independent and unofficial
Prince fan community
Welcome! Sign up or enter username and password to remember me
Forum jump
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > The Beatles Remasters are here!!!!!
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Page 16 of 19 « First<10111213141516171819>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
Reply #450 posted 09/16/09 1:31pm

errant

avatar

NDRU said:

Does anyone have more insight into the differences in the Help mixes? I see that George Martin remixed the stereo version for the original cd's in 1987, and that's the basis for the one used on the new remasters.

That's an interesting tidbit, seems just a bit out of tune with the spirit of all these remasters being based on the original masters.

However, I wonder if that also means it's a better stereo mix?



haven't heard the remastered Help! remix, outside of the original 1987 CD release. so I can't comment.

however, if they were to do modern stereo (re)mixes for all of the albums instead of using the original stereo masters, I'd probably end up buying them all 3 times neutral
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #451 posted 09/16/09 1:33pm

sextonseven

avatar

NDRU said:

sextonseven said:



I bought Sgt Pepper's and Past Masters twice this month. If you had told me five years ago that I would be owning doubles of Beatles albums, I would have laughed in your face.


I know, there's not a single girl in the band confuse smile


My favorite Beatle is Yoko. razz
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #452 posted 09/16/09 1:35pm

sextonseven

avatar

NDRU said:

sextonseven said:



I bought Sgt Pepper's and Past Masters twice this month. If you had told me five years ago that I would be owning doubles of Beatles albums, I would have laughed in your face.


But my drummer is the same. He has never talked about the Beatles except to say he respects them despite not being his favorite band, and he has been buying these things one after the other.


I even bought the Love CD/DVD-audio at the same time, I got so caught up in this Beatlemania.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #453 posted 09/16/09 1:36pm

errant

avatar

sextonseven said:

NDRU said:



But my drummer is the same. He has never talked about the Beatles except to say he respects them despite not being his favorite band, and he has been buying these things one after the other.


I even bought the Love CD/DVD-audio at the same time, I got so caught up in this Beatlemania.




I somehow thought it necessary to buy both Let It Be remastered and Let It Be...Naked on the same night and that's like my least favorite in all its incarnations. lurking
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #454 posted 09/16/09 1:42pm

Serena

sextonseven said:

NDRU said:



But my drummer is the same. He has never talked about the Beatles except to say he respects them despite not being his favorite band, and he has been buying these things one after the other.


I even bought the Love CD/DVD-audio at the same time, I got so caught up in this Beatlemania.


I need to go back and see the show again in Vegas. When we went, they had a problem with the stage half-way through and had to cancel the show (luckily they gave full refunds). But the sound was AMAZING in the theater, it gave me chills a few times.

Heck, I'm so old I can remember being excited to get to ride the city bus downtown to see Help! in the theater. My older sisters took me and swore if I cried, they'd never take me anywhere again. lol
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #455 posted 09/16/09 2:01pm

NDRU

avatar

errant said:

sextonseven said:



I even bought the Love CD/DVD-audio at the same time, I got so caught up in this Beatlemania.




I somehow thought it necessary to buy both Let It Be remastered and Let It Be...Naked on the same night and that's like my least favorite in all its incarnations. lurking


lol you guys are making me feel relatively healthy. I have been telling myself, "not now, you know those albums like the back of your hand, and a bit more clarity in the guitar won't change that!"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #456 posted 09/16/09 2:04pm

NDRU

avatar

sextonseven said:

NDRU said:



I know, there's not a single girl in the band confuse smile


My favorite Beatle is Yoko. razz


"you become naked" smile
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #457 posted 09/16/09 2:11pm

Serena

NDRU said:

errant said:





I somehow thought it necessary to buy both Let It Be remastered and Let It Be...Naked on the same night and that's like my least favorite in all its incarnations. lurking


lol you guys are making me feel relatively healthy. I have been telling myself, "not now, you know those albums like the back of your hand, and a bit more clarity in the guitar won't change that!"


Yeah, I hear ya. I got all excited after reading how wonderful the Mono set is and impulsively put in an order. Today, I re-thought that decision and cancelled it and just ordered a few of the stereo discs. It's not like I have time to sit and listen to all those albums thoroughly on headphones anyway.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #458 posted 09/16/09 4:49pm

errant

avatar

NDRU said:

errant said:





I somehow thought it necessary to buy both Let It Be remastered and Let It Be...Naked on the same night and that's like my least favorite in all its incarnations. lurking


lol you guys are making me feel relatively healthy. I have been telling myself, "not now, you know those albums like the back of your hand, and a bit more clarity in the guitar won't change that!"



oh, but it does! nod lol
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #459 posted 09/16/09 4:53pm

errant

avatar

errant said:

I'm going to order the mono box as that's what I really want. But I just know in the meantime, I'm going to end up with all of the stereo discs as well.

I'd picked up Abbey Road, Let It Be, Past Masters and Yellow Submarine the night they were released.

But then yesterday, I ended up going to get the White Album and Magical Mystery Tour after reading some people say that in some cases those sound better than the mono.

Doesn't help that Borders has currently got them on sale and also a deal with ALL of their CD's. Buy one, get one half off, including sale items. (half-off is off the list price, not the sale price, but it's still even cheaper than the sale price). And also, if you buy 2, you get to buy an Abbey Road album cover tin thing for $7.99. Shit. I'm a sucker.




Sgt. Pepper's, Help!, Rubber Soul and A Hard Day's Night today. boxed


fucking Target. on sale for 11.98 and if you buy 2 at a time, you get a $5 gift card. lurking
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #460 posted 09/16/09 4:55pm

NDRU

avatar

errant said:

NDRU said:



lol you guys are making me feel relatively healthy. I have been telling myself, "not now, you know those albums like the back of your hand, and a bit more clarity in the guitar won't change that!"



oh, but it does! nod lol


Holy shit, really?!! omg
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #461 posted 09/16/09 5:02pm

Poplife88

avatar

errant said:

errant said:

I'm going to order the mono box as that's what I really want. But I just know in the meantime, I'm going to end up with all of the stereo discs as well.

I'd picked up Abbey Road, Let It Be, Past Masters and Yellow Submarine the night they were released.

But then yesterday, I ended up going to get the White Album and Magical Mystery Tour after reading some people say that in some cases those sound better than the mono.

Doesn't help that Borders has currently got them on sale and also a deal with ALL of their CD's. Buy one, get one half off, including sale items. (half-off is off the list price, not the sale price, but it's still even cheaper than the sale price). And also, if you buy 2, you get to buy an Abbey Road album cover tin thing for $7.99. Shit. I'm a sucker.




Sgt. Pepper's, Help!, Rubber Soul and A Hard Day's Night today. boxed


fucking Target. on sale for 11.98 and if you buy 2 at a time, you get a $5 gift card. lurking


Crap, now I know where I'll be tomorrow...I promised myself when these came out I wouldn't buy them all at once....but yesterday got White Album and Revolver. Tomorrow, Abbey Road, Help, Bealtes for Sale, and Past Masters at Target...and I just ordered Sgt Pepper, Rubber Soul, and Magical Mystery Tour on Amazon. I am hopeless...completely hopeless. Damn those Beatles wink
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #462 posted 09/16/09 5:08pm

errant

avatar

Poplife88 said:

errant said:





Sgt. Pepper's, Help!, Rubber Soul and A Hard Day's Night today. boxed


fucking Target. on sale for 11.98 and if you buy 2 at a time, you get a $5 gift card. lurking


Crap, now I know where I'll be tomorrow...I promised myself when these came out I wouldn't buy them all at once....but yesterday got White Album and Revolver. Tomorrow, Abbey Road, Help, Bealtes for Sale, and Past Masters at Target...and I just ordered Sgt Pepper, Rubber Soul, and Magical Mystery Tour on Amazon. I am hopeless...completely hopeless. Damn those Beatles wink


and I promised myself I'd wait for the mono box. and then I thought, well, I'll probably end up getting the individual stereo discs too, but I'll take my time and spread it out... and now, who the hell knows how long this Target deal will last, so I imagine by the weekend I'll have them all falloff
[Edited 9/16/09 17:08pm]
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #463 posted 09/16/09 5:27pm

MendesCity

avatar

NDRU said:

Does anyone have more insight into the differences in the Help mixes? I see that George Martin remixed the stereo version for the original cd's in 1987, and that's the basis for the one used on the new remasters.

That's an interesting tidbit, seems just a bit out of tune with the spirit of all these remasters being based on the original masters.

However, I wonder if that also means it's a better stereo mix?


It does. Panned much less obnoxiously. I really can't stand hearing drums only in my left ear...really grating.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #464 posted 09/16/09 7:01pm

AlexdeParis

avatar

MendesCity said:

NDRU said:

Does anyone have more insight into the differences in the Help mixes? I see that George Martin remixed the stereo version for the original cd's in 1987, and that's the basis for the one used on the new remasters.

That's an interesting tidbit, seems just a bit out of tune with the spirit of all these remasters being based on the original masters.

However, I wonder if that also means it's a better stereo mix?


It does. Panned much less obnoxiously. I really can't stand hearing drums only in my left ear...really grating.

Agreed.

For the person who asked about "Don't Let Me Down," it sounds great either way. It's my all-time favorite Beatles song, so I tested it first. I couldn't decide, but I guess I'd pick mono if forced to choose.
"Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #465 posted 09/17/09 5:30am

TyphoonTip

LondonStyle said:

Thanks for the review, the track "Don't let me down" which version sounds better to you? wink


Either or. If pushed, I'd say stereo, where there's marginally more space and life.

There's certainly nothing in the mono mix that screams 'drastic improvement', if that's what you're suggesting.

One mono mix I do love is 'Hey Bulldog'. I've always loved the song despite the stereo mix being almost unlistenable.
[Edited 9/17/09 5:33am]
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #466 posted 09/17/09 7:33am

PsychedelicGoo
f

avatar

NDRU said:

Does anyone have more insight into the differences in the Help mixes? I see that George Martin remixed the stereo version for the original cd's in 1987, and that's the basis for the one used on the new remasters.

That's an interesting tidbit, seems just a bit out of tune with the spirit of all these remasters being based on the original masters.

However, I wonder if that also means it's a better stereo mix?

from http://www.beatlesnews.co...icago.html

George Martin tweaked both "Help!" and "Rubber Soul" when the albums were issued on CD back in 1987. Although "Rubber Soul" was recorded on a four-track machine, most of its songs have severe stereo separation with vocals on one side and instruments on the other. George Martin completely remixed the album to bring the vocals down the center. The stereo remasters use the 1987 George Martin stereo mixes rather than the original 1965 mixes. But for those who want to hear the original 1965 stereo mixes, they will be available in the mono collection.



On another note, my Box Of Vision arrived yesterday! biggrin
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #467 posted 09/17/09 7:47am

errant

avatar

TyphoonTip said:

LondonStyle said:

Thanks for the review, the track "Don't let me down" which version sounds better to you? wink


Either or. If pushed, I'd say stereo, where there's marginally more space and life.

There's certainly nothing in the mono mix that screams 'drastic improvement', if that's what you're suggesting.

One mono mix I do love is 'Hey Bulldog'. I've always loved the song despite the stereo mix being almost unlistenable.
[Edited 9/17/09 5:33am]


all the new tracks on Yellow Submarine suffered on the previous '87 CD release. almost unlistenable and some pretty good songs on there. the Harrison tracks were particularly mind-boggling in their shittiness. they are much improved. and i'm finding myself enjoying them more from the Mono Masters disc than on the stereo version of the album.

does anyone know... are the mono mixes of the Yellow Submarine songs just fold downs of the stereo version, since that's the only way it was released at the time? I know they were planning a mono EP of Beatles-only songs in 1969 from Yellow Submarine, but it was scrapped. the album was released in stereo, and the mono EP was just going to be a fold-down of the stereo mixes.

but I wonder if the mono mixes of these tracks on Mono Masters are those or if they are from earlier on. like... were they *originally* mixed in mono? since the album came out so much later than the songs were initially mixed for the film and actually some time after the film, I wonder if maybe these are earlier, more careful mono mixes than what would have appeared on the cancelled YS EP.
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #468 posted 09/17/09 8:25am

PsychedelicGoo
f

avatar

errant said:

does anyone know... are the mono mixes of the Yellow Submarine songs just fold downs of the stereo version, since that's the only way it was released at the time? I know they were planning a mono EP of Beatles-only songs in 1969 from Yellow Submarine, but it was scrapped. the album was released in stereo, and the mono EP was just going to be a fold-down of the stereo mixes.

but I wonder if the mono mixes of these tracks on Mono Masters are those or if they are from earlier on. like... were they *originally* mixed in mono? since the album came out so much later than the songs were initially mixed for the film and actually some time after the film, I wonder if maybe these are earlier, more careful mono mixes than what would have appeared on the cancelled YS EP.

from http://www.beatlesnews.co...icago.html :

As has been previously reported in Beatles books, in January, 1969, The Beatles considered issuing an EP with the four new "Yellow Submarine" songs plus "Across The Universe." Although that EP was never issued, a mono master for the five-song EP was put together. The five songs were given true mono mixes for the mono EP. These five songs will make their true mono debut on the Mono Masters set prepared exclusively for the Mono Box.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #469 posted 09/17/09 10:18am

NDRU

avatar

PsychedelicGoof said:

NDRU said:

Does anyone have more insight into the differences in the Help mixes? I see that George Martin remixed the stereo version for the original cd's in 1987, and that's the basis for the one used on the new remasters.

That's an interesting tidbit, seems just a bit out of tune with the spirit of all these remasters being based on the original masters.

However, I wonder if that also means it's a better stereo mix?

from http://www.beatlesnews.co...icago.html

George Martin tweaked both "Help!" and "Rubber Soul" when the albums were issued on CD back in 1987. Although "Rubber Soul" was recorded on a four-track machine, most of its songs have severe stereo separation with vocals on one side and instruments on the other. George Martin completely remixed the album to bring the vocals down the center. The stereo remasters use the 1987 George Martin stereo mixes rather than the original 1965 mixes. But for those who want to hear the original 1965 stereo mixes, they will be available in the mono collection.



On another note, my Box Of Vision arrived yesterday! biggrin


cool, thanks!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #470 posted 09/19/09 1:04pm

sextonseven

avatar

NDRU said:

sextonseven said:



My favorite Beatle is Yoko. razz


"you become naked" smile


I never skip over that song. razz

I got an email notice saying my mono box shipped this week! woot!
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #471 posted 09/19/09 1:42pm

errant

avatar

errant said:

Poplife88 said:



Crap, now I know where I'll be tomorrow...I promised myself when these came out I wouldn't buy them all at once....but yesterday got White Album and Revolver. Tomorrow, Abbey Road, Help, Bealtes for Sale, and Past Masters at Target...and I just ordered Sgt Pepper, Rubber Soul, and Magical Mystery Tour on Amazon. I am hopeless...completely hopeless. Damn those Beatles wink


and I promised myself I'd wait for the mono box. and then I thought, well, I'll probably end up getting the individual stereo discs too, but I'll take my time and spread it out... and now, who the hell knows how long this Target deal will last, so I imagine by the weekend I'll have them all falloff
[Edited 9/16/09 17:08pm]




have them all now. AND. put in an order for the mono box.

i hate myself neutral
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #472 posted 09/19/09 2:06pm

AlexdeParis

avatar

So, I've decided the definitive Revolver is mono with "Tomorrow Never Knows" in stereo. I'm going all-mono for the first 2 albums and Sgt. Pepper. Now I'm going to compile the rest of the albums track-by-track. I think I'm going to have the hardest time with Help!, because that's the album where I think stereo really shines.
"Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #473 posted 09/19/09 3:50pm

Sdldawn

I've been picking apart the stereo White Album, Revolver, Magical Mystery, and Abbey Road all week.


I actually prefer Magical Mystery in stereo, simply because the experimentation of those songs, it almost sounds as if they were made for stereo.. i like the back and forth in the speakers for the most part in those songs.


having said that, Mono's sound better with headphones of virtually all of them to me.
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #474 posted 09/19/09 8:16pm

AlexdeParis

avatar

Sdldawn said:

I've been picking apart the stereo White Album, Revolver, Magical Mystery, and Abbey Road all week.


I actually prefer Magical Mystery in stereo, simply because the experimentation of those songs, it almost sounds as if they were made for stereo.. i like the back and forth in the speakers for the most part in those songs.

hmmm Well, I like the stereo effects on a lot of that album's songs, but I'm not sure they're worth having the drums shifted to one side... particularly songs when the backing harmonies are also panned. "I Am the Walrus" and "Strawberry Fields Forever" are great in stereo, but they're great in mono as well. "All You Need Is Love," "Penny Lane," "Baby You're a Rich Man," and especially "Your Mother Should Know" are better in mono IMO, but I've only listened a couple of times.

having said that, Monos sound better with headphones on virtually all of them to me.

Yeah, I think that's where I am as well. So far, "Tomorrow Never Knows" is the one song I definitely prefer in stereo. As happy as I am with these releases, I still wish they had remixed them. Vocals and drums in the center would go a long way towards making the stereo versions significantly better.
[Edited 9/19/09 20:20pm]
"Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #475 posted 09/19/09 8:58pm

Sdldawn

also Helter Skelter.. Overall I prefer the stereo because the drums can be heard better.. I do dig the extra effects in the mono tho..
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #476 posted 09/19/09 11:31pm

errant

avatar

AlexdeParis said:

Sdldawn said:

I've been picking apart the stereo White Album, Revolver, Magical Mystery, and Abbey Road all week.


I actually prefer Magical Mystery in stereo, simply because the experimentation of those songs, it almost sounds as if they were made for stereo.. i like the back and forth in the speakers for the most part in those songs.

hmmm Well, I like the stereo effects on a lot of that album's songs, but I'm not sure they're worth having the drums shifted to one side... particularly songs when the backing harmonies are also panned. "I Am the Walrus" and "Strawberry Fields Forever" are great in stereo, but they're great in mono as well. "All You Need Is Love," "Penny Lane," "Baby You're a Rich Man," and especially "Your Mother Should Know" are better in mono IMO, but I've only listened a couple of times.

having said that, Monos sound better with headphones on virtually all of them to me.

Yeah, I think that's where I am as well. So far, "Tomorrow Never Knows" is the one song I definitely prefer in stereo. As happy as I am with these releases, I still wish they had remixed them. Vocals and drums in the center would go a long way towards making the stereo versions significantly better.
[Edited 9/19/09 20:20pm]



that'll be next, i'm sure. after a new definitive best-of to replace Red & Blue and 1, utilizing these remasters.

fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your financial statement whatever month/year it is they get around to it. it could be another 20 years after all.

on the other hand, so much of that mid-60's stuff used very primitive tracking and who knows what survives of the original 4-tracks that got bounced down to one track when they needed more tracks for other instruments, etc. if the only thing that remains is a track with all the vocals, a track with all the instruments, etc, instead of the original tracks that when into creating those single tracks on the eventual master, we may just be stuck with these sub-standard primitive stereo mixes forever.

although i don't remember "Love" suffering from that, so hopefully they kept EVERYTHING.
"does my cock look fat in these jeans?"
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #477 posted 09/19/09 11:34pm

Sdldawn

The re(mix) of All You Need Is Love from the Love album is the most superior version out. (aside from the ending splices)
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #478 posted 09/20/09 3:37am

GirlBrother

avatar

I just came across a freeware font that's a dead ringer for the Apple Corps. typeface.

If you're interested, it's here:
http://moorstation.org/ty...nslite.htm
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Reply #479 posted 09/20/09 4:28am

AlexdeParis

avatar

errant said:

AlexdeParis said:


Yeah, I think that's where I am as well. So far, "Tomorrow Never Knows" is the one song I definitely prefer in stereo. As happy as I am with these releases, I still wish they had remixed them. Vocals and drums in the center would go a long way towards making the stereo versions significantly better.


that'll be next, i'm sure. after a new definitive best-of to replace Red & Blue and 1, utilizing these remasters.

fortunately or unfortunately, depending on your financial statement whatever month/year it is they get around to it. it could be another 20 years after all.

on the other hand, so much of that mid-60's stuff used very primitive tracking and who knows what survives of the original 4-tracks that got bounced down to one track when they needed more tracks for other instruments, etc. if the only thing that remains is a track with all the vocals, a track with all the instruments, etc, instead of the original tracks that when into creating those single tracks on the eventual master, we may just be stuck with these sub-standard primitive stereo mixes forever.

although i don't remember "Love" suffering from that, so hopefully they kept EVERYTHING.

Between Love and the Yellow Submarine Songtrack, I think we can assume they have access to just about everything. Like one of those articles mentions, some of the mixes for the songtrack are definitive ("Eleanor Rigby" for sure).
"Whitney was purely and simply one of a kind." ~ Clive Davis
  - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator
Page 16 of 19 « First<10111213141516171819>
  New topic   Printable     (Log in to 'subscribe' to this topic)
« Previous topic  Next topic »
Forums > Music: Non-Prince > The Beatles Remasters are here!!!!!