independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > The Stan Database
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 3 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #60 posted 06/16/10 7:55pm

Aryll

Paris9748430 said:

trueiopian said:

falloff

I wonder the same about Beyonce.....

I know noone sells records like they used to 10 years ago when you could fart and sell a million in a week.

But this kid couldn't even sell 100,000 his 1st week???

All that hype, all those nutbag chicks following him, and that was the best he could do???

=\ Both of his albums have gone platinum.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #61 posted 06/16/10 8:45pm

NastradumasKid

Lord have Mercy...once again...NEVER GO ON IMDB.COM, particularly the MJ message board. Some of those fucking fans are just crazy and some of them will go as far as to hating on the Jackson 5...it is ridiculous. lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #62 posted 06/19/10 2:40am

Layzie

avatar

NastradumasKid said:

Lord have Mercy...once again...NEVER GO ON IMDB.COM, particularly the MJ message board. Some of those fucking fans are just crazy and some of them will go as far as to hating on the Jackson 5...it is ridiculous. lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol

What do they say about the Jackson 5? What is there to hate on? confuse

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #63 posted 06/19/10 2:50am

NastradumasKid

Layzie said:

NastradumasKid said:

Lord have Mercy...once again...NEVER GO ON IMDB.COM, particularly the MJ message board. Some of those fucking fans are just crazy and some of them will go as far as to hating on the Jackson 5...it is ridiculous. lol lol lol lol lol lol lol lol

What do they say about the Jackson 5? What is there to hate on? confuse

They pretty much say shit like MJ was talented and all of them sucked. Or if it wasn't for MJ, they would be nothing. Although that may be true, people need to understand, if it wasn't for the fact that he was part of the Jackson 5, he probably would have just been any other solo artist in the late 70s and 80s. Those people are nuts like for real. In fact there's some fan on there talking about how MJ had a nice ass that she would have let him sit on her face... nutso

[Edited 6/18/10 19:52pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #64 posted 06/19/10 3:03am

Layzie

avatar

NastradumasKid said:

Layzie said:

What do they say about the Jackson 5? What is there to hate on? confuse

They pretty much say shit like MJ was talented and all of them sucked. Or if it wasn't for MJ, they would be nothing. Although that may be true, people need to understand, if it wasn't for the fact that he was part of the Jackson 5, he probably would have just been any other solo artist in the late 70s and 80s. Those people are nuts like for real. In fact there's some fan on there talking about how MJ had a nice ass that she would have let him sit on her face... nutso

[Edited 6/18/10 19:52pm]

[img:$uid]http://i44.tinypic.com/208jz0w.jpg[/img:$uid]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #65 posted 06/19/10 3:07am

NastradumasKid

Layzie said:

NastradumasKid said:

They pretty much say shit like MJ was talented and all of them sucked. Or if it wasn't for MJ, they would be nothing. Although that may be true, people need to understand, if it wasn't for the fact that he was part of the Jackson 5, he probably would have just been any other solo artist in the late 70s and 80s. Those people are nuts like for real. In fact there's some fan on there talking about how MJ had a nice ass that she would have let him sit on her face... nutso

[Edited 6/18/10 19:52pm]

[img:$uid]http://i44.tinypic.com/208jz0w.jpg[/img:$uid]

I know right. That was pretty much how my face looked. I'm telling you, some of them fans on that site are crazy. nuts

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #66 posted 06/19/10 7:25pm

LouieLestate

yeahthat the gif rocks!!

But Mj did prove with Got to be there that he didnt need his brothers. smile

[Edited 6/19/10 12:26pm]

"We're not hitchhiking anymore!....we're riding!!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #67 posted 06/19/10 7:34pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

trueiopian said:

BEYONCE STANS:
By far the worst group to come across. They are obsessive, relentless, aggressive, mean…and I can go on. Understand this, they don’t give a shit about you once you’ve come for Beyonce. They don’t care if you’re mother just died, you’re house burned down, you were involved in a ten car pile up, they’ll drag every bit of your character until you’re damn near ready to hang yourself with your Ethernet cord. This goes for light shade as well. They’ll swarm your Twitter/email/Facebook/Hack your computer/send viruses..etc. Once an offense is committed no amount of apology can undo the hit on your head. They do the most to end your career (see: Keri Hilson). They lock the offense away in their little heads for future reference. If you can help it do your best to not rattle the beasts.


CHRIS BROWN STANS:
In a surprise twist of events, the Chris Brown stans are becoming as aggressive and persistent as the Beyonce stans. The more Chris Brown is denied his right as an artist the more his stans create Twititions and scour the internet for someone to drag. Some of them have even gone as far as to drag Government officials. They use to be a quiet, happy bunch, but because of Chris’s fall from grace they have toughened up and become an outspoken group. You’re most likely to see them swarming in the @replies of Chris’s latest jumpoff or radio station. Aside from the outside drama they usually find themselves in, it’s admirable for the true fans to fight for their boy, even if they get carried away sometimes.

RIHANNA STANS:
You’re most likely to lose an argument with this group because of the pure delusion they’re often sippin’ on. This group often searches Rihanna’s name in hopes of getting in an argument with someone. They lurk on people’s pages and then send their “navy” to attack. The Rihanna stans love their girl (for reasons unknown), but often they take it above & beyond the extreme. They’re sometimes better than Rihanna’s own P.R. They bring up Billboard & RIAA stats in every argument. Some people in this group make fake hate pages and swarm the comment sections of blogs to start shit. They make up stats when they’re losing an argument. They won’t ever admit to losing an argument, opting to push their point to til the break of dawn. Rihanna stans are sneaky and often do they bandwagon an individual who shares the same enemies as they do. Word of advice, don’t argument with this group it’ll just be a headache and time wasted.

BRITNEY STANS:
A highly delusional group.

LADY GAGA STANS:
This is an emotional group. They’re just getting on their feet when it comes to dragging and some of them are hella good at it. The thing about this group is that most of them drag with kindness. They’ll express their disappointment with the individual, but you never fully see a “bitch I hate your fucken ass, Imma fuck u up bitch..!” Some of them do it sure, but they seem to take up after their favorite when it comes to dragging. They are very sensitive, however. Even the slightest shade is the cause for alarm. This group is relatively sweet when it comes to dragging.

CIARA STANS:
This group is funny because not only are they a small group, but they are forgetful. The Ciara stans simply block out “Fantasy Ride” and argue Billboard stats from 10 years ago. They’ll never be as delusional as the Britney stans, but they are sure as hell up there. This group throws words like “iconic” and “legendary” for everything Ciara does. I’d say fuck with this group as much as possible because it’s funny as hell.

ASHANTI STANS:
(See: Ciara stans)

AALIYAH STANS:
This group is melodramatic and highly emotional. If you don’t think Aaliyah was the greatest thing on Earth, they’ll drag. Their drags are drenched with emotion and hurt (which is understandable in a sense). I’d say don’t fuck with this group on principle.

MICHAEL JACKSON STANS:
There’s too many so don’t even try it. They drag in droves and no matter what you say you won’t win and we all know why. The cute will be kept with this group.

KELLY ROWLAND STANS:
This group bitches and whines yet uses none of that effort to purchase Kelly’s albums/singles. They play the Beyonce/Matty card for everything and uses the most outrageous excuses as to why Kelly constantly flops. This group is disgraceful draggg them to the pits when you can.

JANET STANS:
Janet stans reject the new generation of female singers. They still think it’s 1989 and Rhythm Nation has just been released. Their font usually reeks of pretension and superiority. This group holds onto the Billboard and RIAA stats for dear life and don’t hesitate to remind everyone that Janet broke the barriers for female singers. They often drag any individual who doesn’t think Janet is the creator of music. If this group feels that a female singer is getting too much praise, they drag that individual for dear life. This group drags with their hearts on their sleeves. However, much like the Rihanna stans arguing with Janet stans is nothing but time-wasted.

MARIAH STANS:
Unlike most stan groups, the Lambs don’t always see Mariah with rose-colored glasses. They are quick to point out her mistakes and where she went wrong. Now this doesn’t mean that they don’t drag for their girl, it just means that they genuinely want the best for her. This group often clashes with Mary J. Blige and Whitney stans (for reasons unknown). The Lambs don’t roam too far out of their pasture so if getting them riled up is what you want I wouldn’t bet on it.

CHRISTINA AGUILERA STANS:
Almost exactly like the Janet stans, this group is pretentious and feels entitled to talk shit (for reasons unknown). They hold onto Billboard stats way back to when Lauryn Hill was still stable. This group is not only delusional, but outrageous. They wish death on certain artists who pose a threat to Christina and they often use straw man arguments as to why Christina is flopping out of this world. They believe Christina has the greatest voice of all time and nothing you say will change their mind. However, like the Ciara stans, it’s funny to fuck with them to see what excuses they’ll pull out of their asses.

KESHA STANS:
This group thinks Kesha is a legendary artist = (see: Britney stans).

ALICIA KEYS STANS:
Alicia’s stans are sometimes pompous and think they are music connoisseurs. This group believes that because Alicia plays a piano it gives her an exemption from being ridiculed like the other girls. They often that think that the mere mention of the piano playing can put an end to the argument. Alicia’s stans are horrible at dragging so go easy on ‘em.

USHER STANS:
Usher stans are relatively quiet. They don’t always take the bait so trying to get them to argue with you might be a waste of your time. The one thing Usher stans DO often is fuck with Tameka Raymond (or whatever her last name is now). They already know that this woman is unstable yet they fill her @replies and DMs with messages that they know will send her over the edge. Often than not it works and they get a good laugh out of it. These stans are pretty chill and not as involved in internet beef.

JUSTIN BIEBER STANS:
This group is horrifically obsessive and weirdly sexual. For a group of pre-teens they will tweet some of the nastiest things I’ve ever seen to this boy, shit that makes me blush. They worship Justin and drag on the drop. You can practically hear the childish giggling through their font when they tweet him. This group swoons over every and anything Justin says. If Justin said he had to take a shit, some of them would kill to be the toilet bowl. They can get unstable when it comes to Justin so I wouldn’t even go through the headache of trying to drag.

KERI STANS:
Just like their favorite, they talk big then disappear when confronted. They don’t drag they just throw little bullshit shade on their pages. When they drag, however, they try to display a faux superiority that’ll make you laugh in tears. This group is also known for stretching the truth when it comes to Billboard stats. An argument with them is funny at first then it turns into something sad.

DESTINY’S CHILD STANS:
This group still grasps for straws when it comes to a reunion. They’ll insist that the girls are better off together than as solo artists. DC stans are stuck in so much nostalgia that they refuse to think about anything else, but the girls together. It was admirable back in 2006, it 2010 girls, it’s over.

NICKI MINAJ STANS:
This group gives Nicki so much support that it’s almost sure that she’ll be a big star. They get tattoos, dye their hair, send positive energy her way…etc. They’re nice group so far. Nicki stans don’t have as much as inner drama/arguments as the other stan groups (it’s only a matter of time). They get along with most stan groups. You’re most likely to see them defending their girl against the Kim stans rather than starting unnecessary shit with other groups. I say don’t mess with them b/c they generally play in their own field.

JAY-Z STANS:
This group spends more time on rap blogs then they do on Twitter. They’re usually involved in the same arguments (Who’s the GOAT) so they don’t drift too far from their lane. However, some of them are quick to throw Jay’s wife under the bus if need be. All in all this group stays in their lane.


http://www.allshadezone.c...6#more-216

lol

I don't know who created this godawful word "stan" rolleyes but every artist has them...No need for those kinds of threads to create arguments.

[Edited 6/19/10 12:35pm]

MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #68 posted 06/19/10 7:45pm

trueiopian

and what was your point of striking through all of that? whofarted

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #69 posted 06/19/10 8:13pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

trueiopian said:

and what was your point of striking through all of that? whofarted

the point was to indicate that all what you wrote was a complete nonsense.....lol

and the point of this thread is to create arguments and you know it, every artist has "stans"? rolleyes

So lock

MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #70 posted 06/19/10 8:24pm

trueiopian

Fuck outta my thread with this non-sense

First of all, I didn't write this. Second, I never said every artist doesn't have stans confused falloff

and the point of this thread wasn't to start an argument. It was just for shits and giggles. I guess your feelings got hurt with your stan description . Boo fucking hoo lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #71 posted 06/19/10 8:29pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

trueiopian said:

Fuck outta my thread with this non-sense

First of all, I didn't write this. Second, I never said every artist doesn't have stans confused falloff

and the point of this thread wasn't to start an argument. It was just for shits and giggles. I guess your feelings got hurt with your stan description . Boo fucking hoo lol

falloff

You furious right lol lol

but who's the idiot who wrote this? spending so much time studying the artists fans and come up with ridiculous failed assumptions.

Im not hurt at all, why should I be?

fail

lol

MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #72 posted 06/19/10 8:33pm

NastradumasKid

seeingvoices12 said:

trueiopian said:

Fuck outta my thread with this non-sense

First of all, I didn't write this. Second, I never said every artist doesn't have stans confused falloff

and the point of this thread wasn't to start an argument. It was just for shits and giggles. I guess your feelings got hurt with your stan description . Boo fucking hoo lol

falloff

You furious right lol lol

but who's the idiot who wrote this? spending so much time studying the artists fans and come up with ridiculous failed assumptions.

