independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Critics label Beyonce concert an "insolent sex party"
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #30 posted 11/07/09 10:40am

estelle81

avatar

Critics label Beyonce concert an "insolent sex party"


lol Aren't most of the concerts by top selling female artists like this nowadays? If Egypt is going to get pissy with Beyonce for this, than they had better never allow: Britney, Madonna, Rihanna, Mariah, Janet, Lady Gaga, etc. Really, can't pick on one and not all of them because that's some hypocritical nonsense so they should just ban 90% of the pop/rock/hip-hop concerts in Egypt because most of them have sex involved at some point.
Prince Rogers Nelson
Sunrise: June 7, 1958
Sunset: April 21, 2016
~My Heart Loudly Weeps

"My Creativity Is My Life." ~ Prince

Life is merely a dress rehearsal for eternity.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #31 posted 11/07/09 11:26am

sosgemini

avatar

purplesweat said:

sosgemini said:



okay, wasn't that worn for George Michael's Too Funky video? Why is she sporting it now? Next thing we know she is going to be wearing 1814 hats, one white glove or cone bras and playing it off like their her creations.


Who cares? It's just a top. Michael Jackson mimicked his favorite artists and outfits all the time, why can't she?


it's an iconic outfit like madonna's cone bras and mj's glove and the image is all George Michael's. She could have at least had a different one designed but it's the same damn outfit. I watched George Michael's Too Funky video to make sure.
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #32 posted 11/07/09 12:05pm

errant

avatar

sosgemini said:

purplesweat said:



Who cares? It's just a top. Michael Jackson mimicked his favorite artists and outfits all the time, why can't she?


it's an iconic outfit like madonna's cone bras and mj's glove and the image is all George Michael's. She could have at least had a different one designed but it's the same damn outfit. I watched George Michael's Too Funky video to make sure.



actually, it belongs to the designer, Thierry Mugler, not George and was on loan for the Too Funky video. it's sean in a haute coutour fashion show in that video. it's his to do with as he wishes. i'm sure it's on loan to Beyonce now. it is kind of weird that she brought it back after 17 years though
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #33 posted 11/07/09 12:08pm

midiscover

purplesweat said:

midiscover said:



OKAYYY!! The bitch just totally took MJ's VMA performance from 1995



Watch her say "It's a tribute to MJ"

falloff


She adored Mike and he adored her so it's obviously a tribute.




[Edited 11/6/09 21:15pm]


rolleyes

See what I mean? Is all her performances tributes
confused
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #34 posted 11/07/09 6:01pm

sosgemini

avatar

errant said:

sosgemini said:



it's an iconic outfit like madonna's cone bras and mj's glove and the image is all George Michael's. She could have at least had a different one designed but it's the same damn outfit. I watched George Michael's Too Funky video to make sure.



actually, it belongs to the designer, Thierry Mugler, not George and was on loan for the Too Funky video. it's sean in a haute coutour fashion show in that video. it's his to do with as he wishes. i'm sure it's on loan to Beyonce now. it is kind of weird that she brought it back after 17 years though


sigh

people do realize that I never claimed Michael's owned the actual piece of fashion, right? he owns the cultural significance though and beyonce, out of her own stupidity, attempted to co-opt it
Space for sale...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #35 posted 11/07/09 6:35pm

errant

avatar

sosgemini said:

errant said:




actually, it belongs to the designer, Thierry Mugler, not George and was on loan for the Too Funky video. it's sean in a haute coutour fashion show in that video. it's his to do with as he wishes. i'm sure it's on loan to Beyonce now. it is kind of weird that she brought it back after 17 years though


sigh

people do realize that I never claimed Michael's owned the actual piece of fashion, right? he owns the cultural significance though and beyonce, out of her own stupidity, attempted to co-opt it



wouldn't you say George co-opted it as well when he put it in his video?
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #36 posted 11/07/09 6:51pm

purplesweat

midiscover said:

purplesweat said:



She adored Mike and he adored her so it's obviously a tribute.




[Edited 11/6/09 21:15pm]


rolleyes

See what I mean? Is all her performances tributes
confused


????

He's her idol, the night she saw him on the Bad tour was the night she decided to be a singer. They were close friends. Of course she's going to tribute and reference him a lot.
[Edited 11/7/09 18:52pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #37 posted 11/07/09 6:52pm

purplesweat

sosgemini said:

purplesweat said:



Who cares? It's just a top. Michael Jackson mimicked his favorite artists and outfits all the time, why can't she?


it's an iconic outfit like madonna's cone bras and mj's glove and the image is all George Michael's. She could have at least had a different one designed but it's the same damn outfit. I watched George Michael's Too Funky video to make sure.


Again, who gives a fuck? She probably liked the top.
[Edited 11/7/09 18:52pm]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #38 posted 11/07/09 7:14pm

ABeautifulOne

avatar

errant said:

sosgemini said:



it's an iconic outfit like madonna's cone bras and mj's glove and the image is all George Michael's. She could have at least had a different one designed but it's the same damn outfit. I watched George Michael's Too Funky video to make sure.



actually, it belongs to the designer, Thierry Mugler, not George and was on loan for the Too Funky video. it's sean in a haute coutour fashion show in that video. it's his to do with as he wishes. i'm sure it's on loan to Beyonce now. it is kind of weird that she brought it back after 17 years though


Thierry brought it back because he's clothing her for this entire I Am era including in videos, red carpet appearances, and her entire tour...
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #39 posted 11/07/09 7:23pm

HonestMan13

avatar

An "Insolent Sex Party"?!?

Please! As soon as you think her tit will pop out or something she'll start thanking Jesus for her many blessings and then the 'party' will be over.
When eye go 2 a Prince concert or related event it's all heart up in the house but when eye log onto this site and the miasma of bitchiness is completely overwhelming!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #40 posted 11/07/09 7:36pm

midiscover

purplesweat said:

midiscover said:



rolleyes

See what I mean? Is all her performances tributes
confused


????

He's her idol, the night she saw him on the Bad tour was the night she decided to be a singer. They were close friends. Of course she's going to tribute and reference him a lot.
[Edited 11/7/09 18:52pm]


Well, her "borrowed" ideas are very obvious in all her work.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #41 posted 11/07/09 7:40pm

errant

avatar

midiscover said:

purplesweat said:



????

He's her idol, the night she saw him on the Bad tour was the night she decided to be a singer. They were close friends. Of course she's going to tribute and reference him a lot.
[Edited 11/7/09 18:52pm]


Well, her "borrowed" ideas are very obvious in all her work.



you must be very young to have not yet figured out that everything in popular music is "borrowed"
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #42 posted 11/07/09 7:43pm

midiscover

errant said:

midiscover said:



Well, her "borrowed" ideas are very obvious in all her work.



you must be very young to have not yet figured out that everything in popular music is "borrowed"


What do you mean? I know many artists have used ideas from other artists for their own work but Beyonce makes it so obvious. Age has nothing to do with this.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #43 posted 11/07/09 7:47pm

errant

avatar

midiscover said:

errant said:




you must be very young to have not yet figured out that everything in popular music is "borrowed"


What do you mean? I know many artists have used ideas from other artists for their own work but Beyonce makes it so obvious. Age has nothing to do with this.



comfort
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #44 posted 11/07/09 7:49pm

midiscover

errant said:

midiscover said:



What do you mean? I know many artists have used ideas from other artists for their own work but Beyonce makes it so obvious. Age has nothing to do with this.



comfort


http://www.nizkor.org/fea...rring.html

batting eyes
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #45 posted 11/07/09 7:52pm

errant

avatar

midiscover said:




was that on this week's list of vocab words? lol
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #46 posted 11/07/09 7:54pm

midiscover

errant said:

midiscover said:




was that on this week's list of vocab words? lol



Still....

lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #47 posted 11/07/09 9:44pm

Ottensen

TD3 said:

BlaqueKnight said:

I'm sorry but the words "Beyoncé" and "sex party" aren't exactly a deterrent for ticket sales.
If I find out Beyoncé is having a sex party near me, insolent or other wise, I'm goin'.


lol lol lol

Much to about nothing. I sure Beyoncé will tone it down in some aspects. But like the article stated, the well to do will be going to the concert. Like all countries, I don't care how conservative they are the middele class/wealth kinda do what they want to. Different rules.....



Ummm, not in North Africa. The culture in that region is nothing like what we would compare to western lives in the middle and upper middle class suburbanite United States. Her best approach for ensuring her concert actually gets to happen is to institute a bit of modesty, and indicate that she is sensitive to their culture. On their turf, she will have to adapt to fit into their paradigm, not the other way around, regardless of how much money is involved from the patrons who attend.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #48 posted 11/07/09 9:55pm

PurpleGstring

avatar

babynoz said:

Bey sings well enough that she doesn't need to rely on the "sexy" to put on a good show. Why not just tone it down?

That's the point she can't tone it down. She likes being naked. confused
music
None of them got what it takes
2 B a future baby mama
Gotta bend in the wind, but don't break
2 keep your man
Show me 1 of them and I'll make her mine
With no more drama
Future baby mama
prince
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #49 posted 11/07/09 11:59pm

purplesweat

midiscover said:

purplesweat said:



????

He's her idol, the night she saw him on the Bad tour was the night she decided to be a singer. They were close friends. Of course she's going to tribute and reference him a lot.
[Edited 11/7/09 18:52pm]


Well, her "borrowed" ideas are very obvious in all her work.


Uh, tributes are supposed to be obvious. You're not supposed to be going "who the hell is she referencing?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #50 posted 11/08/09 1:01am

errant

avatar

PurpleGstring said:

babynoz said:

Bey sings well enough that she doesn't need to rely on the "sexy" to put on a good show. Why not just tone it down?

That's the point she can't tone it down. She likes being naked. confused



who's that in your avatar?
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #51 posted 11/08/09 6:57am

babynoz

Ottensen said:

TD3 said:



lol lol lol

Much to about nothing. I sure Beyoncé will tone it down in some aspects. But like the article stated, the well to do will be going to the concert. Like all countries, I don't care how conservative they are the middele class/wealth kinda do what they want to. Different rules.....



Ummm, not in North Africa. The culture in that region is nothing like what we would compare to western lives in the middle and upper middle class suburbanite United States. Her best approach for ensuring her concert actually gets to happen is to institute a bit of modesty, and indicate that she is sensitive to their culture. On their turf, she will have to adapt to fit into their paradigm, not the other way around, regardless of how much money is involved from the patrons who attend.


Exactly. If she was smart enough she would see this as an opportunity to prove herself as more than just a sexpot.
Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #52 posted 11/08/09 9:57am

BlaqueKnight

avatar

babynoz said:

Ottensen said:




Ummm, not in North Africa. The culture in that region is nothing like what we would compare to western lives in the middle and upper middle class suburbanite United States. Her best approach for ensuring her concert actually gets to happen is to institute a bit of modesty, and indicate that she is sensitive to their culture. On their turf, she will have to adapt to fit into their paradigm, not the other way around, regardless of how much money is involved from the patrons who attend.


Exactly. If she was smart enough she would see this as an opportunity to prove herself as more than just a sexpot.



So now its okay for an artist to compromise their art?
Nobody would approve of Prince doing that. Why should Beyonce be subjected to a different set of rules?
Before we go down this path, I know and agree that she is more pop product than artist. All I'm saying is that if you're not going to respect a culture's guidelines, then DON'T GO THERE. No artist should have to compromise what they do for anyone. She should cancel the gig rather than force a tense situation.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #53 posted 11/08/09 5:39pm

babynoz

BlaqueKnight said:

babynoz said:



Exactly. If she was smart enough she would see this as an opportunity to prove herself as more than just a sexpot.



So now its okay for an artist to compromise their art?
Nobody would approve of Prince doing that. Why should Beyonce be subjected to a different set of rules?
Before we go down this path, I know and agree that she is more pop product than artist. All I'm saying is that if you're not going to respect a culture's guidelines, then DON'T GO THERE. No artist should have to compromise what they do for anyone. She should cancel the gig rather than force a tense situation.


You talk as though the totality of her art consists only of revealing costumes and vigorous rump shaking and I don't think that's the case. I'm actually giving her art more credit than you are. She can easily change the packaging of her product as Prince has done many times. For example, note the contrasts between the Dirty Mind Tour, Lovesexy and Musicology. Some might, and in fact, have argued that P compromised his art since he was performing in tailored suits and no longer utters profanity...I don't agree.

Exhibiting versatility is not a compromise...just the opposite, and Bey is capable of pulling off a great performance minus the gimmicks she has come to rely on...I've seen her do it.

Whether she sees this as an obstacle or an opportunity is her choice.
Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #54 posted 11/08/09 6:05pm

seeingvoices12

avatar

SCNDLS said:

Ain't enough money in the world to make me play in any of those places. She would be a perfect target for anyone wanting to lash out against America. Her daddy is crazy. disbelief


Are you serious? hmm eek
MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P
مايكل جاكسون للأبد
1958
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #55 posted 11/08/09 8:43pm

errant

avatar

babynoz said:

BlaqueKnight said:




So now its okay for an artist to compromise their art?
Nobody would approve of Prince doing that. Why should Beyonce be subjected to a different set of rules?
Before we go down this path, I know and agree that she is more pop product than artist. All I'm saying is that if you're not going to respect a culture's guidelines, then DON'T GO THERE. No artist should have to compromise what they do for anyone. She should cancel the gig rather than force a tense situation.


You talk as though the totality of her art consists only of revealing costumes and vigorous rump shaking and I don't think that's the case. I'm actually giving her art more credit than you are. She can easily change the packaging of her product as Prince has done many times. For example, note the contrasts between the Dirty Mind Tour, Lovesexy and Musicology. Some might, and in fact, have argued that P compromised his art since he was performing in tailored suits and no longer utters profanity...I don't agree.

Exhibiting versatility is not a compromise...just the opposite, and Bey is capable of pulling off a great performance minus the gimmicks she has come to rely on...I've seen her do it.

Whether she sees this as an obstacle or an opportunity is her choice.



the difference is, had someone, anyone tried to censor Prince during the Dirty Mind and Lovesexy tours, he and ESPECIALLY his fans would've been up in arms about it.

but i did hear he took out or abbreviated the "love is god, god is love" part of Anna Stesia during the Lovesexy shows in Japan. and you know the Prince of 2009 with his holier than thou bullshit wouldn't be doing that now.
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #56 posted 11/09/09 12:34am

BlaqueKnight

avatar

babynoz said:


You talk as though the totality of her art consists only of revealing costumes and vigorous rump shaking and I don't think that's the case. I'm actually giving her art more credit than you are. She can easily change the packaging of her product as Prince has done many times. For example, note the contrasts between the Dirty Mind Tour, Lovesexy and Musicology. Some might, and in fact, have argued that P compromised his art since he was performing in tailored suits and no longer utters profanity...I don't agree.

Exhibiting versatility is not a compromise...just the opposite, and Bey is capable of pulling off a great performance minus the gimmicks she has come to rely on...I've seen her do it.

Whether she sees this as an obstacle or an opportunity is her choice.


I don't understand how you jumped to that conclusion. I've said many times on here that Beyonce is a talented singer and entertainer. It just seems that her talents are squandered on sub-par material and mindless musical dribble to feed the pop culture zombies.
I said nothing of exhibiting versatility. I was referring to making drastic changes in her set/tour for the sake of one place. I don't know how much you know about tours and what it takes to put a large one together but I can tell you that its not an easy task and a lot of work goes on before the show hits the road. All costumes, sets and ideas are hammered out beforehand. Changing an outfit can change a lot more than you'd think.
Also, this is a COMPLETELY different era in music than when Prince was a pop artist. The game has changed and its a lot more formula-oriented than it ever was before. If the laws in the country refuse to allow for her show as it is then its much simpler to bow out of the gig than change the show - especially on a major tour like hers.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #57 posted 11/09/09 5:56am

babynoz

errant said:

babynoz said:



You talk as though the totality of her art consists only of revealing costumes and vigorous rump shaking and I don't think that's the case. I'm actually giving her art more credit than you are. She can easily change the packaging of her product as Prince has done many times. For example, note the contrasts between the Dirty Mind Tour, Lovesexy and Musicology. Some might, and in fact, have argued that P compromised his art since he was performing in tailored suits and no longer utters profanity...I don't agree.

Exhibiting versatility is not a compromise...just the opposite, and Bey is capable of pulling off a great performance minus the gimmicks she has come to rely on...I've seen her do it.

Whether she sees this as an obstacle or an opportunity is her choice.



the difference is, had someone, anyone tried to censor Prince during the Dirty Mind and Lovesexy tours, he and ESPECIALLY his fans would've been up in arms about it.

but i did hear he took out or abbreviated the "love is god, god is love" part of Anna Stesia during the Lovesexy shows in Japan. and you know the Prince of 2009 with his holier than thou bullshit wouldn't be doing that now.


As I recall, someone named Tipper Gore did try to censor Prince. The result was parental advisory stickers and I wasn't particularly up in arms about it. Critics and such are the cost of doing business for a celeb.

I'm not advocating censorship, neither was the poster who I was responding to. We're simply saying that if Bey "chose" to be sensitive to the culture in that part of the world, she is still capable of putting on a good show.
Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #58 posted 11/09/09 6:16am

Harlepolis

Fuck the bullshit!

You don't come to people's houses and expect them to adapt the way you present yourself, its the other way around OR at least repsect it.

Agree/disagree with ANY social custom they practice till you get blue in the face, the fact of the matter is, its THEIR culture just like we have ours,,,,don't expect 'em them to conform to our ideals and move out the way just because you're an American, you're setting yourself up with this type of thinking.

Alot of Americans have this self-made arrogance about other cultures and they come to those countries with the attitude that they'll do ANYTHING just like they're in their homes, only to be put in their place and get reminded that they're "foreigners" in that side of the world lol If I seen it once, I've seen it a 1000 times.

Respect, people. Its not about censorship or any of that mess,,,,its about respecting people's homes, plain common sense if you ask me.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #59 posted 11/09/09 6:17am

babynoz

BlaqueKnight said:

babynoz said:


You talk as though the totality of her art consists only of revealing costumes and vigorous rump shaking and I don't think that's the case. I'm actually giving her art more credit than you are. She can easily change the packaging of her product as Prince has done many times. For example, note the contrasts between the Dirty Mind Tour, Lovesexy and Musicology. Some might, and in fact, have argued that P compromised his art since he was performing in tailored suits and no longer utters profanity...I don't agree.

Exhibiting versatility is not a compromise...just the opposite, and Bey is capable of pulling off a great performance minus the gimmicks she has come to rely on...I've seen her do it.

Whether she sees this as an obstacle or an opportunity is her choice.


I don't understand how you jumped to that conclusion. I've said many times on here that Beyonce is a talented singer and entertainer. It just seems that her talents are squandered on sub-par material and mindless musical dribble to feed the pop culture zombies.
I said nothing of exhibiting versatility. I was referring to making drastic changes in her set/tour for the sake of one place. I don't know how much you know about tours and what it takes to put a large one together but I can tell you that its not an easy task and a lot of work goes on before the show hits the road. All costumes, sets and ideas are hammered out beforehand. Changing an outfit can change a lot more than you'd think.
Also, this is a COMPLETELY different era in music than when Prince was a pop artist. The game has changed and its a lot more formula-oriented than it ever was before. If the laws in the country refuse to allow for her show as it is then its much simpler to bow out of the gig than change the show - especially on a major tour like hers.


The same way you jumped to the conclusion that I said she should compromise her art...I said nothing of the sort. I'm saying that Bey has the talent and the wherewithal to modify her show IF she chose to do so. You may have a point in that it would most likely be easier to cancel, which she did in fact do in the case of the Malaysia gig, but Ottensen and I were not saying what she "should" do, we were discussing what she "could" do. Maybe, just maybe, this gig could be an opportunity to rise above the mindless musical dribble and pop culture zombies, as you put it.

I'm fine with whatever choice she makes.
Prince, in you I found a kindred spirit...Rest In Paradise.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 2 of 3 <123>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > Critics label Beyonce concert an "insolent sex party"