sleepyq said:

Umm....So are you.

WaterInYourBath said:

Sleepyg is just a negative person.

Faith Evans is underrated.

Chaka Khan beats Whitney Houston vocally, esp. when it comes down to improvisation.

inia said:

Agreed,,,on both accounts.

And I've yet to hear Nippy improv,,,,,she's TOO damn proper to bring some raw emotions.

WaterInYourBath said:

Dont compare what I'm saying to wut ur tryna come with. Your "assumption" makes no sense at all. Usher's shirt has been off his whole career, through the ups and downs. There is no correlation between that, and how many albums he sells.

His shirt is off, and hes doin a straight up LOVE SCENE here:


^^^ And that album FLOPPED, so TRY AGAIN.

And now his shirt is ON and he has a #1 hit on his hands. Will I Am has written countless flops, look it up. Oh, and Usher's "other singles" have reached #1 and #2 on the R&B charts, and another (non single) has reached #1 on Urban AC. All this with his clothes on,and only his face to ogle. 3 strikes. We're done here.

NastradumasKid said:

Yes, because my opinions about Madonna, Kanye West, Usher, Donna Summer, and Lady Gaga are so "negative."

inia said:

Those r popular opinions.

sleepyq said:

FLOP

He is a flop, everything he did is abstract and flop,even his biggest album in my eye is a flop and he will always be a flop....

Will.I.Am is very underrated

Anybody who fell for the whole Jamie Starr/Prince didn't have anything to do with The Time thing was either deaf or insane. That's Prince's ass adlibbing on Girl and Cool!

Image wise, you couldn't really tell Next, 112, Dru Hill, and Jagged Edge apart

bboy87 said:

The last two is not unpopular man.

STICKY?

MJ's worst song is Privacy.

sleepyq said:

PFFFFF

Looks Do NOT matter....

Talent?

MJ talented 100%

Usher talented 3.5%

sleepyq said:

Usher sucks nowadays anyway, he USED to be good, I don't give a damn about Lady Gaga. I'm sure she a talented young lady but to me she's boring. Kanye West IS NOT a musical genius, and Donna Summer is fine.

NastradumasKid said:

He always sucked , Give me something that blusher DID that was great and groundbreaking, He is just like the rest of wannabes , Nothing special.

Blusher doesn't even have half of Mj's talent.

Timmy84 said:

Dru Hill is awesome back then and so was Jagged Edge and the others.


Sisqo second album could have been really good if his record company did screw him over.

Jay-z was/is never the best rapper nowadays

Camp-Lo's music sound like garbage

Grand Puba is one of the most underrated rappers ever

J Dilla was one of the best producers in hip hop

seeingvoices12 said:

Wow.

Moonbeam said:

wow, I'm glad I heard somebody acknowledge Roxette. Don't Bore Us, Get To The Chorus (1995) is all the proof you need of this band's genius.

NastradumasKid said:

Soooo basically, my opinions are only "negative" when u dont agre with them.

.... NEXT!

sleepyq said:

It's not that I don't agree with them, it's just that they almost aways negative. But WHATEVER!

seeingvoices12 said:

Nothing Usher ever did will be as floptastic and trashtastic as Invisible.

U WISH Invisible was 1/100th the amazing album that 8701 was.

NastradumasKid said:

No, its half and half. The only ppl I'm 100% AGAINST are Shitney and Diana.

I just spend way more time defending my "negative" opinions from posters like yourself.

sleepyq said:

Hmm, well, maybe his muscles just couldn't save that dreadful song/album, so I stand corrected. It's hard to "ogle" a body when your ears are upset, lol. But again, just like you think Thriller would not have been huge without MJ changing his nose, all of that wanna-be MJ 2002-2004 era would not have been as successful either if Usher hadn't upgraded his chest. Just like Timberlake, no one was looking at his face or ever calling him cute, at least no girls I knew at the time. Everyone I knew was in love with "adorable" B2K. Usher was known as "Ben Vereen with a Six Pack imitating Michael Jackson." I won't tell you what people used to call Timberlake.

And please, stop with the lame "try again" remark. You have no authority over anything here. But let's hypothetically say you're right that Usher's body has nothing to do with his fame, and that his face is what people are really looking at. IF that is true, you should realize that by mentioning Usher in the first place you totally contradict your entire argument. Since Usher has been able to survive without reconstructing his face, what makes you think Michael couldn't have? Usher's smile isn't as wide/attractive as Michael's. Usher's eyes aren't as large/"pretty" as Michael's. And yeah, Mike had a large nose, but it was still better positioned than Usher's.



Soulja Boy proves my perspective. His face resembles natural '75-78 MJ, but he creates totally horrible music, wears wack clothes, has a terrible personality, is covered with gross-looking tattoos, and has a very slim figure. And yet, he is one of the most popular acts out now. Has had the most followers on Myspace, YouTube, and Twitter. The most votes on these music video shows. Why? Because all the girls say: "He's so cute!"



Man, I'm done with this. Believe what you want. I'm not going to discuss Usher's natural face anymore. His facial development is something he had no control over, so I'm going to leave him alone. You like the way he looks, so yay, enjoy.

sleepyq said:

RIGHT...whatever. That's fine.

sleepyq said:

Fail


Invisible? , you don’t even know the album title.

Invincible was never a flop, it sold millions worldwide with Zero promotion, something that Blusher will never ever achieve in his entire flopped vanishing career

Who gives a fuck or knows about 8701 outside the borders of the U.S? Its not even a groundbreaking record ….and its dead record now…the same with his hit single “yeah” , which is dead now.

Whatever happens was enough to murder Blusher’s entire lifeless record.

seeingvoices12 said:

MJ went from 18 million to 7 million
Usher went from 7.5 million to 8 million

Flops are relative. Oh, and yeah- 8701 DID outsell Inivisible, spawn 2 #1 hits, and garner positive reviews from critics as well as 2 grammy awards.

8701 >>>> Invisible. Are we seriously debating this?

seeingvoices12 said:

You know he/she is mocking that title right?

sleepyq said:

Again, you are talking about shallow stuff, SALES, I have never measured MJ's talent by the number of records he sold.

But if you going talk about sales , Invincible sold millions with Zero promotion? what part of that statement you don't understand? ZERO promotion.


Invincible will live, 8701 is dead already.

That’s difference, who gives a fuck about his lifeless hits anymore, while people still listen to "don't stop till you get enough"

Blusher is nowhere near MJ.

NastradumasKid said:

Considering the questionable shit he said, I wouldn’t be surprised if he messed up that title.

.

A Michael Jackson vs Usher debate?

Really?


Really?