New topic
Printablehow much surgery do yall think janet has gone thru?
are her boobs real, they look real | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
ehuffnsd said: trueiopian said: What photoshoot is this from?
I  this picture!that looks like something in the velvet rope era. No, it's from the Bazaar issue 2007 I think.... It's not from TVR era though | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
dearmother said: how much surgery do yall think janet has gone thru?
are her boobs real, they look real A few nose jobs, her boobs are real remember the SB? She probably got a breast lift around the 20 Y.O. era since she lost a lot of weight. That's it | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
ooh a lift, that's it. they look good | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Yea, I remember in the 20 Y.O. era when she was butt naked by the pool and the paps snapped pics and filmed her playing with her ass and titties. Everything looked very real.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
 | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Have you seen it? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: ehuffnsd said: that looks like something in the velvet rope era. No, it's from the Bazaar issue 2007 I think.... It's not from TVR era though This photoshoot was from the spring 2007 issue of Sly & Chic magazine (in the UK). It's probably the best thing, photography-wise, to come from that era.  [Edited 9/5/09 18:31pm] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: Yea, I remember in the 20 Y.O. era when she was butt naked by the pool and the paps snapped pics and filmed her playing with her ass and titties. Everything looked very real.
That was AFY era and pre-SB. She was very fit. [Edited 9/5/09 18:26pm] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: midiscover said: Yea, I remember in the 20 Y.O. era when she was butt naked by the pool and the paps snapped pics and filmed her playing with her ass and titties. Everything looked very real.
That was AFY era and pre-SB. She was very fit. [Edited 9/5/09 18:26pm] It was actually after the SB in 2005. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: VoicesCarry said: That was AFY era and pre-SB. She was very fit. [Edited 9/5/09 18:26pm] It was actually after the SB in 2005. You're right. I remember most of the tabloid headlines mentioned the SB. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
VoicesCarry said: midiscover said: No, it's from the Bazaar issue 2007 I think.... It's not from TVR era though This photoshoot was from the spring 2007 issue of Sly & Chic magazine (in the UK). It's probably the best thing, photography-wise, to come from that era.
[Edited 9/5/09 18:31pm] I love this photoshoot and I agree it's the best thing from that era! Janet should do more photoshoots like this and Prestige!  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SoulAlive said: This thread is funny
What I really hate is that....before MJ's death,nobody cared about the other Jacksons.They were obsolete and forgotten.But now,all of a sudden,they are everywhere.Jermaine is writing a book,the brothers are doing a reality show,LaToya is on 'The View' and even Joe is launching a new record label :rolll: I wish these people would disappear again! I know that's harsh but it's how I really feel. As for Janet,I see nothing wrong with her doing this interview.At least she will be talking about something important for a change...instead of her sex life with Jermaine Dupri (lol). Thank goodness we'll be spared this time around about hearing how much she wuvs her little troll, I mean, er uh, her little Jermaine.
The rest however, brings me to another question though, because it's a sentiment I hear repeated over and over again on some of these threads: Seriously, Soul Alive; why should the Jacksons disappear? No matter what they do the public is going to give them the shitty end of the stick and they will not escape our collective (and generally negative) judgement. I mean, before Michael's death they were chastized for not working in jobs that we, the public deemed appropriate for their famous show biz lineage. People screamed,"why don't they sing? Why don't they dance? Why don't they tour? Why don't they get involved in some other facet of show business? Michael does all the work and they're just lazy, etc." Even I'm guilty of it; having moaned and groaned for years that Jermaine hadn't taken his 1980's r&b hits and hit the niche 70's-80' r&b nostalgia circuit that would be receptive to his work. Even those who do work consistently (Tito with his blues band doing ordinary gigs, and Latoya with her endless hairbrained C-list celebrity endoresements)get judged just for making a living with what they've got. When Randy was found to be a shelf stocker at a supermarket, the general public ridiculed this man and spoke ill of him as if he were a sideshow freak that shot up a schoolyard full of children 
For those who want to criticize these people for taking these opportunities to make a living, my question is not only why, but what would you have them do instead? Okay, there was little public interest in them as a whole before their brother's death. So what? There were no opportunities for them, but now there are offers out there. Micheal is gone, he is not coming back, and life has to move forward. What are they supposed to do? Hang up the phone on any production company that calls, and go back to stocking shelves at 40 something years old? At what point should they simply be allowed to find ways to eat? At what point do we in the public let go of the ridiculous notion that we are somehow entitled to sanction or bestow blessing on what creative projects come their way? These people are advancing in age, with families to feed. Personally, I don't see where any of these ventures are illegal or immoral, although as a rukle I am a firm follower of and believer in proper social ettiquette, regardless of professional field. Therefore I do agree there should be a respectable amount of time passed before certain endeavors are engaged in. However, for all the opportunities being presented to them, as long as they don't involved ill-intentioned behavior or character assasination, and simply focus on their joy for the art of performing, I think the vitriol being spewed their way is nothing more than silly, nothing less than irrational, and entirely unreasonable. Should Liza Minelli and Lorna Luft have stopped performing or speaking of their mother Judy Gardland after she died? Should Marlo Thomas have discontinued the efforts and message her father Danny Thomas began in his work with St.Judes after his passing? Honestly, the projections and unreasonable expectations we in the public place on celebrities (who are in fact, people we don't even know personally) is staggering. Again, for those criticizing these people for accepting jobs that will allow them to respectfully make a living, my question to you is, what would you have them do instead to feed their families and pay their bills ? Better yet, ask yourself what you would do if you were in their place? Even if your answer is different from what you see (or think you understand) they are doing, people need to wake up and understand at the end of the day we really have no right to expect them to do what we perceive is right for getting food on their tables, making sure their taxes are paid, and that they will have survival money to carry them into their old age. Just a thought. By the way, Soul, this post wasn't directed at you personally, it's more of a question for everyone on the thread
[Edited 9/6/09 0:01am] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
You're absolutely right,they gotta do what they gotta do  It's just so annoying to pick up a magazine and read about "the return of LaToya",you know what I mean? There is a reason why these people were ignored all these decades,lol.
.... [Edited 9/6/09 12:14pm] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
is it really true that randy was a supermarket shelver? the only place i heard that was from a ny post article. and wasn't it marlon who was supposed to be the stocker?
i remember the wall st. journal railing about minority set asides for tv station licenses and being incensed that someone like marlon jackson was able to get in on a sweet deal like that, the implication being that he was a wealthy man so why should he automatically get a lowered price than a wealthy white man. their argument aside, it would seem that marlon had other business ventures. isn't he the one spearheading project for the resort near a former slave port in nigeria? so i'm thinking randy may have had some other stuff on the side. the jacksons music sells and since he and mj wrote some of their biggest hits, i'm sure he gets some royalties from that, no? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
SoulAlive said: This thread is funny
What I really hate is that....before MJ's death,nobody cared about the other Jacksons.They were obsolete and forgotten.But now,all of a sudden,they are everywhere.Jermaine is writing a book,the brothers are doing a reality show,LaToya is on 'The View' and even Joe is launching a new record label :rolll: I wish these people would disappear again! I know that's harsh but it's how I really feel. Actually, I love the Jacksons they make me feel closer to Michael, and the Jackson reality show was already in the works and filmed before Michael died. Also, it's not "all of the sudden," the Jacksons have always been active. Latoya Jackson: Co-hosted "The View" in 2004 Latoya did "Mad TV" in 1998 Latoya did Larry King Live in 2003 Anna Nicole Smith show in 2004 Acess Hollywood in 2003 20/20 in 2005 A reality show called "Armed and Famous"in 2007 Celebrity Big Brother in 2009 And other talks shows and radio shows since 2000s. She also had planned to do a movie. Jermaine Jackson: The View in 2003 Larry King Live in 2003 Unsung in 2008 Ole School with Terry and Gita in 2008 Australian Idol in 2008 Celebrity Big Brother in 2007 The Early Show in 2004 Inside Edition in 2004 Motown 45 in 2004 Michael Jackson 30th Anniversary 2001 Jackie Jackson: Did Armed and Famous in 2007 Michael Jackson 30th Anniversary in 2001 And the other Jacksons have made appearances on talk shows and other shows as well. There was even talks of the Jackson 5 touring again. They haven't been obselete or forgotten. They have always been of interest, even when low key. The Jacksons are musical royalty and LEGENDS. [Edited 9/7/09 20:36pm] [Edited 9/7/09 20:37pm] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I remember being a huge fan of Janet's in the 90's! I went to her Rhythm Nation tour when I was a youngin' Hands down! the greatest female entertainer of our time. But her music just went downhill after All for You! It probably has to do with her dating that one Hip-hop producer. I hope she finds herself one of these days. I'm looking forward to her next album since she's back with Jimmy and Terry. They seem to get the best out of Janet. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Sprite said: SoulAlive said: This thread is funny
What I really hate is that....before MJ's death,nobody cared about the other Jacksons.They were obsolete and forgotten.But now,all of a sudden,they are everywhere.Jermaine is writing a book,the brothers are doing a reality show,LaToya is on 'The View' and even Joe is launching a new record label :rolll: I wish these people would disappear again! I know that's harsh but it's how I really feel. Actually, I love the Jacksons they make me feel closer to Michael, and the Jackson reality show was already in the works and filmed before Michael died. Also, it's not "all of the sudden," the Jacksons have always been active. Latoya Jackson: Co-hosted "The View" in 2004 Latoya did "Mad TV" in 1998 Latoya did Larry King Live in 2003 Anna Nicole Smith show in 2004 Acess Hollywood in 2003 20/20 in 2005 A reality show called "Armed and Famous"in 2007 Celebrity Big Brother in 2009 And other talks shows and radio shows since 2000s. She also had planned to do a movie. Jermaine Jackson: The View in 2003 Larry King Live in 2003 Unsung in 2008 Ole School with Terry and Gita in 2008 Australian Idol in 2008 Celebrity Big Brother in 2007 The Early Show in 2004 Inside Edition in 2004 Motown 45 in 2004 Michael Jackson 30th Anniversary 2001 Jackie Jackson: Did Armed and Famous in 2007 Michael Jackson 30th Anniversary in 2001 And the other Jacksons have made appearances on talk shows and other shows as well. There was even talks of the Jackson 5 touring again. They haven't been obselete or forgotten. They have always been of interest, even when low key. The Jacksons are musical royalty and LEGENDS. [Edited 9/7/09 20:36pm] [Edited 9/7/09 20:37pm] 
Jackie wasn't on Armed and Famous! Have you noticed that the years Latoya and Jermaine did those interviews was when MJ was charged with child molestation!! Both are fake as hell! Latoya talked about MJ like he was a criminal during the '93 allegations! [Edited 9/7/09 21:21pm] | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: Sprite said: Actually, I love the Jacksons they make me feel closer to Michael, and the Jackson reality show was already in the works and filmed before Michael died. Also, it's not "all of the sudden," the Jacksons have always been active. Latoya Jackson: Co-hosted "The View" in 2004 Latoya did "Mad TV" in 1998 Latoya did Larry King Live in 2003 Anna Nicole Smith show in 2004 Acess Hollywood in 2003 20/20 in 2005 A reality show called "Armed and Famous"in 2007 Celebrity Big Brother in 2009 And other talks shows and radio shows since 2000s. She also had planned to do a movie. Jermaine Jackson: The View in 2003 Larry King Live in 2003 Unsung in 2008 Ole School with Terry and Gita in 2008 Australian Idol in 2008 Celebrity Big Brother in 2007 The Early Show in 2004 Inside Edition in 2004 Motown 45 in 2004 Michael Jackson 30th Anniversary 2001 Jackie Jackson: Did Armed and Famous in 2007 Michael Jackson 30th Anniversary in 2001 And the other Jacksons have made appearances on talk shows and other shows as well. There was even talks of the Jackson 5 touring again. They haven't been obselete or forgotten. They have always been of interest, even when low key. The Jacksons are musical royalty and LEGENDS. [Edited 9/7/09 20:36pm] [Edited 9/7/09 20:37pm]
Jackie wasn't on Armed and Famous! Have you noticed that the years Latoya and Jermaine did those interviews was when MJ was charged with child molestation!! Both are fake as hell! Latoya talked about MJ like he was a criminal during the '93 allegations! [Edited 9/7/09 21:21pm] No. The interviews were after 1993 and after 2004. Their appearances had nothing to do with the molestation charges. It was about themselves or their own projects. The point is, they haven't all of the sudden became visible. They have always been visible. Also, Latoya Jackson's husband (Jack Gordon) forced her to say that about Michael. He beat her, poisoned her, and threatened to kill Michael and her siblings if she didn't do what he wanted her to do. He exploited Latoya for money. Jack Gordon had a criminal record and ties with the mob. I remember seeing Latoya's badly bruised and bloodied face in the newspapers after Jack Gordon had given her another beating. Randy finally rescued her. I'm so glad Latoya got away from that abusive man. It's sad that people are always trying to exploit and use the Jackson family. I heard one of Michael's personal assistants was trying to take over Michael's life and was a dangerous man who had threatened some people before. It sounds like the same thing that happened to Latoya might of happened to Michael. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: trueiopian said: LOL! 
  I just see mid-80s Michael with tits.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
trueiopian said: kibbles said: well, that and because they've always been in mj's shadow. now that he's out of the way they know that people will pay attention to them. when i was little, the jacksons had a variety show right after they left motown. i always thought it was a big hit, but maybe not as it was a summer replacement series and then picked up for fall or spring, then didn't come back. it was the first time most people realized that the jackson brothers had sisters. even then it was soooo obvious that mj was the star...and running a very close second, janet. she stole every skit she was in. janet was lucky. she wasn't teathered to the j5 like mj was. she was able to chart her own course without feeling so beholden to her brothers, or made to ensure that everyone lived the hollywood lifestyle. if we scratch beneath the surface of mj's debts, i'm sure we'll find that it wasn't just failed business investments, or charge-backs from sony, or legal fees, or his own wasteful spending. we'll find the debts of his siblings and their families. True. But I don't think Janet's in MJ's shadow. She was early in her career but she eventually became an artist/entertainer in her own right. I agree that the rest of his siblings are though. It's quite sad too! I remember watching an interview with Marlon and he was asked about MJ for about 50% of the interview and his thoughts about Janet (This was in '87). He was promoting his own album! I think the brothers got it worse. Maybe why they let their solo careers just evaporate. Lazy mothafuckas! Janet worked her ass off to get to where she is they probably could've done the same (especially Randy and Jermaine). Rebbie didn't really care for a career in music. She probably just did those albums just to say "Yes, I'm a Jackson and I have a gold record too" (Side note: Latoya is the only Jackson that doesn't have a gold record ). I think Latoya is the only other Jackson that's really trying to please Joe...still. The rest of them just gave up! The reason why MJ and Janet worked as hard as they did is to fufill Joe's dream and they know it!
[Edited 9/5/09 12:45pm] As solo artists, neither Jackie and Tito have gold records "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: trueiopian said: True. But I don't think Janet's in MJ's shadow. She was early in her career but she eventually became an artist/entertainer in her own right. I agree that the rest of his siblings are though. It's quite sad too! I remember watching an interview with Marlon and he was asked about MJ for about 50% of the interview and his thoughts about Janet (This was in '87). He was promoting his own album! I think the brothers got it worse. Maybe why they let their solo careers just evaporate. Lazy mothafuckas! Janet worked her ass off to get to where she is they probably could've done the same (especially Randy and Jermaine). Rebbie didn't really care for a career in music. She probably just did those albums just to say "Yes, I'm a Jackson and I have a gold record too" (Side note: Latoya is the only Jackson that doesn't have a gold record ). I think Latoya is the only other Jackson that's really trying to please Joe...still. The rest of them just gave up! The reason why MJ and Janet worked as hard as they did is to fufill Joe's dream and they know it!
[Edited 9/5/09 12:45pm] As solo artists, neither Jackie and Tito have gold records Jackie Tito Marlon (I don't think anyway) Randy La Toya Only MJ, Jermaine, Janet and Rebbie have gold records as solo artists. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: bboy87 said: As solo artists, neither Jackie and Tito have gold records Jackie Tito Marlon (I don't think anyway) Randy La Toya Only MJ, Jermaine, Janet and Rebbie have gold records as solo artists. Yeah one thing though, the family is the only one I think that have garnered at least 1 top 40 single for each one who went solo Rebbie- 1 top 40 pop single, 2 top 10 R&B singles Jackie- 1 top 40 R&B single Jermaine- 7 top 40 pop singles, 19 top 40 R&B singles LaToya- 5 top 40 R&B singles Marlon- 1 top 40 R&B single Michael- 40 top 40 pop singles, 42 top 40 R&B singles Randy- 1 top 40 R&B single Janet- 32 top 40 pop singles, 42 top 40 R&B singles 3T- 1 top 40 pop single, 1 top 40 R&B single Jackson 5ive/Jacksons- 23 top 40 pop singles, 32 top 40 R&B singles "We may deify or demonize them but not ignore them. And we call them genius, because they are the people who change the world." | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
bboy87 said: Timmy84 said: Jackie Tito Marlon (I don't think anyway) Randy La Toya Only MJ, Jermaine, Janet and Rebbie have gold records as solo artists. Yeah one thing though, the family is the only one I think that have garnered at least 1 top 40 single for each one who went solo Rebbie- 1 top 40 pop single, 2 top 10 R&B singles Jackie- 1 top 40 R&B single Jermaine- 7 top 40 pop singles, 19 top 40 R&B singles LaToya- 5 top 40 R&B singles Marlon- 1 top 40 R&B single Michael- 40 top 40 pop singles, 42 top 40 R&B singles Randy- 1 top 40 R&B single Janet- 32 top 40 pop singles, 42 top 40 R&B singles 3T- 1 top 40 pop single, 1 top 40 R&B single Jackson 5ive/Jacksons- 23 top 40 pop singles, 32 top 40 R&B singles Yeah, least there's that, lol  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
novabrkr said: midiscover said: I just see mid-80s Michael with tits.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: Back on topic- I can't wait to see the photoshoot
hope it's like her last one  that picture is scary. I though someone photoshopped her head on that body. You think she would of learned to keep her clothes on after the superbowl incident. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
trueiopian said: midiscover said: In the recycle bin!!!! If they didn't photoshop it people might've mistaken the mag for XXL or KING magazine  LOL!
 buttaface | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
trueiopian said: What photoshoot is this from?
I this picture!this is a nice picture. Janet looks pretty and classy in this picture. Take more pictures like this janet! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
... She looks pretty because a mug is covering her face and you can basically just see the eye make-up? | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
novabrkr said: ... She looks pretty because a mug is covering her face and you can basically just see the eye make-up?
well i always thought that latoya was the prettiest before all the plastic surgery. Funny how some guys will say she's so fine but she looks like michael in drag. probably sayin that because of her body. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |