independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Pics: Janet Attends London Fashion Week (Feb 21st)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 18 of 18 « First<9101112131415161718
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #510 posted 03/03/10 3:51pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

bboy87 said:

midiscover said:



Paula Abdul wouldn't have had a career in music if it wasn't for sucking Janet's brother off on the regular and lettin' half of the 1984 Lakers smash

.


fixed lol

falloff
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #511 posted 03/03/10 3:52pm

Timmy84

bboy87 said:

ViintageJunkiie said:



LMAO! I'd take ALL of Jan ANYDAY!

eatin' it like it was Popeye's lol



lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #512 posted 03/03/10 3:53pm

Timmy84

seeingvoices12 said:

bboy87 said:


ya'll kept on talkin' shit, now look whatchu did! evillol

All? rolleyes

brick

There were some Informative posts on here.


No there wasn't. I saw more arguments and record stats. lol

And I saw some of these:

"Bitch you don't know me, Janet Jackson is my God." lol
And "bitch Janet don't even know you, Jimmy & Terry..." lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #513 posted 03/03/10 3:53pm

Timmy84

bboy87 said:

ViintageJunkiie said:



IM SAYING! *goes to watch the video of Jan sunbathing* .. *grabs Jergens lotion*



call me Rene....call me Rene!!!


lol Saving this one lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #514 posted 03/03/10 3:55pm

ViintageJunkii
e

avatar

Timmy84 said:

bboy87 said:




call me Rene....call me Rene!!!


lol Saving this one lol


YOU MOTHAFxCKAS! lmao
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #515 posted 03/03/10 3:55pm

midiscover

whatsgoingon said:


Paula abdul wouldn't have had a career without the Janet Jackson. Infact it was her brothers who introduced Paula to Jane. Paula was having an affair with Jackie at the time. So once again Janet was handed something because of her brothers.
You need to deal with Janet, likewise Latoya got record deals in the first place because of their last names.
Jimmy Jam & Lewis may not have been interested in all the Jacksons, but they took interest in Janet, probably due to her last name.
And before all these factors came into the picture Janet albums were flopping. Dance lessons, great producers with lots of hard work can do wonders for someone, just look at Madonna. She is very similar to Janet, very little raw talent, but great producers, lots of reinvention of image, great videos and lots of hard work and she come across like the best thing since slice bread.


And?

Paula was just a dancer then. She wouldn't have a MUSIC career without Janet.

False. Janet got a record deal because she's amazingly talented.

Wrong. They took interest Janet because she's amazingly talented and liked their music.

Her whole family is a flop (excluding her brother MJ).

Janet never took dance lessons in her lifetime (besides ballet lessons for a week at the age of 7). Janet co-writes and produces all her work. Madonna only wishes she was similar to Janet.

Janet is the best thing since slice bread.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #516 posted 03/03/10 3:55pm

Timmy84

bboy87 said:

midiscover said:



Paula Abdul wouldn't have had a career in music if it wasn't for sucking Janet's brother off on the regular and lettin' half of the 1984 Lakers smash

.


fixed lol


True story! lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #517 posted 03/03/10 3:59pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

Timmy84 said:

seeingvoices12 said:


All? rolleyes

brick

There were some Informative posts on here.


No there wasn't. I saw more arguments and record stats. lol

And I saw some of these:

"Bitch you don't know me, Janet Jackson is my God." lol
And "bitch Janet don't even know you, Jimmy & Terry..." lol


spit
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #518 posted 03/03/10 4:03pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

Timmy84 said:

bboy87 said:




call me Rene....call me Rene!!!


lol Saving this one lol


lol its funny. lol
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #519 posted 03/03/10 4:04pm

whatsgoingon

avatar

midiscover said:

whatsgoingon said:


Paula abdul wouldn't have had a career without the Janet Jackson. Infact it was her brothers who introduced Paula to Jane. Paula was having an affair with Jackie at the time. So once again Janet was handed something because of her brothers.
You need to deal with Janet, likewise Latoya got record deals in the first place because of their last names.
Jimmy Jam & Lewis may not have been interested in all the Jacksons, but they took interest in Janet, probably due to her last name.
And before all these factors came into the picture Janet albums were flopping. Dance lessons, great producers with lots of hard work can do wonders for someone, just look at Madonna. She is very similar to Janet, very little raw talent, but great producers, lots of reinvention of image, great videos and lots of hard work and she come across like the best thing since slice bread.


And?

Paula was just a dancer then. She wouldn't have a MUSIC career without Janet.

False. Janet got a record deal because she's amazingly talented.

Wrong. They took interest Janet because she's amazingly talented and liked their music.

Her whole family is a flop (excluding her brother MJ).

Janet never took dance lessons in her lifetime (besides ballet lessons for a week at the age of 7). Janet co-writes and produces all her work. Madonna only wishes she was similar to Janet.

Janet is the best thing since slice bread.


Janet got a record deal because of her last name, likewise Latoya. I mean Latoya got a record deal and she wasn't even interested in making music, initially...The only peeps that got a record deal in the family based purely on talent were the Jackson 5, mainly due to the raw talent of MJ.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #520 posted 03/03/10 4:05pm

babybugz

avatar

Who want's a Janet Sticky raise your hand wave
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #521 posted 03/03/10 4:06pm

babybugz

avatar

I'm glad I saw bboy87 Popeye's gif , it seems that tinypic has failed him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #522 posted 03/03/10 4:08pm

midiscover

whatsgoingon said:

midiscover said:



And?

Paula was just a dancer then. She wouldn't have a MUSIC career without Janet.

False. Janet got a record deal because she's amazingly talented.

Wrong. They took interest Janet because she's amazingly talented and liked their music.

Her whole family is a flop (excluding her brother MJ).

Janet never took dance lessons in her lifetime (besides ballet lessons for a week at the age of 7). Janet co-writes and produces all her work. Madonna only wishes she was similar to Janet.

Janet is the best thing since slice bread.


Janet got a record deal because of her last name, likewise Latoya. I mean Latoya got a record deal and she wasn't even interested in making music, initially...The only peeps that got a record deal in the family based purely on talent were the Jackson 5, mainly due to the raw talent of MJ.




Nobody cares about the lesser girls.
[Edited 3/3/10 16:09pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #523 posted 03/03/10 4:10pm

babybugz

avatar

I was Listening to Janet's VR album yesterday . Haven't heard it in years
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #524 posted 03/03/10 4:14pm

whatsgoingon

avatar

midiscover said:

whatsgoingon said:



Janet got a record deal because of her last name, likewise Latoya. I mean Latoya got a record deal and she wasn't even interested in making music, initially...The only peeps that got a record deal in the family based purely on talent were the Jackson 5, mainly due to the raw talent of MJ.




Nobody cares about the lesser girls.
[Edited 3/3/10 16:09pm]

I will repeat only peeps that got a record deal in that family based purely on talent were the original Jackson 5 due to Michael. Fact,
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #525 posted 03/03/10 4:24pm

midiscover

whatsgoingon said:

midiscover said:





Nobody cares about the lesser girls.
[Edited 3/3/10 16:09pm]

I will repeat only peeps that got a record deal in that family based purely on talent were the original Jackson 5 due to Michael. Fact,


I'll repeat that Janet got her first record deal because she's amazingly talented AND her father, Joe helped her. She was signed under his own label before that. Fact.

Signed a four-album deal with Virgin in 1996 worth an estimated $80 million - a $35 million advance, $5 million per album and a 24% royalty. Because she's Janet and amazingly talented. Fact.
[Edited 3/3/10 16:26pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #526 posted 03/03/10 6:47pm

WaterInYourBat
h

avatar

I'm always amazed at how resentive some Janet Jackson fans are against Michael Jackson. lol How in the world can anyone denigrate MJ's superlative skills and image just to uplift his own sister over him, when she studied and followed HIS styles? All of her little life during the 70s, she was looking at Michael Jackson performing in front of their brothers, and all the while learning how to become a lead, solo, dancing singer herself. We know who Michael studied (James, Sammy, Jackie, Fred, Gene, Diana, etc). But who has Janet ever said were her inspirations as a musical performer besides MJ? confuse Almost everything he did solo, she eventually did solo, and that wouldn't have happened if she hadn't been watching him.

I appreciate her work as an artist who demonstrated that girls/women can dance onstage just as powerful and strong as men. But people actually think the highly successful, military, choreography-driven images she created for herself would have happened if MJ did not exist? I HIGHLY doubt that. disbelief
"You put water into a cup, it becomes the cup...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend." - Bruce Lee
"Water can nourish me, but water can also carry me. Water has magic laws." - JCVD
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #527 posted 03/03/10 6:47pm

kenny88

bboy87 said:

midiscover said:



eek lol

Log off like right now!!



falloff
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #528 posted 03/03/10 7:38pm

KCOOLMUZIQ

trueiopian said:

seeingvoices12 said:


Janet is Nowhere near Michael Jackson’s voice, Not even similar, God, there is a huge difference, Huge difference, with my respect to Janet, she is a mediocre vocalist at best , Nothing more , Nothing less.

Are you freaking serious about the statement that " Janet is More talented than MJ" ....

Only fanatical obsessed fan would say this, No one with a rational mind would say this…Only the crazed fans.


Denial.

Proof that their vocals were similar.


That is Janet's vocals slowed down and there are various other songs where their voices are really similar. So anyone saying she's a weak or mediocre vocalist is just saying the same about MJ. Since both are very reminiscent. He wasn't a powerhouse vocalist or anything.

Janet is more talented than MJ. She can do everything that he could + more.

Such as yourself. I don't even know why you're in here sigh



That is eery how much they sound a like with her voice slowed down. Its almost scary and creepy. But it just proves how talented Janet really is with her vocals which I already knew..
eye will ALWAYS think of prince like a "ACT OF GOD"! N another realm. eye mean of all people who might of been aliens or angels.if found out that prince wasn't of this earth, eye would not have been that surprised. R.I.P. prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #529 posted 03/04/10 10:00am

mancabdriver

WaterInYourBath said:

I'm always amazed at how resentive some Janet Jackson fans are against Michael Jackson. lol How in the world can anyone denigrate MJ's superlative skills and image just to uplift his own sister over him, when she studied and followed HIS styles? All of her little life during the 70s, she was looking at Michael Jackson performing in front of their brothers, and all the while learning how to become a lead, solo, dancing singer herself. We know who Michael studied (James, Sammy, Jackie, Fred, Gene, Diana, etc). But who has Janet ever said were her inspirations as a musical performer besides MJ? confuse Almost everything he did solo, she eventually did solo, and that wouldn't have happened if she hadn't been watching him.

I appreciate her work as an artist who demonstrated that girls/women can dance onstage just as powerful and strong as men. But people actually think the highly successful, military, choreography-driven images she created for herself would have happened if MJ did not exist? I HIGHLY doubt that. disbelief



I'm pretty sure it's usually the other way round. On this forum it’s only 2-3 Janet fans that disrespect MJ to elevate Janet and most of the time they are joking.

I've been a member on a few Janet forums and although many members are completely one-dimensional and disillusioned, they have been very complimentary towards Janet's brother. I can't say the same for MJ fans who tend to think Janet should be forever indebted to Michael for her success.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #530 posted 03/04/10 10:13am

SEANMAN

avatar

mancabdriver said:

WaterInYourBath said:

I'm always amazed at how resentive some Janet Jackson fans are against Michael Jackson. lol How in the world can anyone denigrate MJ's superlative skills and image just to uplift his own sister over him, when she studied and followed HIS styles? All of her little life during the 70s, she was looking at Michael Jackson performing in front of their brothers, and all the while learning how to become a lead, solo, dancing singer herself. We know who Michael studied (James, Sammy, Jackie, Fred, Gene, Diana, etc). But who has Janet ever said were her inspirations as a musical performer besides MJ? confuse Almost everything he did solo, she eventually did solo, and that wouldn't have happened if she hadn't been watching him.

I appreciate her work as an artist who demonstrated that girls/women can dance onstage just as powerful and strong as men. But people actually think the highly successful, military, choreography-driven images she created for herself would have happened if MJ did not exist? I HIGHLY doubt that. disbelief



I'm pretty sure it's usually the other way round. On this forum it’s only 2-3 Janet fans that disrespect MJ to elevate Janet and most of the time they are joking.

I've been a member on a few Janet forums and although many members are completely one-dimensional and disillusioned, they have been very complimentary towards Janet's brother. I can't say the same for MJ fans who tend to think Janet should be forever indebted to Michael for her success.


true indeed
"Get up off that grey line"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #531 posted 03/04/10 10:54am

whatsgoingon

avatar

midiscover said:

whatsgoingon said:


I will repeat only peeps that got a record deal in that family based purely on talent were the original Jackson 5 due to Michael. Fact,


I'll repeat that Janet got her first record deal because she's amazingly talented AND her father, Joe helped her. She was signed under his own label before that. Fact.

Signed a four-album deal with Virgin in 1996 worth an estimated $80 million - a $35 million advance, $5 million per album and a 24% royalty. Because she's Janet and amazingly talented. Fact.
[Edited 3/3/10 16:26pm]

The fact is she got her very first record deal because of her last name, nothing to do with talent. And the FACT is you will never be able to prove she didn't, too bad Michael and the rest of the brothers got there first. And Joe Jackson also helped Latoya to get a record deal. The main difference between Latoya and Janet is Jimmy Jam Lewis and Paula Abdul. You see after the brothers got established getting the sisters record deals wasn't going to be a big deal, it didn't matter if they were talented or not.

I am not trying to down Janet, I am not saying she completely rubbish, but her family name opened doors for her. Fact. Deal with it.
[Edited 3/4/10 13:31pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #532 posted 03/04/10 11:06am

mookie

mancabdriver said:


I've been a member on a few Janet forums and although many members are completely one-dimensional and disillusioned, they have been very complimentary towards Janet's brother. I can't say the same for MJ fans who tend to think Janet should be forever indebted to Michael for her success.


Nope, i'd say it's also maybe 2 or 3 members that speak that way about Janet. I'm a regular reader of 1 particular Janet thread and I see fans mainly giving her her due and rooting for her to make a comeback. When some say unfair shit against her, fans get on their asses.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #533 posted 03/04/10 3:11pm

midiscover

whatsgoingon said:


The fact is she got her very first record deal because of her last name, nothing to do with talent. And the FACT is you will never be able to prove she didn't, too bad Michael and the rest of the brothers got there first. And Joe Jackson also helped Latoya to get a record deal. The main difference between Latoya and Janet is Jimmy Jam Lewis and Paula Abdul. You see after the brothers got established getting the sisters record deals wasn't going to be a big deal, it didn't matter if they were talented or not.

I am not trying to down Janet, I am not saying she completely rubbish, but her family name opened doors for her. Fact. Deal with it.
[Edited 3/4/10 13:31pm]


Let me dumb it down for you since you seem to not get it.

Janet got her first record deal because of her father, Joe Jackson. Nothing to do with her siblings. The other brothers are not established (excluding MJ). Latoya is a non-talented flop and was under own father's and unestablished labels for years. Janet is the most talented person to come out of that loon bin family and 2nd I could give a flying fuck about the rest of those people. I'm in here for Janet. Deal.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #534 posted 03/04/10 3:12pm

midiscover

mancabdriver said:

WaterInYourBath said:

I'm always amazed at how resentive some Janet Jackson fans are against Michael Jackson. lol How in the world can anyone denigrate MJ's superlative skills and image just to uplift his own sister over him, when she studied and followed HIS styles? All of her little life during the 70s, she was looking at Michael Jackson performing in front of their brothers, and all the while learning how to become a lead, solo, dancing singer herself. We know who Michael studied (James, Sammy, Jackie, Fred, Gene, Diana, etc). But who has Janet ever said were her inspirations as a musical performer besides MJ? confuse Almost everything he did solo, she eventually did solo, and that wouldn't have happened if she hadn't been watching him.

I appreciate her work as an artist who demonstrated that girls/women can dance onstage just as powerful and strong as men. But people actually think the highly successful, military, choreography-driven images she created for herself would have happened if MJ did not exist? I HIGHLY doubt that. disbelief



I'm pretty sure it's usually the other way round. On this forum it’s only 2-3 Janet fans that disrespect MJ to elevate Janet and most of the time they are joking.

I've been a member on a few Janet forums and although many members are completely one-dimensional and disillusioned, they have been very complimentary towards Janet's brother. I can't say the same for MJ fans who tend to think Janet should be forever indebted to Michael for her success.


Exactly!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #535 posted 03/04/10 6:03pm

COMPUTERBLUE19
84

avatar

FYI--Janet will be on the Tonight SHow on March 18th but not performing.

Not sure if this has been mentioned, but if so, please disregard
"Old man's gotta be the old man. Fish has got to be the fish."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #536 posted 03/05/10 2:51pm

trueiopian

COMPUTERBLUE1984 said:

FYI--Janet will be on the Tonight SHow on March 18th but not performing.

Not sure if this has been mentioned, but if so, please disregard


biggrin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #537 posted 03/05/10 6:34pm

midiscover

COMPUTERBLUE1984 said:

FYI--Janet will be on the Tonight SHow on March 18th but not performing.

Not sure if this has been mentioned, but if so, please disregard


T4p.

Wish she would perform though.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 18 of 18 « First<9101112131415161718
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Pics: Janet Attends London Fashion Week (Feb 21st)