BlaqueKnight said:

Have you seen the movie Metropolis?

It's symbolism, meaning that humans are slowly becoming more like machines/robots (HINT: microchips in the future)..

Will Smith, Beyonce, Kylie Minogue, and even Lady Gaga has used this kind of symbolism before. Now Chris Brown is using it.

TonyVanDam said:

I'm convinced you're a conspiracy theorist

Well MJ started it with his glitter glove hand. We will all be BORG!!!! Not me....nah, Ima be that human/terminator hybrid from Terminator:Salvation. Ima choose my choice and woop all you bouncays and chrisbeatas and gagagooers asses!!!!


"YAHOO DA MUTHAFUCCAS!!!!"





CARRY ON.

DesireeNevermind said:

reminds me of MJ and JJ and purple rain- is that the same font?

"Do you like my style?"

Is it the clothes, or is he shaped like a female??

midiscover said:

Actually, I'm a conspiracy realist.

By definition, a conspiracy realist is a person who has come to terms with the harsh reality that most conspiracies are real, especially on the moment the evidences/hints/clues are too obvious.

BACK ON TOPIC: People wanting to be robotic is not an original concept. Have you ever seen any classic episodes of Doctor Who featuring Cybermen?!?

trueiopian said:

TonyVanDam said:

Chris Brown and all these other fake, worthless, image-heavy wannabes have never been original....robotic or not! Those pictures and that new single is hideous!
[Edited 11/4/09 19:50pm]

TonyVanDam said:

All this talk of these artists got you militant all of a sudden man.

Better yet, how many fans of the old-school remember Kraftwerk?



These guys predict the man/robot merger years before any other artists even thought about putting those ideas in their videos.

silverchild said:

First he was suppose to be a potential heir to the throne of Michael Jackson. Now he wants to be a robot like Kraftwerk.

Timmy84 said:

The clones (Beyonce, Lady Gaga, Chris Brown) getting more credit than the originals (Tina Turner, David Bowie, Michael Jackson) is enough to make anyone a bitter cultural critic, never mind a militant.

TonyVanDam said:

You do know Metropolis is from the 1930's? Quite a few years on Dr. Who.

TonyVanDam said:

How you can explain this nucca wearin' Spanx though?

BklynBabe said:

he stole her clothes, hoping the devil gets them confused and gives him his career back

bboy87 said:

Something is entirely wrong with that!

Like someone said earlier, he stating that he's Jay-Z and Kanye's bitch now!!
[Edited 11/4/09 21:06pm]

SUPRMAN said:

I know that.

I just saw this wack cover and was coming here to post about it. LMBAO!!!! WTH?

I always thought that when a dude wears tight pants, spandex looking pants at that, it would be solely to show off a bulge of some sort. But Chris seems to have gone out of his way to look as bump-free as possible. The hell?

He has me told, though!! Here he go: “Who cares if my pants r fitted,” he wrote. “It’s called fashion. I'm so tired of closed minded people. I'm 100% comfortable wit my sexuality. I'm a grown man.” He snapped up haters like me something awful!! http://www.news.com.au/en...84,00.html

And isn't one of his community service jobs supposed to be REMOVING GRAFFITI? I swear this dude is clueless. And that song is plum awful! Dang!! I thought, watch the music be the business 'cause the artwork is so bad...but no, I don't think I'll have to worry about liking his stuff this time out. "I Can Transform You," though? Transform you to a poster child for beat up women? His PR team is a massive, mammoth-sized FAIL!!!
[Edited 11/4/09 21:29pm]

silverchild said:

I need a new woman to bash. Or I am trying to be Ike Turner, one of the two. Also I need to sack my album designer.

So much negativity on this thread. U guys are merciless...

Three things:

* Look! Someone I know has read Quark XPress and Photoshop for Dummies!
* I'm reaching out to my gay audience
* I've still got the artistic tastes of a high school freshman
[Edited 11/5/09 5:38am]

It's tasteless.

Pseudo-iconic.

His trousers look gay.

TonyVanDam said:

MJ gets too much credit. More than he desrves. Yet you wanna say it's quite the difference, no?

TonyVanDam said:

I think the film is from 1927/28?

Funnily enough there's no bulge?

banks said:

banks said:

Can I just say and and and finally