New topic
Printablefluid said: NOw since Michael's gone someone's got to fill the space of bihhest superstar in the world. Right now it would be Madonna. But perhaps The Jackson family can spuroff some new successes. Do you think Prince, Paris, or Blanket have the talent to soar as high as their father?
Please Madonna isn't getting any YOUNGER!!!  The message you are about to hear are not meant for transmission. Should ONLY be accessed in the privacy of your mind. Words are so intense so if you dare to listen.Take off your clothes and meet me between the lines.  | |
- E-mail - orgNote -  Report post to moderator |
Why are people acting like MJ's kids have his talent in their genes or something?
Genetics are only passed down to one's biological children. Now, MJ's children could definitely have developed a love for music by being raised by him, and possibly an interest in singing and performing - and he could have even tried to teach them these things. But any "inherited" abilities can only be passed by biological means. By all accounts, MJ was a wonderful father to those kids, but why does everyone insist on perpetuating the myth that he played any part in their conception? It's actually sort of insulting to adoptive parents. Michael Jackson included. It seems that Michael Jackson was a loving, attentive, and awesome father to those 3 children. And make no mistake, he WAS their father. A wonderful example of the fact that raising a child has little or nothing to do with who actually provided the semen or the egg. Biology ain't got nothing to do with it. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JulesWindu said: By all accounts, MJ was a wonderful father to those kids, but why does everyone insist on perpetuating the myth that he played any part in their conception?
Because a lot of these folks are nuts.  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
uPtoWnNY said: JulesWindu said: By all accounts, MJ was a wonderful father to those kids, but why does everyone insist on perpetuating the myth that he played any part in their conception?
Because a lot of these folks are nuts. those are his bio kids. time will tell. just watch. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
cdcgold said: uPtoWnNY said: Because a lot of these folks are nuts. those are his bio kids. time will tell. just watch. they are his kids but not his blood. You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JulesWindu said: Why are people acting like MJ's kids have his talent in their genes or something?
Genetics are only passed down to one's biological children. Now, MJ's children could definitely have developed a love for music by being raised by him, and possibly an interest in singing and performing - and he could have even tried to teach them these things. But any "inherited" abilities can only be passed by biological means. By all accounts, MJ was a wonderful father to those kids, but why does everyone insist on perpetuating the myth that he played any part in their conception? It's actually sort of insulting to adoptive parents. Michael Jackson included. It seems that Michael Jackson was a loving, attentive, and awesome father to those 3 children. And make no mistake, he WAS their father. A wonderful example of the fact that raising a child has little or nothing to do with who actually provided the semen or the egg. Biology ain't got nothing to do with it. And let the church say AMEN! | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JulesWindu said: Why are people acting like MJ's kids have his talent in their genes or something?
Genetics are only passed down to one's biological children. Now, MJ's children could definitely have developed a love for music by being raised by him, and possibly an interest in singing and performing - and he could have even tried to teach them these things. But any "inherited" abilities can only be passed by biological means. By all accounts, MJ was a wonderful father to those kids, but why does everyone insist on perpetuating the myth that he played any part in their conception? It's actually sort of insulting to adoptive parents. Michael Jackson included. It seems that Michael Jackson was a loving, attentive, and awesome father to those 3 children. And make no mistake, he WAS their father. A wonderful example of the fact that raising a child has little or nothing to do with who actually provided the semen or the egg. Biology ain't got nothing to do with it. Clearly, you've never even seen pictures of these children  | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
JulesWindu said: Why are people acting like MJ's kids have his talent in their genes or something?
Genetics are only passed down to one's biological children. Now, MJ's children could definitely have developed a love for music by being raised by him, and possibly an interest in singing and performing - and he could have even tried to teach them these things. But any "inherited" abilities can only be passed by biological means. By all accounts, MJ was a wonderful father to those kids, but why does everyone insist on perpetuating the myth that he played any part in their conception? It's actually sort of insulting to adoptive parents. Michael Jackson included. It seems that Michael Jackson was a loving, attentive, and awesome father to those 3 children. And make no mistake, he WAS their father. A wonderful example of the fact that raising a child has little or nothing to do with who actually provided the semen or the egg. Biology ain't got nothing to do with it. I've seen pictures, and I agree with you. But it still doesnt mean they're not talented musically | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Arnotts said: JulesWindu said: Why are people acting like MJ's kids have his talent in their genes or something?
Genetics are only passed down to one's biological children. Now, MJ's children could definitely have developed a love for music by being raised by him, and possibly an interest in singing and performing - and he could have even tried to teach them these things. But any "inherited" abilities can only be passed by biological means. By all accounts, MJ was a wonderful father to those kids, but why does everyone insist on perpetuating the myth that he played any part in their conception? It's actually sort of insulting to adoptive parents. Michael Jackson included. It seems that Michael Jackson was a loving, attentive, and awesome father to those 3 children. And make no mistake, he WAS their father. A wonderful example of the fact that raising a child has little or nothing to do with who actually provided the semen or the egg. Biology ain't got nothing to do with it. I've seen pictures, and I agree with you. But it still doesnt mean they're not talented musically and people are acting like they are and we know NOTHING about these kids You CANNOT use the name of God, or religion, to justify acts of violence, to hurt, to hate, to discriminate- Madonna
authentic power is service- Pope Francis | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Just cos their Dad was a singer/ dancer, that makes THEM talented in that way too, huh...?
By that token, I should be good at mathematics and hold down a decent job in a bank like my dad did before he retired... Thank goodess I didn't take MY father's musical talent - much as I love my dad to bits, he's tone deaf and couldn't hold a tune in a bucket.....! This is not an exit | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
Well how many jackson kids have contracts?
Both Prince and blnket are named Prince. The couldn't go by their first names. Working up a purple sweat. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |
And all three are named Michael.
I feel sorry for Blanket, what a stupid name to be saddled with. | |
| - E-mail - orgNote - Report post to moderator |