independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Janet Jackson Interview on oprah
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 7 of 11 « First<234567891011>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #180 posted 04/06/10 1:50am

Marrk

avatar

NastradumasKid said:

Marrk said:



Precisely. I'm fine with that. I exaggerated my post for maximum dramatic effect, look what happened! lol

She's still too damn old for Midiscover to say she has 'potential' when it comes to acting that's for sure.


lol You really are something else.


yup. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #181 posted 04/06/10 1:52am

NastradumasKid

Marrk said:

NastradumasKid said:



lol You really are something else.


yup. smile


However, you might want to working that counting. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #182 posted 04/06/10 6:43am

ernestsewell

Marrk said:

She's still too damn old for Midiscover to say she has 'potential' when it comes to acting that's for sure.

So people stop growing and changing in their 40's, is that what you're saying? Only 20 somethings can grow and have potential as an actor? They only have what.....20 years to do something significant before they hit 40 and have no more potential to change?

Your world must be very small.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #183 posted 04/06/10 9:26am

kibbles

Ottensen said:

kibbles said:



exactly. oprah has been clownin' mj for a while now, or having her guests like chris rock do it, and it has never ever bothered janet in the least from all appearances.

she's sitting there on oprah helping her heap more dirt on the grave of her dead brother, who's not here to defend himself, 'causing his children sadness, i'm sure, and wiping her hands clean of the mess, glad not to be 'burdened' anymore.


I'm not even trying to say all of that, rather than they clearly have an amicable relationship, not more , not less.


well, beg pardon, but i am trying to say all that. i wouldn't be having a relationship, amicable or otherwise, with someone like that. it's one thing to go promote your movie or whatever, i guess, but something else to be breakin' bread with someone with such clear contempt for the brother you claimed to have loved so much. confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #184 posted 04/06/10 9:26am

NastradumasKid

ernestsewell said:

Marrk said:

She's still too damn old for Midiscover to say she has 'potential' when it comes to acting that's for sure.

So people stop growing and changing in their 40's, is that what you're saying? Only 20 somethings can grow and have potential as an actor? They only have what.....20 years to do something significant before they hit 40 and have no more potential to change?

Your world must be very small.


falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #185 posted 04/06/10 9:33am

midiscover

Marrk said:

ernestsewell said:


You're off base. If you round her age, 43 to the nearest - it'd be 40, not 50. She won't be 44 until middle May. She still has another year after that before you can round up to 50 and have nudge room to say "she's heading toward 50".

Frankly, we're all heading to 50. Some are just closer to others.


Precisely. I'm fine with that. I exaggerated my post for maximum dramatic effect, look what happened! lol

She's still too damn old for Midiscover to say she has 'potential' when it comes to acting that's for sure.


That doesn't make any sense at all!

She's reading many scripts and is in production of another movie. You mad?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #186 posted 04/06/10 9:42am

ernestsewell

midiscover said:

Marrk said:



Precisely. I'm fine with that. I exaggerated my post for maximum dramatic effect, look what happened! lol

She's still too damn old for Midiscover to say she has 'potential' when it comes to acting that's for sure.


That doesn't make any sense at all!

She's reading many scripts and is in production of another movie. You mad?

It's a stupid statement. Ignore it.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #187 posted 04/06/10 9:43am

NastradumasKid

ernestsewell said:

midiscover said:



That doesn't make any sense at all!

She's reading many scripts and is in production of another movie. You mad?

It's a stupid statement. Ignore it.



Marrk is just mad because he's not gonna be in a movie with her. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #188 posted 04/06/10 2:05pm

Marrk

avatar

NastradumasKid said:

ernestsewell said:


It's a stupid statement. Ignore it.



Marrk is just mad because he's not gonna be in a movie with her. lol


No, not really. She's not a great actress by any stretch. Even bloody great actresses past 40 struggle to get parts, is that generally not the case? Do i mishear all these actresses bemoaning their lack of opportunities? their work drying up?

It's a shame but generally that's the way it is it seems.

So i don't see much hope for a mediocre actress like Janet. She might want to consider theatre if she wants to improve her acting chops.

Blinkered fans are free to disagree of course. smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #189 posted 04/06/10 3:26pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

Marrk said:

ernestsewell said:


You're off base. If you round her age, 43 to the nearest - it'd be 40, not 50. She won't be 44 until middle May. She still has another year after that before you can round up to 50 and have nudge room to say "she's heading toward 50".

Frankly, we're all heading to 50. Some are just closer to others.


Precisely. I'm fine with that. I exaggerated my post for maximum dramatic effect, look what happened! lol

She's still too damn old for Midiscover to say she has 'potential' when it comes to acting that's for sure.


Thats what i understood from your post, I got the point , I know you didn't mean that she is 50 years old...years fly so quick.

.....

Some of janet fans are sigh Its not that FUCKING serious to call someone a dumbass....some of you really need to get a hobby.
[Edited 4/6/10 15:27pm]
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #190 posted 04/06/10 3:28pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

NastradumasKid said:

ernestsewell said:


It's a stupid statement. Ignore it.



Marrk is just mad because he's not gonna be in a movie with her. lol

rolleyes

lol
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #191 posted 04/06/10 3:28pm

Timmy84

falloff

By the way, I understand what you mean, Marrk. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #192 posted 04/06/10 3:57pm

lowkey

ernestsewell said:

midiscover said:



That doesn't make any sense at all!

She's reading many scripts and is in production of another movie. You mad?

It's a stupid statement. Ignore it.



mj fans have so much bitterness towards janet its ridiculous
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #193 posted 04/06/10 4:00pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

Timmy84 said:

falloff

By the way, I understand what you mean, Marrk. lol


LOL, he only said she is pushing towards 50 and look what happened, crazed, Fanatical obsessed fans for real.

I mean, I'm scraching my head trying to figure out what the horrible thing he said to get that kind of response, he only said she is pushing 50, what the hell, she will be 50 years old sooner or later and she will still be beautiful,50 is not that old....
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #194 posted 04/06/10 4:01pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

lowkey said:

ernestsewell said:


It's a stupid statement. Ignore it.



mj fans have so much bitterness towards janet its ridiculous



I don't think so, Its the contrary.
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #195 posted 04/06/10 4:05pm

midiscover

lowkey said:

ernestsewell said:


It's a stupid statement. Ignore it.



mj fans have so much bitterness towards janet its ridiculous


Its weird confused they ruin every Janet thread on here.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #196 posted 04/06/10 4:07pm

lowkey

kibbles said:

Ottensen said:



I'm not even trying to say all of that, rather than they clearly have an amicable relationship, not more , not less.


well, beg pardon, but i am trying to say all that. i wouldn't be having a relationship, amicable or otherwise, with someone like that. it's one thing to go promote your movie or whatever, i guess, but something else to be breakin' bread with someone with such clear contempt for the brother you claimed to have loved so much. confused



i must have missed something but what did ophah say or do to mj that was so terrible? i know she had her doubts about him after the accusations but so did alot of people. oprah was molested so of course she will be sympathetic to any child who claims to be molested but i still never heard her flat out say he was quilty. why do michael fans expect janet's world to revolve around him,she is not suppose to talk to anybody who didnt think her brother was god's gift to the world? you all need to grow up and get some kinda life.did mj hate everybody who didnt care for janet, i really doubt it.until i see janet doin lunch with the likes of diane diamond or tom sneddon,jordan chandler,or dr.conrad yall need to chill
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #197 posted 04/06/10 4:11pm

lowkey

seeingvoices12 said:

lowkey said:




mj fans have so much bitterness towards janet its ridiculous



I don't think so, Its the contrary.



theres like 100 everything mj threads on here and i bet you wont find janet fans up in there talking nonsense or trying to downplay his career or just plain hating the way mj fans do in every janet thread.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #198 posted 04/06/10 4:14pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

midiscover said:

lowkey said:




mj fans have so much bitterness towards janet its ridiculous


Its weird confused they ruin every Janet thread on here.

Hello...

Janet threads weren't like this before your presence and some other cats.

Since you joined , all Janet threads turned to living hell, you follow and harass every only who says the slightest criticism about Janet, its not that serious , every artist has some critic, you don't have to jump on everyone and calling them names , that’s not nice...learn to agree to disagree without be being so disrespectful, this forum for everyone, fans and non-fans


So dude, before you put the blame on others or Mj fans , put it on yourself
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #199 posted 04/06/10 4:18pm

NastradumasKid

Marrk said:

NastradumasKid said:




Marrk is just mad because he's not gonna be in a movie with her. lol


No, not really. She's not a great actress by any stretch. Even bloody great actresses past 40 struggle to get parts, is that generally not the case? Do i mishear all these actresses bemoaning their lack of opportunities? their work drying up?

It's a shame but generally that's the way it is it seems.

So i don't see much hope for a mediocre actress like Janet. She might want to consider theatre if she wants to improve her acting chops.

Blinkered fans are free to disagree of course. smile


lol It's obivous her acting isn't top-notch but I know you still want to be in a movie with her. wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #200 posted 04/06/10 4:19pm

midiscover

ohgoon

Now, now, now lets not act brand new.

You always come in Janet threads to leave your unneeded pennies just to start shit. There's a difference between stating an opinion and being downright foolish. You and a couple of other MJ fans tend to do the latter. Oh and why are you contradicting yourself? Don't you jump on anyone that says MJ is overrated or better yet, Janet is far better than him? LMAO!

wave
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #201 posted 04/06/10 4:19pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

lowkey said:

seeingvoices12 said:




I don't think so, Its the contrary.



theres like 100 everything mj threads on here and i bet you wont find janet fans up in there talking nonsense or trying to downplay his career or just plain hating the way mj fans do in every janet thread.


Flase.

all what Mark said , that she is pushing 50 and look what happened, this prime example of what Im talking about, its not that serious, this forum is for everyone , not stricitly for fans.
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #202 posted 04/06/10 4:19pm

NastradumasKid

seeingvoices12 said:

midiscover said:



Its weird confused they ruin every Janet thread on here.

Hello...

Janet threads weren't like this before your presence and some other cats.

Since you joined , all Janet threads turned to living hell, you follow and harass every only who says the slightest criticism about Janet, its not that serious , every artist has some critic, you don't have to jump on everyone and calling them names , that’s not nice...learn to agree to disagree without be being so disrespectful, this forum for everyone, fans and non-fans


So dude, before you put the blame on others or Mj fans , put it on yourself



falloff But you're no better than them. Look at you, trying to put the blame on someone now.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #203 posted 04/06/10 4:26pm

midiscover

seeingvoices12 said:

lowkey said:




theres like 100 everything mj threads on here and i bet you wont find janet fans up in there talking nonsense or trying to downplay his career or just plain hating the way mj fans do in every janet thread.


Flase.

all what Mark said , that she is pushing 50 and look what happened, this prime example of what Im talking about, its not that serious, this forum is for everyone , not stricitly for fans.



Wth falloff

You're being so biased right now! If you read the convo between Marrk and others in here. You should know he was saying that Janet doesn't have the potential to act because she's towards 50. I corrected him by saying he needs to learn how to count because she's not towards 50 and she's already in production for another movie.

Now your attempt at playing peacemaker has failed. You're no different from the Janet fans on this forum defending her against trolls. If you can recall we've gotten into it plenty of times because I've said Janet is better than MJ. So I assume that would make you just as wrong. Secondly, you don't find any Janet fans in MJ threads bashing him. Its always the other way around.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #204 posted 04/06/10 4:27pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

midiscover said:

ohgoon

Now, now, now lets not act brand new.

You always come in Janet threads to leave your unneeded pennies just to start shit. There's a difference between stating an opinion and being downright foolish. You and a couple of other MJ fans tend to do the latter. Oh and why are you contradicting yourself? Don't you jump on anyone that says MJ is overrated or better yet, Janet is far better than him? LMAO!

wave



LOL, I'm Not contradicting myself, its good to have a great debate , and I defend MJ viciously I admit, but I will not get to the point to call others names and personally insult them unless they insult me, That’s the BIG difference between you and Me.

As far as I know, Mark is man in 40s , and you called him a dumbass, have some respect , its not that serious to call other people bad names, its not that serious ,I highly doubt that janet even knows that you even exist
[Edited 4/6/10 16:29pm]
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #205 posted 04/06/10 4:31pm

NastradumasKid

seeingvoices12 said:

midiscover said:

ohgoon

Now, now, now lets not act brand new.

You always come in Janet threads to leave your unneeded pennies just to start shit. There's a difference between stating an opinion and being downright foolish. You and a couple of other MJ fans tend to do the latter. Oh and why are you contradicting yourself? Don't you jump on anyone that says MJ is overrated or better yet, Janet is far better than him? LMAO!

wave



LOL, I'm Not contradicting myself, its good to have a great debate , and I defend MJ viciously I admit, but I will not get to the point to call others names and personally insult them unless they insult me, That’s the BIG difference between you and Me.

As far as I know, Mark is man in 40s , and you called him a dumbass, have some respect , its not that serious to call other people bad names, its not that serious ,I highly doubt that janet even knows that you even exist
[Edited 4/6/10 16:29pm]



lol Still going at it. huh? You know why people were getting on Marrk, right? Because what he said about Janet shouldn't act because of her age was a very ignorant statement to make.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #206 posted 04/06/10 4:31pm

lowkey

seeingvoices12 said:

lowkey said:




theres like 100 everything mj threads on here and i bet you wont find janet fans up in there talking nonsense or trying to downplay his career or just plain hating the way mj fans do in every janet thread.


Flase.

all what Mark said , that she is pushing 50 and look what happened, this prime example of what Im talking about, its not that serious, this forum is for everyone , not stricitly for fans.



yeah but her fans are aware of her age, what was the point of that? the purpose of that post was not to make some kinda point it was trying to throw shade, why i dont know since janet looks great and her movie is still a hit despite if you like her acting or not. so what youre saying is that mj fans can enjoy his work and love what he did but janet fans cant do the same, we spose to always find the negative in whatever she does and point it out to make the non fans happy?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #207 posted 04/06/10 4:32pm

Marrk

avatar

seeingvoices12 said:

Timmy84 said:

falloff

By the way, I understand what you mean, Marrk. lol


LOL, he only said she is pushing towards 50 and look what happened, crazed, Fanatical obsessed fans for real.

I mean, I'm scraching my head trying to figure out what the horrible thing he said to get that kind of response, he only said she is pushing 50, what the hell, she will be 50 years old sooner or later and she will still be beautiful,50 is not that old....


Hey i wasn't bothered, just the internet, i read it, shrugged and moved on.

And i agree, outwardly, Janet is very beautiful.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #208 posted 04/06/10 4:33pm

midiscover

seeingvoices12 said:

midiscover said:

ohgoon

Now, now, now lets not act brand new.

You always come in Janet threads to leave your unneeded pennies just to start shit. There's a difference between stating an opinion and being downright foolish. You and a couple of other MJ fans tend to do the latter. Oh and why are you contradicting yourself? Don't you jump on anyone that says MJ is overrated or better yet, Janet is far better than him? LMAO!

wave



LOL, I'm Not contradicting myself, its good to have a great debate , and I defend MJ viciously I admit, but I will not get to the point to call others names and personally insult them unless they insult me, That’s the BIG difference between you and Me.

As far as I know, Mark is man in 40s , and you called him a dumbass, have some respect , its not that serious to call other people bad names, its not that serious ,I highly doubt that janet even knows that even exists


Wrong. You've belittled members before simply because they don't find MJ all that thrilling as you do. I can easily search this forum and quote what you've said. Its not that hard, boo.

Yes, I called him a dumbass biggrin

You shouldn't take e-life so serioulsy comfort

FYI, Janet knows I exist. Can I say the same about you and MJ? lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #209 posted 04/06/10 4:33pm

NastradumasKid

lowkey said:

seeingvoices12 said:



Flase.

all what Mark said , that she is pushing 50 and look what happened, this prime example of what Im talking about, its not that serious, this forum is for everyone , not stricitly for fans.



yeah but her fans are aware of her age, what was the point of that? the purpose of that post was not to make some kinda point it was trying to throw shade, why i dont know since janet looks great and her movie is still a hit despite if you like her acting or not. so what youre saying is that mj fans can enjoy his work and love what he did but janet fans cant do the same, we spose to always find the negative in whatever she does and point it out to make the non fans happy?


Some of you must have forgotten that this is Prince.org. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 7 of 11 « First<234567891011>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Janet Jackson Interview on oprah