Timmy84 said: @poetcorner61 don't worry, there's still some happiness here. Like babybugz said, we're just tensed.
Yeah me and Timmy are friends .. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MOL said: babybugz said: I guess you and me are going to be on the same boat I do believe he had drug problems at one point but this is not what he died from but I do agree with you. That's why i'm staying away from Michael threads and the forums because my head is always hurting from this situation...lol [Edited 2/12/10 16:00pm] 1. Read his autopsy report. He was NOT a drug addict. 2. The other drugs Michael was taking are anesthetics and are, usually, used along with Propofol. They avoid body addiction and resistance. 3. Janet said Michael was "in denial". This means he told his family that he was NOT a drug addict. She said he was a druggie because he was taking Propofol! Propofol is barely an addictive substance and is used to put one to sleep...and she talked about it as if it was coke! 4. Janet never gave a timeframe, didn't say why did he take drugs and barely spoke/saw Michael. Even if he was the biggest junkie on Earth...how would she know it? 5. If he was such a druggie...then why was the family constantly hounding him for reunion tours? 6. The family admitted to have NEVER seen Michael taking drugs or under its effects. They asked him if he was an addict and he answered "no". They base their "he was a junkie" argument on tha fact that Michael kept a distance from them and sometimes didn't want to even see his family. It was not his problem...it was the family's. 7. He had a problem with drugs in 93 for some months. He never had another again. Yet, the family milks the "some-months-addiction-from-17-years-ago" and makes it seem as if Michael was a junkie all these years. And why? *I smell a lawsuit agaisnt AEG and the "we had a junkie relative" argument is the only way the family can sue this company* 8. Michael died from a lethal dose OF PROPOFOL. So your argument about Propofol having bad reactions with other drugs is SIMPLY STUPID. In fact, the other drugs HAVE/ARE MEANT to be used along with Propofol, otherwise the patience might get addicted and gain resistance. 9. It was Murray's fault. 10. I don't hate you: I just see that you know NOTHING about this case. It's impossible to hate ignorance. I just pity it. I hope I'm not being to complex for you! I posted this a while ago...you chose to ignore it. I don't know what you wrote because your convo wasn't directed toward me it was directed towards ViintageJunkiie so I didn't read your shit. If you saw my post I said that he had a problem at ONE POINT ,but He did not die from that so no need for you to be coming at me with your shit.I don't have a problem with you but you are really becoming a annoying bitch sorry to say. [Edited 2/13/10 15:52pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
babybugz said: Timmy84 said: @poetcorner61 don't worry, there's still some happiness here. Like babybugz said, we're just tensed.
Yeah me and Timmy are friends .. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
babybugz said: MOL said: 1. Read his autopsy report. He was NOT a drug addict. 2. The other drugs Michael was taking are anesthetics and are, usually, used along with Propofol. They avoid body addiction and resistance. 3. Janet said Michael was "in denial". This means he told his family that he was NOT a drug addict. She said he was a druggie because he was taking Propofol! Propofol is barely an addictive substance and is used to put one to sleep...and she talked about it as if it was coke! 4. Janet never gave a timeframe, didn't say why did he take drugs and barely spoke/saw Michael. Even if he was the biggest junkie on Earth...how would she know it? 5. If he was such a druggie...then why was the family constantly hounding him for reunion tours? 6. The family admitted to have NEVER seen Michael taking drugs or under its effects. They asked him if he was an addict and he answered "no". They base their "he was a junkie" argument on tha fact that Michael kept a distance from them and sometimes didn't want to even see his family. It was not his problem...it was the family's. 7. He had a problem with drugs in 93 for some months. He never had another again. Yet, the family milks the "some-months-addiction-from-17-years-ago" and makes it seem as if Michael was a junkie all these years. And why? *I smell a lawsuit agaisnt AEG and the "we had a junkie relative" argument is the only way the family can sue this company* 8. Michael died from a lethal dose OF PROPOFOL. So your argument about Propofol having bad reactions with other drugs is SIMPLY STUPID. In fact, the other drugs HAVE/ARE MEANT to be used along with Propofol, otherwise the patience might get addicted and gain resistance. 9. It was Murray's fault. 10. I don't hate you: I just see that you know NOTHING about this case. It's impossible to hate ignorance. I just pity it. I hope I'm not being to complex for you! I posted this a while ago...you chose to ignore it. I don't know what you wrote because your convo wasn't directed toward me it was directed towards ViintageJunkiie so I didn't read your shit. If you saw my post I said that he had a problem at ONE POINT ,but He did not die from that so no need for you to be coming at me with your shit.I don't have a problem with you but you are really becoming a annoying bitch sorry to say. [Edited 2/13/10 15:52pm] You DID agree with Vintage Junkie's comment. "I guess you and me are going to be on the same boat". Actually, my post was directed at VJunkie. But, since you replied (so intelectually!!!) I spent some of my time writing to you! You should be mad at people who think Michael is a pedo-junkie. Not me. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MOL said: babybugz said: I don't know what you wrote because your convo wasn't directed toward me it was directed towards ViintageJunkiie so I didn't read your shit. If you saw my post I said that he had a problem at ONE POINT ,but He did not die from that so no need for you to be coming at me with your shit.I don't have a problem with you but you are really becoming a annoying bitch sorry to say. [Edited 2/13/10 15:52pm] You DID agree with Vintage Junkie's comment. "I guess you and me are going to be on the same boat". Actually, my post was directed at VJunkie. But, since you replied (so intelectually!!!) I spent some of my time writing to you! You should be mad at people who think Michael is a pedo-junkie. Not me. Yeah on the same boat as far as feeling Michael wasn't murdered some things the poster said I did agree with and Yes I can replied Intellectually or I can cut to the chase and say Shut the fuck up. You just a bunch of negative energy bad enough Michael is not here and you make it worse when you coming with your essays disrespecting Michael's family. Everything out your mouth is hatred everytime you post I just skip it because you really not worth it.Just a bitch. [Edited 2/13/10 16:13pm] [Edited 2/13/10 16:16pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
babybugz said: MOL said: You DID agree with Vintage Junkie's comment. "I guess you and me are going to be on the same boat". Actually, my post was directed at VJunkie. But, since you replied (so intelectually!!!) I spent some of my time writing to you! You should be mad at people who think Michael is a pedo-junkie. Not me. Yeah on the same boat as far as feeling Michael wasn't murdered some things the poster said I did agree with and Yes I can replied Intellectually or I can cut to the chase and say Shut the fuck up. You just a bunch of negative energy bad enough Michael is not here and you make it worse when you coming with your essays disrespecting Michael's family. Everything out your mouth is hatred everytime you post I just skip it because you really not worth it.Just a bitch. [Edited 2/13/10 16:13pm] [Edited 2/13/10 16:16pm] The family that sells rumours to the press about how he was an addict? The family that told the police that Michael was a coke and heroin addict? The family that constantly hounded and sued him? I'm just stating facts about the family while defending MJ. [Edited 2/13/10 16:58pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MOL said: babybugz said: Yeah on the same boat as far as feeling Michael wasn't murdered some things the poster said I did agree with and Yes I can replied Intellectually or I can cut to the chase and say Shut the fuck up. You just a bunch of negative energy bad enough Michael is not here and you make it worse when you coming with your essays disrespecting Michael's family. Everything out your mouth is hatred everytime you post I just skip it because you really not worth it.Just a bitch. [Edited 2/13/10 16:13pm] [Edited 2/13/10 16:16pm] The family that sells rumours to the press about how he was an addict? The family that told the police that Michael was a coke and heroin addict? The family that constantly hounded and sued him? I'm just stating facts about the family while defending MJ. [Edited 2/13/10 16:58pm] I don't care ,go to another board and preach it. And since you be up in their house go give us those Truimph and Victory tour DVD's I know you know where they at since you living in their closet. I'm done with you. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MOL said: The family that sells rumours to the press about how he was an addict? The family that told the police that Michael was a coke and heroin addict? The family that constantly hounded and sued him? I'm just stating facts about the family while defending MJ. [Edited 2/13/10 16:58pm] Yeah, people don't like folks disrespecting the family, but is what they're saying not true? As long as it is, I have no problem with the knocks. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
mookie said: MOL said: The family that sells rumours to the press about how he was an addict? The family that told the police that Michael was a coke and heroin addict? The family that constantly hounded and sued him? I'm just stating facts about the family while defending MJ. [Edited 2/13/10 16:58pm] Yeah, people don't like folks disrespecting the family, but is what they're saying not true? As long as it is, I have no problem with the knocks. The problem is: it is NOT true. What they're saying is NOT true. Some in the family are inventing a lot of things because they want to sue AEG. Others because they want to mantain the "we are the perfect family" image. Others in that family simply didn't know anything about him and are just making assumptions. Michael was NOT a drug addict. He was NOT using Coke or Heroin. He wasn't addicted to any substance. [Edited 2/13/10 17:48pm] [Edited 2/13/10 17:48pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
babybugz said: MOL said: The family that sells rumours to the press about how he was an addict? The family that told the police that Michael was a coke and heroin addict? The family that constantly hounded and sued him? I'm just stating facts about the family while defending MJ. [Edited 2/13/10 16:58pm] I don't care ,go to another board and preach it. And since you be up in their house go give us those Truimph and Victory tour DVD's I know you know where they at since you living in their closet. I'm done with you. Shut up. You realised I was just stating facts and agaisnt facts, honey, there are no arguments. So, when you realised I was right and, therefore, you could not counter-argument me (was there a way?), you started insulting me and screaming "I'm done". You're done because you know I'm right. The truth hurts. By the way, another truth: I got too much to do to be having "discussions" with you. It's an impossible task. Whenever I state facts about MJ's family, you do everything but trying to have an argument. The whole "since you know so much..." and "Their his family..." doesn't go with me. If you or anyone else wants to continue thinking that MJ was a junkie then do it. Just don't disrespect me for defending him with real evidence (now you will call me "an worshipper" due to the lack of a counter-argument). [Edited 2/13/10 17:59pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MOL said: babybugz said: I don't care ,go to another board and preach it. And since you be up in their house go give us those Truimph and Victory tour DVD's I know you know where they at since you living in their closet. I'm done with you. Shut up. You realised I was just stating facts and agaisnt facts, honey, there are no arguments. So, when you realised I was right and, therefore, you could not counter-argument me (was there a way?), you started insulting me and screaming "I'm done". You're done because you know I'm right. The truth hurts. By the way, another truth: I got too much to do to be having "discussions" with you. It's an impossible task. Whenever I state facts about MJ's family, you do everything but trying to have an argument. The whole "since you know so much..." and "Their his family..." doesn't go with me. If you or anyone else wants to continue thinking that MJ was a junkie then do it. Just don't disrespect me for defending him with real evidence (now you will call me "an worshipper" due to the lack of a counter-argument). [Edited 2/13/10 17:59pm] Did I say he was a junkie no I did not Dumbass ,Go back in that closet and search for those dvd's you can keep posting all the essays in the world I DON'T GIVE A FUCK. Whatever happen in the past is so irrelevant now . I can care less what the jacksons have done they are not my family and they sure not as hell yours. Shit I'm actually laughing at your stupid ass while i'm typing this.You can reply if you like But I won't be writing back keep the comedy coming. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Project Love | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
luv4ever said: Project Love
I Apologize. let me get a drink | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Not to continue a debate but I thought it worthwhile to weigh in on the "junkie" tag being tossed about. Many people were quick to label Michael a "junkie" at his death, a sensationalist tag the media ran with (what a surprise).
Whilst certainly not a "junkie" by any stretch of the imagination - I don't think that anyone could deny that Michael had a dependancy on prescription drugs. He admitted to an over dependance in 93, and according to several reports underwent rehab on 2-3 occasions. As the autopsy results show, Michael was taking several pills for various ailments and sadly this was compounded by his insomnia. Sadly this over dependance on prescriptions became a crutch for Michael, and rather than relieve issues in the long run only made for a tragic outcome. But let's be clear - his cause of death was related to the propofol. Swa "I'm not human I'm a dove, I'm ur conscience. I am love" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
thats what im saying mj was harassed by family cuz they wanted his money.
