vainandy said: Hell, he'll do for 20 minutes. He looks just like a good friend of mine that I used to sleep with from time to time. That motherfucker had the thickest dick I ever wrapped my hand around. Why you tryna make me jealous? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Copycat said: ![]()
I failed to do a thorough job on research. Above is registered sex offender Foster Sylvers' mug shot at the time of his arrest. He was charged with oral copulation (the victim unconscious of the nature of the act). In 2004, he was supposedly in the process of having his record expunged. Oral copulation huh? He sure is cute.... Okay I need to go stand in the corner! None of them got what it takes 2 B a future baby mama Gotta bend in the wind, but don't break 2 keep your man Show me 1 of them and I'll make her mine With no more drama Future baby mama ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
^ imagine waking up to those damn ears and crazy eyes down below. [Edited 8/27/09 13:18pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Were the Sylvers biracial? "Lack of home training crosses all boundaries." | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
scriptgirl said: Were the Sylvers biracial?
No. Song written by Froster "Don't Stop Get Off" & "Forever Yours" the single from the same album along with "Don't Stop...." _____ [Edited 8/27/09 15:15pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
scriptgirl said: Were the Sylvers biracial?
they was just light skinded...da did...da did. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: lowkey said: they were no where near the level of the jackson 5, why do people always compare these obscure groups with the jacksons? the sylvers had a couple bubble gum hits,they were cute with big afros but they came and went.what sets the jacksons apart from these other groups is the timeless classic music they recorded.
They weren't that obscure. I'm sure if the roads were reversed, we'd be asking the same question about the Jacksons (even WITH Michael's talent). You never know how history would've turned out. They actually came at a bad time BECAUSE of the Jacksons being so successful and Edmund and Foster sounding like Jermaine/Michael clones. when people make arguments that so n so would have been bigger 'if it wasnt for' whoever was hot at the time that just tells me they didnt have what it took. the sylvers were a fad, they rode the jackson 5 /family act bandwagon just like many other groups at the time. when an act comes on the scene and creates their own lane record labels scramble to find 'the next' and thats what the sylvers were suppose to be 'the next jacksons. of course this is my own opinion but im speaking from the perspective of actually bein around at the time not from reading books. with me and my friends the sylvers came and went. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: You know the same can be said for the "first family of soul", the Burke Family (the Stairsteps). Their material was composed in the early years by Curtis Mayfield and then later on they did their own compositions but they were another family that never got the accolades that the Jacksons got. I don't think no one would argue that there were more talented musical families than the Jacksons (Isleys anyone?). It just happened that not only did the Jacksons had Motown, but they had better PR and MJ was the right age to be exploited (as unfortunate to put it as, it's the truth).
the jacksons were kids, the isleys were grown men,the jacksons had something that trumped the other family acts and that was their lil lead singer and a team of songwriters that provided them with great material.nobody can really explain why phenoms happen, i mean you can take the same exact pr, the same writers,the same label and lightening wont strike twice, mj was destined to become what he did, he took his brothers along for the ride when he was a kid then he shot to orbit on his own. the beatles wasnt the most talented band imo, i never saw the appeal of elvis but it is what it is. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
No one's denying that MJ had it. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lowkey said: Timmy84 said: They weren't that obscure. I'm sure if the roads were reversed, we'd be asking the same question about the Jacksons (even WITH Michael's talent). You never know how history would've turned out. They actually came at a bad time BECAUSE of the Jacksons being so successful and Edmund and Foster sounding like Jermaine/Michael clones. when people make arguments that so n so would have been bigger 'if it wasnt for' whoever was hot at the time that just tells me they didnt have what it took. the sylvers were a fad, they rode the jackson 5 /family act bandwagon just like many other groups at the time. when an act comes on the scene and creates their own lane record labels scramble to find 'the next' and thats what the sylvers were suppose to be 'the next jacksons. of course this is my own opinion but im speaking from the perspective of actually bein around at the time not from reading books. with me and my friends the sylvers came and went. That's a tad condescending, I was there therefore I know and you weren't so you don't. For what it's worth, I was around with you at the time. There is nothing the Sylvers could have done about being compared to the Jackson 5, nothing. Other people's perceptions but their careers. Like the Jackson 5 the Sylvers didn't fall off a turnip truck and land a record contract nor find success overnight. The group first constisted of Olympia, Leon, Charmaine, and James aka "The Little Angles" had cut a record or two and had been appearing on varity show's in mid/late 50 and 60's. Did the Sylvers have the goods to sustain their decade plus career? No. But sometimes choices, circumstances, timing, and other variables beyond your control, can affect whether you succeed at all or if you are able to sustain success.(IMHO) I think those are valid questions. I think that's the point Timmy was trying to make and a very valid one. (IMO) I don't care if he's almost young enough to be my son. _____ [Edited 8/27/09 17:26pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
DesireeNevermind said: ^ imagine waking up to those damn ears and crazy eyes down below. [Edited 8/27/09 13:18pm] Who said anything about waking up to him? Hell, after he gave up the dick, I'd send him on his way and tell him to send the next dick out in the hall into the room. Andy is a four letter word. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
scriptgirl said: Were the Sylvers biracial?
I think they were silver. PRINCE: Always and Forever
MICHAEL JACKSON: Always and Forever ----- Live Your Life How U Wanna Live It | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TD3 said: lowkey said: when people make arguments that so n so would have been bigger 'if it wasnt for' whoever was hot at the time that just tells me they didnt have what it took. the sylvers were a fad, they rode the jackson 5 /family act bandwagon just like many other groups at the time. when an act comes on the scene and creates their own lane record labels scramble to find 'the next' and thats what the sylvers were suppose to be 'the next jacksons. of course this is my own opinion but im speaking from the perspective of actually bein around at the time not from reading books. with me and my friends the sylvers came and went. That's a tad condescending, I was there therefore I know and you weren't so you don't. For what it's worth, I was around with you at the time. There is nothing the Sylvers could have done about being compared to the Jackson 5, nothing. Other people's perceptions but their careers. Like the Jackson 5 the Sylvers didn't fall off a turnip truck and land a record contract nor find success overnight. The group first constisted of Olympia, Leon, Charmaine, and James aka "The Little Angles" had cut a record or two and had been appearing on varity show's in mid/late 50 and 60's. Did the Sylvers have the goods to sustain their decade plus career? No. But sometimes choices, circumstances, timing, and other variables beyond your control, can affect whether you succeed at all or if you are able to sustain success.(IMHO) I think those are valid questions. I think that's the point Timmy was trying to make and a very valid one. (IMO) I don't care if he's almost young enough to be my son. _____ [Edited 8/27/09 17:26pm] if you read the line before the one you bolded i stated that it is only my opinion, i can only speak from my own experiences. i didnt get into the sylvers life story i was only giving my opinion on what the thread starter asked...was the sylvers as popular as the jacksons, and my answer to that was no where near. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Read for educational purposes | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Here's the Sylvers full discography in order, including Foster's/Pat & Angie albums and the late Edmund Sylvers (b.1957- d.2004) who left the band in 1980 to pursue a solo career.
1972
1973
1974
This 3 Sylver albums are considered classics by many. ===== ===== [Edited 10/12/09 22:00pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
1973 Foster's solo works
1974 ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
1975
1976
1977 ![]() | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
1978
1979
1980
Edmund left to start a solo career. 1984
The Sylvers disbanded in 1984. The group members did studio work as singers/ musicians and worked for Solar Record and others. Leon Sylvers III became a well known excutive/producer/songwriter/bass player for Solar Records. Foster and the late Edmund Sylvers (b 1957 - d 2004) did some producing and songwriting. Edmund did two solo albums one was shelved ('Take Me Over", for Arista Records) and the other "Have You Heard" was released in 1980. Forster also released two solo projects "Plain & Simple" (EMI America 1987) & "Prime Time" (EMI America 1990)
===== ===== [Edited 10/13/09 8:25am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This thread is a good read. I've lost the use of my heart, But I'm still alive, Still looking for the life, The endless pool on the other side, It's a wild wild west, I'm doing my best, I'm a soldier of love, Every day and night, I'm soldier of love, All the days of my life. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Here's the link to the thread where we talk about the Sylvers I, II, III classic albums.
http://prince.org/msg/8/317526 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
TD3 said: Here's the link to the thread where we talk about the Sylvers I, II, III classic albums.
http://prince.org/msg/8/317526 Thanks! I've lost the use of my heart, But I'm still alive, Still looking for the life, The endless pool on the other side, It's a wild wild west, I'm doing my best, I'm a soldier of love, Every day and night, I'm soldier of love, All the days of my life. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |