bboy87 said: There's gonna be an announcement soon from the brothers and their producer Jodi Gomes
Hopefully it's something about the new Jacksons album. I sure hope they put that track they were recording on the first ep., which contains a sample of | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JabarR74 said: bboy87 said: There's gonna be an announcement soon from the brothers and their producer Jodi Gomes
Hopefully it's something about the new Jacksons album. I sure hope they put that track they were recording on the first ep., which contains a sample of I hope they don't use none of those songs they were working on. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thatruth said: While I have my own beef about the Jacksons, I'm not going to waste an entire thread talking about how the family screwed or manipulated Michael, or whatever. The things that happened to Michael were unfortuate, but it was because of the people he was dealing with on a professional level, managers, lawyers, etc. Everybody sued Michael at one point, I don't remember one case filed against him from family members.
Really? Randy didn't sue, but testified against Michael in 2006. Joe was sueing Michael in 2007, 2008 and early 2009. Joe and the siblings are now sueing Michael through Leonard Rowe. Remember the 300 millions lawsuit against Michael's estate? Read the lawsuit. Oh wait...TMZ deleted the siblings' and Joe's name 2 hours after the document was put online. Go figure. Still, it was Joe (along with Leonard) who was sueing Michael and threatening to boycott TII, back in May. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This needs to be on DVD "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: This needs to be on DVD CO-SIGN. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well if you want it the show on DVD, just start a petition. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You know, I really don't understand how it is supporting the family to attend a court hearing regarding Conrad Murray. This idea, that seems to be par for the course right now, trips me out, and leads me down the following path...
Of the perplexing behavior from this family, perplexing for years, finger pointing seems to be one of their favorite stock moves. It is a move without clear and real meaning, and without any indication of true intention. In Michael’s absence the brothers and Joe seem to be left with no alternative but acting out with poor behavior that often seems financially or publicity motivated. They do not seem to have weathered the storm that was being the Jackson Five very well, and have become a severely dysfunctional family. The interventions the family staged for Michael went no where. In a dynamic driven by Randy's narrative where the family deflects any responsibility for Michael's death and points fingers at others, MJ fans could easily suggest that Michael was not supported by his family. They did not support their brother because Michael would not give them real access to his life? They did not support their brother because they really didn't care about Michael? Yeah, that seems absurd to me, too. But if the Jackson family is going to throw bull out into the public arena, they are inevitably going to have to catch some, too. Sadly, I think Wanda Sykes is not off the mark when she says in her stand up act, “Michael Jackson died of Michael Jackson.” We can point fingers at a direct target, such as Conrad Murray. We could do the same finger pointing with Pepsi Cola and the director of the incendiary TV commercial, and every Doctor that subsequently treated him. Other direct targets could be Joe Jackson and Katherine Jackson, and on and on. In the end it is so much more complex that saying “Conrad Murray killed Michael Jackson.” Michael Jackson exercised his Civil Liberties to pursue Doctors and acquire illegal drugs in a predatory manner. Michael was a grown and informed man at this point in his life. Conrad Murray was simply a greedy pawn in a very sad historic event. He will be in a constant punishment state over his role in the death of Michael Jackson for the remainder of his life, regardless of what the court deals out to him. For me, a piece of my heart “died of Michael Jackson.” …can’t wait to get home and listen to some Off The Wall. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
allsmutaside said: You know, I really don't understand how it is supporting the family to attend a court hearing regarding Conrad Murray. This idea, that seems to be par for the course right now, trips me out, and leads me down the following path...
Of the perplexing behavior from this family, perplexing for years, finger pointing seems to be one of their favorite stock moves. It is a move without clear and real meaning, and without any indication of true intention. In Michael’s absence the brothers and Joe seem to be left with no alternative but acting out with poor behavior that often seems financially or publicity motivated. They do not seem to have weathered the storm that was being the Jackson Five very well, and have become a severely dysfunctional family. The interventions the family staged for Michael went no where. In a dynamic driven by Randy's narrative where the family deflects any responsibility for Michael's death and points fingers at others, MJ fans could easily suggest that Michael was not supported by his family. They did not support their brother because Michael would not give them real access to his life? They did not support their brother because they really didn't care about Michael? Yeah, that seems absurd to me, too. But if the Jackson family is going to throw bull out into the public arena, they are inevitably going to have to catch some, too. Sadly, I think Wanda Sykes is not off the mark when she says in her stand up act, “Michael Jackson died of Michael Jackson.” We can point fingers at a direct target, such as Conrad Murray. We could do the same finger pointing with Pepsi Cola and the director of the incendiary TV commercial, and every Doctor that subsequently treated him. Other direct targets could be Joe Jackson and Katherine Jackson, and on and on. In the end it is so much more complex that saying “Conrad Murray killed Michael Jackson.” Michael Jackson exercised his Civil Liberties to pursue Doctors and acquire illegal drugs in a predatory manner. Michael was a grown and informed man at this point in his life. Conrad Murray was simply a greedy pawn in a very sad historic event. He will be in a constant punishment state over his role in the death of Michael Jackson for the remainder of his life, regardless of what the court deals out to him. For me, a piece of my heart “died of Michael Jackson.” …can’t wait to get home and listen to some Off The Wall. Name them. All the ones confirmed in his house were completely legal. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
allsmutaside said: You know, I really don't understand how it is supporting the family to attend a court hearing regarding Conrad Murray. This idea, that seems to be par for the course right now, trips me out, and leads me down the following path...
Of the perplexing behavior from this family, perplexing for years, finger pointing seems to be one of their favorite stock moves. It is a move without clear and real meaning, and without any indication of true intention. In Michael’s absence the brothers and Joe seem to be left with no alternative but acting out with poor behavior that often seems financially or publicity motivated. They do not seem to have weathered the storm that was being the Jackson Five very well, and have become a severely dysfunctional family. The interventions the family staged for Michael went no where. In a dynamic driven by Randy's narrative where the family deflects any responsibility for Michael's death and points fingers at others, MJ fans could easily suggest that Michael was not supported by his family. They did not support their brother because Michael would not give them real access to his life? They did not support their brother because they really didn't care about Michael? Yeah, that seems absurd to me, too. But if the Jackson family is going to throw bull out into the public arena, they are inevitably going to have to catch some, too. Sadly, I think Wanda Sykes is not off the mark when she says in her stand up act, “Michael Jackson died of Michael Jackson.” We can point fingers at a direct target, such as Conrad Murray. We could do the same finger pointing with Pepsi Cola and the director of the incendiary TV commercial, and every Doctor that subsequently treated him. Other direct targets could be Joe Jackson and Katherine Jackson, and on and on. In the end it is so much more complex that saying “Conrad Murray killed Michael Jackson.” Michael Jackson exercised his Civil Liberties to pursue Doctors and acquire illegal drugs in a predatory manner. Michael was a grown and informed man at this point in his life. Conrad Murray was simply a greedy pawn in a very sad historic event. He will be in a constant punishment state over his role in the death of Michael Jackson for the remainder of his life, regardless of what the court deals out to him. For me, a piece of my heart “died of Michael Jackson.” …can’t wait to get home and listen to some Off The Wall. I don't think she meant it like that, I think she was talkin' more fame of being "Michael Jackson" the most famous man in the world. PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever ----- Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LittleBLUECorvette said: allsmutaside said: You know, I really don't understand how it is supporting the family to attend a court hearing regarding Conrad Murray. This idea, that seems to be par for the course right now, trips me out, and leads me down the following path...
Of the perplexing behavior from this family, perplexing for years, finger pointing seems to be one of their favorite stock moves. It is a move without clear and real meaning, and without any indication of true intention. In Michael’s absence the brothers and Joe seem to be left with no alternative but acting out with poor behavior that often seems financially or publicity motivated. They do not seem to have weathered the storm that was being the Jackson Five very well, and have become a severely dysfunctional family. The interventions the family staged for Michael went no where. In a dynamic driven by Randy's narrative where the family deflects any responsibility for Michael's death and points fingers at others, MJ fans could easily suggest that Michael was not supported by his family. They did not support their brother because Michael would not give them real access to his life? They did not support their brother because they really didn't care about Michael? Yeah, that seems absurd to me, too. But if the Jackson family is going to throw bull out into the public arena, they are inevitably going to have to catch some, too. Sadly, I think Wanda Sykes is not off the mark when she says in her stand up act, “Michael Jackson died of Michael Jackson.” We can point fingers at a direct target, such as Conrad Murray. We could do the same finger pointing with Pepsi Cola and the director of the incendiary TV commercial, and every Doctor that subsequently treated him. Other direct targets could be Joe Jackson and Katherine Jackson, and on and on. In the end it is so much more complex that saying “Conrad Murray killed Michael Jackson.” Michael Jackson exercised his Civil Liberties to pursue Doctors and acquire illegal drugs in a predatory manner. Michael was a grown and informed man at this point in his life. Conrad Murray was simply a greedy pawn in a very sad historic event. He will be in a constant punishment state over his role in the death of Michael Jackson for the remainder of his life, regardless of what the court deals out to him. For me, a piece of my heart “died of Michael Jackson.” …can’t wait to get home and listen to some Off The Wall. I don't think she meant it like that, I think she was talkin' more fame of being "Michael Jackson" the most famous man in the world. Exactly "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Has anyone seen the 180 gram vinyl reissues of the J5 albums? The look great, they're not gatefold except for Goin' Back To Indiana. I plan on getting them soon "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: This needs to be on DVD i've been saying this for years, maybe we should write cbs...i'm suprised that haven't jumped on the opportunity yet. "we make our heroes in America only to destroy them" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MOL said: thatruth said: While I have my own beef about the Jacksons, I'm not going to waste an entire thread talking about how the family screwed or manipulated Michael, or whatever. The things that happened to Michael were unfortuate, but it was because of the people he was dealing with on a professional level, managers, lawyers, etc. Everybody sued Michael at one point, I don't remember one case filed against him from family members.
Really? Randy didn't sue, but testified against Michael in 2006. Joe was sueing Michael in 2007, 2008 and early 2009. Joe and the siblings are now sueing Michael through Leonard Rowe. Remember the 300 millions lawsuit against Michael's estate? Read the lawsuit. Oh wait...TMZ deleted the siblings' and Joe's name 2 hours after the document was put online. Go figure. Still, it was Joe (along with Leonard) who was sueing Michael and threatening to boycott TII, back in May. michael's family is not suing his. "we make our heroes in America only to destroy them" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MOL said: sleepyq said: There is no excuse for allowing your 55 year old son to continue living with you, especially one with no source of income. She should be ashamed of herself. Did she and Joe really break up, or is that just a front? Seems like she can't get enough of that man, and I can see why. They deserve eachother. Perfect match. She still loves him, aparently. Besides, she used to give him some of the money Michael used to give her. He used her to sweeten' Michael and, according to reports, Joe ordered her to beg her son/cry to her son to put his family in AEG's payroll. Joe knew she manipulated him easily and, therefore, took advantage of her by forcing her to "cry" or beg something to Michael. I can only imagine: Joe: "Kate, I need money. You're going to cry in front of Michael so that he will do what you want. If that doesn't result, guilt him into giving you as much money as he has." Kate: ...*in love* Joe: "Train the way you cry. It has to look convincing." What kind of mother lets her 5 years old son be exploited? Remember when Michael said that even if he had spent the entire day sick, in a bed, Joe would force him to perform for hours, at night? What kind of mother lets her child be abused in every way? What kind of mother takes advantage (or let her sons and husband take advantage) of her child? Yet, she still has the nerve to excuse Joe's behaviour. Remember the Jacksons: American Dream? The part in which Kate tells Michael he should do exactly what joe wants because he "is the reason why you're famous" and "because he had a master plan for you". What kind of mother deceives her own child in order to let her husband leech off of him? Yup; she's as bad as Joe, Jermaine, Randy and Latoya. MOL ur doing too much :disbelief that mother just lost her child,i don't know what the jacksons did to you but your personal vendetta is getting ridiculous. if you don't like them don't come in the family thread. [Edited 2/24/10 17:10pm] "we make our heroes in America only to destroy them" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: There's gonna be an announcement soon from the brothers and their producer Jodi Gomes
where did you hear this? about what? "we make our heroes in America only to destroy them" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i love this song right here
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mimi07 said: bboy87 said: There's gonna be an announcement soon from the brothers and their producer Jodi Gomes
where did you hear this? about what? "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WaterInYourBath said: bboy87 said: [img]
She wasted so many years doing atrocious music instead of being a great model. she has some ok song bt she would have been a great model "we make our heroes in America only to destroy them" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: mimi07 said: where did you hear this? about what? i thought so, i haven't been on in a minute, did they make the announcement yet? "we make our heroes in America only to destroy them" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
allsmutaside said: You know, I really don't understand how it is supporting the family to attend a court hearing regarding Conrad Murray. This idea, that seems to be par for the course right now, trips me out, and leads me down the following path...
Of the perplexing behavior from this family, perplexing for years, finger pointing seems to be one of their favorite stock moves. It is a move without clear and real meaning, and without any indication of true intention. In Michael’s absence the brothers and Joe seem to be left with no alternative but acting out with poor behavior that often seems financially or publicity motivated. They do not seem to have weathered the storm that was being the Jackson Five very well, and have become a severely dysfunctional family. The interventions the family staged for Michael went no where. In a dynamic driven by Randy's narrative where the family deflects any responsibility for Michael's death and points fingers at others, MJ fans could easily suggest that Michael was not supported by his family. They did not support their brother because Michael would not give them real access to his life? They did not support their brother because they really didn't care about Michael? Yeah, that seems absurd to me, too. But if the Jackson family is going to throw bull out into the public arena, they are inevitably going to have to catch some, too. Sadly, I think Wanda Sykes is not off the mark when she says in her stand up act, “Michael Jackson died of Michael Jackson.” We can point fingers at a direct target, such as Conrad Murray. We could do the same finger pointing with Pepsi Cola and the director of the incendiary TV commercial, and every Doctor that subsequently treated him. Other direct targets could be Joe Jackson and Katherine Jackson, and on and on. In the end it is so much more complex that saying “Conrad Murray killed Michael Jackson.” Michael Jackson exercised his Civil Liberties to pursue Doctors and acquire illegal drugs in a predatory manner. Michael was a grown and informed man at this point in his life. Conrad Murray was simply a greedy pawn in a very sad historic event. He will be in a constant punishment state over his role in the death of Michael Jackson for the remainder of his life, regardless of what the court deals out to him. For me, a piece of my heart “died of Michael Jackson.” …can’t wait to get home and listen to some Off The Wall. in early 2009 or late 2008, the family denied that mj was on drugs and that they had been involved in interventions. they've conveniently changed their story in the wake of mj's death when there's money to be made in scandal. there is no evidence that mj was on illegal drugs (you would know that if you had bothered to read the autopsy) and the person who is saying he gave his informed consent to receiving the propofol is dr. murray, who has a reason to put all of the blame on mj. one can only give their 'informed consent' if one is informed. we don't know what dr. murray told mj with respect to dr. murray's ability to administer drugs appropriately; still, it seems clear that he told mj that he knew what he was doing. but the circumstances of mj's death - the lack of appropriate equipment, the overconcentration of the sedatives dr. murray gave him - points to the fact that dr. murray did *not* know what he was doing, and further, that he tried to save his own butt by withholding information from the authorities. [Edited 2/24/10 10:50am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Boy! the Jackson thread is making me go | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
LittleBLUECorvette said: allsmutaside said: You know, I really don't understand how it is supporting the family to attend a court hearing regarding Conrad Murray. This idea, that seems to be par for the course right now, trips me out, and leads me down the following path...
