independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Preview: Janet Jackson's 'Make Me' Video
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 11/17/09 11:41am

Lammastide

avatar

alphastreet said:

Lammastide said:

Definitely sounds like the Time. I take it this is a Jam/Lewis project?


sounds like old school Prince more than The Time. It made me think of Controversy a little bit with the intro.

You hear the old-school MPLS in it, too, eh?

I'm not bringing it up as a criticism, BTW. Just a personal observation.
Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ
πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν
τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.”
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 11/17/09 11:44am

Timmy84

It's definitely Minneapolis Sound-esque, that's why I like it. I could care less of the sample when I hear it. It's great!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 11/17/09 11:48am

Lammastide

avatar

Timmy84 said:

It's definitely Minneapolis Sound-esque, that's why I like it. I could care less of the sample when I hear it. It's great!

hmmm What is that sample? I thought maybe "Sexy Dancer," but that's not it.
Ὅσον ζῇς φαίνου
μηδὲν ὅλως σὺ λυποῦ
πρὸς ὀλίγον ἐστὶ τὸ ζῆν
τὸ τέλος ὁ χρόνος ἀπαιτεῖ.”
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 11/17/09 12:40pm

alphastreet

Lammastide said:

alphastreet said:



sounds like old school Prince more than The Time. It made me think of Controversy a little bit with the intro.

You hear the old-school MPLS in it, too, eh?

I'm not bringing it up as a criticism, BTW. Just a personal observation.


yeah I really do, a cross between that and off the wall mj
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 11/17/09 12:41pm

alphastreet

Lammastide said:

Timmy84 said:

It's definitely Minneapolis Sound-esque, that's why I like it. I could care less of the sample when I hear it. It's great!

hmmm What is that sample? I thought maybe "Sexy Dancer," but that's not it.


you mean there is a sample?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 11/17/09 12:49pm

Riverpoet31

more shallow plastic
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 11/17/09 12:56pm

ernestsewell

alphastreet said:

Lammastide said:


hmmm What is that sample? I thought maybe "Sexy Dancer," but that's not it.


you mean there is a sample?

I don't think there's a sample. Oddly, there are fewer songs of Janet's that have samples, than those that don't. Stuff like "Miss You Much", "Love Will Never Do With You", "I Get Lonely", "Come Back To Me", "Again", "Control", "Nasty", "What Have You Done For Me Lately?", "Runaway", etc have no samples. The songs that do, most of those don't rely on the sample. Stuff like "That's The Way Love Goes", "Son Of A Gun", and "You Want This" and "If" don't rely on the sample, but do highlight it, whereas "Rhythm Nation", "Someone To Call My Lover" and "All For You" depend more heavily on the sample for the sake of the song. She's certainly not a Will Smith or a Beyonce, who almost solely relies on a sample to carry a song (like Bootylicious, Men In Black, Crazy In Love, Deja Vu, Wild Wild West, Miami, Gettin' Jiggy Wit It).

"Feedback" was one of those songs that sounded like it had a sample in it, but it didn't. I think it's more about Jerkins' production. It has that heavy R&B/synth sound that almost makes you think it's a sample, but it's not. Examples: Justin's "Rock Your Body" (a Neptunes song), and MJ's "You Rock My World".
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 11/17/09 1:07pm

bboy87

avatar

midiscover said:

and I think the choreography would be better if Gil wasn't doing it

fixed it for you lol
"We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world."
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 11/17/09 1:07pm

80spfantwp

avatar

ernestsewell said:

I love the song.


yet you post negative comments about Prince's latest offerings, yet you acytually like this generic track - eek
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 11/17/09 1:13pm

ernestsewell

80spfantwp said:

ernestsewell said:

I love the song.


yet you post negative comments about Prince's latest offerings, yet you acytually like this generic track - eek

I'm not sure how loving a Janet song compares to saying something honest about Prince's music in the past few years.

If you care to judge me based on what I say only on Prince.org, then so be it. But I have over 21,000 songs in my iTunes, and hundreds of CDs, LPs, etc. That being said: I love all kinds of music, and I love lots of music.

"Make Me" is a straight ahead dance track, nothing else. She's not trying to preach about jehovah, the New Translation, or stupidly sidestepping a curse word in a song when the implication is there. It's just a one-off track for a Greatest Hits compilation. Same goes for "Celebration" and "Revolver" from Madonna.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 11/17/09 1:14pm

alphastreet

ernestsewell said:

alphastreet said:



you mean there is a sample?

I don't think there's a sample. Oddly, there are fewer songs of Janet's that have samples, than those that don't. Stuff like "Miss You Much", "Love Will Never Do With You", "I Get Lonely", "Come Back To Me", "Again", "Control", "Nasty", "What Have You Done For Me Lately?", "Runaway", etc have no samples. The songs that do, most of those don't rely on the sample. Stuff like "That's The Way Love Goes", "Son Of A Gun", and "You Want This" and "If" don't rely on the sample, but do highlight it, whereas "Rhythm Nation", "Someone To Call My Lover" and "All For You" depend more heavily on the sample for the sake of the song. She's certainly not a Will Smith or a Beyonce, who almost solely relies on a sample to carry a song (like Bootylicious, Men In Black, Crazy In Love, Deja Vu, Wild Wild West, Miami, Gettin' Jiggy Wit It).

"Feedback" was one of those songs that sounded like it had a sample in it, but it didn't. I think it's more about Jerkins' production. It has that heavy R&B/synth sound that almost makes you think it's a sample, but it's not. Examples: Justin's "Rock Your Body" (a Neptunes song), and MJ's "You Rock My World".


Yeah good point. I don't really think Rodney Jerkins was a fan of sampling anyways, so more power to him.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 11/17/09 1:49pm

ernestsewell

alphastreet said:

ernestsewell said:


I don't think there's a sample. Oddly, there are fewer songs of Janet's that have samples, than those that don't. Stuff like "Miss You Much", "Love Will Never Do With You", "I Get Lonely", "Come Back To Me", "Again", "Control", "Nasty", "What Have You Done For Me Lately?", "Runaway", etc have no samples. The songs that do, most of those don't rely on the sample. Stuff like "That's The Way Love Goes", "Son Of A Gun", and "You Want This" and "If" don't rely on the sample, but do highlight it, whereas "Rhythm Nation", "Someone To Call My Lover" and "All For You" depend more heavily on the sample for the sake of the song. She's certainly not a Will Smith or a Beyonce, who almost solely relies on a sample to carry a song (like Bootylicious, Men In Black, Crazy In Love, Deja Vu, Wild Wild West, Miami, Gettin' Jiggy Wit It).

"Feedback" was one of those songs that sounded like it had a sample in it, but it didn't. I think it's more about Jerkins' production. It has that heavy R&B/synth sound that almost makes you think it's a sample, but it's not. Examples: Justin's "Rock Your Body" (a Neptunes song), and MJ's "You Rock My World".


Yeah good point. I don't really think Rodney Jerkins was a fan of sampling anyways, so more power to him.

Yeah, I'm not sure of his stance on sampling, but it's a bit refreshing that he doesn't do it, if at all. People really bash Jerkins and his production, but the fact is he's put out a string of hits from Janet to Whitney to MJ, and beyond. Frankly, I'd take his stuff over The Neptunes any day of the week. He's not THE end all and be all of production, but he's more desirable than The Neptunes, and a few others.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 11/17/09 2:28pm

alphastreet

ernestsewell said:

alphastreet said:



Yeah good point. I don't really think Rodney Jerkins was a fan of sampling anyways, so more power to him.

Yeah, I'm not sure of his stance on sampling, but it's a bit refreshing that he doesn't do it, if at all. People really bash Jerkins and his production, but the fact is he's put out a string of hits from Janet to Whitney to MJ, and beyond. Frankly, I'd take his stuff over The Neptunes any day of the week. He's not THE end all and be all of production, but he's more desirable than The Neptunes, and a few others.


Yeah, I especially love his work on Brandy's albums, especially Full Moon, and the hits he was producing in the earlier part of the decade. It's like he changes his sound every few years, so he's cool in my book.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 11/17/09 4:37pm

therevolutionw
illnotbe

News flash! This is a 1982 CHIC track called "I Work For A Livin'". Producer extraordinaire Jerkins and Ms. Jackson simply sped it up, added some drum programming and sound effects. The original:
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 11/17/09 4:51pm

xlr8r

avatar

therevolutionwillnotbe said:

News flash! This is a 1982 CHIC track called "I Work For A Livin'". Producer extraordinaire Jerkins and Ms. Jackson simply sped it up, added some drum programming and sound effects. The original:


lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 11/17/09 5:02pm

ernestsewell

Based on the "Soup For One" album, let's not forget this:


was used as a sample in this:
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 11/17/09 5:13pm

midiscover

therevolutionwillnotbe said:

News flash! This is a 1982 CHIC track called "I Work For A Livin'". Producer extraordinaire Jerkins and Ms. Jackson simply sped it up, added some drum programming and sound effects. The original:


Yea, we know
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 11/17/09 5:30pm

therevolutionw
illnotbe

midiscover said:

therevolutionwillnotbe said:

News flash! This is a 1982 CHIC track called "I Work For A Livin'". Producer extraordinaire Jerkins and Ms. Jackson simply sped it up, added some drum programming and sound effects. The original:


Yea, we know


Are you speaking for the whole class now, midi?
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 11/17/09 7:40pm

phunkdaddy

avatar

The video looks okay. I like the song too
but i damn sure ain't buying another greatest hits
cd just to get one new song. I can live with listening
to it online.
Don't laugh at my funk
This funk is a serious joint
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 11/17/09 8:03pm

murph

Identity said:




I dig it...Old school JJ groove....Very R&B...Don't know how anyone who is/was a Janet Jackson fan could hate this song...Will wait to judge the video when its finished....
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 11/17/09 9:37pm

daPrettyman

avatar

murph said:

Identity said:




I dig it...Old school JJ groove....Very R&B...Don't know how anyone who is/was a Janet Jackson fan could hate this song...Will wait to judge the video when its finished....

Radio won't touch this song for some reason. I've requested it on several formats and pds won't give it the time of day. It's the same type of dance style that Britney or Gaga are doing, but pop radio won't play it. I just don't get it.
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 11/17/09 9:42pm

midiscover

daPrettyman said:

murph said:




I dig it...Old school JJ groove....Very R&B...Don't know how anyone who is/was a Janet Jackson fan could hate this song...Will wait to judge the video when its finished....

Radio won't touch this song for some reason. I've requested it on several formats and pds won't give it the time of day. It's the same type of dance style that Britney or Gaga are doing, but pop radio won't play it. I just don't get it.


  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 11/18/09 7:22am

daPrettyman

avatar

midiscover said:

daPrettyman said:


Radio won't touch this song for some reason. I've requested it on several formats and pds won't give it the time of day. It's the same type of dance style that Britney or Gaga are doing, but pop radio won't play it. I just don't get it.



I don't even think this is the reason anymore. I really think that pop radio is not ready for a 40+ year old singing dance music. Madonna is running into the same issues. "Celebration" didn't get pop radio airplay either.
**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••--**--••**--••-
U 'gon make me shake my doo loose!
http://www.twitter.com/nivlekbrad
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 11/18/09 1:19pm

IstenSzek

avatar

daPrettyman said:

midiscover said:




I don't even think this is the reason anymore. I really think that pop radio is not ready for a 40+ year old singing dance music. Madonna is running into the same issues. "Celebration" didn't get pop radio airplay either.


perhaps they should take a hint and start making some mature music
for a change.

not that radio would play that, since, well, they're over 40. they
don't play anyone over a certain age i guess.

but at least these 'old' artists could stop trying to be hip and
trendy and just go back to doing what they did best before they
became obsessed with being considered 'young' and 'happening'.
instead of all that they could just be themselves again and thus
actually being relevant and authentic and genius.

it's almost the same thing with prince. they want to be treated
like mature, serious artists, treated with the respect they all
deserve, yada yada yada.

yet, they're pissing away their own carreers by trying desperate
to stay 'relevant' an catering to 16 yr old instead of the people
who grew up with them and their music.

i can understand you'd want to make a fun, dance record or what
ever you'd fancy but come on, janet and madonna have been doing
the same damn routine for so long now that it's beyond boring.

why are they so affraid to just calm the fuck down and write an
album's worth of well crafted, melodic, classic sounding songs.
with an actual band. with lyrics that fit the mindset and wisdom
of their age.

i can't see any of their fans saying no to that.
and true love lives on lollipops and crisps
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 11/18/09 1:22pm

midiscover

daPrettyman said:

midiscover said:




I don't even think this is the reason anymore. I really think that pop radio is not ready for a 40+ year old singing dance music. Madonna is running into the same issues. "Celebration" didn't get pop radio airplay either.


No, it's that.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 11/18/09 1:24pm

alphastreet

IstenSzek said:

daPrettyman said:


I don't even think this is the reason anymore. I really think that pop radio is not ready for a 40+ year old singing dance music. Madonna is running into the same issues. "Celebration" didn't get pop radio airplay either.


perhaps they should take a hint and start making some mature music
for a change.

not that radio would play that, since, well, they're over 40. they
don't play anyone over a certain age i guess.

but at least these 'old' artists could stop trying to be hip and
trendy and just go back to doing what they did best before they
became obsessed with being considered 'young' and 'happening'.
instead of all that they could just be themselves again and thus
actually being relevant and authentic and genius.

it's almost the same thing with prince. they want to be treated
like mature, serious artists, treated with the respect they all
deserve, yada yada yada.

yet, they're pissing away their own carreers by trying desperate
to stay 'relevant' an catering to 16 yr old instead of the people
who grew up with them and their music.

i can understand you'd want to make a fun, dance record or what
ever you'd fancy but come on, janet and madonna have been doing
the same damn routine for so long now that it's beyond boring.

why are they so affraid to just calm the fuck down and write an
album's worth of well crafted, melodic, classic sounding songs.
with an actual band. with lyrics that fit the mindset and wisdom
of their age.

i can't see any of their fans saying no to that.


I can't stand Madonna's Celebration, very disappointed in that song. I don't think Make Me is Janet's best either, but it's not her worst either. I remember that her record label wanted her to sound like Sade and she wasn't having it. Though I like how Discipline turned out, I would have loved to hear janet go for a jazzier, mature sound cause she has the lush, melodic vocals for that IMO, and Velvet Rope was definitely a mature record on her part.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 11/18/09 1:33pm

IstenSzek

avatar

alphastreet said:

I can't stand Madonna's Celebration, very disappointed in that song. I don't think Make Me is Janet's best either, but it's not her worst either. I remember that her record label wanted her to sound like Sade and she wasn't having it. Though I like how Discipline turned out, I would have loved to hear janet go for a jazzier, mature sound cause she has the lush, melodic vocals for that IMO, and Velvet Rope was definitely a mature record on her part.


that is still her best album imo, although, fcuz, that's all just personal
taste. it sounds deeper, more daring and more intimate. i don't like any of
the albums that came after it even 10% as much as i love velvet rope.
and true love lives on lollipops and crisps
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 11/18/09 1:40pm

alphastreet

Yeah I really love that album too. Even though I love All For You, it was a grand departure from how she evolved on Velvet Rope. The rest of the albums had some good songs and some not so great.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 11/18/09 1:50pm

mimi07

avatar

midiscover said:

daPrettyman said:


Radio won't touch this song for some reason. I've requested it on several formats and pds won't give it the time of day. It's the same type of dance style that Britney or Gaga are doing, but pop radio won't play it. I just don't get it.




why post that ISH people need to get over that, it was OVER 5 years ago and it was an accident. u'd think janet's boob was a nuclear threat.

who listens's to the radio anymore these days anyways. i only listen to it when i use the bathroom at my mother's house.

and f**k YOU justin, u punk bitch
[Edited 11/18/09 13:51pm]
"we make our heroes in America only to destroy them"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 11/18/09 2:04pm

Shiningstarr26

avatar

Identity said:



This vid looks like it's gonna be fire!
pray dove rose *R.I.P MJ*...*And Thank You SO Much!* rose dove pray
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 2 <12
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Preview: Janet Jackson's 'Make Me' Video