/13/11 23:23pm]

"There's Nothing That The Proper Attitude Won't Render Funkable!"

star
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #17 posted 03/13/11 11:42pm

Timmy84

PDogz said:

prodigalfan said:

Just don't say anything at all. Don't outright lie.

Just say "no comment". Anything else only add fuel to the fire.

Seems to me she's been trying with all her might to do exactly THAT... "No Comment" and "I don't speak about my personal business", and people mow right over that and just keep coming at her with... "TELL US ABOUT THE CANCER!".

In light of how the media & fans relentlessly continue to disregard her wishes to not speak about her medical issues, I think she's thoroughly justified to lie all she wants if that's what it takes to maintain privacy over an issue that she absolutely doesn't want to talk about.

Seems to me people would just drop it. shrug They're not going to get Aretha to spit out anything she doesn't want to, and at some point it becomes wildly disrespectful that they continue trying.

.

.

[Edited 3/13/11 23:23pm]

Whatever it IS, Aretha does NOT have to answer. Who in the hell wants that? Aretha has not let people invade her privacy for such a long time, if they're expecting her to do it NOW, they can forget that shit.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #18 posted 03/14/11 12:06am

PDogz

avatar

Timmy84 said:

PDogz said:

Seems to me she's been trying with all her might to do exactly THAT... "No Comment" and "I don't speak about my personal business", and people mow right over that and just keep coming at her with... "TELL US ABOUT THE CANCER!".

In light of how the media & fans relentlessly continue to disregard her wishes to not speak about her medical issues, I think she's thoroughly justified to lie all she wants if that's what it takes to maintain privacy over an issue that she absolutely doesn't want to talk about.

Seems to me people would just drop it. shrug They're not going to get Aretha to spit out anything she doesn't want to, and at some point it becomes wildly disrespectful that they continue trying.

Whatever it IS, Aretha does NOT have to answer. Who in the hell wants that? Aretha has not let people invade her privacy for such a long time, if they're expecting her to do it NOW, they can forget that shit.

If she came out and told people she had cancer, everywhere she would go from now till the end of her days people would be staring at her with tombstones in their eyes. If she does in fact have cancer; someone like Aretha would want to spend the rest of her time LIVING, not DYING.

"There's Nothing That The Proper Attitude Won't Render Funkable!"

star
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #19 posted 03/14/11 12:16am

Timmy84

PDogz said:

Timmy84 said:

Whatever it IS, Aretha does NOT have to answer. Who in the hell wants that? Aretha has not let people invade her privacy for such a long time, if they're expecting her to do it NOW, they can forget that shit.

If she came out and told people she had cancer, everywhere she would go from now till the end of her days people would be staring at her with tombstones in their eyes. If she does in fact have cancer; someone like Aretha would want to spend the rest of her time LIVING, not DYING.

Yeah Aretha ain't gonna go out like a victim. That's not how she was raised.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #20 posted 03/14/11 4:30am

RnBAmbassador

avatar

It was a print interview with Miss LaBelle and below is what was reported:

When we asked her for a reaction to the news of Aretha Franklin's diagnosis with pancreatic cancer, Patti gave the Queen of Soul a moving tribute, saying: "I called her two weeks before it was publicized, so I knew for a long time that she had pancreatic cancer. And I knew for a long time that she had lost 50 lbs. So, people are going around with bad rumors that she had liposuction - that's not nice. You know, the lady is suffering. I've talked to her manager to see when I should send flowers to her, and all of that kind of stuff. I'm going to go to Detroit just to see her. She's our Queen - you'll never, ever find another one like her. Ever. She's the best! And a lot of people are in pain. I went and lit a candle for her at a cathedral, and you pray for Aretha Franklin now. She will be back. Love you ReRe!"

PDogz said:

RnBAmbassador said:

The problem with the Patti Labelle alleged quote is the media source it came from. A star of LaBelle's magnitude would have garnered more mainstream media coverage - but only that one source said she said it in an interview.

ALLEGED quote?!? As I remember it (though I can't recall the source at this time), but it was a video clip of Patti speaking about Aretha's condition. It wasn't a matter of "he said she said", like someone "heard" Patti say... Patti was saying it directly to the camera. I saw it, and remember it well. Then she went on to say how she was waiting to find out where to have flowers delivered to Aretha. Naturally that footage would have been pulled the minute Aretha learned of it.

Perhaps, or maybe sympathetic fans would realize that she's just saying what she needs to say in order to keep her personal issues PRIVATE. I don't think an Aries like Aretha would take very kindly to people approaching her with: "We KNOW you have cancer, and you better tell us about it!", which is essentially what the media and fans have been doing.

RnBAmbassador said:


Also surgery for pancreatic cancer does not add 15 years to one's life, Pancreatic cancer is terminal to my knowledge - not a curable form of the dreaded disease.

All the more reason to not want to talk about it. I would disregard the "15 years added to life" part.

Music Royalty in Motion
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #21 posted 03/14/11 4:34am

RnBAmbassador

avatar

http://globalgrind.com/mu...a-franklin

THE ORIGINAL SOURCE OF PATTI LABELLE'S COMMENT

Global Grind

Music Royalty in Motion
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #22 posted 03/14/11 6:07am

SoulAlive

HuMpThAnG said:

trueiopian said:

Aretha needs to stop bullshitting.

yup

I totally respect her right to privacy and I understand why she wouldn't want to discuss these very personal matters.Unfortunately,when you're a celebrity,people are gonna talk,spread rumors and lie.That's the price of fame.Look at how crazy this situation became: some fans were having prayer vigils for Aretha! Then you have people who are supposedly 'close' to Aretha (Patti LaBelle,Jesse Jackson,etc) making statements to the media...conflicting,confusing statements that only raise more questions,lol.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #23 posted 03/14/11 6:09am

SoulAlive

PDogz said:

Timmy84 said:

Whatever it IS, Aretha does NOT have to answer. Who in the hell wants that? Aretha has not let people invade her privacy for such a long time, if they're expecting her to do it NOW, they can forget that shit.

If she came out and told people she had cancer, everywhere she would go from now till the end of her days people would be staring at her with tombstones in their eyes. If she does in fact have cancer; someone like Aretha would want to spend the rest of her time LIVING, not DYING.

Yep nod I'm just happy that,whatever she was going through,she seems to be healing from it and is on the road to recovery.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #24 posted 03/14/11 7:55am

HuMpThAnG

SoulAlive said:

PDogz said:

If she came out and told people she had cancer, everywhere she would go from now till the end of her days people would be staring at her with tombstones in their eyes. If she does in fact have cancer; someone like Aretha would want to spend the rest of her time LIVING, not DYING.

Yep nod I'm just happy that,whatever she was going through,she seems to be healing from it and is on the road to recovery.

And that's all that matters biggrin

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #25 posted 03/14/11 11:02am

sosgemini

avatar

There is a 10% chance of surviving from pancreatic cancer. So, the cancer or the lap-band could be both be in play. Either way, I wish she would use her celebrity to educate rather than skirt around the issue. It's very unbecoming of someone who makes their living off of the public.

Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #26 posted 03/14/11 12:16pm

prodigalfan

avatar

PDogz said:

prodigalfan said:

Just don't say anything at all. Don't outright lie.

Just say "no comment". Anything else only add fuel to the fire.

Seems to me she's been trying with all her might to do exactly THAT... "No Comment" and "I don't speak about my personal business", and people mow right over that and just keep coming at her with... "TELL US ABOUT THE CANCER!".

In light of how the media & fans relentlessly continue to disregard her wishes to not speak about her medical issues, I think she's thoroughly justified to lie all she wants if that's what it takes to maintain privacy over an issue that she absolutely doesn't want to talk about.

Seems to me people would just drop it. shrug They're not going to get Aretha to spit out anything she doesn't want to, and at some point it becomes wildly disrespectful that they continue trying.

.

.

[Edited 3/13/11 23:23pm]

Then if that is really her intent she should stop doing exclusive 1 on 1 interviews with Wendy Williams, Access Hollywood and Jet magazine to name the few I have seen. It is not like the paparazzi is running her down and screaming at her with microphones in her face. These are very controlled interviews. Why make an appointment to talk about what you are not going to talk about? :confuse:
"Remember, one man's filler is another man's killer" -- Haystack
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #27 posted 03/14/11 12:21pm

Timmy84

prodigalfan said:

PDogz said:

Seems to me she's been trying with all her might to do exactly THAT... "No Comment" and "I don't speak about my personal business", and people mow right over that and just keep coming at her with... "TELL US ABOUT THE CANCER!".

In light of how the media & fans relentlessly continue to disregard her wishes to not speak about her medical issues, I think she's thoroughly justified to lie all she wants if that's what it takes to maintain privacy over an issue that she absolutely doesn't want to talk about.

Seems to me people would just drop it. shrug They're not going to get Aretha to spit out anything she doesn't want to, and at some point it becomes wildly disrespectful that they continue trying.

.

.

[Edited 3/13/11 23:23pm]

Then if that is really her intent she should stop doing exclusive 1 on 1 interviews with Wendy Williams, Access Hollywood and Jet magazine to name the few I have seen. It is not like the paparazzi is running her down and screaming at her with microphones in her face. These are very controlled interviews. Why make an appointment to talk about what you are not going to talk about? confuse

Because Aretha wants to control her own media.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #28 posted 03/14/11 12:40pm

PDogz

avatar

Timmy84 said:

prodigalfan said:

Then if that is really her intent she should stop doing exclusive 1 on 1 interviews with Wendy Williams, Access Hollywood and Jet magazine to name the few I have seen. It is not like the paparazzi is running her down and screaming at her with microphones in her face. These are very controlled interviews. Why make an appointment to talk about what you are not going to talk about? confuse

Because Aretha wants to control her own media.

nod She's trying to take control of the story, to redirect the spin, as opposed to just sitting back silently and letting the media attempt to rip her insides out, while fans are busy digging her grave.

"There's Nothing That The Proper Attitude Won't Render Funkable!"

star
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #29 posted 03/14/11 12:57pm

errant

avatar

PDogz said:

Timmy84 said:

Because Aretha wants to control her own media.

nod She's trying to take control of the story, to redirect the spin, as opposed to just sitting back silently and letting the media attempt to rip her insides out, while fans are busy digging her grave.

yeah, because that always works. as in never.

"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 1 of 2 12>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Aretha Franklin: I Didn't Have Gastric Bypass