i'll just refer to the evidence which was private phone calls that michael made [Edited 2/14/10 1:19am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
MOL said: The problem is: it is NOT true. What they're saying is NOT true. Some in the family are inventing a lot of things because they want to sue AEG. Others because they want to mantain the "we are the perfect family" image. Others in that family simply didn't know anything about him and are just making assumptions. Michael was NOT a drug addict. He was NOT using Coke or Heroin. He wasn't addicted to any substance. [Edited 2/13/10 17:48pm] [Edited 2/13/10 17:48pm] Yeah, I know that. I'm talking about folks like you who is criticized for going after them. I'm saying as long as your attacks are true, you shouldn't be criticized for your opinions on them | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Oh MY Gosh! Is that what I think it is? Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life. ~Berthold Auerbach | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life. ~Berthold Auerbach | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Is this Debbie? Some say it is, some it isn´t. Does anyone know for sure? Anyways, Mike´s just too gorgeous. It kinda looks like her. The chin, the smile, the nose... [Edited 2/14/10 10:54am] [Edited 2/14/10 10:55am] "When Michael Jackson is just singing and dancing, you just think this is an astonishing talent. And he has had this astounding talent all his life, but we want him to be floored as well. We really don´t like the idea that he could have it all." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Swa said: Not to continue a debate but I thought it worthwhile to weigh in on the "junkie" tag being tossed about. Many people were quick to label Michael a "junkie" at his death, a sensationalist tag the media ran with (what a surprise).
Whilst certainly not a "junkie" by any stretch of the imagination - I don't think that anyone could deny that Michael had a dependancy on prescription drugs. He admitted to an over dependance in 93, and according to several reports underwent rehab on 2-3 occasions. As the autopsy results show, Michael was taking several pills for various ailments and sadly this was compounded by his insomnia. Sadly this over dependance on prescriptions became a crutch for Michael, and rather than relieve issues in the long run only made for a tragic outcome. But let's be clear - his cause of death was related to the propofol. Swa To me drug addicts are like alcoholics, even if they haven't had a drink for 10 years they still view themselves as alcoholics because there is always that possibility that one drink can lead them back to alcoholism. Even if MJ wasn't takING large amounts of drugs at the time of his death, the fact is he was addicted in the pass he even sings about his addiction on his History album and the fact that he needed propofol to sleep in the first place means he must have built up a tolerance to the move conventional sleeping tablets. That in it's self points to some kind of addiction. [Edited 2/14/10 16:13pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dag said: Is this Debbie? Some say it is, some it isn´t. Does anyone know for sure? Anyways, Mike´s just too gorgeous. It kinda looks like her. The chin, the smile, the nose... [Edited 2/14/10 10:54am] [Edited 2/14/10 10:55am] Yes that is Debbie in the first picture definitely. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Disagree. Doesn't look like Debbie to me. A few similarities but I can tell it's not the same person. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WildStyle said: Disagree. Doesn't look like Debbie to me. A few similarities but I can tell it's not the same person.
Any idea on who it is then? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
EmeraldSkies said: bboy87 said: Oh MY Gosh! Is that what I think it is? It's a brand new website "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
WildStyle said: Disagree. Doesn't look like Debbie to me. A few similarities but I can tell it's not the same person.
It isn't her "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Can't believe that I went to the flea market today and found a first edition copy of Moonwalk from 1988 that was signed and had a sketch by MJ right before the title page dated 1998! The signature is definitely MJ's as well as the sketch. The guy selling it didn't know what he had--he sold the book for $7.00. Can't believe my luck--what a find! Just had to share! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
poetcorner61 said: Can't believe that I went to the flea market today and found a first edition copy of Moonwalk from 1988 that was signed and had a sketch by MJ right before the title page dated 1998! The signature is definitely MJ's as well as the sketch. The guy selling it didn't know what he had--he sold the book for $7.00. Can't believe my luck--what a find! Just had to share!
Yeah, that's in all copies of the First Edition from '88. "You put water into a cup, it becomes the cup...Now water can flow or it can crash. Be water, my friend." - Bruce Lee
"Water can nourish me, but water can also carry me. Water has magic laws." - JCVD | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Timmy84 said: Right. contrary to belief, black folks actually have brown hair, it's just really dark Where'd you get these pics from? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
poetcorner61 said: Can't believe that I went to the flea market today and found a first edition copy of Moonwalk from 1988 that was signed and had a sketch by MJ right before the title page dated 1998! The signature is definitely MJ's as well as the sketch. The guy selling it didn't know what he had--he sold the book for $7.00. Can't believe my luck--what a find! Just had to share!
Yeah that's on all first edition copies - it was touch he did to try and make it more personal. It's not reprint of his signature and sketch - sorry to burst the bubble. Swa "I'm not human I'm a dove, I'm ur conscience. I am love" | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |