independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Would you say Mick Jagger is a great singer?
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 02/16/11 4:19pm

rialb

avatar

I like Mick but he is basically the world's greatest Don Covay tribute artist. wink

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 02/16/11 4:33pm

NDRU

avatar

The amazing thing about Mick is what a dork he is! lol He is the biggest dork ever, but one of the best performers, too. He is great through sheer will power & confidence.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 02/16/11 4:53pm

Marrk

avatar

JoeTyler said:

Number23 said:

And there it is. This is not subjective. Mick Jagger is a great singer. There is no deabte. He may not be to your taste, but he is a great vocalist. Over 80 million albums in homes all around the world contest to this fact. You want him to sing like Whitney Houston? Is jumping scales perfectly in tune your barometer of vocal greatness? Then you're a fucking moron. Or Patrick Bateman, who was completely insane. So many dummys on this site these days. So many fucking clueless doss cunts. The children of music televiiosn and cultural imperialism. How these kids get into Prince is beyond me. Get back to your Mariah and Janet Jackson records, you laughable fuckwits. Rot your brains away with Coca Cola and the top ten.

eek man, relax, chill, get a grip ...

Lol. He was on point though.

I read years ago Mr Jackson was unhappy with Jagger's contribution to the song in my avatar, saying he was flat etc. Michael Jackson upset me that day, true or not, it hangs in my mind and bothers me to this day.

Mick is a rock God. You can take your 'Greatest Hits' by any artists (Elton, Stevie, Bowie etc) and the best of The Stones matches or exceeds them. Incredible songs. Most of that is down to Jagger and seeing that old git bring more energy and realism to the grammys than people less than a third his age just seals it for me.

[Edited 2/16/11 16:58pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 02/16/11 4:58pm

vainandy

avatar

Rock is like funk. It's not the voice that makes the song great, it's the music behind it. That's why I've hated the majority of most R&B in the 1990s and 2000s because the focus was totally on the voice and they didn't give a damn about the music whatsoever.

Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 02/16/11 5:01pm

Timmy84

Marrk said:

JoeTyler said:

eek man, relax, chill, get a grip ...

Lol. He was on point though.

I read years ago Mr Jackson was unhappy with Jagger's contribution to the song in my avatar, saying he was flat etc. Michael Jackson upset me that day, true or not, it hangs in my mind and bothers me to this day.

Mick is a rock God. You can take your 'Greatest Hits' by any artists (Elton, Stevie, Bowie etc) and the best of The Stones matches or exceeds them. Incredible songs. Most of that is down to Jagger and seeing that old git bring more energy and realism to the grammys than people less than a third his age just seals it for me.

[Edited 2/16/11 16:58pm]

Then why didn't he get Freddie on the track then?! falloff

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 02/16/11 5:01pm

Timmy84

vainandy said:

Rock is like funk. It's not the voice that makes the song great, it's the music behind it. That's why I've hated the majority of most R&B in the 1990s and 2000s because the focus was totally on the voice and they didn't give a damn about the music whatsoever.

yeahthat

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 02/16/11 5:01pm

vainandy

avatar

scriptgirl said:

Dylan is one of the worst singers I have ever heard. Mick is much better

You got that right. The first time I ever heard his voice was on "We Are The World" and I thought it was somebody that made jokester type records like Weird Al Yankovic. I couldn't believe it was actually a serious artist. Hell, he sounded like somebody out of a mental institution. lol

Andy is a four letter word.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 02/16/11 5:09pm

NDRU

avatar

vainandy said:

scriptgirl said:

Dylan is one of the worst singers I have ever heard. Mick is much better

You got that right. The first time I ever heard his voice was on "We Are The World" and I thought it was somebody that made jokester type records like Weird Al Yankovic. I couldn't believe it was actually a serious artist. Hell, he sounded like somebody out of a mental institution. lol

I thought that too. But I was 12 or 13 lol

Now I think he is maybe the most distinctive singer alive, but not the prettiest!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 02/16/11 5:11pm

NDRU

avatar

vainandy said:

Rock is like funk. It's not the voice that makes the song great, it's the music behind it. That's why I've hated the majority of most R&B in the 1990s and 2000s because the focus was totally on the voice and they didn't give a damn about the music whatsoever.

yes, good point, and it's also about the style

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 02/16/11 5:20pm

Marrk

avatar

vainandy said:

scriptgirl said:

Dylan is one of the worst singers I have ever heard. Mick is much better

You got that right. The first time I ever heard his voice was on "We Are The World" and I thought it was somebody that made jokester type records like Weird Al Yankovic. I couldn't believe it was actually a serious artist. Hell, he sounded like somebody out of a mental institution. lol

falloff

Exactly what i thought. It was jarring as hell. I've not heard it in years, but what you typed made me laugh my bollocks off!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 02/16/11 5:25pm

NDRU

avatar

Marrk said:

vainandy said:

You got that right. The first time I ever heard his voice was on "We Are The World" and I thought it was somebody that made jokester type records like Weird Al Yankovic. I couldn't believe it was actually a serious artist. Hell, he sounded like somebody out of a mental institution. lol

falloff

Exactly what i thought. It was jarring as hell. I've not heard it in years, but what you typed made me laugh my bollocks off!

I remember my brother, sister, & I watching the video and howling with laughter. Saying "who is that?!" And my dad was like "that's Dylan, man!!!"

Now he sounds totally normal to me in We Are the World shrug

But such a strong reaction means something doesn't it? Even shocked laughter. I don't react that strongly to Justin Bieber or Justin Timberlake. Dylan is the most stylish singer I can think of!! lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 02/16/11 5:30pm

PDogz

avatar

vainandy said:

scriptgirl said:

Dylan is one of the worst singers I have ever heard. Mick is much better

You got that right. The first time I ever heard his voice was on "We Are The World" and I thought it was somebody that made jokester type records like Weird Al Yankovic. I couldn't believe it was actually a serious artist. Hell, he sounded like somebody out of a mental institution. lol

There's something about Dylan though that I find absolutely mesmerizing (in a good & entertaining way). I think his style has always been more about conveying thought and expressing ideas than it has been about carrying a melody. He's still got a lot of swagger for an old dude, and he's a legend! (...much like Jagger)

"There's Nothing That The Proper Attitude Won't Render Funkable!"

star
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 02/16/11 5:37pm

NDRU

avatar

PDogz said:

vainandy said:

You got that right. The first time I ever heard his voice was on "We Are The World" and I thought it was somebody that made jokester type records like Weird Al Yankovic. I couldn't believe it was actually a serious artist. Hell, he sounded like somebody out of a mental institution. lol

There's something about Dylan though that I find absolutely mesmerizing (in a good & entertaining way). I think his style has always been more about conveying thought and expressing ideas than it has been about carrying a melody. He's still got a lot of swagger for an old dude, and he's a legend! (...much like Jagger)

true, but he also sings a melody like nobody else. It's almost like jazz where he will bring variations that normal people would never think of.

He's perfectly capable of keeping to a melody, though

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 02/16/11 5:38pm

Timmy84

vainandy said:

scriptgirl said:

Dylan is one of the worst singers I have ever heard. Mick is much better

You got that right. The first time I ever heard his voice was on "We Are The World" and I thought it was somebody that made jokester type records like Weird Al Yankovic. I couldn't believe it was actually a serious artist. Hell, he sounded like somebody out of a mental institution. lol

When he gets the right music to accompany the music, Bob Dylan has a distinctive sound. But that was Quincy's bright idea knowing how much Bob contributed to social causes and all in the past. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 02/16/11 5:38pm

Timmy84

PDogz said:

vainandy said:

You got that right. The first time I ever heard his voice was on "We Are The World" and I thought it was somebody that made jokester type records like Weird Al Yankovic. I couldn't believe it was actually a serious artist. Hell, he sounded like somebody out of a mental institution. lol

There's something about Dylan though that I find absolutely mesmerizing (in a good & entertaining way). I think his style has always been more about conveying thought and expressing ideas than it has been about carrying a melody. He's still got a lot of swagger for an old dude, and he's a legend! (...much like Jagger)

nod clapping

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 02/16/11 5:43pm

Marrk

avatar

NDRU said:

Marrk said:

falloff

Exactly what i thought. It was jarring as hell. I've not heard it in years, but what you typed made me laugh my bollocks off!

I remember my brother, sister, & I watching the video and howling with laughter. Saying "who is that?!" And my dad was like "that's Dylan, man!!!"

Now he sounds totally normal to me in We Are the World shrug

But such a strong reaction means something doesn't it? Even shocked laughter. I don't react that strongly to Justin Bieber or Justin Timberlake. Dylan is the most stylish singer I can think of!! lol

It DOES mean something, i agree. Time is an interesting healer too. I remember having and adverse reaction to Stevie & Bruce's 'duet' at the end. I thought Bruce was straining to shit or something, i hated it, but that's probably the highlight to me now.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 02/16/11 5:45pm

Timmy84

Marrk said:

NDRU said:

I remember my brother, sister, & I watching the video and howling with laughter. Saying "who is that?!" And my dad was like "that's Dylan, man!!!"

Now he sounds totally normal to me in We Are the World shrug

But such a strong reaction means something doesn't it? Even shocked laughter. I don't react that strongly to Justin Bieber or Justin Timberlake. Dylan is the most stylish singer I can think of!! lol

It DOES mean something, i agree. Time is an interesting healer too. I remember having and adverse reaction to Stevie & Bruce's 'duet' at the end. I thought Bruce was straining to shit or something, i hated it, but that's probably the highlight to me now.

We Are the World was one example of bad timing. confused It was cool to see all the legends together because it was for a cause but I think a better song could've been had or Michael could've sung it all by himself. lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 02/16/11 5:51pm

Marrk

avatar

Timmy84 said:

Marrk said:

It DOES mean something, i agree. Time is an interesting healer too. I remember having and adverse reaction to Stevie & Bruce's 'duet' at the end. I thought Bruce was straining to shit or something, i hated it, but that's probably the highlight to me now.

We Are the World was one example of bad timing. confused It was cool to see all the legends together because it was for a cause but I think a better song could've been had or Michael could've sung it all by himself. lol

Well maybe. I like 'WATW' though, the original. Don't care what anyone says, i LOVE the build and the chorus. Guilty pleasure. Hella cheesy i know! lol

Anyway off topic, back to Mick or Bob.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 02/16/11 5:51pm

NDRU

avatar

Marrk said:

NDRU said:

I remember my brother, sister, & I watching the video and howling with laughter. Saying "who is that?!" And my dad was like "that's Dylan, man!!!"

Now he sounds totally normal to me in We Are the World shrug

But such a strong reaction means something doesn't it? Even shocked laughter. I don't react that strongly to Justin Bieber or Justin Timberlake. Dylan is the most stylish singer I can think of!! lol

It DOES mean something, i agree. Time is an interesting healer too. I remember having and adverse reaction to Stevie & Bruce's 'duet' at the end. I thought Bruce was straining to shit or something, i hated it, but that's probably the highlight to me now.

yes, I totally agree, I hated Bruce and did not hear a good singer in him. Now, that blending of two such different styles works perfectly to me. It's a great moment.

That is something the new version seems to have completely missed out on.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 02/16/11 5:54pm

NDRU

avatar

Timmy84 said:

Marrk said:

It DOES mean something, i agree. Time is an interesting healer too. I remember having and adverse reaction to Stevie & Bruce's 'duet' at the end. I thought Bruce was straining to shit or something, i hated it, but that's probably the highlight to me now.

We Are the World was one example of bad timing. confused It was cool to see all the legends together because it was for a cause but I think a better song could've been had or Michael could've sung it all by himself. lol

yeah that style just did not work for everyone. Surprisingly it did seem to work for Bruce.

It's hard to judge that song objectively, I know it so well. But I do think it had something, even if it was cheesy. It had legends at the top of their game.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 02/16/11 6:14pm

NoVideo

avatar

Number23 said:

And Bob Dylan is a better singer than Jagger. He's up there with Sinatra when it comes to phrasing, tone and reinvention of lyric. I'm pretty sure Mick would agree. You just don't get it, do you, Mr Jones?

clapping The examples of Dylan's brilliance as a vocalist are too numerous to list, but at the top i'd go "Blind Willie McTell" or "Moonshiner" or "Mississippi".

It's not always about how many octaves someone can hit. If you want that, there are hundreds of American Idol wannabees singing in their bedrooms all over the country.

* * *

Prince's Classic Finally Expanded
The Deluxe 'Purple Rain' Reissue

http://www.popmatters.com...n-reissue/
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 02/16/11 6:20pm

angel345

Timmy84 said:

Marrk said:

Lol. He was on point though.

I read years ago Mr Jackson was unhappy with Jagger's contribution to the song in my avatar, saying he was flat etc. Michael Jackson upset me that day, true or not, it hangs in my mind and bothers me to this day.

Mick is a rock God. You can take your 'Greatest Hits' by any artists (Elton, Stevie, Bowie etc) and the best of The Stones matches or exceeds them. Incredible songs. Most of that is down to Jagger and seeing that old git bring more energy and realism to the grammys than people less than a third his age just seals it for me.

[Edited 2/16/11 16:58pm]

Then why didn't he get Freddie on the track then?! falloff

To my understanding, schedule issues. Mick Jagger wanted a shot at it. He has a rock voice to begin with, so it worked out.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 02/16/11 6:33pm

Timmy84

angel345 said:

Timmy84 said:

Then why didn't he get Freddie on the track then?! falloff

To my understanding, schedule issues. Mick Jagger wanted a shot at it. He has a rock voice to begin with, so it worked out.

Right. Mick was the perfect choice after Freddie IMHO.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 02/16/11 6:47pm

angel345

Timmy84 said:

angel345 said:

To my understanding, schedule issues. Mick Jagger wanted a shot at it. He has a rock voice to begin with, so it worked out.

Right. Mick was the perfect choice after Freddie IMHO.

But you see how it worked out. Did MJ scout around? Was anyone else interested? Who had the time?

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 02/16/11 6:51pm

Timmy84

angel345 said:

Timmy84 said:

Right. Mick was the perfect choice after Freddie IMHO.

But you see how it worked out. Did MJ scout around? Was anyone else interested? Who had the time?

Obviously it worked lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 02/16/11 7:05pm

angel345

Timmy84 said:

angel345 said:

But you see how it worked out. Did MJ scout around? Was anyone else interested? Who had the time?

Obviously it worked lol

To be honest, I like the song lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 02/16/11 8:28pm

xlr8r

avatar

Mick Jagger is a god.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 02/16/11 10:46pm

sosgemini

avatar

Is Jagger my cup of tea? No. Do I respect his musical contributions and his talent? Hell yes!

Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 02/17/11 1:43am

deebee

avatar

sosgemini said:

Is Jagger my cup of tea? No. Do I respect his musical contributions and his talent? Hell yes!

This is not the time or the place for diplomacy, dammit... Now, pick a side, grab some shit, and start slingin'! wink

"Not everything that is faced can be changed; but nothing can be changed until it is faced." - James Baldwin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 02/17/11 1:57am

PDogz

avatar

angel345 said:

Timmy84 said:

Then why didn't he get Freddie on the track then?! falloff

To my understanding, schedule issues.

I don't think scheduling would have prevented them from recording a duet. They could have each sang their respective parts, on their own time, even in separate parts of the world.

They're both gone now, so we'll never know for sure. But I had always heard that something of a more personal nature transpired between Freddy & Michael, that Michael wasn't too pleased with, that caused him to sever ties with Mercury.

"There's Nothing That The Proper Attitude Won't Render Funkable!"

star
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Would you say Mick Jagger is a great singer?