Of the perplexing behavior from this family, perplexing for years, finger pointing seems to be one of their favorite stock moves. It is a move without clear and real meaning, and without any indication of true intention. In Michael’s absence the brothers and Joe seem to be left with no alternative but acting out with poor behavior that often seems financially or publicity motivated. They do not seem to have weathered the storm that was being the Jackson Five very well, and have become a severely dysfunctional family. The interventions the family staged for Michael went no where. In a dynamic driven by Randy's narrative where the family deflects any responsibility for Michael's death and points fingers at others, MJ fans could easily suggest that Michael was not supported by his family. They did not support their brother because Michael would not give them real access to his life? They did not support their brother because they really didn't care about Michael? Yeah, that seems absurd to me, too. But if the Jackson family is going to throw bull out into the public arena, they are inevitably going to have to catch some, too. Sadly, I think Wanda Sykes is not off the mark when she says in her stand up act, “Michael Jackson died of Michael Jackson.” We can point fingers at a direct target, such as Conrad Murray. We could do the same finger pointing with Pepsi Cola and the director of the incendiary TV commercial, and every Doctor that subsequently treated him. Other direct targets could be Joe Jackson and Katherine Jackson, and on and on. In the end it is so much more complex that saying “Conrad Murray killed Michael Jackson.” Michael Jackson exercised his Civil Liberties to pursue Doctors and acquire illegal drugs in a predatory manner. Michael was a grown and informed man at this point in his life. Conrad Murray was simply a greedy pawn in a very sad historic event. He will be in a constant punishment state over his role in the death of Michael Jackson for the remainder of his life, regardless of what the court deals out to him. For me, a piece of my heart “died of Michael Jackson.” …can’t wait to get home and listen to some Off The Wall. I don't think she meant it like that, I think she was talkin' more fame of being "Michael Jackson" the most famous man in the world. Her comment could have went either way *shrugs* | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
1 I Want You Back 2 Zip A Dee Doo Dah 3 The Love You Save 4 ABC 5 2-4-6-8 6 I'll Be There 7 Little Bitty Pretty One 8 E-Ne-Me-Ne-Mi-Ne-Moe (The Choice Is Yours To Pull) 9 My Little Baby 10 Corner Of The Sky 11 Dancing Machine 12 Mama's Pearl Bonus "Sing-Along" Versions13 I Want You Back (Karaoke) 14 The Love You Save (Karaoke) 15 I’ll Be There (Karaoke) 16 Mama’s Pearl (Karaoke) Released on March 30th, 2010 "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I'll post this again so ya'll see it this time
http://www.jackson5abc.co...?newsid=57 Vibrations Magazine : Could you talk about the unreleased songs by the Jackson 5 which are still sleeping in the vaults?
Harry Weinger : (He takes out a CD stack from the drawer: Jackson 5 Rare Number 1, Jackson 5 Rare Number 2, Jackson 5 Live At The Forum) : The Corporation made, with the Jackson 5, a superb cover version of "Mama Told Me Not To Come ", a song which, at that time, was competing with a song by the Jackson 5 for the top of the charts. "Mama Told Me Not To Come" is very touching because it tells the story of kids who are at a party they should not be, and then someone tells them a dirty thing: "We have stolen your keys! You can't go! " And the boys lament: "My mother will kill me, I habe to go home, Mama told me not to come." "Mama Told Me Not To Come" spotted number 1 which was formerly by "The Love You Save" by the J5, hence the idea of them recording a cover version. I mentioned "If I Can not Nobody Can not" part of the tracks that have filtered from internet before I was in charge. "Would You Would You Baby" which is in the vaults under a different title, "Love Trip", "Making Life A Little Easier For You", another song from The Corporation. There is also a cover of "What's So Good About Goodbye" sung originally by the Miracles. On our CD I Want You Back! Unreleased Masters there is a song titled "Love Call", for which we also have another version with the same instrumental, but with completely different lyrics, and re-recorded a few months later when Michael's voice was being transformed, which probably explains it was never released. This version is incredible, but we had to make a choice for the CD and our small committee chose the first version of "Love Call". Next year, maybe we will release an expanded version of the CD and we'll put the second version of "Love Call" for people to compare. As for the "Live At The Forum", there are two shows, recorded in 1970 and 1972, which are quite different. In 1970, the songs were longer, the group talked between songs, they last night, while in 1972 they had more hits like "Sugar Daddy" or "Mama's Pearl" and Michael sang his own songs, along with Jermaine. "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Michael Jackson's Mother to Attend Press Conference to Announce International Fan Convention in Hometown of Gary, Indiana
Katherine Jackson will attend the press conference announcing the first International King of Pop Fanvention where thousands will come to honor Gary, IN native son Michael Jackson Gary, IN (PRWEB) February 24, 2010 Katherine Jackson, the mother of the late entertainer Michael Jackson will be in attendance at a press conference to announce the first annual International King of Pop Fanvention on March 9, 2010 at 10 a.m.(CST). The press conference will be held at the Radisson Hotel at Star Plaza, in the Star Plaza Theatre, 800 E. 81st Avenue in Merrillville, IN. The hotel is just 10 minutes from the childhood home of Jackson. . The Fanvention will take place during the weekend of August 26 – 29, 2010. The event, organized by Fluid Productions, LLC in partnership with the Radisson Hotel at Star Plaza in Merrillville is expected to attract over ten thousand enthusiastic Michael Jackson fans from around the world to celebrate Jacksons’ legacies of humanity, love for the environment and music. Donald Thompson, event director, said “This is the only event of its kind in the world because it is the only event that will be held so close to his boyhood home. We felt that Indiana was the perfect place to host an event that will highlight Michael’s life and music. It just makes sense. It all began here.” The Fanvention, which is a combination of the words “fan” and “convention”, will include autograph and photo sessions with people that worked with and knew Michael. Members of the Jackson family will be in attendance and will participate in question and answer sessions about Michael. A dance party and gala are also scheduled. Tours will also run to the Jackson family home throughout the weekend. Vendors will be on hand to sell memorabilia and collector’s items. A special salute to Jackson will be performed by young entertainers from the northwest Indiana area on Sunday. Check out the FanVention website - http://www.mjfanvention.com/default.asp http://www.prweb.com/rele...633754.htm From events calendar Aug 26 - VIP reception - Triple Dose Band, led by Keith Jackson, first cousin of Michael Jackson. Aug 27 - Friday night dance party - ut on your best Michael Jackson outfit. Hosted by local radio station Aug 28 - Gala Celebration concert - Celebrate with the Jackson family and the next generation of Jackson performers (Genevieve Jackson is confirmed) along with a special surprise guest performer. Aug 29 - Michael Jackson Dance studio - Dance workshop that is hosted by THIS IS IT dancers and Omer Bhatti. Come learn the choreography behind the moves in THIS IS IT and other Michael Jackson videos. [Edited 2/24/10 18:34pm] "we make our heroes in America only to destroy them" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mimi07 said: bboy87 said: i thought so, i haven't been on in a minute, did they make the announcement yet? It's gotta be about a new album/tour and/or about a season 2 of the show what else could it be?... | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
RONNYRON said: mimi07 said: i thought so, i haven't been on in a minute, did they make the announcement yet? It's gotta be about a new album/tour and/or about a season 2 of the show what else could it be?... This is what i assume it to be about also. "we make our heroes in America only to destroy them" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
hey bboy...yesterday on KBLX during their " celebrity gossip" segment,they mentioned that Janet Jackson is gonna join her brothers on tour,later this year.
A Jacksons reunion tour with Janet taking the place of Michael Is this true,or a rumor? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: There's gonna be an announcement soon from the brothers and their producer Jodi Gomes
about Janet joining her brothers on tour later this year? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Janet Jackson To Join Jacksons Tour,According to Jermaine Jackson
Tuesday February 23, 2010 With the statement, "We had a conference call and Janet has agreed to join us on tour," Jermaine Jackson indicated Janet Jackson has decided to join her brothers on a world reunion tour later this year. She frequently denied in the past that she would join her brothers on stage. However, in the wake of the tragic death last year of Michael Jackson, it is believed that she thinks joining her brothers would be a fitting tribute. Late last week producer Rodney "Darkchild" Jerkins released a new Janet Jackson song, "Heartbeat Love," to the Internet. It has been very well received by fans. Follow Pop Music on Twitter | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |