lowkey said: maybe its kinda historic considering the amount of albums she's released, shit i donno maybe they just wanna hype whitney up, i aint mad. im pretty sure that aretha and the others recorded at least twice as many albums though.
That's true. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
I would love to see the rest of the all time list (beyond the top 10 artists). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Historic my ass | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Wowugotit said: I would love to see the rest of the all time list (beyond the top 10 artists).
next is Mary J. Blige but I don't know after that | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jiorjios said: Wowugotit said: I would love to see the rest of the all time list (beyond the top 10 artists).
next is Mary J. Blige but I don't know after that On the Hot 100?? I highly doubt! maybe on the R&B charts | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: jiorjios said: next is Mary J. Blige but I don't know after that On the Hot 100?? I highly doubt! maybe on the R&B charts Nah, she really has that many songs on the Hot 100, she has like 50, 55 songs on the R&B chart. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
This isn't historic at all. I have to hand it to her and give her credit, it was historic back in 1985 for her to be at the top of the charts making dull shit when the music by other artists was far from dull. But to enter the charts these days when all the music on the charts is dull should be a breeze for her. In fact, these dull artists today should bow down and kiss her feet because she's the Queen of Dull and if it weren't for her, they wouldn't be on the charts today. Andy is a four letter word. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vainandy said: This isn't historic at all. I have to hand it to her and give her credit, it was historic back in 1985 for her to be at the top of the charts making dull shit when the music by other artists was far from dull. But to enter the charts these days when all the music on the charts is dull should be a breeze for her. In fact, these dull artists today should bow down and kiss her feet because she's the Queen of Dull and if it weren't for her, they wouldn't be on the charts today.
This thread wasn't complete without your presence, thank you Andy. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: midiscover said: On the Hot 100?? I highly doubt! maybe on the R&B charts Nah, she really has that many songs on the Hot 100, she has like 50, 55 songs on the R&B chart. LMAO!! who knew! how many does she have on Hot 100?? I'm confused now. The list I saw placed Janet as #7 and MJ as #8 and I don't recall seeing that. I can't post it though since on my bro's PSP | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: Timmy84 said: Nah, she really has that many songs on the Hot 100, she has like 50, 55 songs on the R&B chart. LMAO!! who knew! how many does she have on Hot 100?? I'm confused now. The list I saw placed Janet as #7 and MJ as #8 and I don't recall seeing that. I can't post it though since on my bro's PSP I think they're #7 and #8 as far as overall top ten singles (MJ & Janet). | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: vainandy said: This isn't historic at all. I have to hand it to her and give her credit, it was historic back in 1985 for her to be at the top of the charts making dull shit when the music by other artists was far from dull. But to enter the charts these days when all the music on the charts is dull should be a breeze for her. In fact, these dull artists today should bow down and kiss her feet because she's the Queen of Dull and if it weren't for her, they wouldn't be on the charts today.
This thread wasn't complete without your presence, thank you Andy. oh mah gahh | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
OK I'll try do it. This is from another source hence the differences.:
1.Aretha Franklin 74 2.Madonna 56 2.Dionne Warwick 56 4.Connie Francis 55 5.Gladys Knight 46 6.Janet Jackson 42 7.Mariah Carey 41 7.Barbra Streisand 41 9.Diana Ross 40 9.Brenda Lee 40 11.Olivia Newton-John 39 12.Linda Ronstadt 38 12.Whitney Houston 38 14.Patti Page 36 15.Tina Turner 35 16.Cher 34 17.Donna Summer 33 18.Mary J Blige 31 18.Doris Day 31 20.Gloria Estefan 28 21.Carly Simon 26 21.Anne Murray 26 23.Beyonce 23 23.Sheena Easton 23 25.Petula Clark 22 26.Britney Spears 21 26.Nancy Sinatra 26.Chaka Khan 21 26.Leslie Gore 21 30.Toni Braxton 20 30.Celine Dion 20 30.Sarah Vaughan 20 30.Dolly Parton 20 34.Dusty Springfield 19 35.Pati LaBelle 19 36.Roberta Flack 18 36.Natalie Cole 18 36.Kim Carnes 18 36.Bette Midler 18 40.Teresa Brewer 17 40.Shania Twain 17 40.Martina McBride 17 Spelling mistakes corrected. [Edited 8/16/09 13:06pm] [Edited 8/16/09 13:20pm] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Imago said: Timmy84 said: This thread wasn't complete without your presence, thank you Andy. oh mah gahh | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PricelessHo said: i love how they tailor-make these kind of news with some artists releases (such as MC = biggest selling female artist in history )
this reminds me when Whitney's Greatest Hits came out, and Mariah's fans went ballistic coz on the lable it said: "with more #1 hits than any other female artists" turned out they combined her Hot 100 #1s with the rest of the charts or something like that Do you remember the hype surrounding Just Whitney? Thats why I've learned my lesson about these lying ass press kits,,,,but STIIIIILL I'll give the dame the benefit of the doubt. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: Imago said: oh mah gahh I love vainandy! | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vainandy said: This isn't historic at all. I have to hand it to her and give her credit, it was historic back in 1985 for her to be at the top of the charts making dull shit when the music by other artists was far from dull. But to enter the charts these days when all the music on the charts is dull should be a breeze for her. In fact, these dull artists today should bow down and kiss her feet because she's the Queen of Dull and if it weren't for her, they wouldn't be on the charts today.
| |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
PricelessHo said: errant said: Mariah fans did a lot of hard work getting her all those #1's by buying up cases of those 49 cent singles in the mid/late-90's and god damn it, no one's going to take that away from them!
if i recall well though, the 49c thing only happened with that Loverboy single, which ended up getting stuck at #2 for twe weeks and the fell off ah, no, that trick was WAAAAAY old for Mariah by the time Loverboy came along. they were doing it way back for the Daydream singles | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
vainandy said: This isn't historic at all. I have to hand it to her and give her credit, it was historic back in 1985 for her to be at the top of the charts making dull shit when the music by other artists was far from dull. But to enter the charts these days when all the music on the charts is dull should be a breeze for her. In fact, these dull artists today should bow down and kiss her feet because she's the Queen of Dull and if it weren't for her, they wouldn't be on the charts today.
why you hate the woman so much? I mean , there are/were many female singers who can't sing out there, Whitney definitely wasn't one of them, at the least the woman can sing , or used to sing very well, you just can't deny some of her works, you can't deny her 80's and early 90's work. [Edited 8/16/09 15:44pm] MICHAEL JACKSON
R.I.P مايكل جاكسون للأبد 1958 | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: Whitney Houston Drops In On Hot 100 Chart, Historic Debut
Newsroom | Posted on 08/14/09 | Filed Under: R&B News, Whitney Houston Whitney Houston is officially back and riding the Billboard Hot 100 for the first time in years. Houston's recently released "I Look to You" debuts at no.74 on this week's Billboard Hot 100, just weeks prior to the release of Houston's album of the same name. While the "Million Dollar Bill" singer's debut on the chart is notable, the accomplishment also adds to Houston's list of Hot 100 visits. According to Billboard, "I Look To You" brings Houston's total to 38, just below Janet Jackson(39), Mariah Carey (40), and Diana Ross (40). Whitney Houston's "I Look To You" is slated for release August 31. ---- I remember R&BAmbassador's post about how many top 40 hits the female artists had. [Edited 8/16/09 12:36pm] Are they trying to hype this shit up for a let down or WHAT? A stupid man’s report of what a clever man says can never be accurate, because he unconciously translates what he hears into something he can understand. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
i agree the title is misleading saying she makes history then listing at least 3 other artists thats still ahead of her (not to mention the 6 other artists thats also ahead of her), but like i said maybe they are just trying to hype her up. making the top 100 is not all that impressive when you look at it,its like somebody can have 50 top 100 singles but none ever reaching over #80, i mean how impressive is that? where does whitney rank among the top 10 hits list? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lowkey said: i agree the title is misleading saying she makes history then listing at least 3 other artists thats still ahead of her (not to mention the 6 other artists thats also ahead of her), but like i said maybe they are just trying to hype her up. making the top 100 is not all that impressive when you look at it,its like somebody can have 50 top 100 singles but none ever reaching over #80, i mean how impressive is that? where does whitney rank among the top 10 hits list?
believe me, somebody would be touting that as an "interesting" fact | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
lowkey said: i agree the title is misleading saying she makes history then listing at least 3 other artists thats still ahead of her (not to mention the 6 other artists thats also ahead of her), but like i said maybe they are just trying to hype her up. making the top 100 is not all that impressive when you look at it,its like somebody can have 50 top 100 singles but none ever reaching over #80, i mean how impressive is that? where does whitney rank among the top 10 hits list?
Would a company keep releasing singles from an artist who had 10-20 songs missing the Top 80? | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jiorjios said: OK I'll try do it. This is from another source hence the differences.:
1.Aretha Franklin 74 2.Madonna 56 2.Dionne Warwick 56 4.Connie Francis 55 5.Gladys Knight 46 6.Janet Jackson 42 7.Mariah Carey 41 7.Barbra Streisand 41 9.Diana Ross 40 9.Brenda Lee 40 11.Olivia Newton-John 39 12.Linda Ronstadt 38 12.Whitney Houston 38 14.Patti Page 36 15.Tina Turner 35 16.Cher 34 17.Donna Summer 33 18.Mary J Blige 31 18.Doris Day 31 20.Gloria Estefan 28 21.Carly Simon 26 21.Anne Murray 26 23.Beyonce 23 23.Sheena Easton 23 25.Petula Clark 22 26.Britney Spears 21 26.Nancy Sinatra 26.Chaka Khan 21 26.Leslie Gore 21 30.Toni Braxton 20 30.Celine Dion 20 30.Sarah Vaughan 20 30.Dolly Parton 20 34.Dusty Springfield 19 35.Pati LaBelle 19 36.Roberta Flack 18 36.Natalie Cole 18 36.Kim Carnes 18 36.Bette Midler 18 40.Teresa Brewer 17 40.Shania Twain 17 40.Martina McBride 17 Spelling mistakes corrected. [Edited 8/16/09 13:06pm] [Edited 8/16/09 13:20pm] thanks for digging that up . Interesting stuff . Britney & Beyonce are the only true "youngsters" on that list with the potential of dozens of more Hot 100 entires | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Timmy84 said: midiscover said: LMAO!! who knew! how many does she have on Hot 100?? I'm confused now. The list I saw placed Janet as #7 and MJ as #8 and I don't recall seeing that. I can't post it though since on my bro's PSP I think they're #7 and #8 as far as overall top ten singles (MJ & Janet). This is what I'm talking about http://www.billboard.com/...s-20.shtml 1. The Beatles 2. Hagdonna 3. Elton John 4. Elvis Presley 5. Stevie Wonder 6. Mariah Carey 7. Janet Jackson 8. Michael Jackson 9. Whitney Houston 10.The Rolling Stones | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: Timmy84 said: I think they're #7 and #8 as far as overall top ten singles (MJ & Janet). This is what I'm talking about http://www.billboard.com/...s-20.shtml 1. The Beatles 2. Hagdonna 3. Elton John 4. Elvis Presley 5. Stevie Wonder 6. Mariah Carey 7. Janet Jackson 8. Michael Jackson 9. Whitney Houston 10.The Rolling Stones That means those ten are the most successful acts in the history of the Billboard Hot 100. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
midiscover said: Timmy84 said: I think they're #7 and #8 as far as overall top ten singles (MJ & Janet). This is what I'm talking about http://www.billboard.com/...s-20.shtml 1. The Beatles 2. Hagdonna 3. Elton John 4. Elvis Presley 5. Stevie Wonder 6. Mariah Carey 7. Janet Jackson 8. Michael Jackson 9. Whitney Houston 10.The Rolling Stones I think that's overall chart performance. As far as Top 10s are concerned the Beatles have 33, both Madonna and Elvis 37. Elton John has 27, Stevie Wonder has 29 We Are The World included, Mariah Carey has 26, Janet Jackson has 28, Michael Jackson has 31 We Are The World, Somebody's Watching Me & State Of Shock included, Whitney Houston has 22 and The Rolling Stones have 23. Prince is not far behind Whitney. He has 19. As far as being the most successful acts, well that list obviously underestimates any acts who had their peak in the 80s or before. In the 70s and 80s the charts were moving very fast whereas in the 90s and the 00s they tend to move very slow. That's probably why Janet (who peaked in the 90s) is higher than Michael (who peaked in the 80s) [Edited 8/17/09 9:07am] | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jiorjios said: midiscover said: This is what I'm talking about http://www.billboard.com/...s-20.shtml 1. The Beatles 2. Hagdonna 3. Elton John 4. Elvis Presley 5. Stevie Wonder 6. Mariah Carey 7. Janet Jackson 8. Michael Jackson 9. Whitney Houston 10.The Rolling Stones I think that's overall chart performance. As far as Top 10s are concerned the Beatles have 33, both Madonna and Elvis 37. Elton John has 27, Stevie Wonder has 29 We Are The World included, Mariah Carey has 26, Janet Jackson has 28, Michael Jackson has 31 We Are The World, Somebody's Watching Me & State Of Shock included, Whitney Houston has 22 and The Rolling Stones have 23. Prince is not far behind Whitney. He has 19. As far as being the most successful acts, well that list obviously underestimates any acts who had their peak in the 80s or before. In the 70s and 80s the charts were moving very fast whereas in the 90s and the 00s they tend to move very slow. That's probably why Janet (who peaked in the 90s) is higher than Michael (who peaked in the 80s) [Edited 8/17/09 9:07am] Most top 10 singles Madonna (37) Elvis Presley (36) The Beatles (29) Michael Jackson (28) Janet Jackson (27) (tie) Stevie Wonder (27) (tie) NOTE: If Top 10 sides are considered—that is, singles whose A-sides and B-sides both charted as separate Top 10 entries—then Elvis Presley would have the most, with 38 Top 10 songs. The Beatles' total would increase from 29 to 34, and Janet Jackson would have 29. The totals for Madonna, Michael Jackson and Stevie Wonder would remain as is. http://en.wikipedia.org/w...10_singles So technically Janet has more than MJ. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
jiorjios said: That's probably why Janet (who peaked in the 90s) is higher than Michael (who peaked in the 80s)
Well, it's worth noting that, despite the 11-year head start for MJ, they have released about the same number of singles (Janet may even have more). "Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
AlexdeParis said: jiorjios said: That's probably why Janet (who peaked in the 90s) is higher than Michael (who peaked in the 80s)
Well, it's worth noting that, despite the 11-year head start for MJ, they have released about the same number of singles (Janet may even have more). You'll bring the Janet haters in here. Don't let them hear you saying that Janet is equal to big brother Michael, because some of them may physically harm themselves or others. Janet has a Billboard record that remains un-touched by any artist in recorded sound history, so I don't see why she wouldn't have a large amount of hits. As solo artists, Michael and Janet had about an equal number of hit albums in their careers. They are both great and are the only brother and sister artists listed soo high, and side-by-side, on the Billboard charts in music history. [Edited 8/17/09 12:44pm] Prince Rogers Nelson
Sunrise: June 7, 1958 Sunset: April 21, 2016 ~My Heart Loudly Weeps "My Creativity Is My Life." ~ Prince Life is merely a dress rehearsal for eternity. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
estelle81 said: AlexdeParis said: Well, it's worth noting that, despite the 11-year head start for MJ, they have released about the same number of singles (Janet may even have more). You'll bring the Janet haters in here. Don't let them hear you saying that Janet is equal to big brother Michael, because some of them may physically harm themselves or others. Janet has a Billboard record that remains un-touched by any artist in recorded sound history, so I don't see why she wouldn't a large amount of hits. As solo artists, Michael and Janet had about an equal number of hit albums. They were both great and are the only brother and sister artists listed soo hight and side-by-side on the Billboard charts in music history. | |
- E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |