why was he found not guilty? insufficient evidence

why was that? the same reason many paedophiles are found not guilty, proving the word of an adult against the word of a child. add to that the fact that the adult in question was a multi millionaire who could pay for the best lawyers in the world, and had the resources to use less scrupulous people who could for example intimidate or pay off whoever they wanted to change peoples minds and choices

put yourself in the shoes of a paedophile who doesn't want to go to jail. you would lie, cheat and do anything in your power to avoid prison, including intimidation tactics and trying to pay off witnesses or accusers

whilst you say you saw nothing to make you believe he was a paedophile, tell me what evidence you ever saw of any paedophile? you don't see that stuff, but people are still guilty and convicted of it on a regular basis

the guy admitted to sleeping with kids, even on camera. that's not what a normal straight male would do. what kind of evidence do you need to satisfy your mind he was a paedophile? a video of him fucking a young boy?

my original point was that his fan base would stand by him and say he was innocent without any evidence whatsoever that he was innocent, simply because they couldn't believe, and more importantly did not want to believe that a pop star they idolised could be a criminal. we now know he was a criminal by illegally abusing drugs, that's been clearly established as it killed him. we also know he lied about a number of things about his personal life. it's therefore not hard to accept the possibility that he was a paedophile and should have been convicted of the charges put against him

and as i said before, had he been convicted of the charges, he would than likely have been alive to this day, and healthier than he had been in the past 25 years

But most Pedos would not publicly admit that they allow children to sleep in their bed either. Most Pedos like to blend in and not make themselves obvious.
Mj made his relationship with children too obvious from the beginning, he never hid it. So although his behaviour was very odd for a straight guy, it was not typical Pedo behaviour either, even though it may seem like that. The fact of the matter is all they had is circumstantial evidence and considering the amount of children MJ had around him there should have had a lot more physical evidence then they did. I mean they could not even charge him with child porn, which is how they get most pedos nowadays. His case was not as black and white as people like to think. Anyway doesn't even matter now, even if there was a video of him abusing a child, they can't exactly put him on trial again!!

you can't rope MJ into the category of most peadophiles, as he can't be roped into the category of most humans, he's very different to the average person. the average paedophile wouldn't be able to have a big house to invite kids into,nor the celebrity personality, so just because he doesn't exibit what you consider to be normal paedophile activity doesn't mean he isn't a peadophile. he doesn't exibit the normal activity for any human being. inviting young boys to your home certainly isn't normal activity for a single male without kids, nevermind letting them sleep over