Im not hurt at all, why should I be?

fail

lol

Dude, stop being so sensitive, it was just for fun... lol

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #73 posted 06/19/10 8:35pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

NastradumasKid said:

seeingvoices12 said:

falloff

You furious right lol lol

but who's the idiot who wrote this? spending so much time studying the artists fans and come up with ridiculous failed assumptions.

Im not hurt at all, why should I be?

fail

lol

Dude, stop being so sensitive, it was just for fun... lol

I'm not sensitive at all, you are one who takes it seriously....I'm putting the LOL emoticon in every post which means that Im laughing at this.........lol

MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #74 posted 06/19/10 8:36pm

NastradumasKid

seeingvoices12 said:

NastradumasKid said:

Dude, stop being so sensitive, it was just for fun... lol

I'm not sensitive at all, you are one who takes it seriously....I'm putting the LOL emoticon in every post which means that Im laughing at this.........lol

Yeah right... rolleyes lol wink

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #75 posted 06/19/10 8:37pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

NastradumasKid said:

seeingvoices12 said:

I'm not sensitive at all, you are one who takes it seriously....I'm putting the LOL emoticon in every post which means that Im laughing at this.........lol

Yeah right... rolleyes lol wink

lol

MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #76 posted 06/19/10 8:38pm

trueiopian

This fool said "furious" falloff

Idk who wrote this nor do I care. Failed assumptions, my ass. There's truth to all these descriptions except for the Mariah one.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #77 posted 06/19/10 8:41pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

trueiopian said:

This fool said "furious" falloff

Idk who wrote this nor do I care. Failed assumptions, my ass. There's truth to all these descriptions except for the Mariah one.

No need for the personal insults confused lol

Again...This long winded post is utter bullshit....failed assumptions.

MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #78 posted 06/19/10 8:41pm

NastradumasKid

trueiopian said:

This fool said "furious" falloff

Idk who wrote this nor do I care. Failed assumptions, my ass. There's truth to all these descriptions except for the Mariah one.

Mariah fans aren't that fucking bad.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #79 posted 06/19/10 8:42pm

midiscover

[img:$uid]http://i46.tinypic.com/rhj04w.jpg[/img:$uid]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #80 posted 06/19/10 8:45pm

NastradumasKid

midiscover said:

Fixed

Stop it.

Back on topic.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #81 posted 06/19/10 8:48pm

midiscover

[img:$uid]http://i48.tinypic.com/2r6ehb8.jpg[/img:$uid]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #82 posted 06/19/10 8:52pm

SherryJackson

I smell a bitch fight...bitchfight

Come on, guys. Let's just get along. There's no need to sling names and curses around. grouphug

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #83 posted 06/19/10 8:58pm

midiscover

NastradumasKid said:

trueiopian said:

This fool said "furious" falloff

Idk who wrote this nor do I care. Failed assumptions, my ass. There's truth to all these descriptions except for the Mariah one.

Mariah fans aren't that fucking bad.

Bitch please! lol

[img:$uid]http://i602.photobucket.com/albums/tt105/BiancaDaily/lambs10.jpg[/img:$uid]

and anyone that allows someone to call them by an animal's name has issues.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #84 posted 06/19/10 9:13pm

trueiopian

neutral

Why are they dressed like that?

[Edited 6/19/10 14:17pm]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #85 posted 06/19/10 9:17pm

NastradumasKid

trueiopian said:

neutral

Co-sign

neutral

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #86 posted 06/19/10 9:20pm

Layzie

avatar

lol It's really not that serious. And obviously the getup isn't a stretch for those guys since they seem to be...

[img:$uid]http://i935.photobucket.com/albums/ad198/sober_gifs/3343h3c_thjpg.gif[/img:$uid]

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #87 posted 06/19/10 9:20pm

Hudson

avatar

I don't see anything wrong with that!

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #88 posted 06/19/10 9:22pm

midiscover

trueiopian said:

neutral

Why are they dressed like that?

[Edited 6/19/10 14:17pm]

falloff

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #89 posted 06/19/10 9:22pm

Layzie

avatar

Hudson said:

I don't see anything wrong with that!

Me neither.

  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 3 of 6 <123456>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > The Stan Database