DesireeNevermind said:

Oh yeah sound like bible thumpers that were trying to glue that into our heads back then. Oh well.

Timmy84 said:

i DID. The more Buffy, the better. Any excuse for a pic of SMG.

Marrk said:

Timmy84 said:

Hell no! But I've known some people that were into "playing" Ouija Boards.

Remember that song by Bone Thugs?:


Knowing what I know now, I think THIS^ track was recorded on the same night that they took "The Oath". But who knows.

AHHHH IT'S THE BAPHO... oh wait a minute it's Tiffany Evans under some very bad lightning and worse hair. My bad.

TonyVanDam said:

*facepalm*

You know what...

Timmy84 said:

.....or an potential alter-ego that wasn't going to work for her.


In all jokes aside, I think that the main reason why Tiffany has not reach mainstream success is because she isn't willing the sell-out at the expense of her own spiritually to do it.


[Edited 3/9/10 12:39pm]

TonyVanDam said:

Or maybe she ain't thinking clearly. She signed with Mathew "Daddy Warbucks" Knowles. So uh...hmm...

^ oh no. well that's it then. no way daddy knowles will invest in a female artist the way he's done his baby girl. she might as well be a back up singer.

DesireeNevermind said:

If she was real SMART, she'd form her own label and then sell her music to clubs or something. But this is NOT a smart move.

Timmy84 said:

I just had a somewhat random thought.



What if daddy Knowles is the Baphomet!!

DesireeNevermind said:

He sure has the horns.

TonyVanDam said:

Oh trust me bruh, it IS educational.

But I'm still confused on some things regarding this subject, hence why I hand around these type of threads

It's more entertainment to me.

DesireeNevermind said:

I dislike Matthew Knowles as much as the next person. But even I know that he's too irresponsible with his sex life to be The Baphomet.

Oops, did I say that?!?

TonyVanDam said:

WHO WOULD FUCK A DUDE WITH HORNS AND A TAIL!? Much less a guy who looks like a walrus?!

The only thing about the Baphomet is that he appears to be shirtless but he's a turn off with that face.

Timmy84 said:

A bitch will fuck a dung beetle like Pimp Knowles, she ain't above fuckin' the Baphomet

Harlepolis said:

Or fuckin' Jay Z for that matter.

Harlepolis said:

That's exactly what F***ing For Tracks is all about. Some recording artists (female OR male) are NOT above fornication with a producer, songwriter, manager, record label CEO, lawyers, AND/OR the DJ in order to get that opportunity of the spotlight.

With that said, I wonder about the Pussycat Dolls (my thread on the group's break-up is on going). Harle, do you, Timmy, or any other orger figured that Nicole was granted more responsibilities of the group (besides as lead vocalist) because maybe she also caught up in (sexual?) wicked dealings with other people (READ: Robin Antin) with the industry?
[Edited 3/9/10 13:57pm]

^ oh lord not that bitch!


she been fuckin' for tracks for years and a lot of times it went no where. she is all deva'd out now. they ought to have called the group "Nicole and the Pussycat Dolls."

DesireeNevermind said:

But....



There's some truth to that

DesireeNevermind said:

When Jai Ho (You Are My Destiny) was release as the 4th single off of the group's second album, it was credited as The Pussycat Dolls featuring Nicole Scherzinger. THIS didn't fit well with Melody at all, despite that it was true that Nicole was THE only PCD member on the track. But it also looked hypocritical with all 5 members in the video.

TonyVanDam said:

so true.

DesireeNevermind said:

True on both lol

Instead of making an unnecessary sequel to this thread, I'm better adding new info to this thread instead.



I've just finish watching this latest clip concerning DMX. At the very end of it, there are references to Michael, Tupac, JB, & Aaliyah. But all of that aside, I wonder how different DMX's career would have been if he accepted Jay-Z as his then-new boss at Island Def Jam when he had the chance. Does it mean that Universal didn't take the issue of DMX going independent very well?

Just saying.
[Edited 3/18/10 17:59pm]

For the record any form of Worship is un-healthy, and has to led to more misfortune and tragedy. Not to get off on rant, i used to believe in a God, but i looked at what everyone was focusing on, everyone was believing in this "figure" to some its a man with a beard who died, rose, and flew into the sky. Which is why when baseball players hit a homerun they point up, for once i would like to A-rod give god the finger when he strikes out, i mean if you are gonna believe in that stuff be consistent with it.

As for the devil thing and the Jay Z stuff i have been hearing, to me, im just GLAD that the internet didnt exist when i actually gave a shit. So to me when i see the net, eat up people that it once built up, i stand back and look at it with amusement. Im like George Carlin in that way, im front row at the freak show, i can watch it and comment on it, and be glad im not in it.

To me its like this, believe in god, jesus, buddah, etc...or believe in some guy with horns, or believe in Kim Kardashian's Butt, i bet if you prayed to all of those you would still get the same result, so for me, i'll stick with Kim Kardashians Butt, its a better source, and unlike God and the Devil it wont get me killed for my beliefs.

DesireeNevermind said:

THAT'S 'CISM!!!

lastdecember said:

Point a middle finger to the heavens at the risk of getting hit by lightning OR be curse by a tornado? A-Rod isn't that stupid. No one is!

lastdecember said:

Huh?